|
homeless poster posted:provided that TRUMP wins the general, I wonder if conservatives will have the same kind of milquetoast indifference towards the fact that after 8 years there was never actually a wall built across the US/Mexico border, in the same way that liberals currently have a milquetoast indifference towards the fact that after 8 years Obama never closed gitmo. like will they blame an intractable congress and senate on TRUMP's inability to build a wall too, or will they concoct even more outlandish scenarios? The wall is already there lol
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 04:19 |
|
Majorian posted:You realize Congressional intractability is literally the reason why Gitmo was never closed, right? lol speaking of milquetoast indifference
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:48 |
|
Korelle posted:It would be nice to at least have a few pages to enjoy the electoral chaos without having Majorian poo poo up the thread with a constant stream of painfully terrible posts. no no no i used to feel the same way but then i realized he only feels compelled to do it when trump is dominating the narrative think of him like the canary in the coal mine except instead of warning of dangerous gas he actually produces and inhales his own dangerous gas and warns of america being great again its a metaphor you see
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:48 |
|
zoux posted:https://twitter.com/bgittleson/status/725765632965369857 That's just him admitting to Zodiac killings, "this" is his signature, "this" is Ted Cruz, "this" is the Zodiac signing.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:48 |
|
I like how the Cruz-iCarly mashup didn't even last 12 hours before the news narrative literally turned into Cruz = Satan. I was born too late to explore the seas, and too early to explore the stars, but at just the right time to experience the most riduclous election in the history of the most powerful country that's ever existed.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:48 |
|
Some helpful suggestions on how to use this image over the next few days: Polls show Cruz is dead: Polls show Trump's win streak will stop: Kaisch chokes on sandwich:
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:49 |
|
https://twitter.com/cafedotcom/status/725464561852289024
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:49 |
|
zoux posted:Ah so this stunning takedown of HRC and Trump is why Cruz brought Carly on board. just lmao @ the Cruz/Carly attempt to portray Trump as "the system" I'm the Trump supporter who watches this ad and thinks my god, Carly is right, Donald Trump has been the real Washington insider all along
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:49 |
|
William Bear posted:I like the idea that Donald Trump is some kind of cyborg with an augmented reality display of every person he sees' energy level. Lol
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:50 |
|
Majorian posted:You realize Congressional intractability is literally the reason why Gitmo was never closed, right? They couldnt put the remaining prisoners on US soil when they were never charged with a crime, and they couldnt wrangle them out of the military system to charge them in the federal courts, but im not surprised you dont know the details
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:50 |
|
homeless poster posted:provided that TRUMP wins the general, I wonder if conservatives will have the same kind of milquetoast indifference towards the fact that after 8 years there was never actually a wall built across the US/Mexico border, in the same way that liberals currently have a milquetoast indifference towards the fact that after 8 years Obama never closed gitmo. like will they blame an intractable congress and senate on TRUMP's inability to build a wall too, or will they concoct even more outlandish scenarios? lol if you think we'll have elections 8 years after trump wins. alternatively: he will pick a successor candidate who will also promise to build the wall and finish what he started "After I'm elected, the first thing I'll do is finish that wall!" and the crowd goes wild
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 20:53 |
|
Helical Nightmares posted:I'll take a look. Uh psychohistory IS real, it's just that Trump is the mule, we've been over this. And David Rockefeller is Seldon.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:03 |
|
This is the best loving thing, i can't stop laughing
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:05 |
|
Korelle posted:It would be nice to at least have a few pages to enjoy the electoral chaos without having Majorian poo poo up the thread with a constant stream of painfully terrible posts. You haven't had him blocked for months? It's smooth sailing
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:05 |
|
This is precisely the kind of reaction Trump is trying to get. Yes, in October what he said would be very bad for him. But by getting Hillary to continue to play up her "I'm a woman, fellow women!" now, he opens up a lot of attack options down the line.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:12 |
|
homeless poster posted:provided that TRUMP wins the general, I wonder if conservatives will have the same kind of milquetoast indifference towards the fact that after 8 years there was never actually a wall built across the US/Mexico border, in the same way that liberals currently have a milquetoast indifference towards the fact that after 8 years Obama never closed gitmo. like will they blame an intractable congress and senate on TRUMP's inability to build a wall too, or will they concoct even more outlandish scenarios? Who you kidding. It's the latter all the way. Oiled and Ready posted:Uh psychohistory IS real, it's just that Trump is the mule, we've been over this. And David Rockefeller is Seldon. :iamafag:
