Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Inspector_666
Oct 7, 2003

benny with the good hair

Fiendish Dr. Wu posted:

a dynamic iptables manipulation daemon, written in Python, and backed by ZooKeeper :psyboom:

Right?!

People were laughing at Facebook for spending a billion dollars on "a dumb photo app" but holy poo poo they bought some smart as gently caress engineers (also a zillion more users.)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

hihifellow
Jun 17, 2005

seriously where the fuck did this genre come from

Japanese Dating Sim posted:

I'm looking to dip my toe into WDS to get multicast and PXE boot working. Right now I just do MDT and boot off a USB stick prepared with the LiteTouch ISO file.

It works, but it could be better. All I really want WDS to do is serve up the MDT LiteTouch ISO, so nothing complex at all.

The only issue is that I work at a university that's very silo'd. We share the network and central resources and are all on the same AD, but our servers are our own, etc. So I don't want my WDS server responding to another school's PXE boot requests.

It looks like there's a way to restrict WDS to respond to specific subnets - https://social.technet.microsoft.co...=winserversetup - and I assume this would work for us, but I was curious if anyone's ever done something like this.

I'm just starting to look into this so it's entirely possible that my question is stupid.

That seems a little weird for a problem that's normally solved on your DHCP servers (at least that's how we do it), but it looks like that would work.

Japanese Dating Sim
Nov 12, 2003

hehe
Lipstick Apathy

hihifellow posted:

That seems a little weird for a problem that's normally solved on your DHCP servers (at least that's how we do it), but it looks like that would work.

Yeah, this is a weird environment. I do not touch:

AD User accounts
DHCP
Networking
etc.
though I probably could talk to them if needed.

But we control our own OU, maintain our own images, storage/application servers, inventory, purchasing, Tier 1/Tier 2 support, etc.

I would like to get into a more holistic (if that's the right word) environment but this is what I've got now.

Thanks Ants
May 21, 2004

#essereFerrari


If you do your own networking then can't you lock WDS access down on your routers?

Eidt: Ah, don't touch. Are you on your own subnet? I'd ask the network guys to help you here.

Japanese Dating Sim
Nov 12, 2003

hehe
Lipstick Apathy

Thanks Ants posted:

If you do your own networking then can't you lock WDS access down on your routers?

Sorry, post might not have been clear but that's one of the things we don't control. We've got a few subnet ranges that are ours to play with as far as reserved IPs and such but networking's handled by our "Central" team.

This is semi-common in University settings, for what it's worth. I wish it was all centralized but we're all currently in our own fiefdoms.

Fake edit: Wrote before your edit. Yeah, I should start with networking. I know another school here (the computer science school, naturally) has a much better environment than I walked into, and they've got WDS going so I'm planning on talking to them and see what they had to go through to get it working.

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





Sickening posted:

I am sure the installer isn't intentionally trying to save 10 cents on a cable. Goons always expecting the most nefarious of intentions I swear to god. :colbert:

The most likely cause was that the installer, just like a lot of shops, having tons of patch cables around for use and simply didn't take the time to read the quality because who really cares. I can't think of a single time I have used a patch cable and took the time to actually read the rating for the most mundane of things. Hell, who is to say that the equipment he was connecting wasn't old and included the cable with the installation kit?

I did not imply nefarious intentions.

I get how it happened. It's just silly and careless. It is not hard to use modern cabling when installing gigabit internet connections.

Thanks Ants
May 21, 2004

#essereFerrari


Japanese Dating Sim posted:

Sorry, post might not have been clear but that's one of the things we don't control. We've got a few subnet ranges that are ours to play with as far as reserved IPs and such but networking's handled by our "Central" team.

This is semi-common in University settings, for what it's worth. I wish it was all centralized but we're all currently in our own fiefdoms.

Fake edit: Wrote before your edit. Yeah, I should start with networking. I know another school here (the computer science school, naturally) has a much better environment than I walked into, and they've got WDS going so I'm planning on talking to them and see what they had to go through to get it working.

