Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
UnfortunateSexFart
May 18, 2008

𒃻 𒌓ð’‰𒋫 𒆷ð’€𒅅𒆷
𒆠𒂖 𒌉 𒌫 ð’®𒈠𒈾𒅗 𒂉 𒉡𒌒𒂉𒊑


PK loving SUBBAN posted:

I've never been to Vancouver but it's crushing me to know that all my friends who moved there /Victoria in the last decade because they were priced out of Toronto are now being priced out again. :(

Unless your friends are 50 years old, Vancouver has always been more expensive than Toronto. Most of my 90s high school friends moved to Calgary/Toronto to start a family.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Juul-Whip
Mar 10, 2008

Baronjutter posted:

Quote a single post where I said Vancouver is the best or even good. "pretty ok" is the highest grade I can give Vancouver, and only certain areas.

I wasn't being entirely serious with that post~

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

PK loving SUBBAN posted:

I've never been to Vancouver but it's crushing me to know that all my friends who moved there /Victoria in the last decade because they were priced out of Toronto are now being priced out again. :(

After being priced out of the 2nd most overpriced real estate market in Canada, why would you think that moving to the #1 most overpriced real estate market in the world would be more affordable? :wtc:

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost

Lexicon posted:

Nice nature, poo poo city.

I don't think it's the greatest in the world or anything, but if you put aside the issue of rent/wages, it's a pretty drat good city by most other metrics.

Great transit system. Lots of bike routes/infrastructure. Lots of well maintained parks. Very safe. Well funded community centers. Reasonably responsive and effective government. Good food scene, decent culture. Pleasant climate. Yadda yadda.

What makes it a "poo poo" city in your opinion? Compared to what other places?

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
well the people here are garbage assholes

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost
How does that expression go...? Something about if you smell poo poo everywhere you go, you might want to check the bottom of your own shoe.

Reince Penis
Nov 15, 2007

by R. Guyovich
Toronto is so conservative that you can be a moralistic holier than thou lefty, ranting about better funding for social programs and simultaneously never have to worry about taxes going up because that funding actually increased.

That's what makes a great city.

e: Vote Liberal!

UnfortunateSexFart
May 18, 2008

𒃻 𒌓ð’‰𒋫 𒆷ð’€𒅅𒆷
𒆠𒂖 𒌉 𒌫 ð’®𒈠𒈾𒅗 𒂉 𒉡𒌒𒂉𒊑


Vancouver has three major problems - too expensive, a segregated lovely social culture, and too rainy/dark for seven months per year. Otherwise it's great and still the best major city in Canada (a low bar).

Tighclops
Jan 23, 2008

Unable to deal with it


Grimey Drawer

Cultural Imperial posted:

well the people here are garbage assholes

There is nowhere in this country where this isn't true, the only difference is in the cities you have more people and are thus statistically more likely to meet someone that isn't a piss garbage baby. The minute you leave the core you begin running into hordes of people who probably only barely qualify as sentient life

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
You guys sure are angry that houses are pretty expensive in a mediocre/OK city that no one wants to live in anyway.

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Baronjutter posted:

Rents have been slowly going up at the usual pace but I haven't heard of anyone being priced out here in Victoria. Have actual friends in Vancouver getting priced out of their apartments or "renovicted" which really sucks.

I imagine just about everyone that rents in Vancouver has faced a renoviction/owner"occupation"/priced out situation over the last 5-10 years.

triplexpac
Mar 24, 2007

Suck it
Two tears in a bucket
And then another thing
I'm not the one they'll try their luck with
Hit hard like brass knuckles
See your face through the turnbuckle dude
I got no love for you

But THIS time it's different! Because we're better, smarter and handsomer than those idiots

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Probation
Can't post for 14 hours!
Ruh-roh

Westpac no longer doing mortgages for non-citizens here in Australia.

https://twitter.com/BullionBaron/status/724842937364930565

https://twitter.com/BullionBaron/status/724850650836795392

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Thread's been kinda dead, so have some Vancouver news!

First off: The CMHC finally realizes something might be up after home prices in Vancouver increase 50% over the past 3 years and 27% in the last year alone.

quote:

CMHC warns of 'problematic conditions' in frothy Vancouver housing market

Canada’s federal housing agency is finally joining the chorus of housing market analysts raising red flags about Vancouver’s scorching housing market.

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. said it had identified what it called “moderate evidence of problematic conditions” in Vancouver thanks to prices that have soared higher than even the region’s strong economy should be able to support.

“Fundamentals are actually quite strong in Vancouver, there has been a lot of employment and income growth and population growth,” said CMHC chief economist, Bob Dugan. “But prices are increasing by even more in that market.”

It is the first time the federal mortgage insurer has issued a warning about Vancouver, even as prices for single-family homes have jumped nearly 50 per cent in the past three years. Home resales in the region hit a record in March, the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver said, while the benchmark price of a detached home rose more than 27 per cent from a year earlier.

