Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
The Narrator
Aug 11, 2011

bernie would have won

MonoAus posted:

I'm still not clear on what the purpose of these fines are beyond appearing to do something about a perceived "problem" but not actually doing anything at all.

I think you've got it, actually.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

NPR Journalizard
Feb 14, 2008

MonoAus posted:

I'm still not clear on what the purpose of these fines are beyond appearing to do something about a perceived "problem" but not actually doing anything at all.

No, I think you are perfectly clear.

You are just assuming there must be something more to it, because surely there must be, but there isnt.

Flannelette
Jan 17, 2010


Pickled Tink posted:

This isn't about economics. This is about victim blaming.

Many who are unemployed and can't find work are locked out of the market for a number of reasons, many of which are not within their direct control. Lack of up to date training, no knowledge of current best practices, unfamiliarity with new software packages, injuries, jobs moving offshore etc. These are circumstances that could happen to anyone if they have a run of bad luck, or some misfortune and fall out of the job market for a while. It is therefore imperative to vested interests that people not realise this because then they might start asking why this happens, or worse yet, making noises about stopping it.

The best way to do this is to make sure people think it is the unemployed persons fault that they are unemployed. We'd love to hire them, but they are so lazy that we can't afford to. People who have jobs go "I'm not lazy, therefore that kind of thing won't happen to me if I somehow lost my job".

The whole thing is a complicated mess, but the real issue boils down to scapegoating the poor for the problems caused by the wealthy, blaming the poor for deficits while at the same time not paying their own fair share in taxes and demanding further cuts and subsidies. Because the poor are poor they can't really mount a defence against that kind of thing. Basically it is just bashing a convenient and weak minority in order to distract from other issues.

This seems dangerous too though, it might work in the short term but having an unhappy underclass means as soon as a big enough uncontrollable external force slams into this system and pushes many into the underclass you'll end up with populist revolutionaries.
And in the short term pushing people into desperation and hopeless situations seems like a great way to sow lone gunman and mad bomber situations, you can't rely on people to kill themselves quietly all the time.

Pickled Tink
Apr 28, 2012

Have you heard about First Dog? It's a very good comic I just love.

Also, wear your bike helmets kids. I copped several blows to the head but my helmet left me totally unscathed.



Finally you should check out First Dog as it's a good comic I like it very much.
Fun Shoe

Flannelette posted:

This seems dangerous too though, it might work in the short term but having an unhappy underclass means as soon as a big enough uncontrollable external force slams into this system and pushes many into the underclass you'll end up with populist revolutionaries.
And in the short term pushing people into desperation and hopeless situations seems like a great way to sow lone gunman and mad bomber situations, you can't rely on people to kill themselves quietly all the time.
But we live in a global economy. It is quite easy to just shift over to the next target country to gently caress up, or do it from overseas in the first place.

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

Lol why am I considering turning my Australian PR into an Australian citizenship.

JEsus gently caress

immi.gov.au has turned into border.gov.au

The Before Times
Mar 8, 2014

Once upon a time, I would have thrown you halfway to the moon for a crack like that.

SynthOrange posted:

Lol why am I considering turning my Australian PR into an Australian citizenship.

JEsus gently caress

immi.gov.au has turned into border.gov.au

:stare:

iajanus
Aug 17, 2004

NUMBER 1 QUEENSLAND SUPPORTER
MAROONS 2023 STATE OF ORIGIN CHAMPIONS FOR LIFE



Bogan King posted:

I went to go mock Van Bad Ham but she's blocked me. I've literally never interacted with her or dropped criticism on her. I guess this is what change from within feels like.

I mocked her once and I'm banned too :'(

HookShot
Dec 26, 2005

SynthOrange posted:

Lol why am I considering turning my Australian PR into an Australian citizenship.

JEsus gently caress

immi.gov.au has turned into border.gov.au

My PR lapsed in September.

Never going back permanently again!

Tokamak
Dec 22, 2004

MonoAus posted:

I'm still not clear on what the purpose of these fines are beyond appearing to do something about a perceived "problem" but not actually doing anything at all. The article said that there would be grounds for appeal, I imagine it wouldn't be any more/less difficult than reapplying. Cutting off someone's payments saves a lot more money than fining them 10%.

When you get cut off for non-attendance it is usually treated like a clerical error. So if you ring up and say you forgot and reschedule it, they will fix it up. It isn't really an appeal, as the phone operators have some leeway to fix missed appointments. If you get a fined by the provider, the implication is that it isn't a clerical error and that you will have to go through the official appeals process. First you appeal to the Centrelink branch manager, and they will reject it because you missed the appointment. Then you appeal that, which means you get an independent assessor (who is typically on your side) and in a few months determine that the fine should be reversed.