If you have clearly(ish) defined subnets for client devices and another one for servers then limiting access to WDS might just be a case of not putting the IP helper rules in anywhere but the subnets you look after.

H110Hawk
Dec 28, 2006

Internet Explorer posted:

Why wouldn't he care? If they are installing gigabit fiber they should be using at least Cat5e on their LAN-side equipment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet#1000BASE-T

I would be surprised if it wasn't cat5e, but even if it's not, it literally does not matter. Unless there are serious crosstalk issues at hand or they're reaching the cable length limit it doesn't matter. You're talking about gigabit like this is something brand new and shiny. Its not. It's been around for ages and the problems were shook out ages ago.

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





H110Hawk posted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet#1000BASE-T

I would be surprised if it wasn't cat5e, but even if it's not, it literally does not matter. Unless there are serious crosstalk issues at hand or they're reaching the cable length limit it doesn't matter. You're talking about gigabit like this is something brand new and shiny. Its not. It's been around for ages and the problems were shook out ages ago.

So, you use Cat5 in your server racks (that aren't 10g)?

Proteus Jones
Feb 28, 2013



Judge Schnoopy posted:

Nah it's just not my thing. I script anything I can in powershell, and have used Python for a few non-domain things, and enjoy that immensely. But trying to script network config changes on cisco ios, which is very user oriented (steps through series of commands and feedback instead of allowing piped one-does-all commands) tickles part of my brain that screams "no don't get out now!"

You need to discover the python library 'pexpect' for CLI shenanigans in python. It's like TCL Expect but for python, of course.

Granted, I'm hugely biased toward Python as my weapon of choice, but my use case is a bit different than DevOps. It's enormously flexible and well suited to pick up the network management tasks that fall in the cracks of most Network Management Tools. I know some of the guys here use it for UAT environments that aren't managed by our NCM.

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof

ChickenWing posted:

I had my ISP come in and install gigabit fiber and then he used a cat5 cable to connect the modem and router :psyduck: is cat6 expensive or something?

If it's a short run and doesn't receive any interference then it shouldn't be a problem. e.g. patch cable 3' - 6' that doesn't enter a wall or run along 120vac+ power.

e: looks like I'm late to the party. ^^what they said.

Internet Explorer posted:

So, you use Cat5 in your server racks (that aren't 10g)?

There's enough electronics there to cause interference. Cat5 isn't a great choice.

H110Hawk
Dec 28, 2006

Internet Explorer posted:

So, you use Cat5 in your server racks (that aren't 10g)?

I don't intentionally use Cat5, Cat5e, or Cat6 for my 1gig. I think it is all 5e, but that is not based on any action on my part. Mail me a cat5 cable and I will go install it in the datacenter. We still don't have confirmation that this is even not 5e from the original poster.

https://xkcd.com/386/

H110Hawk fucked around with this message at 01:09 on Mar 2, 2016

lampey
Mar 27, 2012

ChickenWing posted:

I had my ISP come in and install gigabit fiber and then he used a cat5 cable to connect the modem and router :psyduck: is cat6 expensive or something?

Cat5 and above all work for gigabit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet#1000BASE-T

Cat 6 is a pain in the rear end to crimp

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof

lampey posted:

Cat5 and above all work for gigabit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet#1000BASE-T

Cat 6 is a pain in the rear end to crimp

I hope you're not crimping solid core cat6. That's a paddlin'
The little separators that come with most of the cat6 biscuits are a bitch though.

H110Hawk
Dec 28, 2006

GnarlyCharlie4u posted:

I hope you're not crimping

gently caress making cables.

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof

H110Hawk posted:

gently caress making cables.

Woah ease up. Cabling is my zen.

Inspector_666
Oct 7, 2003

benny with the good hair
Today I got to help pull 6 separate Ethernet runs through drop ceiling in my office. Tomorrow I get to pull another six on that floor, then another fourteen on the other floor, then I get to terminate both ends.

:suicide:

GnarlyCharlie4u
Sep 23, 2007

I have an unhealthy obsession with motorcycles.

Proof

Inspector_666 posted:

Today I got to help pull 6 separate Ethernet runs through drop ceiling in my office. Tomorrow I get to pull another six on that floor, then another fourteen on the other floor, then I get to terminate both ends.