“Better to ring the alarm bell late than never,” wrote Bank of Montreal senior economist Sal Guatieri. Home prices have been outrunning incomes in the Greater Vancouver Area for much of the past 10 years, he said, although a jump of nearly 20 per cent in resale condo prices over the past year likely helped trigger the warning from Ottawa.

With the addition of Vancouver, the federal housing agency highlighted problems in 10 out of the 15 largest local housing markets in the country. It renewed its warnings of “strong evidence” of problems in the housing markets of Toronto, Calgary, Regina and Saskatoon and said it found “moderate evidence” of similar problems in Edmonton, Winnipeg, Ottawa, Montreal and Quebec City.

CMHC’s views on the Canadian housing market matter in large part because the federal agency effectively backstops much of the country’s mortgage market. The corporation said its local market assessments are one of the factors it considers when deciding whether or not to approve an individual application for mortgage insurance.

“Insured borrowers in high-risk markets are more likely to be declined, be asked to put down more money or have their loan amount reduced,” said Robert McLister, a mortgage planner at intelliMortgage and founder of RateSpy.com.

The government’s assessment also serves as a warning to lenders, investors and policy makers, potentially leading to less money flowing into the regions of the country that CMHC deems high risk. “Anecdotally, I’m hearing more stories of appraisals coming in under expected value in Alberta, loans being scaled back in Alberta, more requests for co-signers in Toronto,” Mr. McLister said. “But there is no panic.”

In Toronto, industry officials commended the Crown agency for raising issues that have long plagued some sectors of the market, such as eroding affordability and a supply of single-family homes that has not kept pace with intense demand.

“It’s good to see CMHC confirming the facts around the Toronto housing market,” said Bryan Tuckey, chief executive officer of the Building Industry and Land Development Association, which represents developers. “What would be useful is if CMHC could start to look at and assess the real underlying causes of why the prices are increasing.”

He pointed to provincial anti-sprawl legislation that has encouraged municipalities to shift away from single-family home development and a lack of available land for low-density housing.

While some industry players are taking stock of the federal government’s opinions on the housing market, some say buyers and sellers are increasingly turning a blind eye to the growing collection of housing market warnings as home prices have continued to defy all predictions of a slowdown.

“It used to have an effect,” said Dianne Usher, senior vice-president of Royal LePage Johnson & Daniel. “People would listen and would react. Then certain market drivers just started to take hold and all of a sudden the predictions were not valid any more.”

Next: In a shocking surprize, the Chinese realty company in trouble for shadow flipping does more shadow flipping! Only posts ads on WeChat because foreign buyers are definitely not driving up prices.

quote:

Vancouver real estate firm’s new ads feature ‘shadow flipping’ homes

The Vancouver-area realty firm under investigation for questionable practices has just posted new ads offering homes for sale through contract assignment – the controversial and profitable practice known as “shadow flipping,” which Premier Christy Clark has promised to curtail.

New Coast Realty agents Sylvie Zhao and Lucy Wang confirmed to The Globe and Mail the two homes featured were just purchased by buyers who have since hired the brokerage to flip them before the contracts with the initial sellers close.

The ads posted this week on WeChat, a Chinese-language social media site, offer deals priced at $1.15-million and $1.85-million. The New Coast agents refused to give the addresses for properties, so ad readers cannot look up the price for which those homes were just purchased. Ms. Zhao said addresses are not advertised because the assignment deals are “exclusive,” and not available through MLS.

In a typical shadow flip, a speculator buys a property and then re-sells the sales contract immediately to a new buyer or buyers for a higher price. The initial seller sometimes does not know about it. At closing, that seller receives less for their property than what the end buyer pays. The middleman speculator pockets the difference. The property transfer tax is paid only once, at the final sale.

Shadow flipping is increasingly controversial in the hot Vancouver real estate market. Last month, Ms. Clark promised to bring in new rules aimed at removing the profit, by requiring any gains to be paid to the initial seller in deals involving licensed real estate agents.

Contract assignment is legal in B.C. and other provinces. Ms. Zhao said New Coast agents did not arrange initial purchases – those were done at another brokerage. “I am just doing the assignment,” she said.

“The buyer-owner who wants us to sell asked us to assign it,” Ms. Wang added.

The company points out in a statement that there is no rule against what its agents are doing. “Assisting clients in this way is entirely lawful and within the regulations,” it said.

The industry self-regulator, the Real Estate Council of B.C., says it will monitor the transactions.

“New Coast Realty is required to promptly report to the Council any trade in real estate that is an assignment where a licensee related to the brokerage acted on behalf of one of the parties,” it said in a statement.

“Should the Council find non-compliance with the conditions or any other aspects of the Real Estate Services Act, the Council will take such further action as it considers necessary,” the statement said.

New Coast has been under fire for what its owner taught agents in a training session last fall. In a recording of the October session obtained by The Globe, owner Ze Yu Wu is heard coaching agents, in Mandarin, on how to talk vendor clients into selling their homes quickly, for a lower price than what they want.

