|
TinTower posted:The Doctor was basically one of the few fictional characters that the fandom wants to be asexual. This is generally backlash from how awkward and horrible anything related to romance is in Doctor Who, in my experience
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 00:51 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 07:18 |
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:This is generally backlash from how awkward and horrible anything related to romance is in Doctor Who, in my experience I liked Paul McGann.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 01:44 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:He has the beard/glasses/ponytail trio of a fat man. And the standard-issue dress-up polo of a fat man. Curious. You forget that there are fat nerds but also skinny nerds, who are equally punchable and have the added benefit of being chafed by the wind.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 02:45 |
|
Scott's defense of Uber. Not really much to be said, some real tech bubbel poo poo. http://slatestarscratchpad.tumblr.com/post/145471809566/uber-is-having-a-hard-time-finding-enough-people
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 03:35 |
|
Why are our social structures not working? Beats me. Anyway as I was saying how politics is just tribal outgroup identification stuff, not about real issues, which I'm all above and outside of.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 03:58 |
|
Just alerted to this Laurie Penny piece from April, in which she details precisely how "friendly AI" arguments map closely to fear of women. Ideal for the sort of Tumblr rationalist who uses "neurotypical" mostly as a misogynist slur. (As opposed to the ones who use it against people who aren't racists and/or libertarians.) Scott memory-holed his Uber piece, but archive.is provides.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 11:31 |
|
Most "friendly AI" arguments presuppose godlike, massively powerful AI overlords, however, and those AI overlords would be exceedingly unlikely to have any gendered characteristics at all.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 15:00 |
|
Woolie Wool posted:Most "friendly AI" arguments presuppose godlike, massively powerful AI overlords, however,
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 15:40 |
|
Woolie Wool posted:Most "friendly AI" arguments presuppose godlike, massively powerful AI overlords, however, and those AI overlords would be exceedingly unlikely to have any gendered characteristics at all. I mean, so would the omnipotent god of the Abrahamic religions, yet we all know He is always referred to as such despite explicitly being intended to be without distinct gender.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 15:51 |
|
Night10194 posted:I mean, so would the omnipotent god of the Abrahamic religions, yet we all know He is always referred to as such despite explicitly being intended to be without distinct gender. iirc, Muslims use "Allah" partially because it's a term with no plural or gendered forms. Also: This tweet never gets old https://twitter.com/AndyRichter/status/679085381644488706
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 15:55 |
|
Woolie Wool posted:
You are quite correct of course, evidently I was reading the other thread from the mirror universe where it had a goatee and didn't suck.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 16:55 |
|
divabot posted:You are quite correct of course, evidently I was reading the other thread from the mirror universe where it had a goatee and didn't suck. Molten Salt Reactor is fine when the IKs (and particularly fishmech) are up to bat down the crazy people. And I'm not saying that people I disagree with are crazy people, just those guys are crazy and I disagree with them.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 17:23 |
|
pookel posted:FTFY But in all the sci fi movies the future computers are voiced by smooth calm British women because americans mentally associate a British accent with intelligence and sophistication though. (I discovered a while back while watching some brit gameshows that it works in reverse too, that show used an American guy's voice to talk about how COOL AND INTENSE AND RAD something was )
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 17:43 |
|
Koanic Soul posted:Aeoli attempts to pick an example anime character for each of Vox’s SSMV hierarchy ranks. I rather disagree with his rankings. Go read it and then I’ll explain why.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 23:21 |
|
Neoreactionary art criticism is universally poo poo. It's actually a worse version than conservative art criticism, which is already overwhelmingly poo poo.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 23:29 |
|
Curvature of Earth posted:Neoreactionary art criticism is universally poo poo. It's actually a worse version than conservative art criticism, which is already overwhelmingly poo poo. It seems like the only difference between neoreactionary art criticism and tvtropes art criticism is that the latter isn't inherently political.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2016 23:37 |
|
http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/2015/12/29/the-peace-sign-unites-pedophiles-and-rabbits-liberals/
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 01:06 |
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/2015/12/29/the-peace-sign-unites-pedophiles-and-rabbits-liberals/ That reads like word salad to me. Is there some current event that's supposed to be a response to?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 01:10 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:That reads like word salad to me. Is there some current event that's supposed to be a response to? I have no loving idea. That said, never forget that neoreactionaries took this super, ultra, seriously for a while. As we all know, reinventing phrenology and trying to cultivate "Inner Game" is the mark of a true intellectual.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 01:19 |
|
That is, far as I understand it, a guy who thinks that there are Neanderthals amongst us, and that the thals (as he calls them) are a superior race. He's also a pick-up artist. Wesley took him pretty seriously.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 02:25 |
Fututor Magnus posted:That is, far as I understand it, a guy who thinks that there are Neanderthals amongst us, and that the thals (as he calls them) are a superior race. He's also a pick-up artist. Wesley took him pretty seriously.
