|
Just announced, five minutes OT kicking each way, if scores are tied at the end of the ten minutes, the siren won't sound for the second period and play will continue until the next score which will win the match
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 07:45 |
|
|
Memento posted:The AFL Commission is meeting today, and one thing on their agenda is whether or not to play a Grand Final again in the event of a draw. Clearly if they decide that the status quo regarding that is acceptable then they're shitwits of the highest order, but does anyone know if they're also going to be discussing the 2012 Brownlow? Possibly? But if they do nothing will be put into place until the appeal by the players is done. Even if the appeal won't effect their suspension it would/could change their status as drug cheats so they are probably in a holding pattern until that goes through. Re GF replay: I can see them doing some loving moronic poo poo where if there is an interstate team involved they will add extra time so they/their supporters don't have to come back at short notice. But then if it's two Victorian teams they'd uphold VFL traditions or something and do a replay for the extra $$ which I'm sure they are not wanting to miss a chance at. Hopefully sanity prevails. e: ^^ sanity prevails.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:29
|
|
|
Carlton v Collingwood is now on election night. Imagine if a loss there is the game that kills Bucks. Turnbull/Shorten + Buckley all in one day! e: man, Facebook comments on articles don't like this change. "Leave the game alone!" "Whatever happened to tradition!" "This means st kilda should have won the 2010 premiership!" I think Facebook is worse than bigfooty these days. Last time I checked bigfooty was when it was said that Hep was looking to sue the club and I was surprised how many people in the Essendon forum were completely agreeing with him and thought he had every right, whilst on Facebook... thepokey fucked around with this message at 07:35 on Apr 19, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:32
|
|
|
10 minutes is a pretty short OT.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:36
|
|
|
Negligent posted:10 minutes is a pretty short OT. isnt thats what is in place for elimination/prelim finals anyway?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:39
|
|
|
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/western-bulldogs-early-banner-of-the-year-contender/news-story/544ba460d8a1395046f9ef60d2c7264e Doggies banners greatest hits
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:40
|
|
|
snaeksikn posted:isnt thats what is in place for elimination/prelim finals anyway? Yep, it's uniform across all finals now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:41
|
|
|
Guess we have to look to the tribunal for today's AFL idiocy
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 07:46
|
|
|
Negligent posted:10 minutes is a pretty short OT.  CAREYA bit of debate about whether the winning score should be a point or a goal, well, a point's good enough if the other team hasn't been able to nail it. I actually like the idea of not blowing the siren until there's a decisive score rather than having a second reset. I will miss the shrieking about ruined weddings though like we got in 2010.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:24
|
|
|
I'm fine with a point because a point would have been enough to end it within the OT.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:26
|
|
|
I think a goal would be funner to watch though. Teams would have to approach offense differently if they actually needed to get a good shot on goal. With a behind they'll just launch it from a mile out and try to get a rushed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:28
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:I think a goal would be funner to watch though. Teams would have to approach offense differently if they actually needed to get a good shot on goal. With a behind they'll just launch it from a mile out and try to get a rushed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfSpjX82Ij8 I mean, in rugby they have golden points all the time, a field goal's good enough for that. (About the only time you see them is in tight games.) Just as long as they keep draws a thing in the home-and-away because I like the existential angst and also because they break up the ladder nicely.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:33
|
|
|
Testekill posted:http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/western-bulldogs-early-banner-of-the-year-contender/news-story/544ba460d8a1395046f9ef60d2c7264e the one about the giants is great
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:35
|
|
|
May plead guilty. Just waiting to see how many years he gets.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:40
|
|
|
The Deadly Hume posted:I will miss the shrieking about ruined weddings though like we got in 2010. This unironically
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:41
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:May plead guilty. Just waiting to see how many years he gets. Pleas aren't supposed to count for anything when referred directly to tribunal, but this is the AFL so
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 08:51
|
|
|
