Linux: is the machine running fedora or just the user

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > YOSPOS > Linux: is the machine running fedora or just the user

«‹›1111 »

Soricidus: Oct 21, 2010; freedom-hating statist shill

OldAlias posted:

digging around for 10 seconds brought up , though not actually useful or up to date https://web.archive.org/web/20160305103603/https://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/docs.shtml

god drat it snowden you had one job

# ? Jun 20, 2016 21:25

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Jun 4, 2024 13:35

Tankakern: Jul 25, 2007

i just wonder if male shoegaze got the speakers working

# ? Jun 20, 2016 21:36

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

Tankakern posted:

i just wonder if male shoegaze got the speakers working

they're working as we speak, but i havent tried unplugging them yet today to see if that kills it

e: just went for it. plugged + unplugged and it worked, so yay

now i just need to get my monitors at work working and figure out how to lock my screen and i'll be happy

# ? Jun 20, 2016 23:59

bobson: Dec 25, 2007; wa we wa wa

ratbert90 posted:

Well, not... really. At least not that I could find.

What I was doing (and did) was I wanted to create a "system_u:object_r:mycompany_t" context for security purposes. That isn't covered very well that I could find. Although that was a year or so ago, so perhaps documentation has become better.

It's still terrible, I just went through the same thing.

# ? Jun 21, 2016 00:15

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

well i installed a lock thing and i dont know what password it used because i couldn't unlock it

# ? Jun 21, 2016 00:23

b0red: Apr 3, 2013

MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

well i installed a lock thing and i dont know what password it used because i couldn't unlock it

it doesn't use your account password???

# ? Jun 21, 2016 01:26

FlapYoJacks: Feb 12, 2009

bobson posted:

It's still terrible, I just went through the same thing.

Oh good. I just grabbed refpolicy and did a bunch of grepping. Ended up working out.

# ? Jun 21, 2016 01:31

eschaton: Mar 7, 2007; Don't you just hate when you wind up in a store with people who are in a socioeconomic class that is pretty obviously about two levels lower than your own?

whereas the only trouble I have with audio on my Mac running the world's most advanced operating system is when I do a clean install at work, it doesn't remember that I prefer my sound be routed to my fancy Rule 36 speakers via USB

a quick choice from the table in the Sound pref pane clears that right up until I do another clean install

# ? Jun 21, 2016 07:15

eschaton: Mar 7, 2007; Don't you just hate when you wind up in a store with people who are in a socioeconomic class that is pretty obviously about two levels lower than your own?

MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

now i just need to get my monitors at work working and figure out how to lock my screen and i'll be happy

just ask jwz, I'm sure he'll be happy to help you get it working with xscreensaver

# ? Jun 21, 2016 07:16

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

b0red posted:

it doesn't use your account password???

it used whatever was stored in pam (nothing??)

# ? Jun 21, 2016 08:07

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

eschaton posted:

just ask jwz, I'm sure he'll be happy to help you get it working with xscreensaver

i really doubt he would be happy to talk to me

# ? Jun 21, 2016 08:11

Last Chance: Dec 31, 2004

eschaton posted:

whereas the only trouble I have with audio on my Mac running the world's most advanced operating system is when I do a clean install at work, it doesn't remember that I prefer my sound be routed to my fancy Rule 36 speakers via USB

a quick choice from the table in the Sound pref pane clears that right up until I do another clean install

if you alt-click the sound icon in the tray you can switch audio input/outputs (including airplay) without touching the prefs panel. its great

# ? Jun 21, 2016 14:02

b0red: Apr 3, 2013

MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

it used whatever was stored in pam (nothing??)

lmao

# ? Jun 21, 2016 14:21

FlapYoJacks: Feb 12, 2009

Upgraded to Fedora24 on day one like a boss. Only thing that was kind of hokey was the nvidia driver. Reinstalled it and all is good.

