Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
bowmore
Oct 6, 2008



Lipstick Apathy

LibertyCat posted:

Greens plan to raise refugee intake to 50,000


This certainly won't hurt jobs and encourage people smugglers, resulting in more deaths at sea. How many terrorists will this bring into the country?
gently caress you, you are a piece of poo poo.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

bowmore
Oct 6, 2008



Lipstick Apathy
I have no problems saying that to you because you clearly lost your humanity some time ago.

Negligent
Aug 20, 2013

Its just lovely here this time of year.
lol, you know shorten is a tory piece of poo poo right? his mother in law is dame quentin bryce. loving lol if you think he is any less neoliberal than turnbull.

TheIllestVillain
Dec 27, 2011

Sal, Wyoming's not a country

LibertyCat posted:

I am not kidding when I say I was more moved during the events of the Mass Effect series than I ever was by the works of Beethoven or Leonardo da Vinci.

:captainpop:

Skellybones
May 31, 2011




Fun Shoe

Anidav posted:

Economic Inequality Complaints Are Just A Cover For Anti-Rich Prejudice
It’s not fair to blame individuals for other people’s wrongdoing. Yet we let envy-peddlers get away with it when unfairly attacking rich people.
APRIL 14, 2016 By Don Watkins
In the wake of the endless controversies surrounding Donald Trump’s campaign, it’s easy to forget that most of us rightfully pride ourselves on our opposition to racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of unjust discrimination. But we rarely even discuss another prevalent form of prejudice: the demonization and dehumanization of the successful. This prejudice is central to today’s chief economic concern: the campaign against economic inequality.

Not everyone worried about our economic challenges is bigoted, of course. There are real problems we all should be concerned about, whether it’s declining opportunity (especially for those starting at the bottom), slowing economic progress, the pitiful state of education, or the political favors bestowed on some businesses.

In our new book on inequality, “Equal Is Unfair: America’s Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality,” my co-author Yaron Brook and I address those problems and many others. But whatever one’s view of our challenges, nothing can justify the way many—including presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders—are treating those who have achieved economic success.

The Double Standards for Rich People
Consider just a few of the behaviors that inequality critics apparently consider acceptable when dealing with wealthy Americans.

Collective Judgments. Virtually everyone agrees we should judge people by their actions and the content of their character, not by the (real or manufactured) sins or shortcomings of other members of whatever group they happen to belong to.

Replace ‘the rich’ with ‘Hispanics’ or ‘women’ or ‘Jews’ in that sentence, and ask yourself: isn’t this precisely the sort of prejudice we object to when it is targeted at other groups?
Regarding businessmen, for example, we should condemn those who lie, cheat, and steal. But we should condemn them as individuals for their dishonest and predatory actions. By the same token, we should praise individuals who earn their wealth through ingenuity and effort—not make them pay for other people’s sins.

Yet what we hear from today’s inequality critics is across-the-board denunciations of successful businessmen. Sanders contends “the business model of Wall Street”—which employees hundreds of thousands of productive Americans—“is fraud.” A headline for a Sean McElwee article in Salon tells us “Rich white people are ruining the planet.” Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett write in their popular book “The Spirit Level” that “Rather than adopting an attitude of gratitude toward the rich, we need to recognize what a damaging effect they have on the social fabric.” Replace “the rich” with “Hispanics” or “women” or “Jews” in that sentence, and ask yourself: isn’t this precisely the sort of prejudice we object to when it is targeted at other groups?

Dehumanization. Prejudice encourages dehumanization—it encourages demonizing “the other” so they are seen as less than human and therefore unworthy of respect. This is precisely what inequality critics are trying to do to “the 1 percent.”

To take just one example, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has claimed that rich Americans are “less likely to exhibit empathy, less likely to respect norms and even laws, more likely to cheat, than those occupying lower rungs on the economic ladder”—they are, in short, “spoiled egomaniacs.” Well, if so, what concern should we have for their rights and their dignity?

The Wealthy Are People, Too
A common myth is that you cannot be a victim of injustice unless you are powerless or disadvantaged, or that an injustice is okay if it’s aimed at someone who isn’t powerless or disadvantaged. But those are nothing more than crude rationalizations for injustice.

