Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

brawleh posted:

They are no longer being ordered to die for the interest of profit. The Trade Federation is no longer trading within the republic, they are rebelling within a separatist movement.

-and- interests. The separatists are no less culpable in their exploitation, if not moreso; instead of unashamedly exploiting the droids for profit, they exploit the droids for a movement they consider important but not important enough to die for.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy

Neurolimal posted:

The imperials launch a movement against the rebels. They lose because they do not hold the will of the public, only the privileged few. It is a result of a diverse coalition of the republics' citizens (including the ewoks, who are not strong enough to be this nefarious Other, nor is it established that they are not members of the New Republic. If anything their worship of a republic citizen says the opposite) that the second death start is destroyed and the empire is defeated.

They fomulate an ideology around the ideals of the republic which are subverted by the empire. That is why The New Republic is erected in the Empire's place.

I do not know for what reason the fictional character Leia chooses to rebel. I can only state that it is noble of her to do so when she does not need to.

The "nefarious Other" you've fantasized is the elites of the Republic. The Rebellion is coming from inside the Establishment, as established in ANH. Ideology is limited to opposition of the Empire, not on democracy: Leia wants to restore the Old Republic (the Senate), while Luke wants vengeance. This is opposition, not a popular mandate.

Again, you're losing sight of what you're arguing. There is nothing wrong with observing that the OT presents a problematic portrait of social revolt.



Hoth contains only a military base. 'The people' are not there.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Neurolimal posted:

we're back to images of slavemasters forcing their slaves to fight for them, being opposed by the newest free race of the republic.

If the seperatists are morally different from the federation, they wouldn't be placing the slavemasters of the federation in high positions among their elite. Let alone composing their army entirely of enslaved droids.

What? Where is it shown that clones are free? The exact opposite is shown.

Schwarzwald
Jul 27, 2004

Don't Blink

Neurolimal posted:

It was wrong to militarize, yes. There were better uses of the Jedi than using them to command armies of already competent and tactical soldiers. This is a far more agreeable position than "they are not good because they should have ended slavery".

So your complaint with the Jedi militarizing is that it was inefficient? And that inefficiency is worse than being compliant in slavery?

brawleh
Feb 25, 2011

I figured out why the hippo did it.

Neurolimal posted:

-and- interests. The separatists are no less culpable in their exploitation, if not moreso; instead of unashamedly exploiting the droids for profit, they exploit the droids for a movement they consider important but not important enough to die for.

So why are the jedi not taking part in this rebellion when faced with it in order to make the cause just?(this is ignoring a former jedi master leading the movement) This is your assertion, that when they see an uprising of droids, when faced with this truth, they should take part and aid them. Why then are they engulfing the galaxy in a civil war with a mirror to the droid army seen in an army of clones, rather than joining their oppressed brothers?

brawleh fucked around with this message at 23:58 on Apr 25, 2016

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

The "nefarious Other" you've fantasized is the elites of the Republic. The Rebellion is coming from inside the Establishment, as established in ANH. Ideology is limited to opposition of the Empire, not on democracy: Leia wants to restore the Old Republic (the Senate), while Luke wants vengeance. This is opposition, not a popular mandate.

The elites of the republic are the Imperials. The Imperials resist the rebels. The existence of sympathetic imperials does not suggest that the rebels are controlled by the imperials.

quote:

Hoth contains only a military base. 'The people' are not there.

The rebels are the people. You are demanding that guerillas display themselves openly in civilian areas before you are willing to consider that members of the rebels are members of the citizens.

We even follow a member of the empire as he joins the rebels.

Serf posted:

What? Where is it shown that clones are free? The exact opposite is shown.

Where are the clones shown that they are enslaved prior to Order 66? Was it when Jango Cody and Obi-Wan had some friendly banter?

Schwarzwald
Jul 27, 2004

Don't Blink

Neurolimal posted:

Where are the clones shown that they are enslaved prior to Order 66?

Oh, wow.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

brawleh posted:

So why are the jedi not taking part in this rebellion when faced with it in order to make the cause just?(this is ignoring former jedi master leading the movement) This is your assertion, that when they see an uprising of droids, when faced with this truth, they should take part and aid them. Why then are they engulfing the galaxy in a civil war with a mirror to the droid army seen in an army of clones, rather than joining their oppressed brothers?