:suicide:

Could be worse. I was given 12 hours to do 150 runs terminated from the shittiest cubicle farm furniture imaginable to the patch panel.
Had them done, tied, tested, and even made patch cables to go from the patch panel to the switch.

The lovely part was that I had zero notice so I wasted an hour and a half running home to get my tools and some snacks.


It gets interesting when you have to break into electrical closets to run 12 500' risers to the building's demarc only to find out you really needed 4

Virigoth
Apr 28, 2009

Corona rules everything around me
C.R.E.A.M. get the virus
In the ICU y'all......



Inspector_666 posted:

Right?!

People were laughing at Facebook for spending a billion dollars on "a dumb photo app" but holy poo poo they bought some smart as gently caress engineers (also a zillion more users.)

My brain is having a hard time wrapping around this because the only context I know Zookeeper being used in is for our Kafka setup. How did they use zookeeper to support the iptables daemon?

luminalflux
May 27, 2005



It's laid out in the blog post.

quote:

1. Neti contacts Zookeeper1-proxy, and, using its instance ID, inquires if it has ever been registered. If found, it gets the same overlay IP as before. If not, it randomly chooses an available overlay IP and locks it to this instance ID.
2. Neti sends up the IP information and network location to Zookeeper to complete registration.
3. Neti downloads the current list of running instances from Zookeeper, including all of their public, private, and overlay IPs, as well as the network they live in.
4. The list is parsed, and iptables filter and DNAT rules are generated for each of the entries.
5. Neti sets a watch on the Zookeeper instance list.

Concurrently, as soon as step 2 finishes, all the rest of the registered instances get their Zookeeper watches triggered with the new set of instance data, and their iptables configs get updated automatically.

Once this dance is complete, all of the instances have full access to each other, and are successfully blocking any unauthorized traffic. If another instance spins up, this process starts again; if any instance dies, Zookeeper notifies all of the Neti daemons of the change and rules are updated within seconds across the entire fleet.

adorai
Nov 2, 2002

10/27/04 Never forget
Grimey Drawer

Japanese Dating Sim posted:

It looks like there's a way to restrict WDS to respond to specific subnets - https://social.technet.microsoft.co...=winserversetup -
I am not trying to be a jerk, but I don't think you understand how this works.

1) client requests DHCP address
2) client gets IP and checks for PXE info (option 66) in DHCP response
3) client contacts defined PXE server

If you don't populate option 66 in your DHCP scope, WDS will only respond on the same subnet, so it shouldn't be an issue. Technically I think there is another option that will work, 15X or so, but we use 66.

Vulture Culture
Jul 14, 2003

I was never enjoying it. I only eat it for the nutrients.
Technically, you can also chain-load from your initial PXE boot image, but this isn't what you're looking to do.

Wrath of the Bitch King
May 11, 2005

Research confirms that black is a color like silver is a color, and that beyond black is clarity.
Multicasting generally isn't worth it unless you'll be doing large amounts of PXE imaging all at once since the data is replicated in real-time (relative) as the install progresses.

It also has a hard requirement for your switch configuration. For some reason MS Server DHCP is poo poo (unsupported, technically) at handling PXE in a meaningful way once you get to the point of having completely hands-free installs with multiple possible boot images, so you'll need to have those options set on the router/gateway anyway.

Vulture Culture
Jul 14, 2003

I was never enjoying it. I only eat it for the nutrients.

Wrath of the Bitch King posted:

It also has a hard requirement for your switch configuration. For some reason MS Server DHCP is poo poo (unsupported, technically) at handling PXE in a meaningful way once you get to the point of having completely hands-free installs with multiple possible boot images, so you'll need to have those options set on the router/gateway anyway.
Unless you're imaging literal hundreds of machines at a time, I agree that it's usually a better idea to just throw a 10-gig interface into the WDS server and call it a day than to screw around with multicast and all the different ways you can get it wrong. But you don't need DHCP to deal with multiple boot images unless you're also dealing with non-Windows installs -- that's a WDS problem that you should be handling with install image filters.