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:12 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:This is precisely the kind of reaction Trump is trying to get. Yes, in October what he said would be very bad for him. But by getting Hillary to continue to play up her "I'm a woman, fellow women!" now, he opens up a lot of attack options down the line. Like what
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:13 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:This is precisely the kind of reaction Trump is trying to get. Yes, in October what he said would be very bad for him. But by getting Hillary to continue to play up her "I'm a woman, fellow women!" now, he opens up a lot of attack options down the line. Exactly. He's really the best at this that anyone's seen.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:14 |
|
zoux posted:Like what She will lose the valuable misogyny coalition
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:15 |
|
wow new dilbert blog already we are blessed dilbert blog is an approved news source for any aspiring hari seldon "can trump change the frame on his perceived sexism?" dilbert blog posted:Donald Trump called John Kasich “disgusting” for how he eats. Trump insulted Rand Paul’s looks. He said Rubio was sweaty and little. He mocked a disabled guy (an enemy reporter) who has a bad arm. Ted Cruz turned into “lyin’ Ted” and Jeb Bush got tagged with the “low energy” kill shot. dilbert blog -> predictit in 2016 if you want to be rich
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:19 |
|
Where the gently caress is my men's card?? I need something to go with my tshirt
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:23 |
|
Trump *click*
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:27 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:This is precisely the kind of reaction Trump is trying to get. I think "precisely the kind of reaction he was trying to get" was cheers from the crowd of trump supporters he was talking to. It seems people have shifted from "Trump is a moron who nobody will ever vote for" to "Trump is actually Kevin loving Spacey and underneath that dopey orange exterior he is a cold, calculating machine that is manipulating the world and playing us all like chess pieces". They still aren't right. Donald Trump is Donald Trump. He's breaking the system because it turns out the system had gaping holes in it that everyone ignored and it was just asking to be broken, all it required was shouting what he thought people would like to hear and calling corrupt politicians corrupt.. Him beating Cruz is not an absurd miracle or the result of a convoluted long-con that would make an anime villain blush, because Cruz is an absurdly unlikable goon that the Republicans were stupid to ever think would be President and they're even more stupid for being in denial about this fact. They're even more stupid for announcing to the world that they'd have two candidates collaborating in order to keep the popular vote from mattering and leave the decision up to a closed council of detached elites and that people would just be okay with this. They bathed in gasoline, lit and match, and are now looking around starstruck wondering how everything is suddenly on fire. Augus fucked around with this message at 21:37 on Apr 28, 2016 |
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:32 |
|
Peachstapler posted:Oregon Poll (thanks C7ty1) from Hoffman Research Group: Well now. Well now indeed.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:33 |
|
zoux posted:Like what I don't know, I'm not Trump, but giving out literal women's cards plays into his narrative that if you're a smart person regardless of gender you shouldn't vote for the person who wants the job based on their gender. I'm eager to see what he does with it after goading her into making that kind of move 100 more times before August.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:35 |
|
Augus posted:I think "precisely the kind of reaction he was trying to get" was cheers from the crowd of trump supporters he was talking to. I shifted to that about 6 months ago and it's been working fairly well every single day since. Meanwhile the wailing from people like you never ends but it never seems to matter! E: also he doubled down in an interview so I donno what crowd of people cheering you're talking about
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:37 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:I don't know, I'm not Trump, but giving out literal women's cards plays into his narrative that if you're a smart person regardless of gender you shouldn't vote for the person who wants the job based on their gender. I'm eager to see what he does with it after goading her into making that kind of move 100 more times before August. Let me go ahead and stop you there: "Woman Card" is an unmitigated disaster of a statement that is going to dog him until November.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:37 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:This is precisely the kind of reaction Trump is trying to get. Yes, in October what he said would be very bad for him. But by getting Hillary to continue to play up her "I'm a woman, fellow women!" now, he opens up a lot of attack options down the line. lmao, what does this even mean? You think this is going to be some kind of self-limiting angle of attack for the Clinton campaign? Like they're going to hit October and be shrugging their shoulders because they shot their wad during the Spring?
