|
Stringent posted:just fwiw, swift is really good swift reminds me a lot of scala, and I'd like to use it more as it matures
|
# ? May 20, 2016 16:28 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 05:04 |
|
Zemyla posted:RAM is cheaper than programmer time. Stick a several MB chip upstream of the FIFO, right before the USB black box, and have it hold the overflow. this is a prototype. i'm sticking a fat chunk of sram on the next board but until then i have no choice but misery it isnt gonna be upstream of the fifo, its gonna be the fifo
|
# ? May 20, 2016 16:29 |
|
yeah basically my ideal language would be a serious/terrible OO imperative lang that allows simple toll free bridging into a functional lang for when i want functional behaviors well, my ideal lang would be a functional lang that allows toll free bridging into an oo lang for when i want oo behaviors which basically sounds like C#/F# so that would be perfect if it werent for being tied to microsoft.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 16:32 |
|
c# is real good and Microsoft is the best so get in.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 16:33 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:yeah basically my ideal language would be a serious/terrible OO imperative lang that allows simple toll free bridging into a functional lang for when i want functional behaviors as far as one language being all things to all people it's swift imo. unfortunately apple has a lot of leftover bad habits that will probably prevent it being adopted outside of apple's sphere.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 16:37 |
|
we made our first official code convention: no wildcard imports. so far everyone had used whatever was their ide's (and sonarqube's) default settings, but today an ~*~opinion~*~ was expressed in the developers channel, discussion was had and then a decision was made. i then went and created the project coding conventions wiki page with that one line in it and added the rule to sonarqube.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 16:57 |
|
Is sonarqube any good? i.e. not lovely
|
# ? May 20, 2016 17:01 |
|
somebody please convince me that visual studio is good
|
# ? May 20, 2016 17:10 |
|
Notorious QIG posted:somebody please convince me that visual studio is good it's a terrible programmer thread axiom. i've literally never used it and yet I know that it is good.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 17:11 |
|
Notorious QIG posted:somebody please convince me that visual studio is good it's apparently good, feels like nothing special using it though. but i dunno, NetBeans was like literally sucking my dick on top of everything else it does. e: i still get hard just thinking about it's maven integration HoboMan fucked around with this message at 17:22 on May 20, 2016 |
# ? May 20, 2016 17:20 |
|
Bloody posted:if the black box is working correctly (it might be, not actually sure), it will realize it is being backpressured by the device that is reading from it; its internal fifos will start to fill up, and the backpressure will move up the chain it's a bit of a hack, but if hwfc was in use you should be setting the device to reject writes from the host when the fifo's above a watermark. set the watermark artificially low to test if the black box is sending when it shouldn't, verify with oscope traces Zemyla posted:RAM is cheaper than programmer time. Stick a several MB chip upstream of the FIFO, right before the USB black box, and have it hold the overflow.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 17:42 |
|
Shaggar posted:c# is real good and Microsoft is the best so get in.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 17:44 |
|
Bloody posted:ok so ive got a piece of hardware talking over usb to a piece of software this seems bad
|
# ? May 20, 2016 17:45 |
|
Bloody posted:eventually, the driver will learn it cant dump more poo poo down the pipe, so the method call that's writing data down the pipe will block until the whole system unjams, then it will finish its write and the rest of the system will go on its merry way add a command that just echoes the index into the return buffer. have host software sitting above the black box track how much buffer usage it's expected to consume with each command, make sure there's enough buffer for commands before sending, don't assume any rx in between
|
# ? May 20, 2016 17:51 |
|
the reason I do not find f# useful is that you are not allowed to have reference cycles between types unless they live in the same file, and your project organization must be "a list of files" because the order of the list matters. it's like writing c without forward declarations or extern
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:01 |
|
Notorious QIG posted:somebody please convince me that visual studio is good its real good
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:09 |
|
raminasi posted:the reason I do not find f# useful is that you are not allowed to have reference cycles between types unless they live in the same file, and your project organization must be "a list of files" because the order of the list matters. it's like writing c without forward declarations or extern that sounds like it's completely useless for making anything of notable size or in a team
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:28 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:it's a terrible programmer thread axiom. i've literally never used it and yet I know that it is good. idk man i just dont really like ides. they feel way overcomplicated to me
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:33 |
|
Notorious QIG posted:somebody please convince me that visual studio is good its ok but its auto complete is not as good as eclipse.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:34 |
|
vs 2015 is the best visual studio yet w/ vs15 looking to be even better!