Because you dont make a cause just by joining the slaveowners. The answer to the civil war was not to join the south.

The droids are not uprising for freedom. They are being commanded to rise up for the separatists' ideals. Which are not suggested to involve droid rights.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Neurolimal posted:

Where are the clones shown that they are enslaved prior to Order 66? Was it when Jango Cody and Obi-Wan had some friendly banter?

I dunno, it might be the part where the clones are grown in vats, speedily aged to adulthood while being educated with strange techno-helmets. Eating in cafeterias all dressed in the same uniform and then made to march into battle.

I mean if you watch The Clone Wars there is literally an episode in the first season about a clone who betrays the Republic because he doesn't want to be cannon fodder anymore.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Serf posted:

I dunno, it might be the part where the clones are grown in vats, speedily aged to adulthood while being educated with strange techno-helmets. Eating in cafeterias all dressed in the same uniform and then made to march into battle.

I mean if you watch The Clone Wars there is literally an episode in the first season about a clone who betrays the Republic because he doesn't want to be cannon fodder anymore.

So the reason they are enslaved is that they are not humans?

TCW does a better job of establishing the clones as enslaved. The clones of the Prequel Trilogy are not exploited. Prior to Order 66, at least.

Lord Krangdar
Oct 24, 2007

These are the secrets of death we teach.

Neurolimal posted:

It wouldn't, which is why I brought up Windu's statement. The jedi lost before the fight at the office. At best Windu would have minimized the damage by erasing the last current generations' sith lord.

Sorry, I meant to say RotJ. As in (paraphrasing you) "What would the Rebels do once they had control of an unwilling Empire? They must either step down and allow the vacuum to be filled with an equally violent official, or must oppress the people to succeed in their coup."

quote:

I didn't say they had to seize power. I said that they were not wrong to at least attempt a trial for Palpatine (and were not wrong to attempt to execute him after discovering that he was a Sith Lord).

But the idea of having a trial for him is not mentioned in the movie. They explicitly say they intend to seize power from him, then head directly to him to do so.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Neurolimal posted:

So the reason they are enslaved is that they are not humans?

TCW does a better job of establishing the clones as enslaved. The clones of the Prequel Trilogy are not exploited. Prior to Order 66, at least.


Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Lord Krangdar posted:

Sorry, I meant to say RotJ. As in (paraphrasing you) "What would the Rebels do once they had control of an unwilling Empire? They must either step down and allow the vacuum to be filled with an equally violent official, or must oppress the people to succeed in their coup."

Thats why I put emphasis on the rebels being of the people; obviously change can never happen if it requires unanimous decree, but through the consent of the majority of society the empire can become the New Republic without major harm to the citizens nor the risk of regression.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Neurolimal posted:

It's certainly exploitative, but considering who they are cloned from I'm inclined to believe that they are aggressive and faithful to their job as soldiers because those were traits of the Fetts. The republic benefits from their work, but did not make them warriors. Its dehumanizing, but at the same time they are not human; we do not know how the clone process works nor how they view their reproduction. For all we know, there could be a constantly updated vat of Jango Cody, and Cody himself views his own body as a disposable instrument.

Dooku certainly deserves blame for their war-focused culture, but it feels like they are as exploited as a free droid; someone influenced and coded them, does that mean they will always be slaves?

Neurolimal posted:

Yeah, but in the PT the mind control aspects are used only by Dracula. Outside of his orders (which the republic are never shown to be aware of) the troopers are joking, squabbling, smiling at thethe presumed "masters", and even get names (like Jango Cody).

If Cnut can see the reasoning in this argument, I'm sure you can as well.

brawleh
Feb 25, 2011

I figured out why the hippo did it.

Neurolimal posted:

Because you dont make a cause just by joining the slaveowners. The answer to the civil war was not to join the south.

The droids are not uprising for freedom. They are being commanded to rise up for the separatists' ideals. Which are not suggested to involve droid rights.