Isn’t it an indictment of our society when good people are treated like villains?
We need to ask ourselves: Do we really think of rich individuals as human beings? Or do we view them as cartoon villains—one-dimensional stereotypes not dissimilar to the caricatures propagated by racists, misogynists, and Jew-haters?

When I discuss unfair treatment of successful businessmen, I almost always hear comments like, “Oh, boohoo. What do the rich have to complain about? Look at everything they have!” This reflects a crass materialism, which amounts to the notion that money solves everything, and that no one can be hurt by or object to mistreatment unless he’s poor.

But have we ever stopped to ask ourselves: What if a rich individual’s dreams mean as much to him as my dreams do to me? What if he wants to be respected for his achievements the way I want to be respected for mine? What if he has made himself into a moral human being—doesn’t he deserve respect and admiration, and isn’t it an indictment of our society when good people are treated like villains?

A Cynical Justification for Government-Sponsored Injustice
Exploitation. When prejudice gets injected into the political system, it leads to the government inflicting tremendous injustices on the victims.

All of it is aimed at erasing the knowledge that economically successful individuals are human beings and that exploiting other human beings is wrong.
More and more, our political system treats economically successful Americans as resources for “society’s” desires rather than as sovereign individuals with an inalienable right to their own pursuit of happiness. Witness, for example, the plans Democratic candidates have for this country. Free health care—paid for by “the rich.” Free college—paid for by “the rich.” Larger Social Security payments—paid for by “the rich.”

Of course, these demands are supported by the claim that “the rich” aren’t paying their “fair share.” Set aside the fact that affluent Americans bear the vast, vast majority of the tax burden. Do we ever so much as ask: Did they honestly earn their money? Did they gain it by dealing voluntarily with other people, through an incalculable number of win-win trades? Don’t they have a right to use their wealth to pursue their own hopes and dreams—the same way we each have the right to use our wealth to pursue our hopes and dreams?

No, we don’t ask those questions. Preventing us from asking those questions is the goal of the demonization and dehumanization of “the rich.” Whether it’s President Obama dismissing individual achievement when he declares “you didn’t build that,” or Sanders claiming it is immoral for some people to prosper while others are struggling, or Barbara Ehrenreich arguing that “To the extent that any demonization is going on, one can’t help thinking that the rich have been, perhaps inadvertently, asking for it”—all of it is aimed at erasing the knowledge that economically successful individuals are human beings and that exploiting other human beings is wrong.

Stripping the Rewards of Virtue
This is prejudice, plain and simple. What’s worse, it is not directed toward traits that have no bearing on a person’s character, it is directed at something that is in fact a moral achievement.

Business success—that is, making a profit through productive achievement, not special favors from Washington—is something that deserves our respect and admiration. As we argue in “Equal Is Unfair,” this kind of success is enormously difficult, and it is profoundly virtuous.

We live in an advanced technological society, and enjoy a level of wealth, health, comfort, and opportunity that our ancestors could not have dreamed of. What made it possible? The effort of producers, on every level of ability, but with the most credit going to the men and women of extraordinary ability: the inventors, entrepreneurs, and investors who drive progress—and earn a fortune in the process.

It’s time we stopped saying “screw you” and started saying “thank you.”

Holy moly :eyepoop:

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Die Rich Scum.

tithin
Nov 14, 2003


[Grandmaster Tactician]




Yes, all this anti-rich propaganda is just the same thing as the persecution of minorities who face persecution for no other reason than the colour of their skin, their nationality, their religion or their sexual orientation, all things that are not under their control

hating rich people is exactly the same because...

Starshark
Dec 22, 2005
Doctor Rope

tithin posted:

Yes, all this anti-rich propaganda is just the same thing as the persecution of minorities who face persecution for no other reason than the colour of their skin, their nationality, their religion or their sexual orientation, all things that are not under their control

hating rich people is exactly the same because...

Well in a lot of cases, they were born that way. They can't help what they are. And part of their DNA is just naturally slashing wages, making working conditions worse, loving the environment irreparably, etc, etc.

