|
Groogy posted:Crusader Kings will outlive me and I just "became a grown up today". Take from that however you want. Happy bar mitzvah
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 01:23 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 16:58 |
|
He's obviously referring to Vanuatu land diving. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_diving?wprov=sfla1
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 01:30 |
|
Groogy has come of age. He became an amateurish plotter.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 02:10 |
|
The Narrator posted:Groogy has come of age. He became an amateurish plotter. lol
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 03:39 |
|
So is there any way to play Darkest Hour windowed with Windows 10?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 04:28 |
|
Will it be possible to have a shrimp themed civilization in Stellaris? I saw that you can play Molluscaloons and fungaloids so just wondering if crustaceans will get their fair shake?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 04:35 |
|
Can I play Stellaris as a race of child-sized amoebas stacked on top of each other in trenchcoats pretending to be adult humans?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 04:36 |
|
Mister Adequate posted:So is there any way to play Darkest Hour windowed with Windows 10? Start the launcher executable directly rather than through Steam
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 05:07 |
|
Enjoy posted:Start the launcher executable directly rather than through Steam The problem is that there's no way to set my desktop to 16 bit color depth mode.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 05:31 |
|
Mister Adequate posted:The problem is that there's no way to set my desktop to 16 bit color depth mode. Is it trying to start the game windowed? If you fire up the launcher instead of the main game you can switch it to full screen mode, which works. I'm using Windows 10.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 05:34 |
|
Omnicarus posted:Will it be possible to have a shrimp themed civilization in Stellaris? I saw that you can play Molluscaloons and fungaloids so just wondering if crustaceans will get their fair shake? Arthopods are in so I assume there will be shellfish in addition to bugs.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 05:35 |
|
Enjoy posted:Is it trying to start the game windowed? If you fire up the launcher instead of the main game you can switch it to full screen mode, which works. I'm using Windows 10. Nah it's the other way around, I want it windowed, but the option is greyed out like yours is.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 05:51 |
|
http://imgmr.com/pc-news/paradox-has-a-grand-strategy-for-gdc/ Some detail on GDC plans. Apparently we will be getting info on Stellaris, HOI IV, and an unrevealed title.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 17:47 |
|
The new thing is probably the secret project Wiz was moved on to. Come onnnnnn Victoria 3.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:02 |
|
GCValentine posted:http://imgmr.com/pc-news/paradox-has-a-grand-strategy-for-gdc/ quote:Chris King (Senior Game Designer): Did King come back to Paradox? I thought he left to make an indie space game? I'd prefer Rome II to Vicky III, but Vicky's probably more likely. EDIT: Session scheduler describes King as 'Senior Game Designer, Paradox Interactive', so I guess he's returned to work on V3. V3 confirmed.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:09 |
|
I did not like King's contributions to V2. The whole reason the economy is so hosed up is that they put a trickle down Thatcherite in charge of designing the economy and way the world, specially capitalism, works. That's like putting a homeopath in charge of a medical sim.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:38 |
|
I know nothing about King except he made a bad space 4x game but let's wait and see, eh?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:43 |
|
Leaves Paradox to finally be able to work on a space 4x. Paradox promptly starts working on a space 4x. Returns to Paradox a couple months before the space 4x releases.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:51 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:The new thing is probably the secret project Wiz was moved on to.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:54 |
|
Baronjutter posted:I did not like King's contributions to V2. The whole reason the economy is so hosed up is that they put a trickle down Thatcherite in charge of designing the economy and way the world, specially capitalism, works. That's like putting a homeopath in charge of a medical sim. Honestly I don't think that's the real issue with Victoria's economy - it's that the capitalist AI is really bad at deciding what to build, and factories don't seem to be able to operate at a loss, so one day of bad sales sends them into a death spiral. Also if the game was meant to demonstrate the superiority of the free market, it failed pretty miserably considering that factories are basically guaranteed to shut down without government subsidies, and because of the aforementioned stupid AI planned economy/state capitalism end up being by far the best choices.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:54 |
|
I had to look up what the you guys were even talking about ... I've never even heard of Galactic Inheritors before. Sounds like it is pretty awful though! Even has a Galatic Ledger and Casus Belli.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 18:55 |
|
The new game is Rome 2 and Wiz lost an office bet, so now he spends his days thinking about and programming AI senates which mimic goon Crete. A fitting fate for one who dared fly too close to the sun!