As a result of The Globe’s reporting, the regulator imposed several conditions on the brokerage’s licences. The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver, the body that authorizes access to the MLS system, is also investigating the firm’s practices.

The first condition imposed by the council required New Coast to appoint a new managing broker approved by the council. The Globe has learned Edwin Yan, a managing broker who has been with the company for nine months, now has that job.

The council says it approved Mr. Yan’s appointment, along with another broker Dave Erickson, as an interim measure only.

“The Council has directed New Coast Realty to seek a qualified managing broker(s) from outside the company, who must be approved by the Council. Until a qualified replacement candidate is identified and has received our approval, Mr. Yan and Mr. Erickson will manage the brokerage,” it said.

The firm’s previous managing broker, Josh Rosenberg, who was at Mr. Wu’s training session, is now an associate broker.

The company insists Mr. Wu’s words in the recording were taken out of context. The Globe has now posted online an English language translation of the session.

Several former New Coast agents have said Mr. Wu’s ideal business model is to sell client properties to speculators who are also New Coast clients and then flip them through assignment. The Globe’s investigation revealed two specific cases where New Coast agents are accused of arranging or trying to flip properties for a higher price, at the expense of their own seller client. New Coast denies any wrongdoing.

David Eby, the Vancouver MLA who recently asked police to investigate the brokerage, said he finds the English translation of Mr. Wu’s full comments during the training session disturbing.

“The presentation is an effort to undermine the client’s best interest,” Mr. Eby said, adding that he thinks Mr. Wu’s meanings are clear. “It’s a training session on how to lie to the client – and sound convincing.”

Mr. Eby points to one section, in which Mr. Wu coaches agents on how to persuade homeowners wanting to sell to offer agents for buyers a bonus of several thousand dollars to entice buyers to make offers. Mr. Wu suggests in the training session agents should later hold back most of that bonus for themselves.

“The bonus stuff is just appalling,” Mr. Eby said.

Mr. Eby called on the regulator to suspend the brokerage firm’s five licences. The council indicated it is too early to say what, if any, further measures will be taken.

“We have taken extraordinary measures to protect the public,” its statement said. “The allegations against New Coast Realty are complex and far-reaching, and the Council will thoroughly investigate all of them.”

Finally, I saved the best for last: Training on shadow flipping from New Coast Realty! (Translated from Chinese of course!)

quote:

Read a condensed translation of an internal training session at New Coast Realty

The following speech was delivered by Ze Yu Wu during an internal training session for New Coast Realty that took place on Oct. 14, 2015. It was translated for The Globe and Mail by Daisy Xiong, a graduate of UBC’s journalism program, and reviewed by another Mandarin speaker, who works in the real-estate industry. The raw audio is available here. The following is a translation of relevant portions of the audio, not a complete transcript.

Ze Yu Wu: Now I start. How to close the deal when the gap between the price of the seller and the price of the buyer is too big? This is very important. Frankly, many team leaders don’t know about it although they are very capable. Even they do know, they only know a part of it, not all of it. Let me take a case yesterday for example. It was Lucas’s friend. He received offers of $2.6-million, $2.4/5-million. [Inaudible] was the agent. There were many offers that the homeowner didn’t take. The homeowner’s price is over $3-million. The homeowner changed his agent to [inaudible], and then changed to our agent. It closed at $2.25-million.

Student: That’s impossible. He didn’t take the offer of 2.6-million at first.

Wu: Yes, you need to use the right strategy. It was charged over $3-million and was closed at $2.25-million. How to suppress homeowner’s bottom price and get him to accept the offer, there has to be a combined series of wording. If you say the right thing, his bottom price goes down, and he would take it. If you say the wrong thing, his bottom price goes very high. You need skills. From this case, I got to some conclusions.

Firstly, the homeowner has a nice house, after he changed agents for several times, his bottom price decreased, but not low enough. Secondly, the buyer’s agent is also from our team, Meng Li, she gave an offer of $2.2-million and signed the contract. We went to Coquitlam together the day before yesterday. She said the buyer only wanted to pay $2.2-million, no more than that. I said you should try to let your buyer offer more. Do your work. She said $2.25-million will not be accepted by the homeowner. I said, don’t worry. Do what you should do, give the offer with a bank draft [deposit] and no subject. The homeowner’s agent [inaudible] is very likely to make the deal happen. As expected, yesterday they closed the deal. More importantly, Cui is very skilled in closing offer. Today I will teach you how to close the deal and decrease homeowner’s bottom price. You know this method; I know that method. Putting all the ideas together, we have the best method. Let’s take this case for example. What do you say that can make the homeowner accept the offer? The homeowner said he would not take any offer that’s less than $2.4-million. Don’t even take a look. What do you say that can make the homeowner take the offer. You answer. I will write it here. You guys write it down. When you meet the homeowner, say those things. The homeowner will take the offer. I don’t say the success rate is 100 per cent, at least 80 per cent.

