|
"Alright girls, what do we say to the police?" "Nothing!" 
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 23:20 |
|
|
PLAINTIVE WAIL
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
I always think Steven Pasquale is the guy who played Keith Dudemeister at first.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
Was Fuhrman the one arresting Cochran in the beginning? My internet was loving up during that scene.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
Hey, its Bert Cooper. This show has everyone!
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
I'm trying to win drat
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
 Oh no he didn't
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
I loving love this show.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
Lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
I don't think OJ did it any more
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure Cochrane helped OJ !
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
Did that really happen? Edit: yup http://articles.latimes.com/1995-01-26/news/mn-24707_1_o-j-simpson-murder-trial Henchman of Santa fucked around with this message at 04:47 on Mar 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
That was my very first thought when that dude said "World War II memorabilia" 
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 05:11
|
|
|
Oh my gosh this show keeps getting better? Last episode was one of the best hours of TV but this was better.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 10:46
|
|
|
Another great episode, really like this show. The cuts back and forth between the prosecution and the defense near the beginning was such a good way to convey the main bullet points that each side plans to hit, also gives us an idea of the various personalities involved and the height of the stakes. Couldn't help but feel bad for Darden in this one, seems like he just can't catch a break. Well, I guess the promotion at the end of the episode was good for him in theory, but given what we all know about the outcome of the case it'll just end up being another loss for poor Chris. I almost don't want to know the answer to this question because it could be considered a 'spoiler' (though that seems ridiculous given the circumstances) but was Cochran's advice to Chris at OJ's house sincere or was he trying to psyche him into questioning Fuhrman? Obviously Chris couldn't tell and I don't know enough about the trial to know exactly how that examination plays out. Speaking of OJ's house: what the gently caress. How could that possibly help the jurors reach a decision, and how in the hell is it okay for the defense to redecorate his house like that before they see it??
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 14:29
|
|
|
timp posted:Speaking of OJ's house: what the gently caress. How could that possibly help the jurors reach a decision, and how in the hell is it okay for the defense to redecorate his house like that before they see it?? Those things are normally done (in my country at least) so that when they say "he jumped the back wall and went up stairs and changed" etc they have a point of reference instead of having to rely on house plans as evidence. Basically it's so they can see the things for themselves.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 15:39
|
|
|
I picked up the book and it's fantastic. I'm trying to keep up with the show but things aren't quite chronological. Something I'm surprised they didn't spend more time on was Clark's dismissal of the focus group testing. I know there were the scenes about Clark's/Nicole's unfavorables vs. OJ's favorables and the racial divide, but the book really hammers it that Clark's insistence that black women loved her in the face of a mountain of evidence saying they were the most likely to A) still see OJ as innocent B) see Nicole as "deserving it" is one of the major parts of losing the case before it started.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 16:22
|
|
|
weekly font posted:I picked up the book and it's fantastic. I'm trying to keep up with the show but things aren't quite chronological. Something I'm surprised they didn't spend more time on was Clark's dismissal of the focus group testing. I know there were the scenes about Clark's/Nicole's unfavorables vs. OJ's favorables and the racial divide, but the book really hammers it that Clark's insistence that black women loved her in the face of a mountain of evidence saying they were the most likely to A) still see OJ as innocent B) see Nicole as "deserving it" is one of the major parts of losing the case before it started. Yep. The show certainly did a good job representing the defense's sheer and unrestrained delight when Clark accepted that jury, though. I liked the Windows 3.1 cameo this episode. And to each comments that have been made in this thread pretty much weekly: Courtney B. Vance is superb.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
Lol at Furman being made a literal nazi
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
Yeah the Nazi thing was hilarious. Let's cast him even more Aryan ubermensch looking than the actual guy and having him listening to some Wagner while he lovingly polishes an Iron Cross!