It will be more difficult than reapplying. The other purpose is a way to coerce clients into undertaking activities under the threat of a fine. I.e. do a lovely JSA run course, unpaid work trial etc.

Tokamak fucked around with this message at 06:41 on Mar 9, 2016

Senor Tron
May 26, 2006


SynthOrange posted:

Lol why am I considering turning my Australian PR into an Australian citizenship.

JEsus gently caress

immi.gov.au has turned into border.gov.au

Change from within!

GoldStandardConure
Jun 11, 2010

I have to kill fast
and mayflies too slow

Pillbug

SynthOrange posted:

Lol why am I considering turning my Australian PR into an Australian citizenship.

JEsus gently caress

immi.gov.au has turned into border.gov.au

one of us

one of us

meteor9
Nov 23, 2007

"That's why I put up with it."
My alternative is to go back to the US. The one where half the country would honestly vote for Trump.

Yeah I think I'm gonna take my chances and stay here where I get paid 3x what I used to for the same work and get healthcare for my MS, thanks.

Smegmatron
Apr 23, 2003

I hate to advocate emptyquoting or shitposting to anyone, but they've always worked for me.

MonoAus posted:

Obviously I can't speak for everyone, all I can tell you in my personal experience.

I remember the appointments were inconvenient and long, but I wouldn't describe it as a punch in the face. I personally don't think it is unreasonable for the agency given the task of helping(forcing) people back in to the workforce would need to have appointments with those people.

I don't think it's reasonable to fine people for not being cooperative with the system, but my question was what SHOULD happen in that situation.

Nothing. Newstart doesn't pay enough to even count as an appearance fee. The idea that people wilfully subject themselves to the newstart lifestyle because it's enjoyable or even comfortable is complete bullshit peddled by dickheads like A Current Affair to boomers who need to be distracted from how entitled they are. It's a miserable existence and nobody actually wants it.

If you want to crack down on welfare abuse, go after the one that Centrelink themselves say has more fraudulent claims than any other; the aged pension. The money saved from that will more than pay for the mythical dole bludger.

Smegmatron fucked around with this message at 08:06 on Mar 9, 2016

MonoAus
Nov 5, 2012

What about improving the system so people actually want to go to their appointments?

Seagull
Oct 9, 2012

give me a chip
the only good story i've ever heard about jsas or centrelink was avs' one about the old hippy who got put in charge of her, and then a week later he died

MonoAus posted:

What about improving the system so people actually want to go to their appointments?

you expect us to help the proles buddy?

Smegmatron
Apr 23, 2003

I hate to advocate emptyquoting or shitposting to anyone, but they've always worked for me.

MonoAus posted:

What about improving the system so people actually want to go to their appointments?

You asked what should happen if people miss their appointments, not how to reform the system.

Showing up once a fortnight to prostrate yourself and dance for a pittance is a waste of everybody's time and they should give up on it. Nationalise seek.com.au and integrate it with Centrelink IMO. Cut out the 500 middle men in the equation.

Tomberforce
May 30, 2006

SynthOrange posted:

Lol why am I considering turning my Australian PR into an Australian citizenship.

JEsus gently caress

immi.gov.au has turned into border.gov.au

Yeah I just spent 12k on getting my PR last year.

Maybe I should have gone hom.....:smithicide:


:britain:

Bogan King
Jan 21, 2013

I'm not racist, I'm mates with Bangladesh, the guy who sells me kebabs. No, I don't know his real name.

HookShot posted:

My PR lapsed in September.

Never going back permanently again!

PR in medical terms means Per Rectum.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

meteor9 posted:

My alternative is to go back to the US. The one where half the country would honestly vote for Trump.

Yeah I think I'm gonna take my chances and stay here where I get paid 3x what I used to for the same work and get healthcare for my MS, thanks.

Only half you reckon?

tithin
Nov 14, 2003


[Grandmaster Tactician]



Tomberforce posted:

Yeah I just spent 12k on getting my PR last year.

Maybe I should have gone hom.....:smithicide:


:britain:

Suicide is also a valid alternative.

At least the snp runs my country.

Negligent
Aug 20, 2013

Its just lovely here this time of year.

MonoAus posted:

What about improving the system so people actually want to go to their appointments?

When I make a doctor's appointment I know I'm looking forward to a lollipop. Good system imo

Negligent
Aug 20, 2013

Its just lovely here this time of year.

Pickled Tink posted:

I am required to go in twice per week to search for work for an hour. The consequences of this are plain:

1: Because of the bus timetables, this ends up eating three hours out of the middle of my day, making scheduling anything else at a reasonable hour on those days pretty much impossible.
2: It costs me money to attend these appointments, even with concession fares.
3: I am forced to use lovely computers to do my job search, and don't have access to resources I have at home.

It needs to be said that the original requirement was for three "appointments" per week for the same time. I successfully convinced them that was stupid and managed to wriggle it down to two.