Male voice: If you don’t sell it now, you will never sell it. (Laugh.)

Female voice: The buyer is very genuine.

Wu: Think twice before you say that, what’s the consequence?

Students: Don’t let you sell the house any more. (Laugh.)

Wu: You answer.

Female voice: No idea.

Wu: Can I say something casually? If it’s a house in Richmond, new house, say that rich people like to go to the west side of Vancouver. There are good schools. Real rich people don’t want to come to Richmond. The key is that rich people are afraid of earthquake and tsunami. Rich people have the chance to offer 100,000 more dollars without hesitation. It’s luchong [bad feng shui], no matter how cheap it is, rich people don’t want it. Your house has problems, and rich people don’t like them.

Being able to find disadvantages and advantages of houses is an essential skill for agents. You must know the disadvantages and advantages of the house. The best house has disadvantages; the worst house has advantages. This is what an agent must know. If you don’t know how to find disadvantages and advantages, you have to change your job. This is basic. It’s like you must know 1+1=2. You learned it in the kindergarten.

Student: People all went to the west side of Vancouver.

Wu: It’s not about money. Your house is luchong, the facing direction is not good, the ground is not flat, and it’s too close to buildings. So rich people don’t want it.

Secondly, rich people are afraid of earthquakes and tsunami. This reason [to sell for less] is very powerful. It was the second house I was involved. I said it to the homeowner. He was worried. I was a translator, 15 dollars an hour, I said it to the homeowner and it was sold right away. If one has no long-term considerations, he can hardly avoid troubles every now and then. Write this sentence. Think for 10 or 20 years later, even next life.

The value of houses in Burnaby has more space to increase. If the house is in Vancouver West, say that the price has risen too much and it’s no longer a good deal; people are buying houses in Burnaby and Richmond. Or say that the houses in this area are too expensive – so you can suppress the seller’s bottom price. [Tell the seller] the stock price [on the Chinese exchange] has decreased a lot, how do people have the money to buy the house? Adding one more sentence, China’s supervision on money is very strict now. People want to buy the house, but they can’t transfer the money to Canada. It will be more and more difficult to transfer money from China. Sell the house as soon as possible. Adding one more sentence, the house market reached the highest in June and is declining now. Sell the house as soon as possible; $2.25-million is a very good price.

Money can’t be transferred now. There are earthquakes, tsunami, and this is luchong. If it’s not luchong, I will sell it for $500,000 more. Rich people leave right away if it’s luchong. They are all the methods to suppress homeowner’s bottom price. That money cannot be transferred is also a good reason. The price has been decreasing since last June. Sell it as soon as possible.

The sixth sentence: Bring the bank draft [deposit]. This is a bank draft. For those who offered 2.4-million before, do they have bank draft?

Even offer you $80-million, without bank draft, it’s just zero. This is bank draft, so this is the real buyer. Buyers without bank drafts are fake, are useless. As soon as you sign it, the money is yours. Even they offer you $80-million, do they have a bank draft? Even if you sign it, the money may not be yours. This is a bank draft with real money, this is the real offer. Remember to bring the bank draft when you give the offer. In Cui’s case, he did his best. After changing agents several times, the homeowner’s bottom price decreased. The most important thing is that Cui knew the right thing to say.

If you don’t talk to the homeowner, go home. The homeowner still insists on high price and the deal cannot be closed, we agents have to keep traveling around and wasting the time. We would keep burning the gas and no one will reimburse you for that, our company will not reimburse you. No one will consider that for you. You will need money for your children’s milk in the future. No one will care about you. You must consider your own interests. Even if our company makes donations, it will not be donated to the staff because you need money for baby milk. You have to think of your own interest.

One more sentence. Normally, the first offer is the best offer, however, parenthesis: it is only a saying to the homeowner, but it will never be true. There will always be higher offers in the next year or in the year after next year. [Laugh.] Student: What if they ask you why it’s the best offer?

Wu: It’s the rule in this industry. If it has been on sale for so long, people will think there is something wrong with it.

Student: Canadian agents said the same.

Wu: The first offer will never be the best offer, I am sure about this, but you have to say: the first offer is the best offer; an offer with bank draft is the best offer.

Answer me, what to say to suppress the bottom price. Everyone say one sentence, and then we will have a textbook. You guys teach me, I then put them together and organize them, and train you.

Student: You should pay tuition. [Laugh.]

Wu: If I learn one point from you, I pay you $100; if you learn one point from me, you pay me $50.

Student: [Laugh.] Good deal

Wu: I will make more money in the end. [Laugh.]

Wu: Write down the points. Write it for five times.

Student: We know the points, but can’t remember it when we are dealing with homeowners.

Wu: That’s why you write them down. Read it before you talk to the homeowner. For every point, you write for five times, then you will remember. Otherwise you will forget in practice. Think about what to say.

Student: Talk about disadvantages of the house.

Wu: It may not be luchong, maybe close to the road, maybe the ground is not flat, and maybe there is an electricity pole.