Why are they not joining in order to make the cause just when faced with the truth, as you assert they would. Again you're ignoring the jedi and the republic being the root cause of these problems. That the separatist movement is lead by a disillusioned former jedi master who tries to convince another of that order with the truth. You're clouding your own judgement on this issue in order to appeal and appease to a majority(republic) who don’t see droids as people, think about this.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

brawleh posted:

Why are they not joining in order to make the cause just when faced with the truth, as you assert they would. Again you're ignoring the jedi and the republic being the root cause of these problems. That the separatist movement is lead by a disillusioned former jedi master who tries to convince another of that order with the truth. You're clouding your own judgement on this issue in order to appeal and appease to a majority(republic) who don’t see droids as people, think about this.

Who says that they would be allowed to join? That they will be allowed to replace the unjust cause with a just cause? How will they make the separatists fight alongside droids? Are the droids capable of rebelling? Do the droid-wipe motherships still exist? Doesn't that same ship design show up in the opening of RotS?

It's not enough for Dooku to claim he is fighting for droids. He must act to fight on behalf of droids. That means more than just the republic, it also means those immediately exploiting and jeopardizing the droids.

If you are disinterested in severing TCW from the PT, and entirely stubboring in believing that the droids are fighting for freedom, also consider that Dooku is responsible for the creation of the army stonewalling the droids. Also consider that his sith person is known for his wit and lies.

Neurolimal fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Apr 26, 2016

Serf
May 5, 2011


Neurolimal posted:

If Cnut can see the reasoning in this argument, I'm sure you can as well.

Nah. The clones are very much human, and forcing them to fight is plain wrong. The movie practically beats the audience over the head with the slavery imagery, and in Attack of the Clones the Kamino cloning facility is likened to the Geonosis droid foundry. The clones and the droids are two armies of slaves fighting for two evil belligerents who are in turn both being duped by Palpatine.

E: I should add that forcing droids to fight is also wrong. If your liberal democracy has to force slaves to fight for it, it really doesn't deserve to exist.

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy

Neurolimal posted:

The elites of the republic are the Imperials. The Imperials resist the rebels. The existence of sympathetic imperials does not suggest that the rebels are controlled by the imperials.

The rebels are the people. You are demanding that guerillas display themselves openly in civilian areas before you are willing to consider that members of the rebels are members of the citizens.

We even follow a member of the empire as he joins the rebels.

Again, you are confused. Both the Rebels and the Empire exist only as armies and military bases. There is no popular component to them. Both are led by elites. The movies depict no social mobilization or organization for revolutionary purposes. The Rebel Allliance is not a popular, emancipatory movement, but a top-down movement to restore the Old Republic (that is to say, the Senate).

Again, there is nothing wrong with observing or admitting that the OT is a problematic portrait of social revolt. I don't love them any less for it.

BravestOfTheLamps fucked around with this message at 00:14 on Apr 26, 2016

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Serf posted:

Nah. The clones are very much human, and forcing them to fight is plain wrong. The movie practically beats the audience over the head with the slavery imagery, and in Attack of the Clones the Kamino cloning facility is likened to the Geonosis droid foundry. The clones and the droids are two armies of slaves fighting for two evil belligerents who are in turn both being duped by Palpatine.

E: I should add that forcing droids to fight is also wrong. If your liberal democracy has to force slaves to fight for it, it really doesn't deserve to exist.

The abstract fails to connect to the literal. Despite the relation we have no reason not to treat the Jango race as a new race. They do not reproduce as humans. They do not grow as humans. They do not mutate as humans. They do not hold similar cultures as humans. They do not learn only as humans. They are humans only in DNA relation. And even that might be suspect if they have been genetically modified. The clones do not hate their role and see it as important. They are actively and happily chatting about it and cracking jokes and looking up to their generals (presumed slavemasters).

None of this happens with the droids. They are treated as disposable tools and respected as disposable tools. We are never shown a separatist talking to a droid as equals. We can say otherwise for the Jangos.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

Again, you are confused. Both the Rebels and the Empire exist only as armies and military bases. There is no popular component to them. Both are led by elites. The movies depict no social mobilization or organization for revolutionary purposes. The Rebel Allliance is not a popular, emancipatory movement, but a top-down movement to restore the Old Republic (that is to say, the Senate).