All in all, it serves to be a waste of time and money for me. It accomplishes nothing, in fact it does worse than nothing because I have had to cut back on my job search outside of those hours just so that I have something to do while I am there because, as you can imagine, the available part time job market in things I can actually do is not very large.

Sorry you had to take time out of your busy schedule of posting cartoons on the internet to attend a free service that's trying to help you

jfc

Negligent
Aug 20, 2013

Its just lovely here this time of year.
Gets payments from the government, is annoyed he had to leave his house twice a week

Starshark
Dec 22, 2005
Doctor Rope

Negligent posted:

Sorry you had to take time out of your busy schedule of posting cartoons on the internet to attend a free service that's trying to help you

jfc

lol if you think jsa's are there to help jobseekers. Even you aren't this dumb.

Negligent
Aug 20, 2013

Its just lovely here this time of year.
Yeah, there's no reason to disturb people.

Getting a dude out of his house twice a week to interact with a human is silly.

MonoAus
Nov 5, 2012

Starshark posted:

lol if you think jsa's are there to help jobseekers. Even you aren't this dumb.

I'm sure someone will call me naive but I do think that JSAs are there to help jobseekers. They're just incredibly bad at what they do.

Futuresight
Oct 11, 2012

IT'S ALL TURNED TO SHIT!

Negligent posted:

Sorry you had to take time out of your busy schedule of posting cartoons on the internet to attend a free service that's trying to help you

jfc

Free? The JSA network is paid for by the taxpayers. We're all just suggesting a great cost-cutting measure for the government to consider.

trunkh
Jan 31, 2011



Negligent posted:

Sorry you had to take time out of your busy schedule of posting cartoons on the internet to attend a free service that's trying to help you

jfc

Newstart payments are below the poverty line. Attendance means further financial hardship. Further the service provided is lowest common denominator. If you are competent you learn nothing and gain nothing. It is time that could be better spent looking for work or developing other skills.

sick of Applebees
Nov 7, 2008

Negligent posted:

Gets payments from the government, is annoyed he had to leave his house twice a week

Going to JSA appointments would be all fine and dandy if they actually accomplished anything for you, I've been on Centrelink twice and both times the JSA have been utterly useless at helping me find a job.

Each time I would show up to the appointment, get my name ticked off and they would ask for my form of applications done, and then they would make another appointment and that would basically be it.

Absolutely nothing they did was geared to helping me find a job, it was just so they could tick off that they'd had an appointment with me and that was it.

I'm lucky in that I'm white and don't look like a drug addict so they were inclined to just leave me alone and not make the situation worse for me.

But being unemployed for a long period of time does gently caress with your self esteem hardcore and when you see these people viewing you as just something to tick off a list. You begin to wonder whether you'll ever find work again or whether you'll be a burden on your family for the rest of your life.

So gently caress JSAs, they should be abolished or replaced with a government run organisation that trains people to help you find work at the very least.

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
My Jsa appointments last 5 minutes
You still studyin
You still applyin
See you next fortnight

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
Just bring on basic income already. All crap JSA's would quickly fold as no one would be forced in to dealing with them, and you might actually end up with decent agencies who are actually well qualified at finding people suitable employment as those would be the only ones people would end up choosing to go to.

See the free market can works with a healthy dose of socialism!

Starshark
Dec 22, 2005
Doctor Rope

MonoAus posted:

I'm sure someone will call me naive but I do think that JSAs are there to help jobseekers. They're just incredibly bad at what they do.

I was unemployed for two months under the Howard government and the only thing the JSA said to me in that time was, 'Why haven't you got a job yet?' Not my idea of 'help'.

MonoAus
Nov 5, 2012
Hence the being 'incredibly bad at what they do' part of that.

My experience with them was basically them telling me they probably can't help me much but I needed to keep coming back to tell them how my search was going.

Starshark
Dec 22, 2005
Doctor Rope

MonoAus posted:

Hence the being 'incredibly bad at what they do' part of that.

My experience with them was basically them telling me they probably can't help me much but I needed to keep coming back to tell them how my search was going.

You're just being a pollyanna about the whole thing, you can't for one second entertain the notion that the government has created an agency with no purpose but to gently caress people around. Well, believe it. It's here. It's the JSA.

Graic Gabtar
Dec 19, 2014

squat my posts

Pickled Tink posted:

I am required to go in twice per week to search for work for an hour. The consequences of this are plain:

1: Because of the bus timetables, this ends up eating three hours out of the middle of my day, making scheduling anything else at a reasonable hour on those days pretty much impossible.
2: It costs me money to attend these appointments, even with concession fares.
3: I am forced to use lovely computers to do my job search, and don't have access to resources I have at home.

It needs to be said that the original requirement was for three "appointments" per week for the same time. I successfully convinced them that was stupid and managed to wriggle it down to two.

