|
zoux posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/709907123233099776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw I'm really looking forward to seeing how the R-Congress gets themselves outta this one.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 17:04 |
|
So at this point Hillary Clinton is virtually guaranteed the Presidency so long as she doesn't literally die before the election
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:26 |
|
Was Rubio the one that had the weird viral marketing thing where he revealed 1/8 of a puzzle piece screen saying he's running? He should do that again.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:28 |
|
PhazonLink posted:Was Rubio the one that had the weird viral marketing thing where he revealed 1/8 of a puzzle piece screen saying he's running? It was Scott Walker.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:29 |
Bernie lost Ohio, which I think pretty much sinks the last remaining hope that his campaign had. Too bad, I was enjoying watching him pull off the occasional upset. I'm still pretty stoked that he did as well as he did, all things considered.
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:30 |
PhazonLink posted:Was Rubio the one that had the weird viral marketing thing where he revealed 1/8 of a puzzle piece screen saying he's running? That was Scott Walker. If I recall, piece number 2 literally had the letters "PRES" on it so it was an abject failure even as a puzzle. Hey, remember Scott Walker? Good times.
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:30 |
|
VikingofRock posted:Bernie lost Ohio, which I think pretty much sinks the last remaining hope that his campaign had. Too bad, I was enjoying watching him pull off the occasional upset. I'm still pretty stoked that he did as well as he did, all things considered. Same. It will be very interesting to see Clinton's strategy going forward from this point on.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:31 |
|
LeeMajors posted:I will hold my nose and pull the lever for the only moderate Republican running.... Are you out of college? I asked earlier about the makeup of the 7% that won't vote if Bernie loses (he will) because I think the younger democrats won't have your outlook (of just voting anyway).
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:31 |
|
zoux posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/709907123233099776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw I sure as poo poo hope it isn't Garland. So likely Srinavasan, which I have to assume the GOP has some sort of plan for discrediting him as an option. He's been the front runner for years now.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:32 |
|
Fojar38 posted:So at this point Hillary Clinton is virtually guaranteed the Presidency so long as she doesn't literally die before the election Not really? She's pretty much guaranteed the nomination at this point unless Sanders reveals his secret bunker filled with millions of white, liberal, college age voters, but not the presidency. A lot can change in the political climate in the next eight months, and who the hell knows who's going to crawl out of the dark crevice that is a contested GOP convention to claim the nomination.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:34 |
|
VikingofRock posted:Bernie lost Ohio, which I think pretty much sinks the last remaining hope that his campaign had. Too bad, I was enjoying watching him pull off the occasional upset. I'm still pretty stoked that he did as well as he did, all things considered. It still looks like Sanders will accomplish his actual goal: He influenced the narrative a lot, got a lot of attention for his positions, proved they had support, and did it without damaging the chances of beating the Republican. He ran a great campaign and I've got a lot more respect for him than I did at the start.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:35 |
|
VikingofRock posted:Bernie lost Ohio, which I think pretty much sinks the last remaining hope that his campaign had. Too bad, I was enjoying watching him pull off the occasional upset. I'm still pretty stoked that he did as well as he did, all things considered. I expect he'll continue to hang on for a while until he's a mathematical impossibility, and if he's able to close the gap in Illinois he could kinda sorta make a case for still being in the game. But yes, he is functionally done having lost Ohio, and if he loses Illionis as well then Clinton's swept the board tonight which means he's actually done.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:37 |
|
Come on FBI
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:39 |
|
Night10194 posted:It still looks like Sanders will accomplish his actual goal: He influenced the narrative a lot, got a lot of attention for his positions, proved they had support, and did it without damaging the chances of beating the Republican. He ran a great campaign and I've got a lot more respect for him than I did at the start. Best angry Jewish grandpa. He can go rest in the Senate again, fighting the good fight, giving rousing speeches to empty rooms.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:40 |
|
gohmak posted:Come on FBI Trump's sleeper agents in the FBI come up with damning evidence that force Hillary to concede in October, handing Trump the presidency and dooming America to a thousand years of blood and darkness.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:41 |