Nibbles!
Jun 26, 2008

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

make australia great again as well please

tithin posted:

Yes, all this anti-rich propaganda is just the same thing as the persecution of minorities who face persecution for no other reason than the colour of their skin, their nationality, their religion or their sexual orientation, all things that are not under their control

hating rich people is exactly the same because...

We'll, people are born rich....

LibertyCat
Mar 5, 2016

by WE B Bourgeois
In a way it's actually worse.

You can't help being asian, female etc. Discrimination against those groups is bad but it can't stop them being asian or female.

Some people have worked their backsides off and ended up rich - which is a good thing. We want people to work hard, take risks, and end up well off. Discrimination against those people is worse because it discourages them from trying to end up rich in the first place.

pray for my aunt
Feb 13, 2012

14980c8b8a96fd9e279796a61cf82c9c

LibertyCat posted:

In a way it's actually worse.

You can't help being asian, female etc. Discrimination against those groups is bad but it can't stop them being asian or female.

Some people have worked their backsides off and ended up rich - which is a good thing. We want people to work hard, take risks, and end up well off. Discrimination against those people is worse because it discourages them from trying to end up rich in the first place.

you are a caricature

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Everyone pray for Bronwyn Bishop plz.

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again

LibertyCat posted:

In a way it's actually worse.

You can't help being asian, female etc. Discrimination against those groups is bad but it can't stop them being asian or female.

Some people have worked their backsides off and ended up rich - which is a good thing. We want people to work hard, take risks, and end up well off. Discrimination against those people is worse because it discourages them from trying to end up rich in the first place.

Lol this confirms you are a troll.

Skellybones
May 31, 2011




Fun Shoe
Some rich people, I assume, are good people. I mean they can't ALL be cartoonish villains, right? :shrug:

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
1%ers who give back to society are just as rare as 1%ers themselves.

Tax havens exist because the ultra rich don't want to contribute to our society. They want to contribute to theirs.

Cleretic
Feb 3, 2010


Ignore my posts!
I'm aggressively wrong about everything!

Skellybones posted:

Some rich people, I assume, are good people. I mean they can't ALL be cartoonish villains, right? :shrug:

Of course there's good rich people. Warren Buffett's pretty good from what I know, there's not much bad you can say about Dick Smith these days, everything I've ever heard about the recently-deceased head of Nintendo paints him as exactly what you would hope the head of Nintendo would be like.

But their existence doesn't negate the influence of people like Rhinehart.

Nibbles!
Jun 26, 2008

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

make australia great again as well please
Even after you increase taxes on rich people, they're still rich :shrug:

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)
Good thing this only applies to liberals and not Marxists who recognise that it is not wealth in itself that is the problem, but the exploitative ways in which capital is employed that is the problem.

iajanus
Aug 17, 2004

NUMBER 1 QUEENSLAND SUPPORTER
MAROONS 2023 STATE OF ORIGIN CHAMPIONS FOR LIFE



LibertyCat posted:

In a way it's actually worse.

You can't help being asian, female etc. Discrimination against those groups is bad but it can't stop them being asian or female.

Some people have worked their backsides off and ended up rich - which is a good thing. We want people to work hard, take risks, and end up well off. Discrimination against those people is worse because it discourages them from trying to end up rich in the first place.

That's some quality trolling right there :golfclap:

Skellybones
May 31, 2011




Fun Shoe
"I wanted to apply for a job but the interviewer saw on my resume that I was a former CEO of IBM and just laughed in my face, saying they didn't employ rich people."

"I was walking down the street and people kept crossing to avoid me. I know it's because I'm rich."

"The police keep harassing me. Every minor charge they can get away with making up, they lay it on me, just because I'm rich. Next time I see the Police Commissioner at the golf course I'll have a word with him."

"I keep hearing rude jokes about rich people being stupid or greedy or evil. Whatever happened to making fun of the negros and orientals?"

"It's subtle, but I feel like I'm treated differently when I go out with my family. Waiters will ignore me when I try to order, security guards keep a close eye on me, people stare at me and whisper. It's because I'm rich."

Futuresight
Oct 11, 2012

IT'S ALL TURNED TO SHIT!

