|
How much to buy it outright/on a mortgage?
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 15:27 |
|
|
Who can, hand on their heart, truthfully say that they've never had a threeesome with a married individual? Judge not lest ye be judged.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
Can't you just google it if you're curious?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
Pork Pie Hat posted:The Court of Appeal has said that the 'celebrity threesome' injunction will, pending a legal challenge, be lifted in two days. So on Wednesday we finally get to officially find out it's about yeah right. I really want Carter-Ruck suing me. Is this the thing about Elton Johns' boyfriend getting bored about loving an old man? Sorry, husband.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:18
|
|
|
General China posted:Is this the thing about Elton Johns' boyfriend getting bored about loving an old man? What's the need in this? What are you trying to imply?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:21
|
|
|
Yeah its a stupid story nobody really cares about except its another attempt to pay to keep a secret inside our insular magical kingdom.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:22
|
|
|
£76k in 1999
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:23
|
|
|
Jakabite posted:What's the need in this? What are you trying to imply? I'm not implying anything. I thought the story was about one man getting bored with loving another older man. So he played away. I admit it is a boring story, pedestrian, if you will.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
General China posted:Is this the thing about Elton Johns' boyfriend getting bored about loving an old man? What wonderful homophobia nopantsjack posted:Yeah its a stupid story nobody really cares about except its another attempt to pay to keep a secret inside our insular magical kingdom. There's literally no public interest outside of satisfying curtain twitchers and the press.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:
what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:27
|
|
Jose's Jose av.
|
Total Meatlove posted:What wonderful homophobia How is what Gen China said homophobic, for the avoidance of doubt?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:30
|
|
|
General China posted:I'm not implying anything. I thought the story was about one man getting bored with loving another older man. So he played away. They apparently have an open relationship. It wasn't even cheating. It's the least interesting story ever.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:31
|
|
|
Total Meatlove posted:What wonderful homophobia To quote the most wonderful Mrs Merton " what first attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels " Sorry, that doesn't really answer the question of homophobia. Yeah, I can see your point. It was a quick, unthought out edit. I do apologise. They are married. I maybe a homophobe, I'm not really sure. In much the way a racist may offer a defence- I offer that I spent my early 20s off my tits on Es in Heaven most Friday nights. General China fucked around with this message at 16:40 on Apr 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
forkboy84 posted:They apparently have an open relationship. It wasn't even cheating. It's the least interesting story ever. But will almost certainly have an impact on their kids. The idea of the whole playground and all your friends mums and dads knowing intimate details of your parents sex lives. The whole thing is a pile of poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
haakman posted:How is what Gen China said homophobic, for the avoidance of doubt? He knowingly underplayed the nature of their relationship then corrected himself in way intended to cast aspersions at the validity of all homosexual marriages.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:He knowingly underplayed the nature of their relationship then corrected himself in way intended to cast aspersions at the validity of all homosexual marriages. Maybe he just didn't know they were married. It's not that unusual for couples to live together and have children without getting married first (regardless of the gender of the couple).