|
It'd be dumb for Bernie to drop out because with his delegate count doesn't he get a chance to speak at the convention and would lose that by dropping out of the race?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:42 |
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:Got a source for this? http://www.vox.com/2016/3/15/11236618/trump-conservatives-working-class
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:42 |
|
Fojar38 posted:So at this point Hillary Clinton is virtually guaranteed the Presidency so long as she doesn't literally die before the election What I'm curious about is the aftermath. The far right responded agressively after their 2008 defeat. The base is extremely emotionally invested in Trump and even in defeat he's still going to be a thing in American politics. It could lead to another wave of obstructionist right wing congressmen only these will be even more ignorant and hateful as the last.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:42 |
|
Evil Fluffy posted:It'd be dumb for Bernie to drop out because with his delegate count doesn't he get a chance to speak at the convention and would lose that by dropping out of the race? we can let whoever we want speak at the convention
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:42 |
|
Macrame_God posted:The base is extremely emotionally invested in Trump and even in defeat he's still going to be a thing in American politics. I mean, probably not any more than Sarah Palin was. Probably less so because she had the excuse of McCain being a RINO.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:44 |
|
Evil Fluffy posted:It'd be dumb for Bernie to drop out because with his delegate count doesn't he get a chance to speak at the convention and would lose that by dropping out of the race? Bernie sticks it out for the next few months, gives a rousing speech at the Dem convention about the need to tackle Wall Street, universal healthcare, legalize weed, and college debt and tuition, only for Hillary to immediately turn around and go "lol nah."
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:44 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:we can let whoever we want speak at the convention who's this "we"? are you an establishment democrat functionary binow? if so can you hook me up with a cushy gig?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:45 |
|
Sydin posted:I expect he'll continue to hang on for a while until he's a mathematical impossibility, and if he's able to close the gap in Illinois he could kinda sorta make a case for still being in the game. But yes, he is functionally done having lost Ohio, and if he loses Illionis as well then Clinton's swept the board tonight which means he's actually done. His main problem is an inability to win big (and thus eat up delegates) in big states. Instead he's often just barely squeaking by so while Hillary grabs a lion's share in 12 different states he's stuck getting 67 delegates to 60 for Hillary in Michigan, while she's projected to get 120 delegates to his 50 in Florida. and Clinton getting 72 to his 28 in Ohio. It's a bad situation! Evil Fluffy posted:It'd be dumb for Bernie to drop out because with his delegate count doesn't he get a chance to speak at the convention and would lose that by dropping out of the race? I don't think they've prevented any candidate who'd dropped out from speaking at the past couple contested Democratic conventions. He doesn't need to worry about losing the right to speak there.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:45 |
|
I bet Trump is going to love having to split his attention between the RNC, Cruz, Kasich, protest movements, and Clinton while she can spend months just attacking him endlessly Which is to assume, of course, that she'd try to do anything to stop Trump from getting the nom.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:46 |
|
GhostofJohnMuir posted:who's this "we"? are you an establishment democrat functionary binow? if so can you hook me up with a cushy gig? i wish
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:46 |
|
zoux posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/709907123233099776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Garland is almost 64 years old. Sri is 49 and was unanimously confirmed 97-0 by the Senate a few years ago to another court, seems like the obvious pick.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:46 |
|
Your Dunkle Sans posted:Trump's sleeper agents in the FBI come up with damning evidence that force Hillary to concede in October, handing Trump the presidency and dooming America to a thousand years of blood and darkness. I was thinking more like before May
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:47 |
|
Epic High Five posted:I bet Trump is going to love having to split his attention between the RNC, Cruz, Kasich, protest movements, and Clinton while she can spend months just attacking him endlessly I think people are right in saying that this run is no longer fun and games for Trump. I'm almost sort of looking forward to him blasting a gasket and screaming that Hillary is a oval office or that Ted Cruz is a fat gently caress. I'm... Less than enthusiastic about him calling out for protestors to be beaten to a pulp (even more than now).