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:36 |
|
Notorious QIG posted:idk man i just dont really like ides. they feel way overcomplicated to me just use the bits that you like. you can close every window that you don't use. idk how i'd live without it at this point
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:42 |
|
Does anyone else ever wonder how much Microsoft pays Shaggar?
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:43 |
|
ides are really good and you'd have to be insane not to use one.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:43 |
|
visual studio is good
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:44 |
|
Shaggar posted:ides are really good and you'd have to be insane not to use one. mostly this. what's your project in QTG?
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:44 |
|
i use the 2 good languages, c# and java. for c# i use visual studio and for java i use eclipse. they are the best IDEs for their respective languages. people will tell you intellij is good but they're wrong.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:45 |
|
vs is real good also i always liked this thing in nunit where you can push different cases through the same unit test body, i dont think junit or mstest have anything this neat code:
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:46 |
|
xunit has that too
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:47 |
|
Shaggar posted:i use the 2 good languages, c# and java. netbeans i will fite u
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:48 |
|
HoboMan posted:netbeans
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:49 |
|
HoboMan posted:that sounds like it's completely useless for making anything of notable size or in a team well, sorta. you can't really write a large thing in pure f#, but you can write a large .net thing made up of smaller pieces that all happen to be written in f#. using c# to glue together f# libraries with all of the interesting logic seems like the way to go.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:49 |
|
i haven't used netbeans in like a decade so i have no idea but eclipse works real good and is the standard for the language.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:49 |
|
it's not necessarily that visual studio is good GOOD it's just that every other ide is super bad
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:49 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:well, sorta. you can't really write a large thing in pure f#, but you can write a large .net thing made up of smaller pieces that all happen to be written in f#. using c# to glue together f# libraries with all of the interesting logic seems like the way to go. functional languages are mostly useless. use c# instead because it has all the good parts of functional languages
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:50 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:it's not necessarily that visual studio is good GOOD it's just that every other ides are super bad i feel like i don't understand how the building and linking is done because it abstracts it all away into "solutions" im not claiming that make is some paragon of programming tools but i like how explicit it is in terms of the exact steps your compilation is taking
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:52 |
|
c# is really good. microsoft is really good.
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:52 |
|
St Evan Echoes posted:correct, you do have to fight netbeans to get anything done interesting, that has been my experience with eclipse e: also thought the autocomplete was garbage so maybe i got some hosed up version vv HoboMan fucked around with this message at 19:03 on May 20, 2016 |
# ? May 20, 2016 18:52 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:youre beating us, we release a new version every 18 months or so. so much retrofitting in between. the magic of ~hyperspace~
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:54 |
|
Notorious QIG posted:i feel like i don't understand how the building and linking is done because it abstracts it all away into "solutions" I agree, call me an idiot but...... .....I use make instead of visual studio's building system because at least I understand my own make poo poo Notorious QIG posted:im not claiming that make is some paragon of programming tools but i like how explicit it is in terms of the exact steps your compilation is taking oh snap, I didn't read this before typing that lol I don't even edit code INSIDE visual studio, I use it more like a debugger, I feel like it's pretty good for that and everyone should try it. it doesn't need to replace everything you already use
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:58 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 05:04 |
|
Notorious QIG posted:i feel like i don't understand how the building and linking is done because it abstracts it all away into "solutions" for the average windows programmer creating average windows programs the solution model works fine - it compiles each file then links them into whatever your output file type is however you can have vs run your makefile instead of letting it make its own build decisions
|
# ? May 20, 2016 18:58 |