|
What does the second set of numbers mean?
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 20:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 16:21 |
|
I predict a sudden uptick in same sex marriage licenses over the next week as people realize that it is a Get Out Of Wisconsin Free card
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 20:58 |
|
Darth Walrus posted:What does the second set of numbers mean? Favorability with GOP voters.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 20:58 |
|
33 Favorable, 51 Unfavorable view of Rubio.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 20:58 |
|
Darth Walrus posted:What does the second set of numbers mean? It means that 33% of Ohio GOP voters have a "favorable" impression of him, while 51% have an "unfavorable" impression. Those are really bad numbers for Rubio.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 20:59 |
|
DaveWoo posted:Those are really bad numbers for Rubio. They all are lately.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:00 |
|
zoux posted:They all are lately. Puerto Rico ignored yet again.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:02 |
|
Oh hey Romney is totally going to try and be the Nominee. http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg?201602019005302844+0
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:03 |
|
Dexo posted:Oh hey Romney is totally going to try and be the Nominee.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:13 |
|
How reliable is that document? Edit: reliable as in "is there a chance it is being misinterpreted? "
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:14 |
|
Unzip and Attack posted:It lets Clinton supporters feel good about themselves since they can't bring themselves to get excited about her. I'm just going to start keeping tally of when you well... Unzip and Shitpost +1
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:14 |
Potato Salad posted:How reliable is that document? Filed by Darrell Crate, Romney's campaign CFO from 2012.
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:15 |
|
Dexo posted:Oh hey Romney is totally going to try and be the Nominee. Yes, go ahead GOP. Burn the party down to try to stop the spread of the Trump Virus. You are only delaying the inevitable split.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:16 |
|
Potato Salad posted:How reliable is that document? It is the literal federal exchange commision's website. It's probably pretty legit. I just don't know if it's something that gets filed every year or is a standard thing in election years. Even if it's someone who's not planning on running.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:16 |
Supposedly it's been filed in 2013 and 2014. I'm not sure it's an indication that he's planning on stealing the nomination yet.
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:19 |
|
He also gave a close to Shermanesque denial the other day, but who knows if that means anything anymore.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:20 |
|
It was filed back in the start of February, and is not the document you need to actually jump in - it's something you would refile in an election year if you had maybe an outside thought about doing so. You're going to need to see him file a lot more stuff before he can actually get in, basically.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:21 |
However Romney, the guy that no one really wanted to nominate but did so because it was the sensible thing they were told by serious people to do, getting the nomination after populist darling Trump wins the majority of votes but not enough to stop a brokered election and not actually campaigning or doing any actual work winning over people would be a magnificent thing to behold.
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:22 |
|
Radish posted:However Romney, the guy that no one really wanted to nominate but did so because it was the sensible thing they were told by serious people to do, getting the nomination after populist darling Trump wins the majority of votes but not enough to stop a brokered election and not actually campaigning or doing any actual work winning over people would be a magnificent thing to behold. They couldn't possibly actually be that stupid
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:25 |
I don't think they are either but when you're desperate you make dumb mistakes and who the gently caress knows what's going on anymore.
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:26 |
|
Boon posted:How much of that openness to socialism is natural due the aging of the electorate who were convinced that communists are the great enemy? Millenials seem much less likely to directly link communism and socialism and are likely much more aware of the role social policy plays in day to day life. Probably a lot, but I think wage stagnation and college debt are helping too. Young people are asking "why do I have it so much harder than my parents did?" and finding out the government used to do a lot more for people.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:26 |
|
Lemming posted:They couldn't possibly actually be that stupid
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:26 |
|
Lemming posted:They couldn't possibly actually be that stupid Unskewed polls in 2012 says otherwise.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:27 |
|
Lemming posted:They couldn't possibly actually be that stupid What if the guy they put forward is Paul Ryan? Still pretty stupid but is it AS stupid, LESS stuid or JUST AS stupid as Romney? Interesting days indeed... VH4Ever fucked around with this message at 21:33 on Mar 7, 2016 |
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:27 |
|
VH4Ever posted:What if the guy they put forward is Paul Ryan? More stupid because no one wants to repeat that circus in the House again.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:28 |
|
VH4Ever posted:What if the guy they put forward is Paul Ryan? We'd be able to hear John Boehner laughing from here?
