|
Just realized what would happen if who ever is manning the stream suddenly gets a phone call.
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 12:59 |
|
|
I hope someone makes a cspan caller highlight reel from this incident. I missed everything 
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
Gyges posted:There is no actual downside to this. The Republicans could vote for it and the courts could decide to uphold it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
If the Republicans were the ones staging a sit-in, Louie would definitely bring his grill* down from his office and fire it up. * He picked his office specifically because it has a small ledge outside the window where he can grill.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:The Republicans could vote for it and the courts could decide to uphold it. That's literally not going to happen.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:The Republicans could vote for it and the courts could decide to uphold it. Then they would get squashed by the NRA
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:Travel by airplane is not a constitutionally protected right. All constitutional rights are subject to limitations.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
Whether or not you agree with the bill or not [I don't], the fact of the matter is that Paul Ryan is dumb baby bitch and him losing control is hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:02
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:Travel by airplane is not a constitutionally protected right. Though tying an enumerated right to a non protected right means that it anything you do has to meet constitutional muster.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
This is the top story on every news site, is why.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
zoux posted:This is the top story on every news site, is why. And the story is playing out on Dem terms, just as a reminder.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
BigRed0427 posted:Then they would get squashed by the NRA The same NRA that supported gun control measures when the Black Panthers tried to arm themselves?
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:The same NRA that supported gun control measures when the Black Panthers tried to arm themselves? The would get primaried in a heart beat.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
You can tell the Dems are winning the narrative when foxnews.com and Drudge studiously ignore what is happening.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Letting this whole show continue, when they could just hold a vote. Nah, they wouldn't ever reward this by giving in. I'm surprised that the Republicans haven't all just left though. Not sure the point of forcing a confrontation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
Wait what is she talking about because she lost me at backpacks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:The same NRA that supported gun control measures when the Black Panthers tried to arm themselves? No one cares about that and I mean that seriously, their membership does not give a poo poo about what the did almost 50 - 60 years ago.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
We need to regulate the backpacks Hahaha is someone feeding her lines?
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Mooseontheloose posted:No one cares about that and I mean that seriously, their membership does not give a poo poo about what the did almost 50 - 60 years ago. Yeah, because its mostly Tea Partiers now. Who would do the exact same thing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:That's literally not going to happen. Seeing as how the courts upheld the no-fly list are you willing to put a toxx bet on that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Xandu posted:Nah, they wouldn't ever reward this by giving in. I'm surprised that the Republicans haven't all just left though. Not sure the point of forcing a confrontation. They could have ended it hours ago without it being a giant cluster gently caress. Also they have to go through some process stuff before they can actually continue working on anything, lol. Reminder for anyone who says Pelosi cut the mics and turned off the lights on 2008 -- that was because Republicans tried it after all other business was over
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Democrats have been speaking about how much guns suck for 12 hours on cable news, which is real good.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Nitrousoxide posted:Seeing as how the courts upheld the no-fly list are you willing to put a toxx bet on that? Oh, I am not saying the court wouldn't uphold it (though the intersection of rights would put the Roberts wing of the court in a bind) -- I am saying that the House republicans aren't going to go along with either of four bills in question.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Nitrousoxide posted:I really doubt this is some 12 dimensional chess play to do away with the no fly list dude. Some people are playing chess, some people are playing checkers, and some people are playing with the checker pieces like they're pogs while sniffing glue. No one is playing some multi-dimensional chess, though I think it's possible that John Lewis is playing battle chess. It just so happens that the next move for all of those groups is the same. pacmania90 posted:The Republicans could vote for it and the courts could decide to uphold it. While I ride my unicorn, I'll take solace in the fact that for once the courts upheld gun restrictions and that future gun restrictions are probably going to be upheld.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
She has completely lost me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Seriously, calling Republicans out for hypocrisy is not (n>3)th-dimensional chess. It's extremely simple PR. They don't have to worry about what would happen if the bill passes because they know it won't, and that's the entire point.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Nitrousoxide posted:Seeing as how the courts upheld the no-fly list are you willing to put a toxx bet on that? Speaking of odds, what do you think the outcome of this is gonna be? Best guess.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:but she's fun when she does! not if you live in her district and want to host an event without her showing up
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the insane scenario where this bill passes the House, won't it go to the Senate where Democrats can go "okay so here's how we'll add due process to this thing since our distinguished colleagues on the other side of the aisle will definitely be down with that" before it goes to Obama's desk?
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
zoux posted:Speaking of odds, what do you think the outcome of this is gonna be? Best guess. Real Outcome? Ryan eventually caves sometime tomorrow. We hold the vote, the bill fails, Ryan eats weeks of bad press from colleagues (GOP at large) and the NRA.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
zoux posted:Speaking of odds, what do you think the outcome of this is gonna be? Best guess. Ryan caved. https://twitter.com/MEPFuller/status/745816090220105728
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the insane scenario where this bill passes the House, won't it go to the Senate where Democrats can go "okay so here's how we'll add due process to this thing since our distinguished colleagues on the other side of the aisle will definitely be down with that" before it goes to Obama's desk? Feinstein's verson of the bill is garbo, but yes. The Senate is working on compromise legislation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
This rag is hilarious
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the insane scenario where this bill passes the House, won't it go to the Senate where Democrats can go "okay so here's how we'll add due process to this thing since our distinguished colleagues on the other side of the aisle will definitely be down with that" before it goes to Obama's desk? Well what would happen is the Senate would pass their bill they've said they're taking up tomorrow, assuming gun control bills are passing, and then the leadership from each chamber would get together and decide which bill they want to move forward.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
The beauty in all this is that on the day Trump tossed his entire Clinton attack on the table, with the goal of dominating the news cycle, the Democrats completely snuffed that out. Pundits were supposed to spend tonight picking over every little detail of his attacks, instead it's going to be old news by the time we get through the sit-in and Brexit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
This would not have been my best guess.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
zoux posted:Well what would happen is the Senate would pass their bill they've said they're taking up tomorrow, assuming gun control bills are passing, and then the leadership from each chamber would get together and decide which bill they want to move forward. and then it's passed again as a conference bill
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the insane scenario where this bill passes the House, won't it go to the Senate where Democrats can go "okay so here's how we'll add due process to this thing since our distinguished colleagues on the other side of the aisle will definitely be down with that" before it goes to Obama's desk? Well, if the Senate amends it it will go to a conference committee for reconciliation, then the final bill would have to pass both houses again. Then it goes to the President.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 12:59 |
|
|
zoux posted:Speaking of odds, what do you think the outcome of this is gonna be? Best guess. Status quo or very near it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 04:13
|
|