Student: It’s a stylish house but doesn’t have investment value. It’s hard to sell it in the future.

Wu: Many people are saying this is a good house, but you have to tell him the defects of this house. “It is modern style, less painting but more glass. Your house is beautiful, but only young people will like your house, middle-aged and elderly people will not like it. Why? This house’s design is modern style, which is only suitable to young people but not to middle-aged and elderly people. People who can afford a house are middle-aged and elderly. Think about this, are young people able to pay $2-million for a house?” Middle-aged and elderly people like classic houses. Your house is for young people, like Ikea, stylish. But stylish things are the easiest ones to get out of fashion. But it’s $2-million, not just $500,000.

What if his house is classical style? [Say that] classical style is not good; it is outdated. Right now, only the modern style is popular in the market.” In brief, whatever you are telling, the homeowner should think: Yes, it makes sense! The homeowners feel every word I am telling them make sense. Then, you can suppress homeowner’s bottom price. This is not good, that is not good, he will think you are very experienced.

Analyzing from the international market to stock market, from the state [policy] to the housing market, and the fact that no more investor immigrants are coming after the federal immigrant investor program was closed.

Student: If you keep talking about problems, will they get offended?

Wu: [Tell homeowners]: I’m doing this for your goodness, because I know about the market. Now it has passed the highest point. Investor immigrants can’t come any more. Money cannot be transferred. And the house has those problems. Otherwise, I will sell it for $1-million more. I’m not in the rush. $2.25-million is very good price. Otherwise it’s going to be even lower in the market in the future.

I want to get more profit for you, because the higher the price is, the higher the commission I get. This is an offer with bank draft. You can’t miss this chance. Don’t I want to make more commission? Of course. I’m doing this for your benefit.

Student: What if the homeowner asks: “When you tried to be my agent, you said my house was great. Now you say it has so many problems.” [Laugh.]

Wu: [Tell them]: But I later found that it’s a stylish house. This is what the guests said. They pointed out the problems and I have to let you know. The guest said it’s luchong, the guest said it’s made of glass and the children may get hurt. I have to tell you what they say. [Say that], to be honest, I’m very angry when the guest says this is not good, that is not good. I wanted to kick him out. I explained it to him. You must tell what guests say to the homeowner.

Add more, don’t buy luchong house again in the future. If it’s a house by the road, say don’t buy a house by the road next time; if there is a ditch in front of the house, say don’t buy a house behind a ditch or electricity pole next time; if the house is quite narrow, say don’t buy a narrow house next time, it doesn’t look grand; if the house is wide but shallow, say don’t buy a shallow house without a garden next time. If it’s a stylish house, say don’t build a stylish house next time; build a classic one.

[Laughter.] He will listen to you. He will not buy luchong house in the future. Does it make sense?

Student: Yes, if he listens to you.

Student: If we can make it sound so real, like boss Wu. [Laugh.]

Wu: I said to a client, don’t buy houses near roads again. He has never bought one ever since. I said to one, don’t buy houses with swimming pool again. You don’t use it often and it’s a burden. Canadian people like it, but Chinese don’t.

You remind me. You must print out the lowest prices in the neighbourhood to show to the homeowner. “Look! This house was sold at $2-million and I am selling $250,000 more than this price. Will you still not accept this offer? Plus, the market is dropping now.” It is very critical to compare with low sale prices in the neighbourhood, which is even more important than all above. Low prices around the house, firstly compare with those in the same district. If there is no [low prices] in the same district, compare with those within the diameter of one, two, three or five kilometres.

Compare prices in the same district. And say don’t buy houses near bad schools. It’s hard to sell. Investor immigrants don’t mind to pay more for houses near good schools. This is a good point. Write those for five times. I can guarantee you to increase sales by 50 per cent. You have to be fluent, won’t forget.

[Student talking, having break]

Student: Every time you talk about the price, take your phone out. [Laugh.]

Wu: When you say those to the homeowner, you need to know the right timing to say. Don’t irritate the homeowner. Be persuasive.

Student: You have said everything. [Laugh.]

Wu: How much interest do you pay, how much is the tax, how much is the depreciation. If you don’t sell it in 10 years, all the electrical appliances have to be replaced. See how much you are losing every day. If you sell the house one month earlier, you earn a couple of thousands. You have to do the math for him.

I haven’t finished. $2.25-million, 2 per cent interest, how much do you lose in a month? You lose $40,000 a month. Hydro bills, worn-out prices. If you sell it one month later, you lose tens of thousands of dollars. It’s getting older, different style, different price. New styles come out next year. A whole set of wording is ready to come out all the time. You need to be considerate. Don’t be kicked out by the homeowner.

Nine-minute break in the translation

Wu: [Tell the homeowner]: “He [the other agent] originally wanted to get the buyer to put an offer on another property. I happen to know him, or it’s an agent of our company, he was dragged by me to buy this one. I told that agent I would persuade the homeowner to give him some bonus, and that was how I convinced him. You would have got no offer. Because of my network, I have a client, the agent is from the same company. I asked him to come to buy the house. Without me, you don’t even have an offer. The house next door was only sold for $2-million, your one was sold for $2.25-million.”

