|
(guy who dished out a formal punishment in response to a light insult) I am extremely happy and love being insulted! It does NOT effect my mood. I'm cool as a cucumber.
|
# ? May 15, 2016 15:35 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 14:21 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2016 15:41 |
|
agreed
|
# ? May 15, 2016 15:42 |
|
now make them editable
|
# ? May 15, 2016 15:50 |
|
it's nice to finally get some laughs from this thread
|
# ? May 15, 2016 16:32 |
|
forums cancer lmao
|
# ? May 15, 2016 16:47 |
|
mishaq posted:forums cancer lmao one of the few who deserve it imo
|
# ? May 15, 2016 16:49 |
|
couldn't happen to a better poster
|
# ? May 15, 2016 17:50 |
|
lomarf
|
# ? May 15, 2016 18:03 |
|
two meltdowns on one page. I love this gay soon to be dead forum
|
# ? May 15, 2016 18:11 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Industry standard prototyping and milling software literally doesn't run on anything but Windows autocad runs on Mac and advertising people don't use print software they use Photoshop and then send it to actual printing shops. the Mac is the platform of choice for creatives, don't be a loving idiot.
|
# ? May 15, 2016 19:37 |
|
YA BOY ETHAN COUCH posted:the Mac is the platform of choice for ... a loving idiot.
|
# ? May 15, 2016 19:53 |
|
i use a mac cuck
|
# ? May 15, 2016 20:17 |
|
YA BOY ETHAN COUCH posted:autocad runs on Mac and advertising people don't use print software they use Photoshop and then send it to actual printing shops. Having used the Mac AutoCAD for several years, it somehow sucks more than Windows AutoCAD.
|
# ? May 15, 2016 20:46 |
|
lol did you just to cure your cancer
|
# ? May 15, 2016 20:55 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Having used the Mac AutoCAD for several years, it somehow sucks more than Windows AutoCAD. NX and Teamcenter I think are still supported on OSX but I think they're basically the Linux versions and those suck. Neither Solidworks nor CATIA are available on OSX. Fabricated fucked around with this message at 21:18 on May 15, 2016 |
# ? May 15, 2016 20:56 |
|
Fabricated posted:IIRC I think only Mudbox, Maya, Sketchbook, and regular AutoCAD are natively supported in OSX- I think with some other tools that integrate into those are supported too? Solidworks is mostly what I was talking about... I know there's other tools that might be more popular, but the method of AutoCAD -> Solidworks -> MasterCAM/whatever mill control software -> finishing the machining yourself is just something that's not going to work with a mac at about any step in that process
|
# ? May 15, 2016 22:27 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Solidworks is mostly what I was talking about... I know there's other tools that might be more popular, but the method of AutoCAD -> Solidworks -> MasterCAM/whatever mill control software -> finishing the machining yourself is just something that's not going to work with a mac at about any step in that process It's a big piece of poo poo and I hate it though. edit: also Creo
|
# ? May 15, 2016 23:11 |
|
YA BOY ETHAN COUCH posted:the Mac is the platform of choice for creatives, don't be a loving idiot. I see them in studio use, but rarely anymore by choice. The last place I was in had a first year PowerMac G5 hooked up to a wide format printer and a film scanner, both of which were as old as the mac. Newer software and hardware may work on Windows/OSX, but when it's running a scanner and printer that are "if you have to ask" expensive and won't work on intel, it's hard to really justify an upgrade when it's cheaper to keep the computer running than it is to replace an ink cartridge so the old stuff chugs along. Then because the people just getting started see the macs running the core of a lot of studios, they associate macs with creativity. The prevailing attitude in the studio I was at for the few years I was there was of the youngest people loving the macs and the older crowd tolerating them and just wanting new machines that were faster and had the new software and new hardware that wasn't being kept in operation by prayers and bodges but had to be used because no way can a small studio afford to upgrade that much gear, so you used what you had. Working in a studio or other creative enterprise is pretty much the opposite of what people think or pretend it is, unless you get in with a major firm or studio that actually makes some money.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 01:42 |
|
YA BOY ETHAN COUCH posted:autocad runs on Mac and advertising people don't use print software they use Photoshop and then send it to actual printing shops. autocad is an anachronistic piece of poo poo that no designer or engineer has used in earnest since 2004 solidworks and catia, and maybe pro-e/creo. and none of those run on Macs. obviously neither do the CAM softwares that actually run the machines but that's not a ~creative~ job so I guess it doesn't count
|
# ? May 16, 2016 01:51 |
|
I'm a creative.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 02:03 |
|