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:28 |
|
There's a big difference between writing a check for a nimrod and falling asleep, and strapping a bomb to yourself and suicide bombing Trump
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:30 |
|
McCloud posted:In that sense, what Mark Taibbi wrote is pretty accurate, part of Trumps appeal is that he's telling the truth about things Republicans have been coy about. The GOP are helping the rich exploit illegals and drive down wages, and "ordinary" americans suffer for it. Without cheap labor to exploit a lot of these companies/employers would have to raise their wages. If I was part of the lower class, working two jobs and barely getting by, I'd be pretty pissed too. Unfortunately they choose to aim this anger at the immigrants instead of the real culprits, the companies exploiting them, but I guess it's easier to rile up anger against dem dirty mexicans than aiming your vitrol at Disney and Walmart. Yeah, contrary to popular belief the GOP establishment LOVES illegal immigration because it makes businesses and rich people money. In fact if you pay close attention to the way that they act you'll notice that they rarely, if ever, actually do things that will solve the problem. It's all either ineffective nonsense or blame-shifting from corporations to immigrants (Virtual border fence! Self-deportation!).
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:33 |
|
Naw, I promise: build a wall and nobody will ever go over the wall. Or under it. Or past it via smuggling operations. Or through it with a few bags of commercial explosives in an area devoid of human life in a fifty mile radius.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:35 |
|
VH4Ever posted:What if the guy they put forward is Paul Ryan? At this point there's no one that could unite all the disparate factions, let alone someone like Ryan who's already loathed by the base for [insert dipshit reasons here]. It's hilarious to watch them squirm though. Nostalgia4Infinity posted:I'm just going to start keeping tally of when you well... Unzip and Shitpost Please do. It will be entertaining to see how much of a weirdo stalker you want to be.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:35 |
|
Unzip and Attack posted:So what is the exact number of posts that need to go by before your individual poo poo posts expire and can no longer be addressed? I'm going to have to make a spreadsheet. Maybe you can tell us more about how DWS only gets criticized because she's a woman. That's one of the best threadshits you never ended up even trying to defend, but that's just the first one I could think of.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:41 |
Lemming posted:There's a big difference between writing a check for a nimrod and falling asleep, and strapping a bomb to yourself and suicide bombing Trump What if someone blows Trump up Would Cruz be the likely nominee?
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:46 |
|
Soho Joe posted:Would Cruz be the likely nominee? Trump supporters would break for Cruz a lot more than they would Rubio, so yeah.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:47 |
|
Boon posted:Well. The immigrant labor at sub-standard wages is basically what drives down the cost of food. Without said labor, wages would definitely need to be higher or we would need to import more of our food, but the end impact is that we'd also see massive hikes in a lot of staple food products. This isn't necessarily bad, but given the current state of the US economy, it means that no matter what we do, the middle class is hosed. Didn't South Carolina or Georgia have a temporary crisis in food prices or shortages in their attempt to drive out illegal agricultural workers because of this a few years ago? Content: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/03/07/469506291/families-seek-class-action-status-in-federal-lawsuit-over-flints-water Class-action lawsuit filed against Michigan Governor Rick Snyder over lead disaster in Flint.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:48 |
|
Soho Joe posted:What if someone blows Trump up Normally I'd say yes but 1) lol this cycle and 2) the GOP establishment has personal animosity towards Cruz like nobody else so it's hard to say what wrenches they'd start throwing in.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:49 |
|
Your Dunkle Sans posted:Didn't South Carolina or Georgia have a temporary crisis in food prices or shortages in their attempt to drive out illegal agricultural workers because of this a few years ago? It was specifically Georgia, I believe.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:49 |
|
Potato Salad posted:Naw, I promise: build a wall and nobody will ever go over the wall. Or under it. Or past it via smuggling operations. Or through it with a few bags of commercial explosives in an area devoid of human life in a fifty mile radius. At least a fence could conceivably stop the laziest 10% of people who couldn't be assed to bring some wire cutters or something. GWB's "virtual fence" was pretty much just putting up a webcam and calling it a day.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:51 |
|
Soho Joe posted:What if someone blows Trump up It would automatically be a brokered convention since all those delegates are still pledged to Trump I think.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:53 |
|
zoux posted:Normally I'd say yes but 1) lol this cycle and 2) the GOP establishment has personal animosity towards Cruz like nobody else so it's hard to say what wrenches they'd start throwing in. That's an interesting point - I don't know whether or not these tactics would work on Cruz. They don't work on Trump generally, but Cruz is, somehow, a lot less likable than Trump so you may very well be right.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 16:21 |
|
Unzip and Attack posted:That's an interesting point - I don't know whether or not these tactics would work on Cruz. They don't work on Trump generally, but Cruz is, somehow, a lot less likable than Trump so you may very well be right. IIRC, Cruz is much more favorably looked upon in his own party (among voters) than Trump.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 21:56 |