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 02:47 |
|
Fututor Magnus posted:That is, far as I understand it, a guy who thinks that there are Neanderthals amongst us, and that the thals (as he calls them) are a superior race. He's also a pick-up artist. Wesley took him pretty seriously. Didn't his cosmology also involve aliens who created homo sapiens? Like some reverse version of the Nation of Islam and Yakub?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 03:33 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:Didn't his cosmology also involve aliens who created homo sapiens? Like some reverse version of the Nation of Islam and Yakub? Maybe, except towards a white supremacist end. It really is like old-timey white supremacism with magical, fantastical, and science fiction elements, like you'd see with vril and all that.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 04:22 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:That reads like word salad to me. Is there some current event that's supposed to be a response to? Well, fantasy author Marion Zimmer Bradley (The Mists of Avalon etc) was relatively recently revealed to have been complicit in at least one case of long-term child abuse, which disturbed the hell out of a lot of people because she was considered a very important woman in the history of SF/F. Her reputation was completely destroyed and AFAIK nobody in the fandom came out in defense of her except for some total crazies. She's one of the people in that flood of photos. One of the others in those photos is Samuel Delaney, who is often quoted as "supporting NAMBLA", and I posted about him earlier in the thread: Heresiarch posted:Delany's views are complicated, and influenced by his own experiences as a child. This particular conversation is very recent and probably a lot more useful than the infamous statement from the 90's; it's also not really on topic for the thread and I'm sharing it because people are asking. And no, I don't agree with him either on a lot of the subject but the situation is a lot more nuanced than "he's a NAMBLA supporter", read the whole conversation and draw your own opinions. I have no idea who the rest of the people in the photos are, but given the presence of Bradley and Delaney I have to assume that this guy is taking his "liberals love pedophiles" argument and using it to suggest that SF fandom tolerates child molesters because it's full of liberals and therefore Vox Day Rabid Puppies cultural marxism etc etc This is a guess because his actual writing is a godawful mess.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 04:51 |
|
I'm sure we all want to know what Rev's definition of "oppressed" is, and thankfully, there's an entire sharticle he's written on it.quote:Imagine that you’re faced with a problem, and some other agent X is involved in, or at least adjacent to, that problem. You suspect that X is oppressing you. How can you be sure? E: He tweeted it in response to this article. Fututor Magnus has a new favorite as of 06:46 on Jun 7, 2016 |
# ? Jun 7, 2016 06:44 |
|
You'll be pleased to know that RationalWiki has successfully replaced the alt-right with a very small shell script. divabot has a new favorite as of 10:00 on Jun 7, 2016 |
# ? Jun 7, 2016 09:58 |
|
divabot posted:You'll be pleased to know that RationalWiki has successfully replaced the alt-right with a very small shell script. I thought Phil Sandifer had already dispelled the alt-right using black magic tho
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 11:25 |
|
Fututor Magnus posted:I'm sure we all want to know what Rev's definition of "oppressed" is, and thankfully, there's an entire sharticle he's written on it. That damned Agent X, if only he wasn't... not oppressing me? I like how he provides this guff but then doesn't actually provide a real-world example to prove the validity of it applies to real life.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 11:37 |
|
"Spherical society on a frictionless plane" has never seemed more apt. It's ironic that this is supposed to be a rebuttal to an article saying autistic white tech bros have an oversimplified view of the world that erases everyone else's perspective.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 12:03 |
|
MikeCrotch posted:I thought Phil Sandifer had already dispelled the alt-right using black magic tho No, he neutered them and rendered them ineffectual... that is to say he did nothing.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 13:47 |
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:animu junk If I find out what "SSMV" and "MT" mean will this make any more sense, or is it just a list of "the most badass anime mans!" with bonus idiocy?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 16:08 |
