|
To be honest it's got to the point where reducing strain on the NHS is just propping up a badly failing system that is rapidly becoming very unsafe. Between the new contract, the capping of locum pay and the mounting deficit something is going to give soon. We've already reached the point where managers are regularly putting lives at risk by deliberately under-staffing to save money. Doing an on-call shift for a lot of doctors means doing your work and the work of the other doctor that should be there. But Trusts are at the point now where they would rather not have a doctor on-call than pay them the going rate, and just let patients take the risk.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 01:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 03:14 |
|
A lot of the public services are being criminally understaffed, same with the police where some parts of Scotland are horribly overworked with too little people and some other places just have nothing to do apparently that they just close up early and call it a day. It's almost like Britain needs new people who are actually good at their job like say, I dunno, people who aren't from Britain that are already trained and wouldn't be spending months to train?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 03:21 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:Presumably he thinks there will be a large enough rebellion for a no confidence vote or for a supply bill to fail. I'm not expecting a no confidence vote: I'm expecting an election due to the combination of the government's tiny majority, the enormous divisions within the party and the fact of David Cameron's upcoming retirement from being Prime Minister. We've already seen in the Sunday Trading Act that the government's majority is too small to pass even the most mildly controversial legislation. Added to that is the looming EU referendum, the most divisive subject possible for the Conservatives and one on which most Tory MP's seem to disagree with the Cabinet view. Added to THAT is David Cameron's declaration that he'll be stepping down soon, which has triggered an arms race among the rivals to succeed him. Things are very, very much less stable than they may appear right now. If the Out vote wins the referendum, I expect things to get incredibly messy and the government will disintegrate in a frenzy of recriminations and bitterness. Result: early election. If the In vote wins, I expect Cameron will face a leadership challenge shortly afterwards (furious Eurosceptic MP's getting their revenge) and the winner will quickly go to the polls to affirm their legitimacy. Either way, I fully expect a fresh general election within 12 months, which is kind of regrettable, because I don't think Labour's ready for it yet.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 06:54 |
|
Yeah, I don't see an election any time in the next 2 years returning anything but another vote in favour of the Tories, or a tie at best. Major central government problems are still being blamed on Labour's legacy or on individual Tories, while many local problems that are still in fact Whitehall's fault are being blamed on councils. Basically I think the Tories have successfully infected the voting public with this idea: Praseodymi posted:DOING SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN DOING NOTHING. TOUGH DECISIONS ETC. Sure they're bad, but they're so close to fixing everything, honest! If you let Labour in now, they'll just drop the ball and then you'll be sorry. Can't even eat a sandwich etc
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 07:36 |
|
Also: Corbyn.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 07:44 |
|
For the last time 'flaps, we don't want another Blair. I'd rather see this country burn than lock it in to a de facto one-party neoliberal hell. e/ loving , N E O L I B E R A L is on a word filter now? Thanks Lowtax. Renaissance Robot fucked around with this message at 07:53 on Apr 2, 2016 |
# ? Apr 2, 2016 07:51 |
|
Blame the american election. What's on the word-filter now then? I know that cuck and cuckservative are, and i think Jeb was at some point, neoliberal is a staple of this thread though I'm not sure how we'll survive without that e: well that's confusing.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 08:21 |
|
hth
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 08:33 |
|
I'm a ne0liberal
Zephro fucked around with this message at 13:50 on Apr 2, 2016 |
# ? Apr 2, 2016 08:36 |
|
Luckily there is no racism in the UK, only common-sense reasonable concern about immigration's effect on hard working families and the purity of glorious british culture and the existence of our people and a future for white children, so talk of the "n-word" should have no ambiguity.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 09:04 |
|
I'm so confused. Is there a list of filtered words now? Is the filtered word oval office? Edit: I guess not
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 09:32 |
|
FinalGamer posted:It's almost like Britain needs new people who are actually good at their job like say, I dunno, people who aren't from Britain that are already trained and wouldn't be spending months to train? Unfortunately we cannot import our government from overseas. Fun, fun, fun as the Tory Exit campaign try to get the NHS on side by saying that paying the EU is why there's no money for the NHS, and not because Tories are repellent scum who would steal the last stale crust from a starving child if they thought they could sell it.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 09:38 |
|
Jedit posted:Unfortunately we cannot import our government from overseas Well we could, had a jolly old try!