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


Vulture Culture posted:

I managed a four-digit fleet of Mac Minis for awhile. Anything related to deployment automation is a wreck. Missing commands, commands that don't work as documented, commands that don't return a correct error code, commands that sometimes return a correct error code. Apple's core philosophy is downright hostile to central management.

Curious, could you go any deeper?

I've heard Google has the largest MacBook deployment and supposedly got away with little management and IBM has made some books claims.

Methanar
Sep 26, 2013

by the sex ghost

Tab8715 posted:

Curious, could you go any deeper?

I've heard Google has the largest MacBook deployment and supposedly got away with little management and IBM has made some books claims.

There is little that can be managed :smug:

In a company like google it's probably a safe bet that your average user is quite a bit more capable than your average user elsewhere, too.

Methanar fucked around with this message at 08:03 on Mar 2, 2016

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


Methanar posted:

There is little to manage :smug:

In a company like google it's probably a safe bet that your average user is quite a bit more capable than your average user elsewhere, too.

Developers don't know anything. :suicide:

evobatman
Jul 30, 2006

it means nothing, but says everything!
Pillbug

Tab8715 posted:

Developers don't know anything. :suicide:

Same goes for engineers. I can install Inventor and Autocad on a powerhouse Precision workstation with dual xenons and quadros and 27" monitors, or I can give them a Latitude D630 from 2007. They will have literally no clue that there even is a difference as long as they can draw their little nuts and bolts. Change Autocad from 2008 to 2016? They won't even notice it has happened.

Turtlicious
Sep 17, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Bigass Moth posted:

Do you really need 3 more months of study to take the A+???

I need that long to save up 200$

Roargasm posted:

Is it Pearson? Do you deserve it?

Not Pearson. Definitely.

My boss hit me up today and told me good day on "hacking" the reddit account, (it was deleted.) Apparently I'm getting a title and a raise because of it. I tried to explain to him that I didn't do anything, but he thinks I mean it in a sitcom wink-wink way.

Kill me.

e: I confronted the guy who I was almost positive was in charge of the account and told them to knock that poo poo out. Then I uninstalled Tor and checked for Porn. I have no idea what my "new title" will be.

Turtlicious fucked around with this message at 10:15 on Mar 2, 2016

Docjowles
Apr 9, 2009

He's probably just buying you Reddit Gold.

Japanese Dating Sim
Nov 12, 2003

hehe
Lipstick Apathy

adorai posted:

I am not trying to be a jerk, but I don't think you understand how this works.

1) client requests DHCP address
2) client gets IP and checks for PXE info (option 66) in DHCP response
3) client contacts defined PXE server

If you don't populate option 66 in your DHCP scope, WDS will only respond on the same subnet, so it shouldn't be an issue. Technically I think there is another option that will work, 15X or so, but we use 66.

You're not at all being one, and I don't.

I clearly need to do more reading on WDS and PXE booting in general, and your little summary helped. For some reason I wasn't thinking about the PXE booting being initially governed by DHCP (though that's obvious now...), which I can't configure. But given that we have a department that got it working, presumably I can just retrace their steps and talk to networking to have a different IP specified for PXE requests coming from our subnet via option 66.

Oh, and no the PXE requests would need to travel across subnets; our servers are on a separate subnet from the rest of our clients.

Or I might just leave well-enough alone and continue using USB sticks. We'll see.

Wrath of the Bitch King
May 11, 2005

Research confirms that black is a color like silver is a color, and that beyond black is clarity.

Vulture Culture posted:

Unless you're imaging literal hundreds of machines at a time, I agree that it's usually a better idea to just throw a 10-gig interface into the WDS server and call it a day than to screw around with multicast and all the different ways you can get it wrong. But you don't need DHCP to deal with multiple boot images unless you're also dealing with non-Windows installs -- that's a WDS problem that you should be handling with install image filters.

