|
God dammit I thought this was supposed to be Catbug for about 3 seconds. Speaking of Catbug: http://www.deviantart.com/art/DAY-190-Catbug-25-Minutes-374444923 
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 08:43 |
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
any piece of art that depicts frisk with an expression other than -_- is wrong and bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
FlyinPingu posted:any piece of art that depicts frisk with an expression other than -_- is wrong and bad so all of them are wrong and bad?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 01:35
|
|
|
Of all the things to make fanart of, Burgess shale fauna is definitely something I would never have considered 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
FlyinPingu posted:any piece of art that depicts frisk with an expression other than -_- is wrong and bad It kinda does? It just also makes him an old man. Also does this mean Asriel is going to kiss Frisk.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:30
|
|
|
Lumberjack Bonanza posted:My favorite fan theory is that he's actually incredibly goofy, but is neurotically obsessed with being the cool shonen protagonist. My thought- I don't know Jojo backstory that well, I never read the manga- was that he was always so inscrutable because Dio might be watching.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
Mr Tastee posted:It kinda does? It just also makes him an old man. was referring to the super serious anime one posted before that
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
FlyinPingu posted:was referring to the super serious anime one posted before that Oh that one. There's a reason why their eyes are like that, but it's kind of a spoiler.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 07:00
|
|
|
Nearly every part of Undertale has been spoiled by fanart in this thread so that isn't an issue.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 07:02
|
|
|
BillmasterCozb posted:so all of them are wrong and bad? Yes
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 07:12
|
|
|
Machado de Assis posted:Of all the things to make fanart of, Burgess shale fauna is definitely something I would never have considered Somewhere out there is Burgess shale porn.    
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 07:26
|
|
|
These are awesome! I've always wanted a pet Hallucigenia. vvv Yep, the ocean has always been weird. The one with the "trunk" is Opabinia, and the one with the two proboscis' is Anomalocaris vvv Gynocentric Regime has a new favorite as of 08:31 on May 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 07:50
|
|
|
Wait, you're telling me those things were real at one point? Man, I guess even in the past the ocean was weird.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 08:00
|
|
|
You should look up how the anomalocaris was discovered, it rules. They originally thought it was three separate creatures. Primordial sea creatures rule
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
 Right to left, top to bottom. "Miss Yuuukaaa!" "Look at this! I'm raising a dog!"  "Woof. (Master, I am filled with hunger. Present tribute to me immediately...)" "Woof. (If you do not, then the maleficent judgment of Apophis, ancient embodiment of evil, shall be upon your head...)" "Whiiiine. (This is delectable.)" "Isn't he cute..."  "Woof. (Master, I am perforce coming outside with you. Be that as it may, if you insist, I will not refuse to participate in your exercise or what-have-you.)" "(If you refuse this, then the ancient embodiment of evil, Apophi-...)" Sound effects in the last panel is clap clap and SNAP.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 08:15
|
|
|
Kwyndig posted:Wait, you're telling me those things were real at one point? So weird we don't know what end of the Hallucigenia was the butt. And they used to think the spines were it's legs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 08:16
|
|
|
C.M. Kruger posted:So weird we don't know what end of the Hallucigenia was the butt. And they used to think the spines were it's legs. iirc we're vaguely certain we've got it right now, but yeah, historically we reconstructed this one upside down and back to front. An awful lot of the Cambrian fauna fossils are just outlines of the shape of these animals, and it can be very difficult to work out exactly what they are or which way round they should go because (as you can see from the pictures) a lot of the animals don't look enough like contemporary species to provide any guidelines for how they looked when they were alive. If you go further back still, you find the Edicarian biota, which are kind of blobby shapes that scientists aren't entirely sure are animals or plants or something else.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 09:06
|
|
|
Red Bones posted:iirc we're vaguely certain we've got it right now, but yeah, Everyone knows Jesus put those bones there to fool faithless scientists, heretic.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 09:26
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 15:19
|
|
|
He's not fat, he's just big-boned. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 15:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 15:40
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 21:15
|
|
|
My friend made some cool JoJos. Dora  Belle  C.I.A.  http://intergalaxyman.tumblr.com/
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 21:38
|
|
|
 Cuteosphere posted:have you ever created something that immediately made you feel profoundly uncomfortable
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
fleshy echidna posted:Now I'm imagining an ultra lovely Street Fighter 1 version of the Narrator's voice and it's hilarious. Was it as bad as the Blades of Steel voice? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XJlTaBnlrI
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
Googling that username was a mistake, it's like Lisa Frank had a child that liked to draw cats being chopped in half. Not where I expected to end up from a picture of Bubsy. Maybe add a big [TERRIBLE PERSON] warning in the future if you're going to post names.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
So they are made uncomfortable by Bubsy but not bisected cats. Have they tried drawing a bisected Bubsy?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Cicadas! posted:Googling that username was a mistake, it's like Lisa Frank had a child that liked to draw cats being chopped in half. I disagree with that sentiment, but yeah, she does have some gore pics. Sorry about that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Cicadas! posted:Googling that username was a mistake, it's like Lisa Frank had a child that liked to draw cats being chopped in half. Hey, man. You gotta bisect something.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
Mr Tastee posted:I disagree with that sentiment, but yeah, she does have some gore pics. Sorry about that. Do you have to defend every bad fan artist?
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:Do you have to defend every bad fan artist? No, just the cool and cute ones. The gore stuff is things she makes as an alternative to self-harm.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
Mr Tastee posted:No, just the cool and cute ones. Posting cartoon animal abuse on the internet can't be an alternative to self-harm.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
When you google an artist's name on the internet, you are making a compact that you are at least OK with seeing cat-halves.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
The generic cutsey art is more offensive than the gore because its just boring.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
 Why is this JoJo's hat fused with his hair
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:52
|
|
|
Because it's canon. No really, that's just how it is. I guess years of delinquency do that to your hair.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
Swedish Horror posted:Why is this JoJo's hat fused with his hair 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Further evidence:
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 08:43 |
|
|
HGH posted:I guess years of delinquency do that to your hair. So he has unruly hair. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2016 23:06
|
|
