|
Pinterest Mom posted:https://twitter.com/melaniejoly/status/708028249234915328 If it's fine for Hillary..
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:39 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 12:51 |
|
ChickenWing posted:generally, do not do a sex with a crazy person Jian Ghomeshi suddenly gets sad and cant figure out why.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:40 |
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-calgary-consumer-debt-equifax-1.3484940 Average consumer debt is now $27k in Alberta compared to $21k nation-wide. I really want to know what the median value is because I know there are a lot of people without any consumer debt so I imagine like 50% of Canadians are carrying $50k. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2015001/article/14167-eng.htm In 2012 14% of families had more consumer debt than their annual income. Some other interesting stats in there like the net worth discrepancy of single vs coupled Canadians. It's like 10x. Interestingly, the only group not drowning in debt is seniors 65+. cowofwar fucked around with this message at 22:57 on Mar 10, 2016 |
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:49 |
|
.
Legit Businessman fucked around with this message at 16:52 on Sep 9, 2022 |
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:56 |
|
Ah yes self regulation
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:59 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:https://twitter.com/melaniejoly/status/708028249234915328 Aren't you a Hilary backer over in YCS?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:00 |
|
Weirdly, thinking that one candidate would be a better president than another doesn't also mean thinking that selfies with a war criminal are in good taste.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:01 |
|
Hahaha, she replaced my good MP. I loving hate everything.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:07 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Weirdly, thinking that one candidate would be a better president than another doesn't also mean thinking that selfies with a war criminal are in good taste. I don't mean to be getting all hell dumpy here and bringing in poo poo from other threads / forums but honestly if the most intelligent, disciplined and involved member of the NDP in this thread thinks Clinton is a better choice than Sanders then it really makes a mockery of all my dumb effort posts about how much more left wing the NDP's base of support is. The woman has actively sought out Kissinger's advice while in a position of real power, unlike those Liberal yahoos going in for selfies, and then she bragged about her friendship with him.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:15 |
|
No single person should be taken to represent the NDP's or any party's base of support. That's just silly. Lots of New Democrats are backing Sanders.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:29 |
|
I know that there's a certain level of etiquette expected of you when you're a public figure meeting another public figure but cripes man, it's Kissinger. I'd consider it an honour to pull down my pants and piss on him.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:48 |
|
Wow you guys are all so edgy I cut myself.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:49 |
|
PT6A go educate yourself on who we're talking about and then come back and make white noise posts.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 23:53 |
|
PT6A advocated for razing entire villages if they were thought to harbour ISIS militants, do you really think he's going to have a problem with Kissinger?
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:03 |
|
infernal machines posted:PT6A advocated for razing entire villages if they were thought to harbour ISIS militants, do you really think he's going to have a problem with Kissinger?
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:07 |
|
THC posted:Lots of New Democrats are backing Sanders.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:27 |
|
infernal machines posted:PT6A advocated for razing entire villages if they were thought to harbour ISIS militants, do you really think he's going to have a problem with Kissinger? Kissinger's a piece of poo poo but I don't think it's helpful to talk about taking a piss on him. I don't think selfies were appropriate, though, so I guess we agree on that.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:30 |
|
Idiot parents duped by billions of dollars of alt-med marketing: Shoot in the face. Reviled war criminal that has never faced justice: woah guys let's not be disrespectful that's just not helpful.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:34 |
|
THC's right - much (most is my sense) of the institutional NDP prefers Sanders to Clinton.Helsing posted:I don't mean to be getting all hell dumpy here and bringing in poo poo from other threads / forums but honestly if the most intelligent, disciplined and involved member of the NDP in this thread thinks Clinton is a better choice than Sanders then it really makes a mockery of all my dumb effort posts about how much more left wing the NDP's base of support is. The woman has actively sought out Kissinger's advice while in a position of real power, unlike those Liberal yahoos going in for selfies, and then she bragged about her friendship with him. I mostly don't have faith in Bernie's capacity to govern, both personally and institutionally, and the presidency is a purely executive office. Personally, he has a streak of with-us-or-against-us-itis where he and his campaign are often really quick to impugn dark motives to groups and people who ought to be his natural allies when they don't support him (see Planned Parenthood/that latina activist they slagged), and I'm afraid he surrounds himself with true believers and alienates potential allies too much. He's slow to adapt his language and seems uninterested in learning about issues beyond his core issues (last month, six months after the BLM protests prompted his campaign to change how it talks about race, he still answered "how will you make race relations better" with "we'll put the billionaires in jail"!) Hillary's been a lot better on those two fronts - 30 years of juggling diverse interests and stakeholders prepares you for the presidency better than 30 years of lobbing grenades from outside the system. Institutionally, I just don't think there's an infrastructure for a left president to be successful, and I think the american left is being wrong-headed in pursuing a presidency-first strategy and hoping to replace a liberal with a social democrat at the top of the ticket. I know you agree with me on this - you don't move politics left from within the electoral system, you do it from outside. It doesn't do you any good to elect a president who believes in free college when he's not going to have support from Congress (including much of his own party!), from the states, or even from an activist student movement. I guess I discount his policy positions because of that: single payer's nice, but it's not going to happen. 15$/hour is nice, but it's not going to happen. Free tuition is nice, but it's not going to happen. Legislative outcomes aren't going to start moving left just because Sanders is in the White House instead of Clinton. So when you look at the presidency, my sense is that Clinton would be better at staffing the Labor and Justice departments, better at recognizing and acting on opportunities to use executive action, better at appointing judges. Sanders would get help here, of course, but I just don't think he's interested in the nitty-gritty details of governing. Of course, Clinton has terrible foreign policy judgement, so you have to weigh your sense of the risk she'll make a huge blunder with your sense of how much more competent she'd be. I can understand coming to a different conclusion than me.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:51 |
|
Ofc, I was also dismissive of ANDP's capacity to govern during that election, and they turned out fine. I could be wrong!