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 09:44 |
|
Green Wing posted:I'm so confused. Is there a list of filtered words now? Is the filtered word oval office? Try quoting people's posts to see what the word-filter's concealing.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 09:44 |
|
Pistol_Pete posted:I'm not expecting a no confidence vote: I'm expecting an election due to the combination of the government's tiny majority, the enormous divisions within the party and the fact of David Cameron's upcoming retirement from being Prime Minister. How else are you expecting an election to be called though? Unless there's a no-confidence vote that succeeds, or a supply bill that fails, the next election is in 4 years.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 09:54 |
|
Not sure if anyone's heard these latest theories about Farage's post-referendum plans, supposedly wanting to do a Corbyn but for the right wing:quote:UKIP leader Nigel Farage says he is frustrated he cannot make sweeping changes to the way the party makes policy and recruits members.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 10:19 |
|
Prince John posted:
I can foresee no problems with this suggestion.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 10:30 |
|
KayTee posted:I can foresee no problems with this suggestion. Manifesto McManifestoface
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 10:34 |
|
The most disappointing thing about that poll was the old farts that set it up not appreciating that Clearly no Banks fans on the NERC.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 10:47 |
|
Hey, guy in thread (sorry, terrible with names) who went to the Civil Service assessment centre, how did it go? Did you get the results yet? I kinda feel sorry for the Civil Service. Judging by how my assessment was, what the exercises were and what questions I was asked, as an institution it's pretty left-leaning. Maybe it's difficult to be right-leaning if you actually have to calculate the effect on people of Tory policies, write reports on it, then see them be brushed aside. I think I couldn't handle the job of actually implementing Tory policies.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 10:49 |
|
namesake posted:Manifesto McManifestoface That reminds me of this incredibly vacuous article in GQ Magazine - Corbyn is Labour's Boaty McBoatFace.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 11:09 |
|
GQ Magazine is everybodies toilet paper.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 11:15 |
|
KayTee posted:
Hmm do you think people might take advantage of a low cost membership fee and an open leadership vote to lumber that party with a bad leader?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 11:15 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I once had a kid tell me his dad was bob marley and that he was assasinated by the government. Yeah that's bullshit we all know Danny Baker killed Bob Marley
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 11:19 |
|
Someone on the BBC news this morning described Osbourne's budget as "[being] creepily obsessed with punishing disabled people"
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 11:37 |
|
Zeppelin Insanity posted:I kinda feel sorry for the Civil Service. Judging by how my assessment was, what the exercises were and what questions I was asked, as an institution it's pretty left-leaning. You say that, my dad works in Visas and Immigration and is the most right-wing Thatcherite tory I've ever met, bearing in mind he's an immigrant himself. though he's from Australia, so that probably explains the right-wing part e: actually you're right, apparently everyone else in the office is old-labour or green DarkMalfunction fucked around with this message at 11:44 on Apr 2, 2016 |
# ? Apr 2, 2016 11:40 |
|
Pissflaps posted:Hmm do you think people might take advantage of a low cost membership fee and an open leadership vote to lumber that party with a bad leader? quote:and let members vote online to decide policy. quote:policy The answer to your question is no
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 11:47 |
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:The answer to your question is no So UKIP won't be lumbered with a bad leader in the same way as Labour were?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:05 |
|
Change the record. You are loving boring
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:13 |
|
UKIP will be lumbered with a bad leader due to being a mishmash of people from all over the political spectrum whose only uniting features are being anti-establishment, then chasing a good part of the left half away by making public statements that the gays cause flooding. Allowing online voting on policies won't make their leader any worse. It will probably make them the party that wants to bring back hanging and allow shops to put up 'no coloureds' signs again though. Even though Farage is anti death penalty he has said that he'd bow to democratic pressure from his membership on it if they said so.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:14 |
|
Serotonin posted:Change the record. You are loving boring I'd be concerned if you found me interesting.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:16 |
|
Prince John posted:That reminds me of this incredibly vacuous article in GQ Magazine - Corbyn is Labour's Boaty McBoatFace. Incredibly popular and a winner despite the intentions of the person/s who nominated him?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:23 |
|
Regarde Aduck posted:GQ Magazine is everybodies toilet paper. Naaah. Too glossy. Not enough friction. Firos posted:Someone on the BBC news this morning described Osbourne's budget as "[being] creepily obsessed with punishing disabled people" Any guesses on where I might find that clip?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:24 |
|
Pissflaps posted:Hmm do you think people might take advantage of a low cost membership fee and an open leadership vote to lumber that party with a bad leader? That didn't happen on a scale to make a significant difference in the result.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:31 |
|
Prince John posted:That reminds me of this incredibly vacuous article in GQ Magazine - Corbyn is Labour's Boaty McBoatFace. GQ decided that Osborne was the politician of the year. GQ is the last place you should go for political insight.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:33 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:That didn't happen on a scale to make a significant difference in the result. Hmm so you don't blame them for the selection of a bad leader I see.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:33 |
|
Pissflaps posted:Hmm so you don't blame them for the selection of a bad leader I see. They didn't elect a bad leader. They elected Jeremy Corbyn.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:36 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:They didn't elect a bad leader. They elected Jeremy Corbyn. And you people call me a pedant.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:38 |
|
Pissflaps posted:And you people call me a pedant. Jeremy Corbyn is a good leader.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 03:14 |
|
Pissflaps posted:And you people call me a pedant. Yes people do call you a pedant
|
# ? Apr 2, 2016 12:49 |