|
quote:The Electoral Commission has today announced that it has opened an investigation into allegations regarding the Conservative Party spending return at the 2015 UK Parliamentary General Election It's happening! Oh this could be huge! Heads will roll, resignations will fly, the government itself will topple and th- quote:The Commission’s sanctioning powers are limited to a civil penalty of up to £20,000
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 13:37 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 15:59 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:well, this is a thing "Comments are disabled for this video" Gosh, I wonder why.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 14:41 |
|
Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 14:45 |
|
dark lol
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 14:46 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 14:46 |
|
Being fair I couldn't finish watching either of those videos, Labour's or the tories. If your political ad is longer than like 30 seconds people are just going to put a gun to their head.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:02 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:well, this is a thing i can't help but feel that they're coming at this in rather the wrong way nobody's going to take corbyn bein some kind of terrifying communist menace seriously. they could probably make some progress if they tried to make him seem ridiculous and pathetic, but if they're going to make "corbyn bad" a cornerstone of any kind of campaign i doubt "he's scary" is at all well-conceived
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:03 |
|
unless i have fundamentally misunderstood some primal terror that lurks in the hearts of the british, of course
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:04 |
|
V. Illych L. posted:unless i have fundamentally misunderstood some primal terror that lurks in the hearts of the british, of course There has been at least one local woman who was 'traumatised' by seeing a cow in a field. The British public are bewildered, frightened idiots.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:06 |
|
They even include the setup for McDonnell's Mao gag, that it being about Osborne being friends with the Chinese. Why keep that in?
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:06 |
|
Yeah, I suspect that the more they go on abour Corbyn being an imminent danger, the more he's going to look like a serious contender instead.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:08 |
|
V. Illych L. posted:unless i have fundamentally misunderstood some primal terror that lurks in the hearts of the british, of course corbyn doesn't think refugees are a purely evil horde of rapists
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:08 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:They even include the setup for McDonnell's Mao gag, that it being about Osborne being friends with the Chinese. Why keep that in? in a sense it's endearing. they try to do american-style negative campaigning, but they are just incredibly bad at it
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:11 |
|
At the risk of continuing Supreme Court chat from a few pages back, the SC has declared that Joint Enterprise has been wrongly interpreted for the past 30 years. This came after a few years of protests led by the mother of one of those convicted under it. This means that a lot of people who were convicted of murder despite not actually murdering anyone, and in some cases trying to deescalate the events that led to a murder, could appeal their dubious convictions. The BBC lunchtime news reported it as "hundreds of convicted murderers could be released due to a new Supreme Court ruling" which while technically accurate...
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 15:37 |
|
Cerebral Bore posted:Yeah, I suspect that the more they go on abour Corbyn being an imminent danger, the more he's going to look like a serious contender instead. Kind of like how anti-drug campaigns fail because kids get the impression that all the cool kids are doing drugs and they are being lame by missing out
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 16:07 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 16:31 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 16:31 |
|
Should be the thread title for next month IMO
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 16:38 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled. Now thats a post.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 16:42 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled. I was trying to come up with something Tory/Disabled related but couldn't manage it, and regardless, it wouldn't have been half as good as this. Bravo.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 16:52 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 17:10 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Shameful hypocrisy. They should have put it on ToryTube, where the comments still have to work even if they're disabled. Excellent
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 17:11 |
|
Well-known communist sympathisers the OECD have reduced their growth forecasts and called for more public investment by the government. George Osborne hails this as an endorsement for his policies, somehow: OECD calls for less austerity and more public investment quote:The OECD has called for its rich-country members to ease up on austerity and collectively agree to spend more on infrastructure projects to boost flagging growth.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 17:28 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:well, this is a thing No Inception BWWAAAAAAHS I don't believe there is a threat.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 18:18 |
|
reggie yates is amazingly handsome
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 18:27 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:No Inception BWWAAAAAAHS I don't believe there is a threat. Haha. Also when the Scottish bit starts the woman speaker says 'believes in human potential' right as the video changes to a robot arm in a factory, practically the only part of the video not featuring a human...