|
Puppy Time posted:If I find out what "SSMV" and "MT" mean will this make any more sense, or is it just a list of "the most badass anime mans!" with bonus idiocy? The latter, really. Frogisis posted:"Spherical society on a frictionless plane" has never seemed more apt. It's ironic that this is supposed to be a rebuttal to an article saying autistic white tech bros have an oversimplified view of the world that erases everyone else's perspective. I think the saddest part is not just that it's an overly simplified and abstracted view of the world, but that it's one he came up with entirely to gerrymander an important concept in order to keep his ingroup safe. See also his "Racism means viewing races as being essential unchangeable categories that can be ranked on a hierarchy" in order to have a definition of racism that doesn't include Razib Khan and Wesley, but does include his strawman idea of black sociology professors.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 16:38 |
|
Hermetic posted:I think the discussion was about the emegence of a widely accepted (in rightwing circles) conservative figure. The LCRs tend to be treated like garbage, from what I've heard...As others have said, basically, "Vote for us in November, then go burn in hell, degenerate." There were some strategic differences. I have some grudging respect for LCR as they've taken a less-crazy approach and play a long game. But it's more an elitist approach, and yeah they're treated like garbage. LCR seem less like a tiny group of gay Republicans but more like a tiny group of gay Republicans who specifically *work in Washington D.C.* Somfin posted:Milo is the GOP's gay friend who totally can't understand why gay people would even want to get married and who totally said it's fine to call gay people "human being" and who thinks that gay people totally already have plenty of rights so why would they like even want more, right guys haha but seriously?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 19:41 |
|
Wikkheiser posted:The clearest evidence that Milo Yiannopoulos is or is not making inroads for gay right-wingers is if the right-wing (and the alt-right) starts allowing more room for gays other than Yiannopoulos. I mean if all the gays were self-hating misogynist racists like Milo then I'm sure Republicans would be fine with them. Milo is the Uncle Tom of gays.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 19:45 |
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:I mean if all the gays were self-hating misogynist racists like Milo then I'm sure Republicans would be fine with them. Milo is the Uncle Tom of gays. Uncle Nancy
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 20:56 |
|
I heard Uncle Rohm in another thread.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 21:24 |
|
Fututor Magnus posted:I'm sure we all want to know what Rev's definition of "oppressed" is, and thankfully, there's an entire sharticle he's written on it. If autistic white guys didn't exist and had never existed, I'm pretty sure the problem of representation among women and minorities in tech wouldn't exist. So even according to his own criteria, women and minorities in tech are oppressed.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 21:31 |
|
Careful. There are some severely lovely people in this thread that flip out if you use autistic as an insult. That said, you're 100% right, autistic white tech dudes are pretty much the worst, and responsible for making tech and related fields awful for anyone else.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 22:09 |
|
VirtualBasement posted:If autistic white guys didn't exist and had never existed, I'm pretty sure the problem of representation among women and minorities in tech wouldn't exist. I mean you could also argue that autistic people are being exploited, given stuff like Alex St. John's bizarre primer on how to hire people who won't complain as much about their social lives being wrecked to work unfair hours, which just reinforces it's a lovely definition of oppression. Hermetic posted:Careful. There are some severely lovely people in this thread that flip out if you use autistic as an insult. Shut the gently caress up Immortan
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 22:20 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 07:18 |
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Shut the gently caress up Immortan See? This right here is an awesome example of a lovely, angry person. (also the person he's referring to me as. They're both lovely and should leave the thread tbh )
|
# ? Jun 7, 2016 22:23 |