I misspoke, I meant the network boot program/file. In our environment it was necessary to have multiple NBPs in use since we had a mixture of 32 bit and 64 bit machines in the environment, as well as a mixture of BIOS/UEFI. Before we had things configured at the router to accommodate PXE I had to use Option 67 to specifically enumerate which NBP to use, which defeats the nice filtering that WDS provides. As soon as we made the switch WDS was able to do its thing without any issues.

Maybe it's unique to our setup, but without Option 67 PXE boot wouldn't work using MS hosted DHCP.

BaseballPCHiker
Jan 16, 2006

It's that annual time of the year when my current Dell rep turns into a useless piece of poo poo. This one had such promise but he's about to get either fired or start a new job somewhere else. I dont consider it good service when you first make me build a configuration for a machine and email you a cart to price off of when the specs havent changed between the last order. Then when I finally get a quote back it's somehow more expensive then if I was to just order straight from the website. So gently caress off useless annoying Dell rep. CDW can now sell Dell now and I think I'll hit them up.

So frustrating, I want to spend 0 time on dumb poo poo like ordering computers. Every Dell rep thats any good realizes they can make more somewhere else and leaves or gets promoted leaving you with some useless mouthbreater.

Dr. Arbitrary
Mar 15, 2006

Bleak Gremlin

Turtlicious posted:

My boss hit me up today and told me good day on "hacking" the reddit account, (it was deleted.) Apparently I'm getting a title and a raise because of it. I tried to explain to him that I didn't do anything, but he thinks I mean it in a sitcom wink-wink way.

90% of hacking is social engineering. So your boss is sorta right even if he doesn't know it.

SubjectVerbObject
Jul 27, 2009

Dr. Arbitrary posted:

90% of hacking is social engineering. So your boss is sorta right even if he doesn't know it.

Yeah, I think you did awesome on this. If you had done what management wanted, IT guys being marketing, you would have been laughed off Reddit. If you didn't do anything, management would be pissed. If you went on a public witch hunt and gotten someone fired, you would be down coworkers in a job that has too much work already and the remaining people would be pissed. You found a way to fix the problem that satisfied management, didn't get anyone fired, and didn't spend a lot of time or resources.

Japanese Dating Sim
Nov 12, 2003

hehe
Lipstick Apathy
So re: my WDS talk, apparently the department that got WDS up and running only uses PXE booting temporarily for when they reimage their labs, and otherwise has it turned off. Aside from that, they boot off of a USB stick prepared with a discovery image, which is nearly identical to what we do.

As far as I can tell I'd need to submit MAC addresses for each and every machine I might want to be able to PXE boot and have someone else enter them in for me. I forgot that our DHCP here is based on white-listing - we have to enter MAC addresses for any machine that we want to get an IP address. So this drastically complicates the whole thing and makes it pretty much not worth worrying about. :suicide:

I'm interested in it now, though, so I might try to lab this at home. In any case, I learned a little bit. :shobon:

Foe Hammer
Feb 6, 2016

Strategy is for people that don't have Swords! Play devil’s advocate even when you know you’re wrong because a blog where everyone agrees is boring!

Wrath of the Bitch King posted:

I misspoke, I meant the network boot program/file. In our environment it was necessary to have multiple NBPs in use since we had a mixture of 32 bit and 64 bit machines in the environment, as well as a mixture of BIOS/UEFI. Before we had things configured at the router to accommodate PXE I had to use Option 67 to specifically enumerate which NBP to use, which defeats the nice filtering that WDS provides. As soon as we made the switch WDS was able to do its thing without any issues.

Maybe it's unique to our setup, but without Option 67 PXE boot wouldn't work using MS hosted DHCP.

I have a ton of experience with WDS & PXE, I am currently working on setting up our wds server to not only deploy all images but have all tech tools setup within the pxe boot. so I can plug in any computer into my network or if I'm onsite at a managed services client that I vpn link to my office I can simply boot to nic and run memtest, hdd test, and a million other tools. I can already hear people typing about this fabulous invention called a thumb drive or external hdd but I like that I can update one source for all my tools. I also have techs that lose their thumb drives constantly, and/or take the systems I've developed and used them on their own or when they go work for someone else. (I literally have even walked in on an ex employee at one of my clients wearing one of my uniforms trying to snake the client).