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:53 |
|
You were also wrong about Trudeau, you just haven't realized it yet
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 01:21 |
|
Kissinger did 9/11/1973
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 01:27 |
|
Pinterest Mom would make a fantastic Liberal.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 01:43 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Institutionally, I just don't think there's an infrastructure for a left president to be successful, and I think the american left is being wrong-headed in pursuing a presidency-first strategy and hoping to replace a liberal with a social democrat at the top of the ticket. I know you agree with me on this - you don't move politics left from within the electoral system, you do it from outside. It doesn't do you any good to elect a president who believes in free college when he's not going to have support from Congress (including much of his own party!), from the states, or even from an activist student movement. I guess I discount his policy positions because of that: single payer's nice, but it's not going to happen. 15$/hour is nice, but it's not going to happen. Free tuition is nice, but it's not going to happen. Legislative outcomes aren't going to start moving left just because Sanders is in the White House instead of Clinton. I think you're spot on here, but to be fair that's something Sanders has told his own supporters it's just that no one seems to actually listen to the guy. He isn't going to accomplish more than half the things he's promised if everyone votes him into the nominee/presidency and lets Congress remain in Republican hands. Of course American gerrymandering has made that much more difficult to accomplish.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 02:23 |
|
It's all true, he would be an ineffectual president. But I tend to weigh it more in terms of which candidate would cause the least human suffering around the world. And I reject the premise that American misery is more important than anyone else's. So yeah, Sanders.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 02:34 |
|
Maybe having Sanders in the White House wouldn't result in the sweeping changes we'd like to see, but it may shift the Overton window left - which would be nice
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 03:05 |
|
The right controlling Washington is a recent phenomenon, voting for essentially a Republican in the Democrat party because she's good at governing is stupid sorry if this hurts your feelings.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 03:37 |
|
double post, let me add content PT6A posted:What's the price variation like from the entry-level weed to the top-level? https://www.dispensarytoronto.com/menu.html Not gonna out my involvement and prices, so use google. ed2: popular site among adults or people with actual Rx https://www.leafly.com/ Risky Bisquick fucked around with this message at 04:09 on Mar 11, 2016 |
# ? Mar 11, 2016 03:37 |
|
jm20 posted:double post, let me add content I wasn't asking for prices, just the ratio between bottom and top. 2 times? 10 times? 100 times?
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 04:23 |
|
The brilliant kudatah of the ANDP
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 05:13 |
|
THC posted:It's all true, he would be an ineffectual president. But I tend to weigh it more in terms of which candidate would cause the least human suffering around the world. And I reject the premise that American misery is more important than anyone else's. So yeah, Sanders. This is exactly how I feel. It's possible and even likely Sanders won't be able to pass the big policies we'd like to see south of the border, but Clinton probably won't even try. More importantly though, I don't trust our current government not to piggyback on more foreign adventurism, so I think a Sanders presidency would entail less murder at the hands of Americans and Canadians alike.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 05:36 |
|
Even The Rebel is calling them idiots and mocking them on twitter.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 05:48 |
|
Even some conservatives are laughing at these people. Its actually kind of funny in a sad sort of way.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 05:49 |
|
I started working at Statscan a couple of weeks ago and man is that survey ever going to be soul crushing
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 05:55 |
|
So I know this was three pages ago but Mike de Jong does have an email address listed on his constituency page.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 05:58 |
|
PT6A posted:I wasn't asking for prices, just the ratio between bottom and top. 2 times? 10 times? 100 times? You can get to something like :100bux: but as I posted, check your own local dispensary. Now imagine the LCBO selling pot instead of local dispensaries You might even have someone swindle you with a rare strand for like 200++
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 06:58 |
|
jm20 posted:You can get to something like :100bux: but as I posted, check your own local dispensary. Now imagine the LCBO selling pot instead of local dispensaries Huh, I wouldn't have guessed that, but I guess I was wrong. It seems weed does have similar price variation compared to wine. Thanks for the info. If you don't mind me asking another question, it is based on quantitative strength/concentration or qualitative properties?
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 07:50 |
|
jm20 posted:double post, let me add content Wait are you in the industry? PM me.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 07:56 |
|
Furnaceface posted:Even some conservatives are laughing at these people. Its actually kind of funny in a sad sort of way. theyre planning on sending their hand full of petitions to the QUEEN OF ENGLAND now.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 08:16 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 12:51 |
|
They could just ask the Greens how that turns out
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 08:44 |