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
He's like that gun store owner from Falling Down.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
so is Furhman a real Neo Nazi at all because loving lol, it's so Ryan Murphy-esque to be as unsubtle as possible
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 04:34
|
|
|
quote:But gossip or no, the question of Nazi memorabilia did become part of the case. According to CNN’s transcription of a 1995 CourtTV account, Judge Lance Ito “refused to let the defense see papers linked to allegations Fuhrman had Nazi paraphernalia at his desk.” And in 1996—well after the “not guilty” verdict had been read—Johnnie Cochran told The San Francisco Chronicle: http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/03/mark-fuhrman-nazi-people-vs-oj Well how about that. edit: It also answers that question another goon ahd about whether or not Cochran was being sincere. double edit: I didn't realise that Johnny Cochran is played by the guy who was Seaman Jones in Hunt For the Red October. algebra testes fucked around with this message at 07:58 on Mar 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2016 04:45
|
|
|
They found a buried knife at OJ's house - in 1998, and it was kept by an off-duty cop until now for insane reasons. http://www.tmz.com/2016/03/04/oj-simpson-knife-found-murders-nicole-brown/ quote:The story is incredible. We're told a construction worker found the knife years ago -- we have heard several different stories, ranging from "several years ago" to 1998, when the house was demolished. Corek fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Mar 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Corek posted:They found a buried knife at OJ's house - in 1998, and it was kept by an off-duty cop until now for insane reasons. There's something about this case that just makes everyone act like idiots. This was probably OJ's monkey paw wish - "I will not be convicted of murder".
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
How loving stupid do you have to be to tell another officer you may be holding on to OJs murder weapon since 1998?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
TheBizzness posted:How loving stupid do you have to be to tell another officer you may be holding on to OJs murder weapon since 1998?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 02:38
|
|
|
Question for the law experts in this thread: I know OJ can't be tried again, but if they do discover this knife has blood and DNA on it, what can happen? Surely something has to happen seeing as this is a substantial piece of evidence.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 02:49
|
|
|
fart blood posted:Question for the law experts in this thread: I know OJ can't be tried again, but if they do discover this knife has blood and DNA on it, what can happen? Surely something has to happen seeing as this is a substantial piece of evidence. I was going to ask you how much you cared given his kidnapping and robbery sentence, but apparently he's already out on parole. The sentencing is still a justice boner, though. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFugrhFyV-4
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 03:07
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:I was going to ask you how much you cared given his kidnapping and robbery sentence, but apparently he's already out on parole. I thought he wasn't up for parole until 2017.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
He got parole for some charges, but there are others that he can't get paroled on until another year or something, so he's still behind bars, for now at least.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
I wonder if towards the end of the series they're going to touch on the idea that Jason Simpson (O.J.'s son) is actually the one who committed the murderers. http://www.businessinsider.com/oj-simpson-murders-and-jason-simpson-2014-6 The guy who came up with this theory is a private investigator and has written two books on the subject. If you read the first link it's actually quite a compelling and convincing argument. It explains why the glove didn't fit (leather doesn't shrink), the animal hairs on the black cap, etc.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 12:33
|
|
|
I remember a rumor that his gloves didn't fit because he went off the arthritis medicine he was taking. Can't remember where I got this from though, it may be a common theory
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 15:02
|
|
|
Maldoror posted:I wonder if towards the end of the series they're going to touch on the idea that Jason Simpson (O.J.'s son) is actually the one who committed the murderers. I always heard this theory but never really gave it much credence until I read that Business Insider link, good stuff.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 15:20
|
|
|
fart blood posted:Question for the law experts in this thread: I know OJ can't be tried again, but if they do discover this knife has blood and DNA on it, what can happen? Surely something has to happen seeing as this is a substantial piece of evidence. I doubt the knife would even be admissible given that it was sitting in a cop's house for 20 years.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
Maldoror posted:I wonder if towards the end of the series they're going to touch on the idea that Jason Simpson (O.J.'s son) is actually the one who committed the murderers. I've heard the theory for a bit now and it's pretty drat sound.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
I kinda want to see the knife that was just uncovered get retroactively inserted into the show, completely changing the course of events and introducing the world to an alternate timeline version of the O.J. trial.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
Maldoror posted:I wonder if towards the end of the series they're going to touch on the idea that Jason Simpson (O.J.'s son) is actually the one who committed the murderers. I thought leather shrinks when wet and frozen
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Marcia's getting the Farrah 
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 04:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 23:20 |
|
|
Hell yea, Seal @ the rick james comment
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 04:46
|
|