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 18:30 |
|
namesake posted:Haha. That was the Scottish Tory voting bloc.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 18:38 |
|
Did the Parliamentary Labour Party vote to go on strike? This is like the Kinnock years when they seem more interested in scoring points against internal rivals than actually looking like they could govern. They need to wake up and see that just not being the Tories is not enough, they need to have a clear message on how they are better.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:14 |
|
Foxtrot_13 posted:Did the Parliamentary Labour Party vote to go on strike? tbh just not melting down in public is actually a bit of an improvement, hopefully they can get their act further together in a bit
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:16 |
|
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:16 |
|
Foxtrot_13 posted:Did the Parliamentary Labour Party vote to go on strike? Parliament isn't sitting at the moment, they're having a recess, so it would be slightly odd for the PLP to be doing much right now.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:21 |
|
Pork Pie Hat posted:Parliament isn't sitting at the moment, they're having a recess Bunch of workshy skivers
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:26 |
|
Niric posted:Well-known communist sympathisers the OECD have reduced their growth forecasts and called for more public investment by the government. George Osborne hails this as an endorsement for his policies, somehow: Remember the Tories don't actually think austerity works. I don't think anyone does. It's just an excellent lie to children (stupid people) that makes it ok when you HAVE to dismantle the welfare system and funnel money into your friends pockets. There will be no revelation. No mass of Tories face palming and disclaiming "Oh forgive us, we thought it could work!". It's just a convenient lie that the British public have proven very susceptible to. Possibly due to things like "Blitz spirit" and other TRUE GRIT national prides. The idiots truly believe we're all in this together.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:38 |
|
I honestly couldn't tell you the last time I heard the word gaga and it wasn't about the pop star or the queen song.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:41 |
|
Yeah, Osborne spins it as supporting him because of course he does. He can just throw out catchphrases like Strong Economy and Northern Powerhouse to imply that government investment is exactly what's happening. Even a cursory peep behind the curtain makes it clear it's bollocks, but nobody bothers Remember 'con' is short for 'confidence trick'
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 19:44 |
|
Puntification posted:I honestly couldn't tell you the last time I heard the word gaga and it wasn't about the pop star or the queen song. Tsk. Pearl clutchers. Not that they would mind the ill and disenfranchised having their benefits stopped.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 20:12 |
|
gently caress's sake. You know the European Working Time Directive, that thing that prevents us being worked to death by our slavedriving overlords? Yeah, they're trying to stop that applying to doctors via private members' bill http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2015-2016/0046/16046.pdf Fuckers. (Also, overtime and travel time in a move which will surprise basically no in-home care workers anywhere).
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 21:48 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:gently caress's sake. You know the European Working Time Directive, that thing that prevents us being worked to death by our slavedriving overlords? Why does it irk me that this is in Palatino font
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 21:53 |
|
It's a Christopher Chope PMB, it won't and can't become law, calm down. Much like when he presented the same PMB last Session, Christopher Chope really likes presenting PMBs that can't become law.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2016 22:06 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 15:59 |
|
Seriously, don't just post random Private Member's Bills and say "Look at what they are doing!" else you will be either very frightened or very disappointed a great deal. Current PMBs that also won't receive a second reading are the UK Borders Control Bill (Christopher Chope, also tried last Session), which would "make provision to ensure that the United Kingdom has absolute control over the right to prevent non-UK citizens from entering the United Kingdom; to determine the circumstances in which non-UK citizens may be required to leave the United Kingdom; and for connected purposes." And the BBC Privatisation Bill (actually first on the Order Paper so will get a debate next Friday if he prints the loving thing on time)' (Peter Bone, also tried last Session), which would "make provision for the privatisation of the British Broadcasting Corporation by providing shares in the Corporation to all licence fee payers." if it's the same bill as last year Green Wing fucked around with this message at 22:17 on Feb 18, 2016 |
# ? Feb 18, 2016 22:12 |