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:06 |
|
I love horses, best of all the animals.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:09 |
|
Baronjutter posted:That's like putting a homeopath in charge of a medical sim.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:12 |
|
GCValentine posted:an unrevealed title. Fintilgin posted:King as 'Senior Game Designer, Paradox Interactive'
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:14 |
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:15 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:The new thing is probably the secret project Wiz was moved on to. he won't have even started working on it when the event thing starts so i think this is somewhat unlikely
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:23 |
|
zedprime posted:I would play that game. Sometimes magical thinking makes better gameplay systems. See also Twilight Struggle
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:26 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:Honestly I don't think that's the real issue with Victoria's economy - it's that the capitalist AI is really bad at deciding what to build, and factories don't seem to be able to operate at a loss, so one day of bad sales sends them into a death spiral. That was my favourite part, from his posting unless "cocky conservative capitalist" was just a joke persona I believe he did design the game with an eye towards showing the superiority of the free market and how social programs were useless wastes of money. I recall him saying he was horrified how in V1 the working class would almost always drift towards socialism and how he was horrified that the game didn't depict this as a disaster, but actually as a good way of running a country. I think that's why I liked V1 so much more than V2. In V1 I felt like I could actually steer a country one way or another and eventually get there, and you could have a fairly rewarding experience going off the rails one way or another. In V2 it felt like I was always fighting the system, never in control of anything just sort of reacting to stuff while dreaming that maybe in 100 years if I play perfectly I could increase my vote for some upper house party enough to actually have enough control over my country to do something fun.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:36 |
|
Baronjutter posted:I think that's why I liked V1 so much more than V2. In V1 I felt like I could actually steer a country one way or another and eventually get there, and you could have a fairly rewarding experience going off the rails one way or another. In V2 it felt like I was always fighting the system, never in control of anything just sort of reacting to stuff while dreaming that maybe in 100 years if I play perfectly I could increase my vote for some upper house party enough to actually have enough control over my country to do something fun. This is exactly what I felt like when playing V2 as compared to V1. If I didn't have to deal with the fuuuuucking interface fighting against me to do anything in V1, I'd probably still just be playing it.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:38 |
|
I prefer imperialism because vicky's systems arent very fun to play. They are funny to read about.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 19:41 |
|
Panzeh posted:I prefer imperialism because vicky's systems arent very fun to play. They are funny to read about. The mechanical debt Vicky owes to Imperialism was the biggest thing I noticed when I first play V1. But Imperialism was comparatively streamlined and elegant, but Vicky 1 & 2 were like an 'ideas guy' had got a hold of it and cranked the complexity dial way past 11 to like 24.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 20:06 |
|
I have said before the Vicky games are beautiful and flawed creatures and in a perfect world there would be no Vicky 3 because they would retire the name and make an actual fun to play game instead of a Frankenstein's monster of mechanics of economics and social movements that are playing their own game underneath whatever one you think you might be playing. But a Vicky 3 without the baggage would be insulting to the beautiful hot messes of the past.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 20:33 |
|
I spent about a year way back learning how to play Ricky. Each time was a traumatizing experience of confusion, terror, machine parts and capitalists before I had to cut my losses and quit as my country descended rapidly into bankruptcy and chaos. Then one day I just seemed to get what was going on and I realized that Ricky was beautiful.
