|
Oh, that reminds me of some Stupid poo poo my racist former friend opined about : "I think Hitler had the right idea, he was just an idiot and did [the Holocaust] to the wrong people [the Jews]." Said racist friend was a Jew by heritage.
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2016 18:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 09:27 |
|
|
Inzombiac posted:"I support government surveillance because if you aren't doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about." I haven't heard people say that from their mouths but I've seen it a lot online. It was really bad when that one actress' nude pictures got leaked and no one could loving shut up about how if she didn't want her pictures out on the internet she shouldn't have taken them in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Your Dunkle Sans posted:Oh, that reminds me of some Stupid poo poo my racist former friend opined about : D: When Obama was elected, my Indian ex (newly arrived from India) said that he didn't think "black people were ready." Da fuq
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
RareAcumen posted:I haven't heard people say that from their mouths but I've seen it a lot online. It was really bad when that one actress' nude pictures got leaked and no one could loving shut up about how if she didn't want her pictures out on the internet she shouldn't have taken them in the first place. They stopped saying that at around the time that police officers started opposing accountability devices such as mandatory body cameras.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2016 06:09
|
|
|
CommonShore posted:They stopped saying that at around the time that police officers started opposing accountability devices such as mandatory body cameras. Most people are aware enough not to state it to literally, but the sentiment has always been around.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
CherryCola posted:D: Black people get a surprisingly bad rap all over the world, at least in my experience. My own dad, who's of Chinese/Malay/Indonesian heritage, said pretty much the same thing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2016 08:37
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:
i saw this article posted as well on facebook with the typical " it makes alot of good points" declaration and it made no good posts. that and the article voting for bernie is a vote for trump because its literal logic is that people are too stupid to make up their minds between bernie and donald trump
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2016 15:11
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:One was Glenn Beck's latest conspiracy theory: "God killed Justice Scalia to wake up Americans to the importance of electing Ted Cruz. So...what's the downside of letting horrible old conservatives continue getting struck down???
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2016 15:37
|
|
"
|
Your Dunkle Sans posted:Oh, that reminds me of some Stupid poo poo my racist former friend opined about : A guy once commented on a friend's Facebook post saying "factory farming is literally worse than the Holocaust, and I say that as an actual Jew."
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
Just read in a rather large writing group I'm in on Facebook:quote:Okay this might sound creepy and I PROMISE IT IS NOT MEANT in a creepy way in the slightest.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
Good lord.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
To have someone's mind "explode" over why babies don't have nipples is either a sign of extreme autism, or... 
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Choco1980 posted:Just read in a rather large writing group I'm in on Facebook: "why don't babies have nipples" brings up a nursing website that says they probably do but are too small to see at such a young age. Either their google-fu is weak as gently caress or it's a fetish thing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Birb Katter posted:"why don't babies have nipples" brings up a nursing website that says they probably do but are too small to see at such a young age. Either their google-fu is weak as gently caress or it's a fetish thing. Please let it be laziness...
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
Babies definitely do have (visible!) nipples.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Jastiger posted:Second poster is p good lookin. Too bad she's related to those other people in that thread lol. From a few pages ago but Cinemark and Regal (at le`ast around me) have the first showing of the day be super cheap. Cinemark even has $5 tuesday where every showing is $5.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Birb Katter posted:"why don't babies have nipples" brings up a nursing website that says they probably do but are too small to see at such a young age. Either their google-fu is weak as gently caress or it's a fetish thing. ...have you and those people never seen a baby somehow?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
Aesop Poprock posted:...have you and those people never seen a baby somehow? I was curious to see what the google search brought up to see if it was that hard. But I can't say I've ever paid attention to the presence or lack their of of friends babies when I've been around them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 03:13
|
|
|
Ok goons help me out on this one. I once remarked that if the Supreme Court made a decision then they have absolutely no way of enforcing that decision. It's up to other branches of the government to enforce the law/act etc. Is this a hopelessly stupid way of looking at it or just fairly stupid?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
ServoMST3K posted:Ok goons help me out on this one. I once remarked that if the Supreme Court made a decision then they have absolutely no way of enforcing that decision. It's up to other branches of the government to enforce the law/act etc. Is this a hopelessly stupid way of looking at it or just fairly stupid? I mean, you're not necessarily wrong. It's not like RBG will show up with a lead pipe if you don't follow a decision, as fun as that might have been in the case of Kim Davis. It just seems like it would be silly to go on about it as more than an offhand sort of remark, because barring some sort of complete meltdown of the system everyone respects that Marbury v. Madison is a thing and SCOTUS gets the final say in interpretation of the laws of the United States.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 03:57
|
|
|
The US branches of government seem like a good idea in theory but in practice def qualify for this thread.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
ServoMST3K posted:Ok goons help me out on this one. I once remarked that if the Supreme Court made a decision then they have absolutely no way of enforcing that decision. It's up to other branches of the government to enforce the law/act etc. Is this a hopelessly stupid way of looking at it or just fairly stupid?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 07:10
|
|
|
Hyperlynx posted:I thought the police enforce the law, not the courts. Or am I missing something here? Yes, but when a court says "put this guy in jail, he's guilty", the police do it. If everyone in the police decided to suddenly stop doing their job and ignore the law, then yeah the court's decisions would go unenforced. But that's not really something that's going to happen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
meiram posted:I mean, you're not necessarily wrong. It's not like RBG will show up with a lead pipe if you don't follow a decision, as fun as that might have been in the case of Kim Davis. It just seems like it would be silly to go on about it as more than an offhand sort of remark, because barring some sort of complete meltdown of the system everyone respects that Marbury v. Madison is a thing and SCOTUS gets the final say in interpretation of the laws of the United States. "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it."
