|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y96iyHBhIe0
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 20:20 |
|
|
AngryBooch posted:He wants to gently caress his own daughter and the GOP hasn't attacked him on this because it would insult a plurality of their base in the South. They haven't attacked him on that because "Donald Trump thinks his daughter is beautiful", much like "Donald Trump, one of the richest people on the planet, could have been 18% richer if only he'd listened to me" and "Donald Trump doesn't subscribe to proper political decorum", is a stupid as hell attack that's easily deflected. There are like three dozen better ways to attack him that don't come off as sourcing tactics from the dregs of youtube.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
So right now the general assumption is that Trump is 100% on his own, that the local GOP machines in states aren't giving him access to their voter info and support and whatnot. How much is this predicted to hurt him on Super Tuesday, and if he gets the nom will these people flip or hold out, forcing Trump to continue to rely on his own money and ground game in every single state?
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
Brannock posted:They haven't attacked him on that because "Donald Trump thinks his daughter is beautiful", much like "Donald Trump, one of the richest people on the planet, could have been 18% richer if only he'd listened to me" and "Donald Trump doesn't subscribe to proper political decorum", is a stupid as hell attack that's easily deflected. "Of course it ain't true, but I want to make the son-of-a-bitch deny it."
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:it's that for everything you can call out Trump for (except being a politically correct SJW I guess) Hillary has done the same or worse. How far up your own rear end are you exactly? How about his stances on deportation? Muslim immigrants? Name one platform piece they have the same stance on.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:Trump's new twitter header is beautiful Lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
does anyone else suspect rubio is freaking the gently caress out right now and hes being kept out of the limelight because hes on the verge on a nervous breakdown?
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
babypolis posted:does anyone else suspect rubio is freaking the gently caress out right now and hes being kept out of the limelight because hes on the verge on a nervous breakdown? Absolutely. Dude was not at all ready to be front and center.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
No, I don't think Rubio actually wants to win. There's lots of very good reasons why he wouldn't.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:No, I don't think Rubio actually wants to win. There's lots of very good reasons why he wouldn't. Rubio would love to win. Anyone other than Cruz is going to likely win the general election.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
I don't know who the guys are that determine which clicks are pro clicks, but I'd like to submit this for PRO CLICK consideration.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
Robotnik Nudes posted:Absolutely. Dude was not at all ready to be front and center. rubio needs to pay his dues in a big big way. if he could get named as a vp for whoever, and win, i think hed be a pretty viable contender in 2024. hes just an idiot kid as it stands tho
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
Hahaha
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
Can he win the primary? Absolutely. But it almost certainly wouldn't be without a lengthy bloody fight that would be a pyrrhic victory going into the general. He's woefully under-qualified, both as a campaigner and on his resume, vs Hillary and he knows it. He would almost certainly lose to her and would have the stink of losing to a Clinton on him for the rest of his life. Why in the gently caress would a young rising star in the republican party want that? He's going to have much more favorable elections in the future, which this run was most likely a primer for. TyrantWD posted:Rubio would love to win. Anyone other than Cruz is going to likely win the general election. You are really underestimating how unprepared he is for a tough general fight. There would have to be a lot of external factors for him to win, it would be a complete gamble.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
I still think Rubio only ran to get Jeb Bush's VP slot, and part of me thinks his unwillingness to attack Trump is that lingering opportunity to be Trump's VP. That'd be a great job for Rubio, he can be as lazy as he wants and nobody would care.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:50
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:He uses union labour in NYC though. Compared to your average Republican he's a lot less vehement about destroying them. He's just really scared of those giant inflatable rats that union protesters put outside your building if you gently caress with them. Terrified I tell you. Also, from the NYT article posted earlier, I think saying he isn't a little beholden to banks seems like a bit of a stretch... quote:
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:This is why I have an issue with Hillary-supporting liberals who cry about Trump like he's Hitler. It's not that Trump is perfect, it's that for everything you can call out Trump for (except being a politically correct SJW I guess) Hillary has done the same or worse. Nichael fucked around with this message at 00:54 on Feb 24, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
Pleasant Friend posted:I still think Rubio only ran to get Jeb Bush's VP slot, and part of me thinks his unwillingness to attack Trump is that lingering opportunity to be Trump's VP. That'd be a great job for Rubio, he can be as lazy as he wants and nobody would care. thats been my theory about him for a while now
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
But Rocks Hurt Head posted:well I guess we know who's running the Trump account It's not me - I have a good inkling of who it is but I don't want to say because they'll get banned for double accounts.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
Nichael posted:I still don't get how being against policies like banning an entire religion from entering the nation, while setting up a database to track those who already made it into the country (citizen or not), has become something casually dismissed as something that only far left SJWs care about. Has this country really moved so far to the right in such a short period of time that we ridicule the people who want to preserve religious liberty and privacy for all groups like they're idiots on Tumblr complaining about cis pronouns? You do realize there's a huge difference there, right? It's not just typical liberal sensitivities, it's a betrayal of the foundations of western democracy. That's just The Saurus. Everyone he doesn't like is just a lefty SJW.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
Have any of Trump's surrogates called Rubio "one of them fags from Miami" yet?