Randarkman fucked around with this message at 21:16 on Mar 10, 2016 |
# ? Mar 10, 2016 20:59 |
|
Randarkman posted:I spent about a year way back learning how to play Ricky. Each time was a traumatizing experience of confusion, terror, machine parts and capitalists before I had to cut my losses and quit as my country descended rapidly into bankruptcy and chaos. Then one day I just seemed to get what was going on and I realized that Ricky was beautiful. So that's what was in Room 101.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:01 |
|
Mister Adequate posted:So is there any way to play Darkest Hour windowed with Windows 10? I run it in a Windows XP virtual machine.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:13 |
|
Mister Adequate posted:So is there any way to play Darkest Hour windowed with Windows 10? Run it windowed with the resolution *slightly* smaller than your native res (i.e. edit the .ini to be like 1900x1050 if you normally use 1920x1080). For some reason this works (and runs at normal speed not the crazy lag you get in full screen) but don't move the window because if you do and it touches the edge of the screen it crashes. No I am not joking and I have no idea why this fixes it.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:19 |
|
Baronjutter posted:That was my favourite part, from his posting unless "cocky conservative capitalist" was just a joke persona I believe he did design the game with an eye towards showing the superiority of the free market and how social programs were useless wastes of money. I recall him saying he was horrified how in V1 the working class would almost always drift towards socialism and how he was horrified that the game didn't depict this as a disaster, but actually as a good way of running a country. Yet as a result, he unwittingly showed socialism was a great option again, depending on your country. Small countries benefited heavily by socialism, communism, some dictatorships, and some fascist governments. None of them really benefited from the free market, as often your capitalists would be stupid in building priorities and they'd go bankrupt without subsidies the minute the market had any fluctuations. This would tank your industrial score, lowering your rank, locking you out of even more goods from the market, causing more factories to close, etc, etc. However, if you played as a large country like China or Russia, it was better to be free market once you got the initial industry set up. Because otherwise players would die a slow death of a thousand clicks. Also, on release capitalists had insane demands for resources. Luxuries could never be satisfied, which made them pissed. So pissed they'd revolt to change your government in the vain attempt to fix the problem. Except no matter how free market you were, no matter how anarcho-liberal (pseudo libertarian?) you were, you could never solve their insatiable hunger for more. So they kept revolting, even though they were getting their way. Massive waves of revolts rocked western countries all over the globe. The game was pretty broken on that front. It was later patched, but it gave players even more incentive to hate capitalists. So for all his efforts, he certainly made a good case for socialism and communism.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:29 |
|
Bel Monte posted:Also, on release capitalists had insane demands for resources. Luxuries could never be satisfied, which made them pissed. So pissed they'd revolt to change your government in the vain attempt to fix the problem. Except no matter how free market you were, no matter how anarcho-liberal (pseudo libertarian?) you were, you could never solve their insatiable hunger for more. So they kept revolting, even though they were getting their way. Massive waves of revolts rocked western countries all over the globe. The game was pretty broken on that front. It was later patched, but it gave players even more incentive to hate capitalists. I don't remember that. What I do remember is that, at release, there were no limits on who could assimilate. Meaning that, by 1900 or so, the entirety of the Indian subcontinent would go British. One billion primary-culture POPs makes for a hell of a lot of industry Also Victoria is actually good and fun and I will greet the third instalment with joy, good cheer and a primal lust for wildly overdesigned economic simulations. KOGAHAZAN!! fucked around with this message at 02:57 on Mar 11, 2016 |
# ? Mar 11, 2016 02:55 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 16:58 |
|
Mr Luxury Yacht posted:Run it windowed with the resolution *slightly* smaller than your native res (i.e. edit the .ini to be like 1900x1050 if you normally use 1920x1080). For some reason this works (and runs at normal speed not the crazy lag you get in full screen) but don't move the window because if you do and it touches the edge of the screen it crashes. Okay that's bizarre, I'll give that a try soon! Should that fail, I'll look at what uPen suggests as well. Thanks goons!
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 03:15 |