Again, there is nothing wrong with observing or admitting that the OT is a problematic portrait of social revolt. I don't love them any less for it.

How would you propose a public element be included in a guerilla faction?

They do depict social mobilization. They do it almost verbatim for real life guerilla forces. A sympathetic citizen is discovered, a member of the force recruits them into their cause. They don't pick up shovels and scythes in a montage and stand around outside growling.

brawleh
Feb 25, 2011

I figured out why the hippo did it.

Neurolimal posted:

Who says that they would be allowed to join? That they will be allowed to replace the unjust cause with a just cause? How will they make the separatists fight alongside droids? Are the droids capable of rebelling? Do the droid-wipe motherships still exist? Doesn't that same ship design show up in the opening of RotS?

Count Dooku leader of the separatist movement pleads with Obi-Wan to join him, he does using the truth. If his cause is driven by truth, why does Obi-Wan mistrust what he says? Again the separatists are visually depicted as a diverse and overwhelming force of droids fighting against a stagnant image from the past that seeks to suppress their uprising. Think about what you're saying. Impartiality does not exist only a subjective truth exists, confront this.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

brawleh posted:

Count Dooku leader of the separatist movement pleads with Obi-Wan to join him, he does using the truth. If his cause is driven by truth, why does Obi-Wan mistrust what he says? Again the separatists are visually depicted as a diverse and overwhelming force of droids fighting against a stagnant image from the past that seeks to suppress their uprising. Think about what you're saying. Impartiality does not exist only a subjective truth exists, confront this.

The separatist controllers are depicted as diverse. The droids are depicted as increasingly mutated and upgraded creatures with only one purpose; war. As one deadlier version is produced the older model is slowly outmoded from the army.

The imagery not only does not fit the literal actions, they do not even immediately support your reading, required strained readings where the positive values of the slaves are attributed to the slavemasters.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Neurolimal posted:

The abstract fails to connect to the literal. Despite the relation we have no reason not to treat the Jango race as a new race. They do not reproduce as humans. They do not grow as humans. They do not mutate as humans. They do not hold similar cultures as humans. They do not learn only as humans. They are humans only in DNA relation. And even that might be suspect if they have been genetically modified. The clones do not hate their role and see it as important. They are actively and happily chatting about it and cracking jokes and looking up to their generals (presumed slavemasters).

None of this happens with the droids. They are treated as disposable tools and respected as disposable tools. We are never shown a separatist talking to a droid as equals. We can say otherwise for the Jangos.

Sorry, I don't buy it. The clones are clearly shown to be indoctrinated. In a way, they're a lot like the stormtroopers of TFA. Brainwashed from a young age and forced to fight in someone else's war.

And let's say the clones are a different species. Now you have an entire slave species that is serving the whims of a supposedly liberal democracy and their guardians of peace and justice. Which is just as bad as a regular slave army.

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy

Neurolimal posted:

How would you propose a public element be included in a guerilla faction?

They do depict social mobilization. They do it almost verbatim for real life guerilla forces. A sympathetic citizen is discovered, a member of the force recruits them into their cause. They don't pick up shovels and scythes in a montage and stand around outside growling.

Sam Kriss posted:

At the start of A New Hope, we hear that the Alliance has growing support within the Imperial Senate, and Imperial Senates aren’t usually very fond of proper revolutionaries. Consider the Alliance’s tactics. Every time we meet the rebels, they have built themselves a base on some deserted planet, where they’re stockpiling heavy arms.

As any good student of Mao knows, a revolutionary movement can only succeed if it wins the trust of the people; holding territory is a game played by the State, not those trying to overthrow it. We never see the rebels being sheltered from Stormtroopers by grateful peasants (while they do ally with the Ewoks, it’s with a fully colonial sense of entitlement); we never see Alliance propaganda being passed around in secret by the oppressed; we never see any indication that this armed faction has any kind of popular mandate whatsoever.

This is however unnecessary, since it would complicate the OT's naive romance. It is enough to observe how facile the Rebellion is.