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:38 |
|
zoux posted:Let me go ahead and stop you there: "Woman Card" is an unmitigated disaster of a statement that is going to dog him until November. I have been stopped in my tracks. You are wrong, though, it will dog him to a fever pitch at some point in the narrative (debate one?), which he will choose, then something will happen and you'll be asking how the gently caress Hillary is so bad at running a campaign and there'll be talk of 2008 and Sanders etc etc Then people like you will act like you called it.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:41 |
|
Lol the woman card line of attack would probably lose steam against like, Scott Walker, but it'll get stronger and stronger against Trump because any time the DNC sees women ticking up in favorability for him they'll just play another Stern tape where he says J Lo is too ugly and therefore shouldn't be successful or some poo poo
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:41 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:I don't know, I'm not Trump, but giving out literal women's cards plays into his narrative that if you're a smart person regardless of gender you shouldn't vote for the person who wants the job based on their gender. I'm eager to see what he does with it after goading her into making that kind of move 100 more times before August. clinton playing the gender card doesn't come off nearly as badly irl as it does on reddit a lot of women really do want to see the first female president and sexism to them is a real actual phenomenon they deal with. especially older voters who votes reliably.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:41 |
|
Well well well looks like we all owe Ted Cruz an apology. https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/725759923200520192 Oiled and Ready posted:I have been stopped in my tracks. You are wrong, though, it will dog him to a fever pitch at some point in the narrative (debate one?), which he will choose, then something will happen and you'll be asking how the gently caress Hillary is so bad at running a campaign and there'll be talk of 2008 and Sanders etc etc Ok buddy.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:41 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:I shifted to that about 6 months ago and it's been working fairly well every single day since. Then I'm afraid you're missing the point.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:41 |
|
He doesn't necessarily have to be cold and calculating and be all "if Clinton does this I will do this" for every possible scenario, that's some poo poo that a big machine of a campaign would pay an army of consultants to map out and it wouldn't be or come off organic. What Trump does is he gets inside his opponent's heads and so it becomes a very natural process to draw their weaknesses out of them. A lot of his haters just don't seem to get what level he's operating at. Neither cold and calculating or completely off the cuff, he's disciplined yet unpredictable because he knows how to read people and situations. He's a real politician. Doesn't need an army of professionals around him tell him how to read situations. Of course, that will become more helpful as time goes on as the campaign gets more complicated, and a Presidency is obviously even more complicated than that with a higher learning curve. But that basic instinct will always be a huge strength. IMO Trump has personal qualities that many people aspire to have. Cue the "ha, like racist and sexist?
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:41 |
|
zoux posted:Let me go ahead and stop you there: "Woman Card" is an unmitigated disaster of a statement that is going to dog him until November. Prob true if people didn't remember the hatred Hillary supporters felt towards Barry in 08 after he won the nomination
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:41 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:I don't know, I'm not Trump, but giving out literal women's cards plays into his narrative that if you're a smart person regardless of gender you shouldn't vote for the person who wants the job based on their gender. I'm eager to see what he does with it after goading her into making that kind of move 100 more times before August. Haha, what? Isn't it obvious that HRC is doing that as a response to Trump's comments? It's not a funny joke, but it's a joke.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:42 |
|
Louisgod posted:Where the gently caress is my men's card?? I need something to go with my tshirt Trump got the MRA vote on LOCK!
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:42 |
|
https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/725704920851185664
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:42 |
|
sharkbomb posted:lmao, what does this even mean? "Hillary thinks she gets your vote because you're a woman. She's entitled, but women are smart enough to vote for who will do a better job." This is the frame, and the more times he can get Hillary to make a "he can't say that about us women, right ladies?" move the more ammo he'll have when he turns to that frame in the fall.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 04:19 |
|
Oiled and Ready posted:"Hillary thinks she gets your vote because you're a woman. She's entitled, but women are smart enough to vote for who will do a better job." This is the frame, and the more times he can get Hillary to make a "he can't say that about us women, right ladies?" move the more ammo he'll have when he turns to that frame in the fall. this is what a bunch of dudes on reddit believes but doesn't correspond very well with real life even palin did well with women until the couric interviews or so, her announcement as vp literally flipped women voters like 20 points in mccain's favor overnight
|
# ? Apr 28, 2016 21:44 |