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:48 |
|
Cigar Aficionado posted:Garland is almost 64 years old. There was a New York Times article a week or two ago that said that Garland was on the list as a sign of respect and some advisers thought that having an older candidate would increase chances of confirmation. NYT quoted sources saying it was unlikely that Garland would be the final nominee. So it's probably Sri.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:49 |
|
See you later, Bernie. You're an awesome dude and you brought a lot to the campaign. I'm going to be very interested to see what Bernie does when he gets to the convention and uses his influence and delegates to write/add planks to the Democrat's party platform.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:49 |
|
fishmech posted:His main problem is an inability to win big (and thus eat up delegates) in big states. Instead he's often just barely squeaking by so while Hillary grabs a lion's share in 12 different states he's stuck getting 67 delegates to 60 for Hillary in Michigan, while she's projected to get 120 delegates to his 50 in Florida. and Clinton getting 72 to his 28 in Ohio. It's a bad situation! And of the large states remaining, New York is going to go for Hillary in probably as large a margin as Florida if not more so, Pennsylvania is probably trending similar to Ohio (I don't know honestly), and California is probably going to be at best an even split. Those three states make up 1000 of the remaining delegates. That's basically it at that point.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:52 |
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:One thing in Trump's favor: almost every contest from here on out is winner-take-all. If Kasich and Cruz continue to split the vote, Trump could still do it. One thing I forgot to add: Trump has another advantage in that many of those winner-take-all states are more favorable to him than Cruz. With Kasich continuing his quixotic campaign in Rubio's stead yet not guaranteed Rubio's support, Trump is still reasonably well positioned to get the 57% he needs.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:54 |
|
Unzip and Attack posted:Same. It will be very interesting to see Clinton's strategy going forward from this point on.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:58 |
|
spacetoaster posted:Are you out of college? I asked earlier about the makeup of the 7% that won't vote if Bernie loses (he will) because I think the younger democrats won't have your outlook (of just voting anyway). I'm 32. As distasteful as Hillary is (corporate whoring, foreverwars, socially progressive only when politically expedient), she is far preferable to any of the GOP contenders.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 02:58 |
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:Listening to Rubio's concession speech. It helps when people actually show up to your rallies Marco. https://twitter.com/ianbremmer/status/709907537504526337 Also, a friend of mine retweeted this and it just seems patently false. Firstly, weren't all conventions brokered until the early 20th century? And looking at wikipedia Eisenhower won on the first ballot although there were questions, he still took first ballot so it was never contested. Am I wrong or am I missing something?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 03:05 |
|
You know what the worst thing about trump is? The way he says "billion" is similar to the way Sagan did. And it makes me sick.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 03:07 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:There was a New York Times article a week or two ago that said that Garland was on the list as a sign of respect and some advisers thought that having an older candidate would increase chances of confirmation. NYT quoted sources saying it was unlikely that Garland would be the final nominee. "Appointed by black man sorry not good enough for scotus."
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 03:10 |
|
LeeMajors posted:I'm 32. This is how I feel. I'd rather vote for Bernie; even if Congress spends the next 4 years behind complete dicks and getting nothing done, at least maybe that will be enough to make the people do something about the problem of a congress that throws little tantrums and shuts down when the Bad Man executive branch says the Socialism word. That said, I'll take 8 years of Hillary being fake over 8 years of Cruz genuinely trying to nullify gay marriages or whatever. Frankly, whatever his message was got lost to me while I was busy freaking out about Trump.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 03:11 |
|
deadly_pudding posted:This is how I feel. I'd rather vote for Bernie; even if Congress spends the next 4 years behind complete dicks and getting nothing done, at least maybe that will be enough to make the people do something about the problem of a congress that throws little tantrums and shuts down when the Bad Man executive branch says the Socialism word. I'm right there with you. Hillary is the only person the GOP hates more than Obama, and they will do everything possible to be as obstructive as possible--which takes time away from their comic book villainry. This is preferable to a Ted Cruz United Megachurch of America Theocratic Regime.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 03:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 17:04 |
|
Awwwwwwwwww Marco dropped out. Try again Marco? Run for governor of um. A state where you are popular.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2016 03:19 |