Also, Obi-Wan isn't a member of the Rebel Alliance.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Serf posted:

Sorry, I don't buy it. The clones are clearly shown to be indoctrinated. In a way, they're a lot like the stormtroopers of TFA. Brainwashed from a young age and forced to fight in someone else's war.

And let's say the clones are a different species. Now you have an entire slave species that is serving the whims of a supposedly liberal democracy and their guardians of peace and justice. Which is just as bad as a regular slave army.

You're free to believe that. Both of our readings are subjective and we can agree to disagree.

I will note however, not specifically aimed at Serf, this is the same attitude used when dismissing the Prequel Trilogy.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

This is however unnecessary, since it would complicate the OT's naive romance. It is enough to observe that they do not represent truth.

Also, Obi-Wan isn't a member of the Rebel Alliance.

If we're going to include extended materials such as scripts and cartoons to support our readings, I will point to the Star Wars Holiday Special, where citizens of the empire are attacked by stormtroopers, defeated by heroes of the rebellion, and then the heroes are sheltered by the citizens. If you are no fan of Death of the Author, take note that all of this was approved by George Lucas himself in weekly draft submissions.

The ewoks are never shown to be forced into their position. They freely fight and are commended for their efforts. They do not fight for the ideals for the republic but for the ideals they have placed upon a member of the rebels. While different from the rest of the rebels, this does not make them any less willing members.

Stacks
Apr 22, 2016
Just by dint of the Rebellion's goal of restoring the Republic they're working for the People. No one has a voice in the Empire. For all it's faults, the Republic gives them that voice.

Serf
May 5, 2011










Two armies of slaves, similar in almost every way. Including the assembly-line nature of their production.

I love the contrast of these two scenes. Kamino is rounded edges, blue and white, almost dreamlike in nature, attended by weird but nonthreatening beings. Geonosis is all sharp corners, dirt, red and brown and populated by industrious but frightening aliens. The contrast is used to show the similarity, though. Both the Kaminoans and the Geonosians are mercenary in nature, manufacturing armies of slaves at the behest of corrupt political blocs. And the droids and clones are built, programmed, and deployed almost identically.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012
I see it a different way; Kamino depicts an incredibly alien environment, fitting for the birth of a new race. The Kaminoans themselves have a very nonthreatening design and attire, fitting for safekeepers for a currently resting nursery.

Meanwhile Genosis is filthy, bleak, dark, industrial, monolithic. It calls to mind imagery of the Gilded Age, which is fitting for the center of the federation/separatists' exploitation of droids. Especially the contrast between the artificial and overwhelmingly hellish conditions the workers face, compared to the living conditions of the Separatists themselves.

I hope BOTL is taking so long to reply because they're studiously examining the Star Wars Holiday Special.

brawleh
Feb 25, 2011

I figured out why the hippo did it.

Neurolimal posted:

The separatist controllers are depicted as diverse. The droids are depicted as increasingly mutated and upgraded creatures with only one purpose; war. As one deadlier version is produced the older model is slowly outmoded from the army.

The imagery not only does not fit the literal actions, they do not even immediately support your reading, required strained readings where the positive values of the slaves are attributed to the slavemasters.

Yes you have successfully dehumanized an uprising of the oppressed, regardless of their intent, who fight a war against their oppressor. An oppressor who wishes to suppress this uprising in order to restore peace and by proxy restore them to their place within the republic(system). The imagery of the prequels couldn't be more clear. We start with a droid army first depicted as a uniform force that changes as they join a rebellion that embroils the galaxy in a civil war, only to faced a visually stagnant clone from the past.



BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy

Neurolimal posted:

I see it a different way; Kamino depicts an incredibly alien environment, fitting for the birth of a new race. The Kaminoans themselves have a very nonthreatening design and attire, fitting for safekeepers for a currently resting nursery.

It's explicitly a show for clients.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

brawleh posted:

Yes you have successfully dehumanized an uprising of the oppressed, regardless of their intent, who fight a war against their oppressor. An oppressor who wishes to suppress this uprising in order to restore peace and by proxy restore them to their place within the republic(system). The imagery of the prequels couldn't be more clear. We start with a droid army first depicted as a uniform force that changes as they join a rebellion that embroils the galaxy in a civil war, only to faced a visually stagnant clone from the past.