Besides when people say stupid poo poo like Macs Are For Creatives they're thinking of like, adobe premiere and photoshop. Yeah sure photoshop runs fine on a mac but have you ever rendered a high quality video from raw source with premiere. That poo poo takes hours. So why would you buy a $2000 mac when you can buy a $1400 PC that has triple the processing power because of GPU offloading etc.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 05:33 |
|
The answer is because you're a retarded tech worker with more money than sense and you don't actually know much of anything outside of Java or whatever which is why you haven't gotten a raise for 5 years
|
# ? May 16, 2016 05:34 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2016 05:39 |
|
evilcat posted:I see them in studio use, but rarely anymore by choice. The last place I was in had a first year PowerMac G5 hooked up to a wide format printer and a film scanner, both of which were as old as the mac. This is more or less exactly the experience I had working at a publisher. I think I was working with beige desktop Macs as late as 2009.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 05:51 |
|
lol if you dont have a beefy server with a bunch of tesla cards to do all your rendering on remotely from your mac
|
# ? May 16, 2016 06:04 |
|
i dont' so gently caress you
|
# ? May 16, 2016 10:12 |
|
can we all take a moment of silence for warren "i dont do tech" buffett's 100 million unrealized loss in aapl
|
# ? May 16, 2016 14:02 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Besides when people say stupid poo poo like Macs Are For Creatives they're thinking of like, adobe premiere and photoshop. Yeah sure photoshop runs fine on a mac but have you ever rendered a high quality video from raw source with premiere. That poo poo takes hours. So why would you buy a $2000 mac when you can buy a $1400 PC that has triple the processing power because of GPU offloading etc. wha tabout audio. if you want 2 make sweet synth sounds or record people you use osx... the gold standard. thanks logic x. thanks tim.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 15:58 |
|
Buffett has figured out that Apple has turned into a value company, and he is likely holding for the long term, so don't morn his losses just yet.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 15:58 |
|
remains scary from an investors perspective just how huge a monolith apple is resting almost exclusively on the iphone. but the stock is very very cheap even if the assumption is that they just tread water for decades to come in before tim tries to compete with tesla, making no money while tarnishing the brand, making the whole thing come crashing down
|
# ? May 16, 2016 16:31 |
|
The Management posted:Buffett has figured out that Apple has turned into a value company, and he is likely holding for the long term, so don't morn his losses just yet. alternatively, aapl is a stable consumer dividend and the position was entered by the portfolio managers Cybernetic Vermin posted:remains scary from an investors perspective just how huge a monolith apple is resting almost exclusively on the iphone. but the stock is very very cheap even if the assumption is that they just tread water for decades to come its ok. GE peaked decades ago but that hasnt stopped it
|
# ? May 16, 2016 16:56 |
|
Triglav posted:its ok. GE peaked decades ago but that hasnt stopped it GE is a pretty diverse company though unlike Apple which basically is the iPhone. If somehow some other company were to dominate and eradicate them in the cell phone industry, Apple would be a much different company.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 20:09 |
|
GE has fingers in all pies.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 20:09 |
|
Shaggar posted:GE has fingers in all pies. The major DCS vendors are losing market share quick as the smaller PLC vendors *coughRockwellcough* move way, way up market as all these coal plants retrofit to gas and overall that is Very Good because DCS vendors can eat a big bag of poo poo
|
# ? May 16, 2016 20:15 |
|
Stux posted:wha tabout audio. if you want 2 make sweet synth sounds or record people you use osx... the gold standard. thanks logic x. thanks tim. The only mac exclusive audio program is Garageband which is fail garbage.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 20:16 |
|
GE is one of those companies that is so big that most of it can do well and part of it can poo poo the bed and ruin the stock price.
|
# ? May 16, 2016 20:42 |
|
Triglav posted:alternatively, aapl is a stable consumer dividend and the position was entered by the portfolio managers it is exactly a stable dividend, plus buybacks are steadily increasing eps. they are a value stock GE was rigging its books for years under Welch, hiding losses and deferring profits so that they always hit guidance figures. Apple doesn't do that and then they take a hit when they have a great quarter that follows an even greater quarter y/y
|
# ? May 16, 2016 20:43 |
|
zen death robot posted:apple isn't in the weapons industry so they're kinda hosed there does spreading fail aids through their products not count as biological weaponry? take one look at pleasure kevin and cremnob and tell me apple isnt in the weapons business. please. get a loving clue
|
# ? May 16, 2016 21:03 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 14:21 |
|
zen death robot posted:i just thought that was part of being canadian certainly doesnt help
|
# ? May 16, 2016 21:12 |