[Still talking to homeowner]: “If we do not give him some [bonus], I will be shame to meet him. Let’s give him $20,000, or $50,000.” After adding the bonus, [you say]: Sorry, you [buyer’s agent] can only have half and I have the other half. But at this time if you are dealing with other companies, be careful with issues that may violate rules. If the other agent is from our team, it can be easily arranged, right? Bonus is so awesome. One year gas expense, one year food expense, almost all expenses can be covered. A bonus will be a couple of tens of thousands dollars. For labour job, you have to work for a whole year, right? This tip is very important.

There are many other methods. I didn’t prepare today. The speech is spontaneous. Try to get the bonus. At least half [bonus]. At least half. Try your best to take back $40,000 out of $50,000, it is the most generous to give $10,000 to the selling agent. If I get $20,000, I will give you $2,000, so I can take 80 per cent [sic]. [Laugh.] But be careful. First of all, protect your license before you do anything else, especially the license you worked hard to get. Be sure not to break the rules. Under this principle, you can take other actions. If your license gets revoked [pause]. No matter how much money the deal is worth, even if the deal is right in front of you, don’t look at it, it will affect the license.

You say something.

Student: Professor. [Laugh.]

Student: What if there is a gap of a few thousands.

Wu: When this is a couple of thousand dollars gap, remember our rule, and it is also what we should implement, the homeowner should give up some, the buyer should add more, the selling agent should yield some, and the deal will be firm. Our money cannot be touched at all, every penny of our commission cannot be cut.

We should sell the house fast and buy the house fast. Buy a good house quickly, sell the house quickly and buy a better one for our client. This is our principle. If the house doesn’t get sold, homeowners will get worried, right? We should relieve concerns of homeowners. Make homeowners satisfied and buy a better house later. Why should I give you back my commission? Not even a penny. I helped you sell it for $250,000 more. Other house in Garden City was for $200,000. If I return the commission, my company will fire me. The company takes half of the commission; I and the other agent share the other half. I only take 25 per cent. Why should I give half of the commission to my company? My company has many clients. My clients came from my company. I can’t survive without this system. So I’m willing to give half of the commission to my company. You should ask for more commission. I sold it for $250,000 more. Why don’t you give me more commission? If I do a bad deal for you in the future, I won’t take your commission.

Five-minute and 45-second break in the translation

Student: It’s how we think of it. Who do we serve? If we don’t sell the house, we don’t make money.

Wu: If you sell the house, you are doing him a favour. This offer is a good offer. Once the house is sold, there is tax. Then you are making contribution to the society. You are helping the client do investment. And you are making contribution to the society. We need to raise our own family; we also need to take the responsibility of the society.

Seat Safety Switch
May 27, 2008

MY RELIGION IS THE SMALL BLOCK V8 AND COMMANDMENTS ONE THROUGH TEN ARE NEVER LIFT.

Pillbug
How does this guy have so many students? You'd think being realtor scum comes naturally to unscrupulous shitbags and there's no reason to teach them what they already know.

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
Most of the money in the online spamming / dropshipping/ affiliate "marketing" field is made by the guys selling resources to desperate saps who think they'll strike it rich.

Realty in Vancouver isn't much different.

ductonius
Apr 9, 2007
I heard there's a cream for that...

Rime posted:

Most of the money in the online spamming / dropshipping/ affiliate "marketing" field is made by the guys selling resources to desperate saps who think they'll strike it rich.

Realty in Vancouver isn't much different.

There's more money in selling shovels than there is in mining.

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

Debate & Discussion: You Are Racist > Canadian Debt Bubble Megathread: Once the house is sold, there is tax. Then you are making contribution to the society.

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Subjunctive posted:

Debate & Discussion: You Are Racist > Canadian Debt Bubble Megathread: Rich people leave right away if it’s luchong.

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888

triplexpac posted:

But THIS time it's different! Because we're better, smarter and handsomer than those idiots

When walking around Toronto, there are post war bungalow neighbourhoods where you see 1980s teardown builds all over right next to 2010 teardown builds. It could not be more obvious.

Fried Watermelon
Dec 29, 2008


ductonius posted:

There's more money in selling shovels than there is in mining.

DEHUMANIZE YOURSELF AND FACE TO BLOODSHED

Saltin
Aug 20, 2003
Don't touch

Reverse Centaur posted:

Vancouver has three major problems - too expensive, a segregated lovely social culture, and too rainy/dark for seven months per year. Otherwise it's great and still the best major city in Canada (a low bar).

You missed one.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big-one

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

well I've now spent a very large amount of time checking my elevation above sea level, wondering how much Vancouver Island will lessen the impact of a Tsunami, and pondering how hosed the entire floodplain around the Fraser is

Mozi
Apr 4, 2004

Forms change so fast
Time is moving past
Memory is smoke
Gonna get wider when I die
Nap Ghost
Now that's luchong.