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:36
|
|
|
Total Meatlove posted:There's literally no public interest outside of satisfying curtain twitchers and the press. Reminds me of the press's obsession with the fact John Hemming (former MP for Birmingham Yardley) played away from home with the full understanding of his wife. After spending years trying to shame him for being sleazy he then nominated himself for the News of the World's Love Rat of the Year award.  To be honest, I think the fact that a Cabinet secretary has been having sexual relations with a woman in a profession he wants to criminalise is a much more important story.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:36
|
|
|
haakman posted:How is what Gen China said homophobic, for the avoidance of doubt? Clearly knew the couple were married, but called him the boyfriend anyway. Implying the marriage is not genuine. If he didn't mean to imitate the conservative line that same-sex marriages aren't as valid as opposite sex, then that was an unfortunate fork of words to use
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:37
|
|
|
hookerbot 5000 posted:Maybe he just didn't know they were married. It's not that unusual for couples to live together and have children without getting married first (regardless of the gender of the couple). Did he discover their marital status half way through writing his two sentence post?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
I think what ever Elton John and his husband get up to behind closed doors and with their full agreement and consent of all adults involved is not newsworthy and frankly they seem happy and there is no public interest in exposing details of an arrangement that everyone seems okay with.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Did he discover their marital status half way through writing his two sentence post? I can believe it. Forethought and planning isn't exactly a Maoist thing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
JFairfax posted:I think what ever Elton John and his husband get up to behind closed doors and with their full agreement and consent of all adults involved is not newsworthy and frankly they seem happy and there is no public interest in exposing details of an arrangement that everyone seems okay with. But what if they were papists.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Did he discover their marital status half way through writing his two sentence post? or an edit - if you do it quickly they don't show up. I have no idea though, maybe he is a giant homophobe.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:42
|
|
|
john hemming is an arrogant poo poo and a lib dem
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
hookerbot 5000 posted:or an edit - if you do it quickly they don't show up. I'm a student of the posting game. Trust me: he's a giant homophobe.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
hookerbot 5000 posted:or an edit - if you do it quickly they don't show up. you'd be more likely to correct the actual word than stick it on the end in that case
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
Phoon posted:john hemming is an arrogant poo poo and a lib dem I'm not going to argue. Though he's not bad on the piano.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
TinTower posted:But what if they were papists. Well that's their own business, but frankly I think gay people who are practicing members of of the Catholic church are a bit like black folk who join the KKK, a little misguided.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
The thought of two married men genuflecting with a third makes me feel physically sick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
Phoon posted:john hemming is an arrogant poo poo and a lib dem John Hemming once tried to force his way upstairs in the pub I work in as he'd lost his coat and want to check the cctv to find 'the thieves', he is a massive rear end but I got to mock him the day after he lost his seat. TinTower posted:Reminds me of the press's obsession with the fact John Hemming (former MP for Birmingham Yardley) played away from home with the full understanding of his wife. After spending years trying to shame him for being sleazy he then nominated himself for the News of the World's Love Rat of the Year award. The bad thing about this was when Hemming's wife stole his mistress' cat afterwards. Things like this make me sad http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/n...m-34635796.html paramilitaries and those who are support them are loving twats. StoneOfShame fucked around with this message at 16:59 on Apr 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:55
|
|
|
Darth Walrus posted:I can believe it. I can take the homophobia accusation on the chin. I don't like to think I am, but I may be wrong. Educate me. But you can gently caress off the Maoist poo poo. I'm all about the Juche.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
TinTower posted:Though he's not bad on the piano. I thought we were not meant to be judging people for their private relationships and here you go measuring his pianist skill
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:57
|
|
|
TinTower posted:But what if they were papists. None of the above applies to same sex marriages for the same reason that it doesn't apply to any marriage conducted outside the Church of Rome.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
 his wife stole his lover's cat. top top entertainment
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
cargohills posted:What if a poster isn't from England or Wales? Doesn't matter where they're from, it's where they are. An American in London posting it is hosed, an Englishman in New York isn't.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
*checks Sting's twitter*
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
nopantsjack posted:Yeah its a stupid story nobody really cares about except its another attempt to pay to keep a secret inside our insular magical kingdom. I'm almost tempted to post a half-hearted defence of the superinjunction because in the absence of any meaningful privacy law in this country it's about the only way you can try and keep a secret if a national newspaper decides that it wants to publish it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 17:17
|
|
|
Why does anyone care about pyjamas when Star Wars came out on DVD and Bluray today? Get some perspective, people.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:I'm almost tempted to post a half-hearted defence of the superinjunction because in the absence of any meaningful privacy law in this country it's about the only way you can try and keep a secret if a national newspaper decides that it wants to publish it. Nah. You can be a minister and enter into a disturbing blackmail/mexican standoff arrangement instead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 15:27 |
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:Doesn't matter where they're from, it's where they are. An American in London posting it is hosed, an Englishman in New York isn't. I think that means that I can post it then! Or not, because I can't be arsed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2016 17:38
|
|