All in all, it serves to be a waste of time and money for me. It accomplishes nothing, in fact it does worse than nothing because I have had to cut back on my job search outside of those hours just so that I have something to do while I am there because, as you can imagine, the available part time job market in things I can actually do is not very large.

I'm going to preface this by acknowledging that although I have no experience with a JSA logic tells me they would be completely poo poo do deal with and little to do with good outcomes for the unemployed.

(Why smart people like yourselves don't start your own outfit is beyond me, but I digress)

Also, I agree with the majority here (and elsewhere) that the grinding poverty of poverty below the poverty line is beyond poo poo.

However, if someone was to come in here cold (or this line was carried elsewhere) they would just think that a person saying things like this was simply a whining gently caress. Personally I could tick those boxes with poo poo public transport, crap technology and other things with the joy of dealing with it at least five days a week as work follows me home often. Yes granted, those people screaming, 'whining gently caress' also seem to forget they are eating.

This isn't trying to be rude and I don't give a gently caress what you think of me personally but that griping probably isn't going to resonate.

Basically not you Pickled Tink (as I know you have me on ignore) but some of you guys are going to have to come up with a plan and do it pretty loving quick. I've seen grinding poverty doubled down lately and I really don't want it here.

MonoAus
Nov 5, 2012

Starshark posted:

You're just being a pollyanna about the whole thing

:shrug: It's just my opinion.

I certainly agree the government is incompetent, but I'm not so sure about intentionally malicious.

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

Graic Gabtar posted:

Basically not you Pickled Tink (as I know you have me on ignore) but some of you guys are going to have to come up with a plan and do it pretty loving quick. I've seen grinding poverty doubled down lately and I really don't want it here.

Basic income seems pretty popular, although it's untested and, at least at the moment, a political non-starter.

The dole needs a serious bump, and I'd suggest making the JSA process competitive. Job seekers could choose to go to a JSA if they felt like they were getting value out of it or choose not to if they thought it was a waste of time. With all that money on offer some JSAs would pick up their game and actually help people to upskill and find jobs, and others would go out of business.

Cleretic
Feb 3, 2010


Ignore my posts!
I'm aggressively wrong about everything!
Some are actually worthwhile. I think the biggest thing the JSA I actually had did for me was that the first person I had--I went through three--was really good about testing how ready I was to actually look for a job. She tested my interview skills, proof-read my cover letter and resume (which were already pretty solid but needed some touch-ups), taught me actual job-searching techniques, all that. The second guy I had didn't do much of anything, though, and the woman that came after him only really stopped idling similarly when I said I was planning to move to Melbourne.

It's possible for JSAs to do good, they're certainly in a position to. But the issue is that it's actually counterproductive for them to be good. Getting someone a job really quickly is great, but people who can do that would probably not need much help. For the rest, it's actually not worth the effort to do much because of how it's structured, it's far more profitable to just keep them there doing either nothing, or earning useless qualifications from quick courses (that the JSAs may or may not actually run). I noticed the woman who had my case kicked it into high gear when I told her I was planning a move, and I think it's most likely because, in the event that I did (and I was clearly getting way better results by making Melbourne searches) they'd get jack poo poo from me.

The Before Times
Mar 8, 2014

Once upon a time, I would have thrown you halfway to the moon for a crack like that.

Pickled Tink posted:

I am required to go in twice per week to search for work for an hour. The consequences of this are plain:

1: Because of the bus timetables, this ends up eating three hours out of the middle of my day, making scheduling anything else at a reasonable hour on those days pretty much impossible.
2: It costs me money to attend these appointments, even with concession fares.
3: I am forced to use lovely computers to do my job search, and don't have access to resources I have at home.

It needs to be said that the original requirement was for three "appointments" per week for the same time. I successfully convinced them that was stupid and managed to wriggle it down to two.

All in all, it serves to be a waste of time and money for me. It accomplishes nothing, in fact it does worse than nothing because I have had to cut back on my job search outside of those hours just so that I have something to do while I am there because, as you can imagine, the available part time job market in things I can actually do is not very large.

Brisbane doesn't even have concession fares for low income, so I'm doing everything I can to avoid having to go on newstart after I graduate.

Also, JSAs are actually incentivised to just let you idle on newstart for a while: if you're classed as "long term" unemployed, they get more money if they "help" you find work. Even if they don't actually do anything and you get a job on your own steam, they get money when you first get the job, and also if you stay in the job for a certain amount of time.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LibertyCat
Mar 5, 2016

by WE B Bourgeois
It should be easier to employ people for certain positions. I'd happily pay someone a couple of bucks to come round once a week & clean my house / mow my lawn, but screw worrying about super, liability etc. If I'm forced to pay the rates cleaning companies etc want I may as well do it myself.

  • Locked thread