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

Richmond and delta need some huge tsunami to wipe them clean of all man made structures and infrastructure. Something powerful enough to break up all the concrete and covered it over with a new layer of topsoil, as if humans had never paved the area over. It can then be re-settled as charming walkable farming villages with rapid transit into the city and rich productive farmland and delta ecosystems.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line
it's gonna be wiped clean of land above sea-level

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Baronjutter posted:

Richmond and delta need some huge tsunami to wipe them clean of all man made structures and infrastructure. Something powerful enough to break up all the concrete and covered it over with a new layer of topsoil, as if humans had never paved the area over. It can then be re-settled as charming walkable farming villages with rapid transit into the city and rich productive farmland and delta ecosystems.

Put it in the ALR! :hurr:

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

JawKnee posted:

well I've now spent a very large amount of time checking my elevation above sea level, wondering how much Vancouver Island will lessen the impact of a Tsunami, and pondering how hosed the entire floodplain around the Fraser is



quote:

Richmond is Not at Significant Risk of Tsunamis

While Richmond is an island community, we are not at significant risk of a tsunami. A 2005 study commissioned by the City of Richmond and the Corporation of Delta was prepared by Dr. John Clague and Dr. Ian Hutchinson of the Simon Fraser University (SFU). The study found no evidence that a significant tsunami has impacted the Fraser River delta, from any source, in the last 4000 years. This is despite the fact that during this period geologists believe there were numerous mega-earthquakes (magnitude 8+ on the Richter Scale) along the Cascadia subduction zone lying west of Vancouver island.

The reason Pacific generated tsunamis do not impact the Fraser River delta is because Vancouver Island lies between the two, which creates a kind of breakwater or natural protective barrier that absorbs the major impact of a tsunami. To prove this theory, scientists have computer modelled Pacific Ocean tsunami waves (generated close to Vancouver Island) as they move down the Juan de Fuca Strait, into the Georgia Strait and finally to the western delta shore. The model predicted that during this journey wave energy would dissipate so much that any wave reaching the western delta shore would be less than 0.5m high.

The evidence that no significant tsunami has impacted the delta area in the last 4000 years is further supported by the 2003 study Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Hypothetical Landslides in the Strait of Georgia, BC. This study modelled hypothetical underwater landslides between Roberts Bank and the Fraser River delta. It found that, while a significant landslide could generate an 18m high wave at Galiano Island, the local shoreward moving wave from a major slide would be only 2m high. This, in part, is due to the submerged banks ability to deflect wave energy away from the shoreline. The study also suggested that if a 2m high wave occurred its energy, and therefore its ability to flood land, would be dissipated by the Fraser River Delta’s wide tidal flats. It is therefore believed that any wave generated by an underwater landslide at Sturgeon Bank would not pose a significant flood risk to the City. This is due to the waves relatively small height potential, the 6 km wide tidal flats that a wave would have to cross to reach the City dike and the fact that the City’s dike stands approximately 3.5m above mean sea level.

Hypothetical tsunamis generated from other sources, such as land based landslides and underwater earthquakes in the Georgia Strait, have not been extensively studied. However, as there is no evidence that significant tsunamis have occurred in the past 4000 years, the City considers it highly unlikely that such sources could trigger a significant tsunami.

Seattle and Port Alberni are superfucked though.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

McGavin posted:

Seattle and Port Alberni are superfucked though.

Well that answers my concerns about Vancouver Island lessening the Tsunami, but I guess massive liquefaction is still a problem for the floodplain areas. Also the possible drop in elevation from an earthquake - figures seem to range between 1-2 meters but I don't know whether that applies to everything on the Pacific side of the North American plate or not.

JawKnee fucked around with this message at 20:01 on Apr 28, 2016

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Risk of liquefaction is High to Very High. It's why they make huge sand piles before doing any construction in Richmond.

tagesschau
Sep 1, 2006
Guten Abend, meine Damen und Herren.
I saw an ad on the subway this morning from that non-profit condo-building company that claimed they could help people with incomes as low as $30,000 own a condo. And yet they're still selling them for close to six times that.

Equal parts :wtc: and "surely, this..."

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

McGavin posted:

Risk of liquefaction is High to Very High. It's why they make huge sand piles before doing any construction in Richmond.

The Province and City are planning on building a major hospital on the False Creek Flats, which is essentially infilled tidal flats and would be super prone to liquefaction. Everyone with a grade school level knowledge of earthquakes knows that liquefaction is Very Bad, and this concern has been brought up a billion times at public meetings about the project, so it's certainly not something the planners are forgetting about. My conclusion is that engineers must be pretty drat certain that with modern technology we can build on this soil with little to no negative affects in an earthquake scenario.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line
Or they don't care, YOLO, etc

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
They don't care. That said, I think it would be awesome if a major hospital for swallowed into the ground during an earthquake.