"Regardless of their intent"

Congratulations. You have introduced identity politics to war.

The droids are enslaved by the separatists, fighting for the separatists. In the naval era many poor citizens were press-ganged into british, french, and spanish armies. That doesn't mean that there existed three impoverished uprisings. It meant the downtrodden were being exploited, irregardless of the quality of their spears nor the cleanliness of their ships.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Neurolimal posted:

I see it a different way; Kamino depicts an incredibly alien environment, fitting for the birth of a new race. The Kaminoans themselves have a very nonthreatening design and attire, fitting for safekeepers for a currently resting nursery.

Meanwhile Genosis is filthy, bleak, dark, industrial, monolithic. It calls to mind imagery of the Gilded Age, which is fitting for the center of the federation/separatists' exploitation of droids. Especially the contrast between the artificial and overwhelmingly hellish conditions the workers face, compared to the living conditions of the Separatists themselves.

I hope BOTL is taking so long to reply because they're studiously examining the Star Wars Holiday Special.

And yet the clones and the droids will both end up dying pointlessly in a war that doesn't stand to benefit them. The droids will remain slaves as they always have (as seen in the OT and ST), and the clones will just rapidly die off. Neither is free in any sense of the word.

E: I don't know where this whole "droid uprising" thing came from but that is explicitly not what is happening in the PT. The Separatists may have legitimate grievances against the Republic, but the droids are just as oppressed under them as they are under the Republic.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

It's explicitly a show for clients.

I'm glad that we can happily handwave any readings that dont support our personal ones.

My turn: the person recording the RotS dogfight is intentionally focusing on samey republic ships to upsell the diversity and strength of the Federation. Possibly a Camera-droid. On a leash.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Serf posted:

And yet the clones and the droids will both end up dying pointlessly in a war that doesn't stand to benefit them. The droids will remain slaves as they always have (as seen in the OT and ST), and the clones will just rapidly die off. Neither is free in any sense of the word.

E: I don't know where this whole "droid uprising" thing came from but that is explicitly not what is happening in the PT. The Separatists may have legitimate grievances against the Republic, but the droids are just as oppressed under them as they are under the Republic.

Sure, ultimately both clones and droids die for a senseless war of no consequence. My only point is that the clones aren't enslaved in the sense typically used. At best they are enslaved to Dooku and Palpatine specificaly, who both ingrain war into their minds and will-overriding orders, without the Republic's input.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009


Jesus the prequels are good.

sponges
Sep 15, 2011

euphronius posted:

Jesus the prequels are good.

At the very least, there's lots of good individual shots in the prequels.

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy

Neurolimal posted:

I'm glad that we can happily handwave any readings that dont support our personal ones.

Obi-Wan, the client, is taken for a tour to show how advanced their clone factory is.

quote:

LAMA SU: "And now to business."

The whole scene is played as creepy and disconcerting. The Kaminoans are proud of "birth acceleration" and gene-manipulation that makes the clones less independent.

porfiria
Dec 10, 2008

by Modern Video Games

euphronius posted:

Jesus the prequels are good.

They're great as long as they're still images without people in them.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

Obi-Wan, the client, is taken for a tour to show how advanced their clone factory is.


The whole scene is played as creepy and disconcerting. The Kaminoans are proud of "birth acceleration" and gene-manipulation that makes the clones less independent.

Or it's played as uncomfortably alien. If I recall right, within the Clone Wars cartoon the Kaminoans are not slimy used car salesmen, but technologically advanced and integrated aliens who worship a specific jedi member. This suggests an inhuman disconnect from organic emotions, a pride in their ability to augment, and an incredibly favorable view of jedi.

It's through these aspects that Obi is proudly shown the inner workings of the clone process, confident that its inorganic cleanliness and unnervingly sterile and logical atmosphere will impress him.

In this reading both readings are true: Obi is given a tour to impress him, and the facility represents the machinations of godlike figures creating a new race. They violate the clones in inhumane ways, but only because they themselves are inhumane. Also I doubt their wacky buildings could house both a Fake Clone factory and a Real Clone factory.

  • Locked thread