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
Rocks posted:Have any of Trump's surrogates called Rubio "one of them fags from Miami" yet? no but thats pretty funny
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
i don't think trump can effectively attack hillary as being an insider candidate owned by banks because everything he accuses her of is true for him as well. other republicans can't hit him on that because that's attacking from the left-- suicide in a republican primary-- but you can bet your rear end she would use it. i'm still hoping for bernie, though, he'd smoke trump by double digits. i seriously think trump might clock EVs in the low 100s against bernie. too bad he won't be allowed to become the nominee  .
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:i don't think trump can effectively attack hillary as being an insider candidate owned by banks because everything he accuses her of is true for him as well. other republicans can't hit him on that because that's attacking from the left-- suicide in a republican primary-- but you can bet your rear end she would use it. God forbid youd have to win elections to be a nominee
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
It's beautiful
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
Fiction posted:That's just The Saurus. Everyone he doesn't like is just a lefty SJW. Yet clearly, many people agree with him. Those statements alone from Trump, more than any of his other batshit statements, should've automatically disqualified him. However the media, the electorate, and the party elite have collectively glossed over them like they're a joke. It's not funny. It's terrifying.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:You are really underestimating how unprepared he is for a tough general fight. There would have to be a lot of external factors for him to win, it would be a complete gamble. Hillary learned nothing since 2008, and Bernie's pull Hillary to the left has inadvertently turned into a campaign to destroy the only viable candidate the Democrats had. It's going to take Cruz or an act of god to keep a Republican from winning the general.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:It's not me - I have a good inkling of who it is but I don't want to say because they'll get banned for double accounts.  There's no rule against having multiple accounts, you got confused on what "account sharing" means.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
radical meme posted:
But you've rejected Cruz's attempts!
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:Trump's new twitter header is beautiful It's not Trump's statements that are shocking, it's the loving graphic design. Does he fire up photoshop himself with those stubby little fingers??
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:i don't think trump can effectively attack hillary as being an insider candidate owned by banks because everything he accuses her of is true for him as well. other republicans can't hit him on that because that's attacking from the left-- suicide in a republican primary-- but you can bet your rear end she would use it. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Lote posted:One: Rubio You've done hosed it up: One: Carson Big: Trump rear end: Cruz Mistake: Rubio America: Kasich ! : Jeb
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
Evil_Greven posted:You've done hosed it up:  Much better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:i don't think trump can effectively attack hillary as being an insider candidate owned by banks because everything he accuses her of is true for him as well. other republicans can't hit him on that because that's attacking from the left-- suicide in a republican primary-- but you can bet your rear end she would use it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
Fiction posted:How far up your own rear end are you exactly? How about his stances on deportation? Muslim immigrants? Name one platform piece they have the same stance on. I can't, I can only name platform pieces on which Trump is superior to Hillary.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
AngryBooch posted:"Of course it ain't true, but I want to make the son-of-a-bitch deny it." he will deflect in 140 character or less, make the person asking look like a deviant, and will ruin that person for the rest of their lives good strat
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:I can't, I can only name platform pieces on which Trump is superior to Hillary. But as I said previously on this page, Trump's tacit approval of violence combined with his extremely dangerous anti-Muslim rhetoric should outweigh any of his (purely hypothetical) positives. I guess it's just shocking to me that people can either approve of such ideas, or dismiss them with a "nobody's perfect". They are so fundamentally discordant with how our society works, and they echo the beginnings of the worst crimes in humanity's history. If you don't have as strong an emotional reaction to those principles as I do, there's really not much else I can say because clearly we have extremely different values.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
maybe everyone shouldve held back on their hitlers and their isms until after he won the primary the wad is blown, the words are flat
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:24
|
|
|
Nichael posted:But as I said previously on this page, Trump's tacit approval of violence combined with his extremely dangerous anti-Muslim rhetoric should outweigh any of his (purely hypothetical) positives. I guess it's just shocking to me that people can either approve of such ideas, or dismiss them with a "nobody's perfect". They are so fundamentally discordant with how our society works, and they echo the beginnings of the worst crimes in humanity's history. If you don't have as strong an emotional reaction to those principles as I do, there's really not much else I can say. What anti-muslim rhetoric? Oh you mean telling the truth? So if he disapproved of violence, then everyone would just leave us alone? I think you have the wrong idea about how OUR society works.
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 20:20 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o25afKNzOFM
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2016 01:25
|
|
