|
JimboMaloi posted:heroku or go into the aws ecosystem. elastic beanstalk for your app + RDS for db + apparently you can use SQS with celery. Looked into doing the raw AWS and its a bit too much to deal with right now. Congratulations tef and mononcqc on the $150/month I'm about to start sending you.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 00:45 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 12:28 |
|
more like dICK posted:Looked into doing the raw AWS and its a bit too much to deal with right now. Congratulations tef and mononcqc on the $150/month I'm about to start sending you. if you want a paas for personal stuff or small to med biz use heroku if anyone reading this is a fortune 1000 cto or other cloud decision maker pm me and I'll tell you about our wonderful enterprise paas product
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 00:53 |
GrumpyDoctor posted:just hit 100 unit tests on the "get our codebase under any kind of test coverage at all" project
|
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 00:58 |
|
more like dICK posted:Looked into doing the raw AWS and its a bit too much to deal with right now. Congratulations tef and mononcqc on the $150/month I'm about to start sending you. thanks buddy
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 01:21 |
|
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 01:43 |
|
I'll never tire of seeing that gif pop around
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 01:45 |
|
i love this gif
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 02:20 |
|
i've never seen this gif but it's very good
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 02:24 |
|
Any given cloud provider looked at Oracle and realized they're missing out on everybody with a couple thousand in their pocket and no dev team
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 02:24 |
|
Shaggar posted:distributed version control is garbage and you deserve what happened. he kept everything on his local machine until his project got cancelled and he put in his two weeks notice
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 02:24 |
|
is this just a reference to cost or am i not getting it?
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 02:47 |
|
akadajet posted:is this just a reference to cost or am i not getting it? nah, I made it back when there were rumors of salesforce (who own Heroku) being bought by oracle around mid-2015.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 02:49 |
|
akadajet posted:is this just a reference to cost or am i not getting it?
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 02:53 |
|
GrumpyDoctor posted:just hit 100 unit tests on the "get our codebase under any kind of test coverage at all" project congrats now if i could just get 1...
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 03:17 |
|
these are actually pretty cool, but gently caress them sideways if they think I'm going to reimplement a shortest path algo manually, that is literally what libraries are for
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 03:37 |
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:https://www.codingame.com/start i finally got to try this out and trying to wrap my head around not only Haskell syntax but also functional programming at the same time is breaking me
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 03:40 |
|
HoboMan posted:i finally got to try this out and trying to wrap my head around not only Haskell syntax but also functional programming at the same time is breaking me to be honest it's better that way. no escape hatch means you'll actually need to employ functional programming, and Haskell is a good language to do just that.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 05:49 |
|
yeah but he's correct that haskell syntax is Bad
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 06:47 |
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:yeah but he's correct that haskell syntax is Bad be much better as S-expressions
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 07:24 |
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:yeah but he's correct that haskell syntax is Bad i mostly like it
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 08:38 |
|
Starting the process of rewriting one of my least performant Ruby classes in C as an extension. This has resulted in a 40% loss of performance due to the shimming required to make the functions work that haven't yet been rewritten in C. However, one of the bright sides is that since Ruby supports monkey-patching you can move stuff over piecemeal while making sure it doesn't break anything. ErIog fucked around with this message at 08:42 on Apr 14, 2016 |
# ? Apr 14, 2016 08:40 |
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:yeah but he's correct that haskell syntax is Bad im the +.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 08:40 |
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:yeah but he's correct that haskell syntax is Bad correct, it got a lot better in Elm and Idris
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 14:23 |
|
monadic IO is really loving annoying
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:18 |
|
like i just wanna get this file into ghci as a string so i can poke at it interactively better but noooooo
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:25 |
|
"i'm sorry you didn't answer in the form of a function call so you get no points" e: all you functional programming people crying about how you can't use a functional language to get a job makes feel me good about loving hating it HoboMan fucked around with this message at 15:35 on Apr 14, 2016 |
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:31 |
|
functional programming ideas are going to continue to sneak into popular langs so you may as well get used to it, terrible programmer
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:46 |
|
HoboMan posted:"i'm sorry you didn't answer in the form of a function call so you get no points" take some time to at least understand the benefits of functional programming and why its advocates are so passionate. i dont do functional languages, obviously, but i try to use a functional style in my code where all data a function needs goes in as parameters and all data that comes out of the function comes out via return value. there's obviously plenty of exceptions where i will use out params or global state but only if i dont think things can be done fairly cleanly as a true function. it helps you stay away from the sort of monstrosities you're apparently working with now, and it's something you might want to consider refactoring towards as you try to fix the codebase youre stuck with.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:47 |
|
although I say a hardy "gently caress You" to Purestrain Functional Programming True Believers
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:47 |
|
i saw some comment on the internet that compared FP zealots to libertarians and not only is that a good comparison i'd bet that most FP zealots are actual libertarians
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:49 |
|
functional languages are good. but so are imperative ones and declarative ones. choose the right tool for the job, imo. java/c# in the streets, racket in the sheets.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:53 |
|
i like functions that return functionsJavaScript code:
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:53 |
|
I have a job with a functional language AMA
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:54 |
|
same. clojure or racket i forget which (maybe its a common term) has a function called "trampoline" which keeps calling a function until it stops returning a function. idk i find it humorous
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:55 |
|
i have a job with a dysfunctional language
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:55 |
|
The last thing I was working on before this was a nio storage backend for a clojure app. Clojure is cool as hell and functional programming is usually OK.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:58 |
|
AWWNAW posted:i saw some comment on the internet that compared FP zealots to libertarians and not only is that a good comparison i'd bet that most FP zealots are actual libertarians things that are immutable: * haskell * the blockchain
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:59 |
|
HoboMan posted:e: all you functional programming people crying about how you can't use a functional language to get a job makes feel me good about loving hating it HoboMan posted:i just got hired as a C# dev with zero experience, i have found my new home in this thread
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 15:59 |
|
Today I needed an admin GUI for a config database so I just pointed django at it and had it auto generated
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 16:00 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 12:28 |
|
i mean doing a thing in a pure functional language can be a fun puzzle and can make you feel clever as gently caress, but gently caress ever having to modify it ever
|
# ? Apr 14, 2016 16:00 |