Sorry Add got me off track, the way I have mine setup and have used it his way for years is that I have the Dhcp on the router, I don't bother with option 66, Personally my opinion is the router works better in a WDS environment. as far as the different subnets, I would assume that it would travel along properly connected subnets as I do this as mentioned above at clients with completely different ip sets and subnets via vpn.

as far as the multicast, the multicast is useful as its not just a factor of the server's speed when deploying, the multicast takes into account the speed of the network and computers and can divide them up into slow medium and fast connections. I personally have 3x 1gb nic cards teamed together. I would vastly prefer to be able to assign each nic to a stream ie this nic is for the fast people, this nic is for the medium people and this nic went wee wee wee all the way to get a new computer cuz its slow.

Also on paper there is absolutely no difference in cat 5, cat 6 and cat 7 on a gigabyte network connection. However I have found that cat 7 seems to be way more reliable, faster and has better throughput than cat 5 or 6. I've come to this opinion from daisy chaining multiple switches together and have tried and what seems to work best in this order in a single connection type cat 5, cat 7. sfp 10, Hdmi, Sfp etc.

BaseballPCHiker posted:

It's that annual time of the year when my current Dell rep turns into a useless piece of poo poo. This one had such promise but he's about to get either fired or start a new job somewhere else. I dont consider it good service when you first make me build a configuration for a machine and email you a cart to price off of when the specs havent changed between the last order. Then when I finally get a quote back it's somehow more expensive then if I was to just order straight from the website. So gently caress off useless annoying Dell rep. CDW can now sell Dell now and I think I'll hit them up.

lol I love/hate Dell reps, if your a dell partner get really good at using Premier.dell.com as that link always has the best price. it also has the quoting tools and everything else that your dell rep does. the problem with cdw and other places is they often screw you on the warranty. Dell starts the warranty when they ship it so by the time cdw gets it and it sits on the shelf and they sell it your warranty could be half gone. I also swear that I have 10x more issues with devices purchased through companies like https://www.firewalls.com or any product on amazon.com (not just dell) as opposed through dell, although it could just be coincidence. you can also get additional dell discounts by getting "dell certified" in whatever thing you want. The annoying part of their Certs is that its not a single person cert but a "company cert" so four people have to pass it. if


I saw a few comments about network security and programming, between cisco, Pen testing and CEH programming is a requirement. half my pen testing tools are custom coded either c++ or python.

Nerdrock
Jan 31, 2006

Japanese Dating Sim posted:

So re: my WDS talk, apparently the department that got WDS up and running only uses PXE booting temporarily for when they reimage their labs, and otherwise has it turned off. Aside from that, they boot off of a USB stick prepared with a discovery image, which is nearly identical to what we do.

As far as I can tell I'd need to submit MAC addresses for each and every machine I might want to be able to PXE boot and have someone else enter them in for me. I forgot that our DHCP here is based on white-listing - we have to enter MAC addresses for any machine that we want to get an IP address. So this drastically complicates the whole thing and makes it pretty much not worth worrying about. :suicide:

I'm interested in it now, though, so I might try to lab this at home. In any case, I learned a little bit. :shobon:

If you have an inventory system worth anything, you already have the information.

if your network personnel love you, they'll give you a powershell script that'll just take a list of mac addresses and give you reservations for them

Our dell orders don't come with that information conveniently anywhere, so we get to boot them all and let them sit while I console into the switch to pull a list of all the mac addresses talking to it. I'm so glad I passed that bullshit down to our newer guy.

Vulture Culture
Jul 14, 2003

I was never enjoying it. I only eat it for the nutrients.

Wrath of the Bitch King posted:

I misspoke, I meant the network boot program/file. In our environment it was necessary to have multiple NBPs in use since we had a mixture of 32 bit and 64 bit machines in the environment, as well as a mixture of BIOS/UEFI.
Also not a problem anymore, at least as of 2012:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Inspector_666
Oct 7, 2003

benny with the good hair
God I really need to sit down and learn how to WDS/MDT...

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply