|
Fayez Butts posted:For like the first 20 years of my life I thought Roy Blount, Jr. was a large black man When I was a kid I thought Robert Siegel was an actual, talking seagull.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2016 15:21 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:42 |
|
Wow I didn't expect that episode to end with Adam Scott and Scott Aukerman playing non-U2 songs for Todd Glass. Aukerman is a national treasure.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2016 17:03 |
|
"Jesus Christ condemned the Zealots! I don't want to someone who pours gas on a fire. I want to bring peace to a situation where anger is the prevailing thought process, Ted Cruz 2016!" Go gently caress yourself.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2016 20:23 |
|
So it turns out I was votin' for Christ, and thought my listeners were votin' for Christ. But it turns out they were votin' for anger and hate all along. What's going on???? What's going on is that the Christ vote and the anger/hate vote have coincided perfectly until just this minute, where this other not-as-Christian-as-you'd-like guy momentarily has a brighter anger and hate flare. But don't you worry, they'll be driving back in your lane soon enough.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2016 02:36 |
|
Regarding the insidious influence of conservative news/talkback programs on the republican party and their base, this is one hell of an article.
High Warlord Zog fucked around with this message at 10:46 on Feb 3, 2016 |
# ? Feb 3, 2016 08:39 |
|
On the one hand the guy seems nice, on the other hand he supports a candidate who wants to carpet bomb Syria.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2016 15:23 |
|
At least he's self aware enough to see that freedom of religion encompasses other religions and not just Christianity.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2016 20:30 |
|
I know this week's is a repeat but I just have to vent that the Christian girl in the robot baby segment has the most infuriating voice I've ever heard.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2016 19:53 |
|
The Banned posted:I know this week's is a repeat but I just have to vent that the Christian girl in the robot baby segment has the most infuriating voice I've ever heard. The best part is when she gets a below-average grade, it's so cathartic.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2016 20:36 |
|
There's gotta be a breaking point when it comes to nurturing your child's uniqueness, and I think that point is this girl's hyper affected voice. On the other hand, teenagers.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2016 21:39 |
|
I still don't understand why they labeled the other girl the "drama kid" when she is like 3 tiers of trainwreck drama club kid below her friend
|
# ? Feb 11, 2016 04:44 |
|
This week on This American Life: never go to Texas.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 15:26 |
|
No foolin'. Who needs rights when you can just shoot someone.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2016 16:15 |
|
I'd gay marry Alex.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 08:31 |
|
I laughed at the idea of a shitkicking linebacker Fed named "Terry Gross" speaking on an NPR show. I feel bad for Alex tho, he's all mixed up right now and I kind of feel like they were picking at him for ~moving content~ when he still has a lot of poo poo to get through before there's gonna be some TAL-esque life lesson wrapped in a bow. It was a voluntary interview but it was edited in a way that was like "get a load of this wacky dude", but despite his polished (for his age) speaking style he's still a kid. And also he's black, and his parents are conservatives with thick Southern accents. So to me it's like Tread lightly Zoe, don't fall into the "let us observe and study the simple ones" left-leaning public radio (for white urbane liberals) trap. I did like hearing that there was still a lot of love and support in that family though, despite some difficult times. There's a lot of people who are way less out and proud from families that are way less religious who get dicked over way worse just for being gay.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 09:21 |
|
I'm a Stan for Zoe because I kind of know her personally, but I don't think she went in to push for the "moving content." It's not as though Alex is lying to himself or not aware that he's gay - if that were the case, you could have a "look at this wacky guy supporting homophobic Republicans - doesn't he get it?" story. He's conflicted by his identity, but I think the story of reconciling that conflict is a legitimate story. Also, Zoe's been pretty good about working with the right - they sent her to Colorado to cover the Republican events during the 2012 election, and it's somewhat telling that she was able to sit down with the evangelical family for however long without them (apparently) addressing the fact that she is SUPER gay.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 15:44 |
Yeah, I was really rolling my eyes at the thought of another Trump-based story but this one was really well done and showcased how ones upbringing can influence your political views, and how deeply rooted those views can become.
|
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 17:05 |
|
The Modern Leper posted:Also, Zoe's been pretty good about working with the right - they sent her to Colorado to cover the Republican events during the 2012 election, and it's somewhat telling that she was able to sit down with the evangelical family for however long without them (apparently) addressing the fact that she is SUPER gay.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 17:27 |
|
Yeah maybe I'm seeing an issue with it when their really isn't one. Overall I liked it and don't think it was exploitative, I just had some alarm bells going off.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 19:37 |
|
Hoops posted:Well Planet Money was always just slightly right of centre economically, I assume the staff there are all somewhat anti-regulation, pro-free market? She may not vote republican but she can probably connect with them on a level that a lot of public radio people would struggle with. She did the election coverage pre-Planet Money, but that definitely makes sense. It never connected how right of center Planet Money really was/is until they did that "but what if we SHOULDN'T get mad about big game hunting?" episode. That wasn't the most egregious case, but it was definitely the one that gave me that "Usual Suspects" moment. Edit: I think it's fine to be wary. She's pretty upfront that she was basically done but had to go back because it was so weird. It just seems that this guy was ready to reveal his life story in response to a question about the weather. Also - as a mother, how do you feel knowing that your kid's efforts to win your heart were, to some extent, part of a conscious power play? The Modern Leper fucked around with this message at 20:10 on Feb 22, 2016 |
# ? Feb 22, 2016 20:06 |
|
planet money is terrible. adam davidson takes money (in the form of "speaking fees") from many of the large firms he covers as a "journalist". he also claims glass steagall was a bad law and its repeal had nothing to do with the economic events of the last decade. and don't forget chana joffe walt passing off unedited talking points from right wing think tanks that are bent on destroying the last vestiges of the american social safety net. burn that poo poo to the ground
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 08:16 |
Both of them aren't on Planet Money anymore. They tend to gravitate more towards typical podcast quirky topics, like how KFC apparently pioneered franchising.
|
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 08:22 |
|
GrandpaPants posted:Both of them aren't on Planet Money anymore. They tend to gravitate more towards typical podcast quirky topics, like how KFC apparently pioneered franchising. Yeah but there's still a "So you'd think that naturally [social program] is good and helps people, right?" *RECORD SCRATCH* "...perhaps the real answer might surprise you" thing going on. It's just typical neoliberal poo poo that's quirky enough to feel subversive.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 09:04 |
|
Honestly I think some of you over react towards Planet Money. The majority of episodes were fine little capsules that were decently interesting.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 09:39 |
|
Huh, that's the second Trump v Cruz story they've run now. But forget Alex, did anyone else never realise that it was illegal to pay a kidney donor?!
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 15:07 |
|
soggybagel posted:Honestly I think some of you over react towards Planet Money. The majority of episodes were fine little capsules that were decently interesting. It all stems from that story they did a few years ago about disability checks and pretty much nothing else. I'm not really defending the show, since most of the time I think it's kind of boring, but that's the main reason people poo poo on it.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 15:11 |
|
VagueRant posted:But forget Alex, did anyone else never realise that it was illegal to pay a kidney donor?! Yeah, I never thought about it and the case they described seemed super reasonable, but allowing it for cases like this would make it super hard to fight organ trafficking.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 15:11 |
|
soggybagel posted:Honestly I think some of you over react towards Planet Money. The majority of episodes were fine little capsules that were decently interesting. It's OK in the little 15-20 minute bursts they do now, if it was TAL-length episodes I would lose interest pretty quick. The perceived political leanings never really got to me either until their most recent episode glorifying some guy who declared himself a sovereign citizen and stopped paying taxes for several years. Then the lawyer who told him how to do it died and he quickly fled the country, only to be extradited and forced to pay up
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 15:29 |
|
I like Freakenomics and Planet Money for their "How this system works" episodes. But their "how the system SHOULD work" episodes are kinda poo poo. I stopped listening to Freakonomics after their terrible Hamburger Diet episode.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 19:01 |
|
Who could believe that Planet Money would support the interests of the monied
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 19:15 |
|
I liked the reveal that Planet Money did on SSDI becoming welfare for rural communities and I don't think they passed negative judgement on the practice so much as stated that "hey, yo, the social safety net is failing the people it should be helping and they're having to go on SSDI now because of it." Of course, Republicans now want to kick people off SSDI (and the rural poor will continue to vote for them) but what else is new.
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 20:49 |
|
I'm listening to NPR One, and they just ran an archive episode that was basically "But wait, what if paying a living wage and getting rid of tips is a BAD idea?" The argument was basically that tipping helps offset the jealousy that waitstaff feel by serving us while we're having fun (which is why you tip at bars but not at supermarkets).
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 01:51 |
|
The Modern Leper posted:I'm listening to NPR One, and they just ran an archive episode that was basically "But wait, what if paying a living wage and getting rid of tips is a BAD idea?" The argument was basically that tipping helps offset the jealousy that waitstaff feel by serving us while we're having fun (which is why you tip at bars but not at supermarkets). If you want an antidote to that nonsense, check out this episode of the Freakonomics podcast: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/should-tipping-be-banned-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/ the interview with the professor is pretty much the end of tipchat imo
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 03:54 |
|
For anyone on the fence about Planet Money, listen to the latest episode from the last day or two - it's about public servants who we all thought were heroes but are really just schlubs RAKING IN THE CASH for doing NOTHING most of the time. They showed up to an emergency call for no reason and rushed by our intrepid reporter and her fake-rear end accent! They asked for $75/year from all the six-figure tech guys buying $2m bungalows, gently caress them. e: 2016 update let us all know that the free market housing situation saved their asses for the time being, all is well for the moochers... but for how long??? I'm aware that overpaid public workers is a thing but this episode seemed more sinister than usual. Kings Of Calabria fucked around with this message at 19:31 on Feb 26, 2016 |
# ? Feb 26, 2016 09:12 |
|
To be fair, getting 90% of your salary after retiring at 50 is crazy. Not the workers' fault for taking the deal or relying on the deal, but man.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2016 22:48 |
|
Great true-crimey heartstring-pulley kinda episode this week. It's just shocking how Peggy at the end is still willing to blame the victim, catches herself knowing it sounds bad, but goes through saying it anyway and allowing it to be put on the radio.
|
# ? Feb 29, 2016 07:29 |
|
This is something that is coming up a lot in Canada in the Jian Ghomeshi trial and the idea of a "perfect victim." How should a rape survivor act in order to be taken seriously? And why is rape seemingly unique in that the actions of the survivor afterward can cast aspersions on whether or not the crime actually happened? People react to trauma differently and in unique ways and that seems beyond the understanding of others.
|
# ? Feb 29, 2016 16:52 |
|
"It's her own fault because I saw her flirt with a guy at a picnic once and she probably just got in over her head with dirty pictures and wanted a cover story" eat poo poo Peggy
|
# ? Feb 29, 2016 17:11 |
|
Sivart13 posted:Great true-crimey heartstring-pulley kinda episode this week. Yeah, that was loving infuriating. How dare she not act like how I thought she would, she has to accept responsibility for that.
|
# ? Feb 29, 2016 17:17 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:42 |
This episode was really good but extremely infuriating.
|
|
# ? Mar 1, 2016 01:01 |