What I'm saying is, kill all vancouverites

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

JawKnee posted:

Or they don't care, YOLO, etc

Politicians might not but eventually they got to find an engineer to put a stamp on this thing. I would expect that engineers would care about not losing their license and being sued into oblivion but then again I'm not knowledgable about the full implications to engineers should the building fail. I dunno maybe you could have thousands die but it's just covered by insurance no big deal.

quaint bucket
Nov 29, 2007

triplexpac posted:

But THIS time it's different! Because we're better, smarter and handsomer than those idiots

Didn't they have a crazy interest rate hike of 9% from 13% to 22% for mortgages back in the 80s?

E: anal bleaching on the rise in Vancouver. What a time to be alive.

quaint bucket fucked around with this message at 18:17 on Apr 29, 2016

namaste friends
Sep 18, 2004

by Smythe
Remember that rear end in a top hat who signed off on the cave-on-foods parking lot

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003

What CMHC says about every major housing market in Canada




quote:


The national housing agency looked at four areas: Overheating, measured by the ratio of sales to new listings; price acceleration based on average prices; overvaluation based on average prices and new housing indexes; and overbuilding, based on rental vacancy rates and the stock of completed and unsold condos.

Here’s a look at what CMHC found in 15 major markets in its second-quarter report, from left to right:

Victoria: “Overheating, price acceleration and overvaluation in the housing market show weak evidence of problematic conditions. We detect weak evidence of overbuilding as newly completed homes were sold and rental vacancy rates remained low.”

Vancouver: “The change in our overall assessment from the previous quarter was mainly influenced by a shift from moderate to strong evidence of overvaluation, indicating that home prices are above the level supported by economic and demographic fundamentals. The remaining indicators assessed continue to suggest weak evidence of problematic conditions.”

Calgary: CMHC detected “strong evidence of problematic conditions, due to a combination of moderate evidence of overvaluation and overbuilding. A deterioration of economic fundamentals have contributed to moderate evidence of overvaluation.”

Edmonton: “We detect moderate evidence of problematic conditions in Edmonton’s housing market. Factors such as overheating and price acceleration continue to show weak evidence of problematic conditions.”

Saskatoon: There’s “strong evidence of problematic conditions.” CMHC found “weak evidence” of overheating and price acceleration, but “strong evidence” of overbuilding.

Regina: “We continue to detect strong evidence of problematic conditions in Regina’s housing market. There’s “weak evidence of overheating and price acceleration, but “strong evidence” of overbuilding. And slower income growth makes the case for “moderate overvaluation.”

Winnipeg: “We continue to detect moderate evidence of problematic conditions, due to overbuilding in the ownership market. Improvements to economic fundamentals, such as growth in full-time employment and disposable income, have contributed to reduce concerns of overvaluation.”

Hamilton: Despite the fact that this is one of Canada’s hottest markets, there’s “weak evidence” of price acceleration and overbuilding, but “moderate evidence” of overvaluation. And “the sales-to-new-listings ratio remained above the 75-per-cent threshold used to determine evidence of overheating.”

Toronto: No surprise that CMHC found “strong evidence of problematic conditions.” There’s “strong evidence” of overvaluation, “moderate evidence” of price acceleration, and “weak evidence” of overheating. And “while we do not detect overbuilding, we have some concerns about the high inventory of completed and unsold condominium apartments.”

Ottawa: There’s “moderate evidence” of overall trouble and overbuilding - the latter is because of condos again - and “weak evidence of overvaluation as price growth has moderated.”

Montreal: CMHC found “moderate” evidence of overall trouble and overvaluation and “weak evidence” of overbuilding, while in the resale market “supply remained rather high relative to demand, such that evidence of overheating and acceleration in the growth of prices was weak.”

Quebec City: There’s “moderate evidence” of trouble, with overvaluation coming in as strong, but just about everything else okay. On overvaluation, the findings “were due to the recent shrinkage of the pool of first-time home buyers (aged from 25 to 34) and the modest increase in disposable income per capita.”

Moncton: Little trouble here, just a yellow flag for overbuilding.

Halifax: No trouble here. “Strong international migration gains in the third and fourth quarter of 2015 mitigated the signs of overvaluation despite weak average earnings gains and employment creation.”

St. John’s: Go east, young man. Little trouble, though overbuilding came in as “moderate” while “excess supply of existing home inventory has kept overheating and price acceleration in check.”


Whoa Saskatoon. Is there anyone around from Saskatoon that can tell us what the heck is going on there?

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨


I'm surprised that they think Toronto is in worse shape than Vancouver.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DariusLikewise
Oct 4, 2008

You wore that on Halloween?

Femtosecond posted:

What CMHC says about every major housing market in Canada





Whoa Saskatoon. Is there anyone around from Saskatoon that can tell us what the heck is going on there?

The main issue with Winnipeg currently is every loving investor decided condos were the way to go and now we have a poo poo ton of empty condos that no one wants to buy. Move to Winnipeg and buy our lovely condos guys.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply