|
shrike82 posted:and corbyn's weakass response gently caress off
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:06 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 18:01 |
|
jabby posted:What would a strong response sound like? given his history of supporting Hamas and Hezbollah, something else?
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:07 |
|
shrike82 posted:the hottest of takes from katie hopkins Get the gently caress out you vile little gobshite
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:07 |
|
shrike82 posted:the hottest of takes from katie hopkins See, now, this is the guy you should be calling a Nazi oval office and inviting to gently caress off every time he speaks.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:07 |
|
Whatever to want to say about shrike82: at least he doesn't boast about pimping his partner out.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:09 |
|
shrike82 posted:something else Scintillating.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:10 |
|
Jedit posted:See, now, this is the guy you should be calling a Nazi oval office and inviting to gently caress off every time he speaks. Now now, there's plenty of gently caress offs to go around.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:17 |
|
That doesn't seem like it needs to be an either or proposition to me.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:24 |
|
jabby posted:What would a strong response sound like? this is from ted cruz which as you can imagine would work wonders
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:25 |
|
Who is responsible for katie hopkins because I feel like her existence and continued ability to speak is causing me more distress than being blown up by terrorists would.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:26 |
|
OwlFancier posted:Who is responsible for katie hopkins because I feel like her existence and continued ability to speak is causing me more distress than being blown up by terrorists would. Fittingly, Donald Trump.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:31 |
|
/\/\ was it the yank one? What is the process for extraditing a presidential candidate I wonder...OwlFancier posted:Who is responsible for katie hopkins because I feel like her existence and continued ability to speak is causing me more distress than being blown up by terrorists would. The apprentice is to blame, lynch alan sugar imo.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:31 |
|
shrike82 posted:and corbyn's weakass response You are a horrible little oval office and the fact that everyone tells you as much should really be ringing alarm bells you racist fuckwit.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:32 |
|
shrike82 posted:something else? You are pissflaps and I clam my 5 pounds.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:32 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I feel like her existence and continued ability to speak is causing me more distress than being blown up by terrorists would. yikes, i'm guessing those that saw loved ones die today would say differently
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:33 |
|
Renaissance Robot posted:Now now, there's plenty of gently caress offs to go around. No need to waste them, though.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:34 |
|
Praseodymi posted:You are pissflaps and I clam my 5 pounds. shrike82 posted:yikes, i'm guessing those that saw loved ones die today would say differently
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:34 |
|
who said anything about victims judging trials? I'm commenting on owlfancier apparently finding katie hopkins more of a problem than deaths from a terror attack
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:35 |
|
Jedit posted:No need to waste them, though. My cup runneth over with gently caress
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:35 |
|
shrike82 posted:yikes, i'm guessing those that saw loved ones die today would say differently Your and katie Hopkins' use of still fresh corpses for snide political point scoring is gross and you should be loving ashamed of yourself you loving piece of poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:36 |
|
Jedit posted:No need to waste them, though. Telling that German fascist to gently caress off is hardly a waste of them.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:36 |
|
shrike82 posted:yikes, i'm guessing those that saw loved ones die today would say differently I hope one day your relatives can count themselves among them.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:36 |
|
shrike82 posted:who said anything about victims judging trials?
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:36 |
|
shrike82 posted:who said anything about victims judging trials? Here's the thing, you don't give a gently caress. You're happy about it. Now gently caress off, you evil little cretin.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:39 |
|
Spangly A posted:future thoughts for Labour: politicise the ACMD, promise to write some legislation that actually makes sense. Which probably won't happen, as it was Labour in the first place that kneecapped the ACMD, and their Home portfolio is one of the few things that's still Blairite in character. (I never understood why Corbyn thought it a good idea to put Andy "almost got sued for libelling Shami Chakrabarti" Burnham in Home. If he wanted to give an olive branch but still draw a line under New Labour, Foreign would have probably been a better idea)
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:40 |
|
It's all part of the master plan. They'll just update his firmware after they win.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:42 |
|
TinTower posted:Which probably won't happen, as it was Labour in the first place that kneecapped the ACMD, and their Home portfolio is one of the few things that's still Blairite in character. I don't know if you noticed but they gave Foreign to another New Labour jobby, Hilary Benn.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:47 |
|
an idiot posted:the hottest of takes from katie hopkins Hope she gets hit by one of your big red bus thingy's.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:50 |
|
Shrike82, I am not by nature a violent man, but I would never tire of stamping on your face, if only to shut you up. You are disingenuously trolling, and hold opinions that would make Goering ashamed. I don't wish death on you, because you should be made to see the error of your scummy, horrendous ways.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:55 |
|
If you all ignored the oval office he'd stop. Arseholes like him and the EuroPol fascist would give it a rest if they didn't get five or ten replies condemning them every time they posted.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 19:59 |
|
Glokta posted:If you all ignored the oval office he'd stop. Arseholes like him and the EuroPol fascist would give it a rest if they didn't get five or ten replies condemning them every time they posted. This isn't true and you know it. He'd keep going, we just wouldn't see it because we wouldn't be looking.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:01 |
|
Renaissance Robot posted:This isn't true and you know it. He'd keep going, we just wouldn't see it because we wouldn't be looking. If we stopped they'd stop. They're a less intelligent Katie Hopkins. Just wait for them to give it a rest/die of epilepsy.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:03 |
|
Fans posted:For those who missed "Nicky Morgan vs The Graph of gently caress You Got Mine" This is brilliant.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:04 |
|
shrike82 posted:yikes, i'm guessing those that saw loved ones die today would say differently I'm sure they would come round after maybe 5 to 8 tweets. E: Like maybe 12 tweets and a headline if they lost their entire family.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:09 |
|
The budget passed because of course it did. The Conservatives plan to tell us how the £4.4 billion gap will be fixed in the Autumn Statement leaving us with a fun mystery of where all that money is going to come from. Will it be the Rich? Will it be the Poor? It'll be the Poor, but you don't get told that till Autumn, the excitement!
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:10 |
|
Something of a public service announcement, but those of you grappling with HMRC might find this new beta service useful. It's accessible through a Government Gateway ID (which you'll have if you have renewed a driving license, or got an EHIC lately) and can be confirmed with some info from your passport for instant access. It'll let you see your tax code, how they've calculated poo poo and make changes to your details and even some corrections without having to wait on the helpline for an eternity. Also, I know everyone always says "check your tax code", but seriously do it. I'd moved jobs this tax year, and they'd added both salaries together, then were coming after me for the massive "underpayment" that didn't actually exist.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:11 |
|
Fans posted:For those who missed "Nicky Morgan vs The Graph of gently caress You Got Mine" The look in her eyes as shes repeatedly hit with what it actually means is brilliant. You can physically see the gears turning in her head as she realises she's said the cabinet don't pay any attention to what the budget actually does.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:15 |
|
Guess what Tory voted for the budget? IDS
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:20 |
|
Fans posted:The budget passed because of course it did. how the gently caress did it pass?
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:20 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 18:01 |
|
JFairfax posted:how the gently caress did it pass? Because voting down the budget would potentially trigger a snap election, which would be a total clusterfuck which virtually nobody actually wants.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2016 20:26 |