|
I am forcibly reminded of that episode of Always Sunny where Mac and Dennis come up with the idea of Paddy's Dollars over steaks at Dave & Buster's.
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 06:58 |
|
|
rear end cobra posted:Friend Ben Friending on CNN fainlly, something i cann understand!! not all lthis... twet business or memes
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
Liberals hate free speech so much they want Donald Trump's twitter account shut down.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:33
|
|
|
Mad Doctor Cthulhu posted:2016 GOP Collapse: Delete Your Account Quoting it because I'm down.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:33
|
|
|
What's up with people putting their name between parentheses, like (((mike))). Is that some weird Twitter thing?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:35
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:Liberals hate free speech so much they want Donald Trump's twitter account shut down. countdown till TBW says this without irony
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:What's up with people putting their name between parentheses, like (((mike))). Is that some weird Twitter thing? I learned in the Alt-Right thread that it's something neo-nazis do to denote that something is controlled by The Jews
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:What's up with people putting their name between parentheses, like (((mike))). Is that some weird Twitter thing? http://www.vox.com/2016/6/6/11860796/echo-explained-parentheses-twitter
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:What's up with people putting their name between parentheses, like (((mike))). Is that some weird Twitter thing? Alt-righties are making it a yellow-star type badge for twitteristas & journalists/surrogates who they suspect (((confirmed))) to be of the Jewish faith.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:38
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:What's up with people putting their name between parentheses, like (((mike))). Is that some weird Twitter thing? There was a Google extension run by white power types that put the names of Jews (real or suspected) in triple parentheses so they'd know who is REALLY controlling the media
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
Gyra_Solune posted:and this is worrying because trump's campaign has a fair number of the same people who brought bush to win against kerry Thom 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
Intel&Sebastian posted:lol cmon guys she tweeted it at someone who was regularly RTing full throated white supremacists and their fantasy charts of how often black people kill whitey just a few months ago. She sucks, dude.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
like someone said about that usatoday article (this one http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/09/donald-trump-unpaid-bills-republican-president-laswuits/85297274/) i think not long ago itt, this is just an easy coffin ad re-run. have that same loving decisions usa or whatever pac do one on one interviews with people who lost their business because trump didnt pay them or w/e. i saw republicans predicting it months ago on that rrhelections.com site i read sometimes as always im really interested to see what the polls do in the next few weeks. the very early returns on the post-hillary-speech era when the press seems to have gotten more negative only show a mild downturn for trump i posted this in the general election thread http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/house-2016-the-balancing-act/ which features a link to a paper arguing that 'who do you think will win' polling predicts the winner better than 'if the election were today who would you vote for' polling https://forecasters.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/7-2a51b93047891f1ec3608bdbd77ca58d/2013/07/Graefe_vote_expectations_ISF.pdf but everybody in that thread was more interested in arguing about some loving unrelated personal opinions they have or w/e quote:Relatedly, polls asking voters who they believe will win can be a better predictor of the actual winner than asking who someone will vote for. So perhaps Clinton can take some solace in the fact that while she trailed Trump by two points (46%-44%) in an ABC News/Washington Post poll conducted in mid-May, she actually led 50%-40% in the “who do you think will win” question. Another survey, the most recent NBC News/SurveyMonkey weekly tracker, also asked voters to handicap the election, and Clinton’s five-point lead (49%-44%) was basically the same as her four-point horse race lead (48%-44%). So the general public isn’t as sold on her chances as the betting markets are, but nonetheless sees her as a favorite, according to these recent polls.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
good politics guy posted:for the record blacks do kill whites at a way higher rate than vice versa although the highest rate of all is blacks killing blacks shoo go on now this is the tweet singularity thread now
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
he's pretty good yeah, i am a fan of his for sure
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
We have a response https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/741007091947556864
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
lol "Hillarys" tweet is so lame
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
rear end cobra posted:We have a response lol trump UNSTUMPED
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
rear end cobra posted:We have a response wow first live twitter debate between presidential candidates?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Gyra_Solune posted:he's pretty good yeah, i am a fan of his for sure He's the smartest and best pundit by far imo.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
Now watch as Hillary utterly blows it and responds.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
rear end cobra posted:We have a response a riposte but somehow you end up with both foils embedded in your neck
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
rear end cobra posted:We have a response Oh, I know the answer. It was about 5 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
One of Trumps mortal Enemies is.... Endorsing him?!?!? https://twitter.com/bencjacobs/status/741006845746126848
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
Oh wait that's rosy o Donnell Is that the same person as rosean barr
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
Vile posted:One of Trumps mortal She hated Obama in '08. Thought she was a big Hilldawg backer this go round?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:She hated Obama in '08. Thought she was a big Hilldawg backer this go round? You thought wrong I guess
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
rear end cobra posted:We have a response Does this stupid gently caress even know tweets have timestamps, like everyone can see it took the HRC camp 5 mins vs donglord's 2 hours of mirror talk
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
Vile posted:You thought wrong I guess 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:She hated Obama in '08. Thought she was a big Hilldawg backer this go round? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
You guys realize that Obama endorsement and Warren endorsement are coming today because the Bernie/Hussein meeting went really bad lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/573616949957124096 (note the time/date)
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
Vile posted:You guys realize that Obama endorsement and Warren endorsement are coming today because the Bernie/Hussein meeting went really bad lol He told him way before the meeting his endorsement was coming.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
Vile posted:One of Trumps mortal Crazy knows crazy
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
rear end cobra posted:We have a response The first presidential debate will be a serious of burns and counter burns in 140 characters or less.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
Vile posted:You guys realize that Obama endorsement and Warren endorsement are coming today because the Bernie/Hussein meeting went really bad lol somewhere Bernie is in a helicopter wondering why it's going further out to sea
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
rear end cobra posted:We have a response This response is sad when you realize it took over two hours.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
I don't have thin skin, I have the opposite of thin skin Who is outside my house yelling log off? Show yourself coward...
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:He told him way before the meeting his endorsement was coming. I know that. Told Bernie on Sunday and filmed the endorsement on Tuesday It's the moving up of the Warren endorsement that is most telling. It was supposed to be next week. They are pushing Warren hard - "fixes" the liberal problem of a nasty Bernie continuing to campaign because he knows Hillary will be indicted
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 06:58 |
|
|
Seems like a bad idea to focus on the emails thing so much when America doesn't know or give a poo poo and she won't be indicted for it
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2016 21:54
|
|