Don Watkins posted:

Economic Inequality Complaints Are Just A Cover For Anti-Rich Prejudice

Importing from the Israel/Palestine play book is pretty funny.

Pale Ale
Sep 10, 2001

Yeah I know that but do you honestly expect England to even slightly challenge Australia in the finals? They will be demolished.

Jumpingmanjim posted:

Everyone pray for Bronwyn Bishop plz.

Didn't work she's dumped

Chadzok
Apr 25, 2002

Anidav posted:

Economic Inequality Complaints Are Just A Cover For Anti-Rich Prejudice
It’s not fair to blame individuals for other people’s wrongdoing. Yet we let envy-peddlers get away with it when unfairly attacking rich people.
APRIL 14, 2016 By Don Watkins
In the wake of ... [a whole lot of bullshit ..]
It’s time we stopped saying “screw you” and started saying “thank you.”

Wikipedia posted:

Don Watkins is an American author, columnist and professional speaker, who currently serves as a fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute, a non-profit organization in Irvine, California, that ..

Ah, good. This person's opinion doesn't actually matter.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Maybe Bronnie can get a shoe on sky news now.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Today marks the end of a long and undistinguished career.

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
Where is the news coverage of Bishop coming from?

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

It's coming from INSIDE THE PARTY

The Lord Bude
May 23, 2007

ASK ME ABOUT MY SHITTY, BOUGIE INTERIOR DECORATING ADVICE
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/bronwyn-bishops-career-over-after-her-party-dumps-her-20160416-go8180.html

In a way I'm disappointed because now we won't get to see her crash and burn against Dick Smith.

What would be the greater humiliation, losing preselection or running and then losing the seat to an independent? Discuss.

The Lord Bude fucked around with this message at 12:18 on Apr 16, 2016

asio
Nov 29, 2008

"Also Sprach Arnold Jacobs: A Developmental Guide for Brass Wind Musicians" refers to the mullet as an important tool for professional cornet playing and box smashing black and blood
It wasn't until I had children of my own that I developed empathy for other people, this is how a healthy human being thinks, vote liberal

Bifauxnen
Aug 12, 2010

Curses! Foiled again!


Lol I could try to make enough money to buy a house just how I want it and never have to worry about finding lovely rentals again, or dealing with landlords again, and make enough that I could retire and never worry about job searching again, or financial stability again, and travel around doing whatever the gently caress I wanted, buying whatever I wanted... but... I don't know man, I just feel so discouraged cause people hate rich people so much!

Other
Jul 10, 2007

Post it easy!

Anidav posted:

Economic Inequality Complaints Are Just A Cover For Anti-Rich Prejudice

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Bronwyn will run on the Liberal Democrat ticket and win.

Zenithe
Feb 25, 2013

Ask not to whom the Anidavatar belongs; it belongs to thee.

quote:

But with a lot of the 1%ers, it's not their fault they're in the 1%. They were just born there, they've done literally nothing to get there. Picking on them is literally the same as racism

DAAS Kapitalist
Nov 9, 2005

Jackass: The Mad Monk

Don't try this at home.

Anidav posted:

Lol this confirms you are a troll.

How thick do you have to be to not have worked that out six weeks ago?

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Jumpingmanjim posted:

Bronwyn will run on the Liberal Democrat ticket and win.

More likely Bronwyn will form and run under the 'Bow to me you plebs' party and lose horribly.

Recoome
Nov 9, 2013

Matter of fact, I'm salty now.

LibertyCat posted:

In a way it's actually worse.

You can't help being asian, female etc. Discrimination against those groups is bad but it can't stop them being asian or female.

Some people have worked their backsides off and ended up rich - which is a good thing. We want people to work hard, take risks, and end up well off. Discrimination against those people is worse because it discourages them from trying to end up rich in the first place.

Futuresight
Oct 11, 2012

IT'S ALL TURNED TO SHIT!
There are many cures for wealth.

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again

DAAS Kapitalist posted:

How thick do you have to be to not have worked that out six weeks ago?

Well look, you read this thread for a few years and figure there's the occasional new face whose entitled to their views but the Dollar Cat has been reaching lately.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
The guillotine won't discriminate against the rich, don't worry.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008

  • Locked thread