quote:6:03pm: Tony Burns is now summarising for the Tribunal. He says the suggestion from Gleeson QC that this could fit into intentional is "the most unfair thing I've ever heard put in this Tribunal (and) I ask you to reject it." Chairman Ross Howie directs the jury not to consider the possibility it was intentional.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:09
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Hahahhaha I didn't realise Gold Coast in addition to having Melbourne's first round pick this year, have the second rounders of: Richmond, Fremantle, Port Adelaide. lol Right when those clubs could all use a few high draft picks too. Didn't Collingwood trade away their picks this year as well?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:14
|
|
|
Grand final replays are good you people consistently have bad opinions
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:15
|
|
|
Well Freo and Port got Bennell and Dixon out of the deal, so they could've been done worse.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:16
|
|
|
realbez posted:Grand final replays are good you people consistently have bad opinions Any grand final where you can walk away not having a clear winner is a bad grand final this isnt under 11 auskick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:19
|
|
|
does the interchange cap have a provision for extra time?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:22
|
|
|
The siren doesn't sound to signify golden point? That is truely idiotic.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:26
|
|
|
Gleeson wants at least least five weeks for May, could get longer based on priors
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:31
|
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:lol Yeah Collingwood traded their first pick away 
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:41
|
|
|
Testekill posted:Gleeson wants at least least five weeks for May, could get longer based on priors They were talking about having the early guilty plea and the prior record cancelling each other out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:43
|
|
|
5 matches. Weak as piss yet again tribunal. The AFL can crow all they want about how the head is sacrosanct, but their systems yet again fail when it actually counts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:44
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:They were talking about having the early guilty plea and the prior record cancelling each other out. Yeah, looks like that's how it went. 5 weeks. Good job dumbass.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 09:44
|
|
|
Guilty pleas are meant to have nothing to do with it once it is referred to the tribunal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:02
|
|
|
realbez posted:Guilty pleas are meant to have nothing to do with it once it is referred to the tribunal. Even the prosecutor was trying to put in mitigating circumstances. hosed system.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:06
|
|
|
Boo @ no GF replay. I mean it isn't a great system but it was an amazing quirk of the game to come up again in 2010, hilarious and amazing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:11
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:5 matches. Weak as piss yet again tribunal. The AFL can crow all they want about how the head is sacrosanct, but their systems yet again fail when it actually counts. Doesn't help that May is a serial offender and should have gotten extra based on that. A really underwhelming punishment considering he left the ground in order to hit the Martin in the head
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:21
|
|
|
I also like the grand final replay and draws in general.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:22
|
|
|
I don't mind grand final replays, more footy! But I loving loathe the idea of a golden goal, it's the worst poo poo ever in sports. Just play another reduced quarter until someone actually wins it. Imagine someone winning a premiership on a rushed behind, or some bullshit free kick. "Just gonna torp this from halfway and hope it goes through for a point or six."
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:29
|
|
|
Diet Crack posted:Imagine someone winning a premiership on a rushed behind, or some bullshit free kick. "Just gonna torp this from halfway and hope it goes through for a point or six." But any of these things could happen with 5 seconds to go in the match also.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:32
|
|
|
And the players won't necessarily realise that it's in golden goal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:34
|
|
|
Diet Crack posted:Imagine someone winning a premiership on a rushed behind, or some bullshit free kick. "Just gonna torp this from halfway and hope it goes through for a point or six."
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:35
|
|
|
Wait, there's no clear observance of when golden gaytime starts at the end of OT? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:36
|
|
|
Diet Crack posted:Wait, there's no clear observance of when golden gaytime starts at the end of OT? Nope. It ticks to 5:01 and suddenly it is golden point with no indication of it. It is very stupid.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 07:45 |
|
|
My understanding is that once the score is confirmed, the siren sounds to end the game. I don't see it as having that big an effect because if it's all tied up players will know they can't concede a score late in 2nd OT anyway
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 10:57
|
|