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 09:11
|
|
|
ServoMST3K posted:Ok goons help me out on this one. I once remarked that if the Supreme Court made a decision then they have absolutely no way of enforcing that decision. It's up to other branches of the government to enforce the law/act etc. Is this a hopelessly stupid way of looking at it or just fairly stupid? Yeah, the court doesn't have a cadre of dudes that go out and, like, actually do stuff. That's mostly the executive branch. IIRC Andrew Jackson defied the court on something and said "neener neener what are you going to do about it." Something about Indians probably.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 11:19
|
|
|
ServoMST3K posted:Ok goons help me out on this one. I once remarked that if the Supreme Court made a decision then they have absolutely no way of enforcing that decision. It's up to other branches of the government to enforce the law/act etc. Is this a hopelessly stupid way of looking at it or just fairly stupid? That is what the separation of powers means. Yes. Now go jump down a Googlehole of poo poo like jury nullification, until you realize U.S. law is basically 200 year old legacy code that needs a good, hard 2.0'ing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 12:00
|
|
|
Clitch posted:That is what the separation of powers means. Yes. With the presidential election process being some patch code hammered out at 2 in the morning following a failed launch.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 12:12
|
|
|
Proof that dinosaurs are a big hoax and never existed and so-called palaeontologists just made the whole thing up. Warning - this will destroy some of your brain cells. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZyIG_jZzBs
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 12:29
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:Proof that dinosaurs are a big hoax and never existed and so-called palaeontologists just made the whole thing up. I don't think I heard a word she said, I couldn't take my mind off of her terrible hair.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 12:35
|
|
|
Canemacar posted:With the presidential election process being some patch code hammered out at 2 in the morning following a failed launch. That was done so poorly that it made the problem it sought to solve worse.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 13:44
|
|
|
She has a bright future in financial domination videos
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:Proof that dinosaurs are a big hoax and never existed and so-called palaeontologists just made the whole thing up. Hoooooooooooly poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:Proof that dinosaurs are a big hoax and never existed and so-called palaeontologists just made the whole thing up. Answers question: "It's a destroyed piece of drywall that you probably put your head through because you are a pants-on-head poo poo-for-brains."
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 17:25
|
|
|
Whenever I see something like that I want to sincerely ask where their information comes from. The concept of dinosaurs antedates fossils? What? Did she even go to like, one dinosaur museum exhibit before making that video? Did she read even one book? Or did she just sit around going "grr dinosaurs" while avoiding getting tainted by the vile palentological propaganda and think about it until she had some kind of argument which seemed coherent in her head before writing down her diagram on a napkin.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
I wonder if that's a peer reviewed napkin. Like, did the waitress at the waffle house check it over before it was put onscreen?
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:Proof that dinosaurs are a big hoax and never existed and so-called palaeontologists just made the whole thing up.    Everything else about this channel screams parody but she sounds so sincere about it
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:Proof that dinosaurs are a big hoax and never existed and so-called palaeontologists just made the whole thing up. I couldn't get through the video because of the constant teeth-sucking and cringing. She cringes every few seconds like someone just said something really stupid and she's too polite to say anything about it. Except she's the one saying stupid things.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 19:10
|
|
|
It's like one of those listicles where they put starter comments right in the title. Ten things you won't believe I actually think! Number 6 is especially stupid!
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
I have a friend who is completely normal and very nice but 100% believes that dinosaurs are made up to increase attendance in failing museums. Allegedly there is a cabal or conspiracy of scientists that have duped the entire world into visiting their showcase for $10 or free on Tuesdays.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 09:27 |
|
|
CommonShore posted:Whenever I see something like that I want to sincerely ask where their information comes from. The concept of dinosaurs antedates fossils? What? Did she even go to like, one dinosaur museum exhibit before making that video? Did she read even one book? Or did she just sit around going "grr dinosaurs" while avoiding getting tainted by the vile palentological propaganda and think about it until she had some kind of argument which seemed coherent in her head before writing down her diagram on a napkin. Yes. Just one and exactly one. I will let you guess the name of this book.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2016 19:50
|
|