# ? Jun 21, 2016 15:46

Soricidus: Oct 21, 2010; freedom-hating statist shill

I'm trying fedora 24 in a vm, it finally seems to be managing to deliver hidpi support almost ootb which is nice

# ? Jun 22, 2016 18:28

Sapozhnik: Jan 2, 2005; Nap Ghost

Currently posting from a Wayland session :whatup:

unfortunately not even Wayland has the power to make those posts anything other than garbage

(been like that since GNOME 3.20.1 came out a month or two ago, though. Arch ftw)

# ? Jun 22, 2016 18:33

b0red: Apr 3, 2013

anyone wanna lend me some iptables/networking knowledge. i wouldn't normally ask anything like this here but i've looked around a good bit and feel some of you guys would have a better idea than half poo poo on serverfault/stackoverflow/random mailing lists

basically i want to mirror all my network traffic from 10.0.0.110 and forward it to 192.168.1.100. if they resided in the same subnet this would be very easy because all i'd have to do is

code:

iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -j TEE --gateway 192.168.1.100

the problem is TEE only works for next-hop stuff soooo what do i do

code:

sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.100
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.100

tried some poo poo like this with no dice.
it sucks that i even have to jump through this hoop. maybe like another node on the 10.0.0.0 network that has ipv4 forwarding enabled and they all TEE mirror at it and it forwards that data to 192.168.1.100. i don't fuckin know, all the network duplication poo poo i've found on github deals with specific ports and poo poo. maybe i'll just look into writing something myself or the possibility of loving with the iptables TEE code

b0red fucked around with this message at 01:00 on Jun 23, 2016

# ? Jun 23, 2016 00:57

celeron 300a: Jan 23, 2005; by exmarx; Yam Slacker

b0red posted:

anyone wanna lend me some iptables/networking knowledge. i wouldn't normally ask anything like this here but i've looked around a good bit and feel some of you guys would have a better idea than half poo poo on serverfault/stackoverflow/random mailing lists

basically i want to mirror all my network traffic from 10.0.0.110 and forward it to 192.168.1.100. if they resided in the same subnet this would be very easy because all i'd have to do is
code:
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -j TEE --gateway 192.168.1.100
the problem is TEE only works for next-hop stuff soooo what do i do
code:
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.100
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.100
tried some poo poo like this with no dice.
it sucks that i even have to jump through this hoop. maybe like another node on the 10.0.0.0 network that has ipv4 forwarding enabled and they all TEE mirror at it and it forwards that data to 192.168.1.100. i don't fuckin know, all the network duplication poo poo i've found on github deals with specific ports and poo poo. maybe i'll just look into writing something myself or the possibility of loving with the iptables TEE code

So, the destination is farther than just one hop? You'll need to start mangling the IP packets so that they can correctly reach your listener, but you'll lose your source/destination IP info.

What you might want to try is duplicating a packet and sending it to your listener with an encapsulation protocol like GRE or ipsec. This should allow the packet to be forwarded correctly.

# ? Jun 23, 2016 02:27

celeron 300a: Jan 23, 2005; by exmarx; Yam Slacker

also, there are comedy options like storing it as pcap and sending it over nfs, or using vlans (like, create a massive bridging vlan over all your routers) and have your listener and transmitter on the same vlan and you can do your old TEE target solution.

# ? Jun 23, 2016 02:37

Captain Foo: May 11, 2004; we vibin'
we slidin'
we breathin'
we dyin'

celeron 300a posted:

also, there are comedy options like storing it as pcap and sending it over nfs

holy lmao why would anyone ever do this

this is truly a comedy option because i cannot stop laughing

(listen for network traffic) -> (write to pcap) -> (copy to nfs destination) -> (read pcap) -> (inject into network stack)

# ? Jun 23, 2016 13:41

Cybernetic Vermin: Apr 18, 2005

everything is a file, lol if you don't route your network requests with dd

# ? Jun 23, 2016 14:30

b0red: Apr 3, 2013

celeron 300a posted:

So, the destination is farther than just one hop? You'll need to start mangling the IP packets so that they can correctly reach your listener, but you'll lose your source/destination IP info.

What you might want to try is duplicating a packet and sending it to your listener with an encapsulation protocol like GRE or ipsec. This should allow the packet to be forwarded correctly.

Appreciate the input, I'll look into GRE. I'm probably just going to have to hack something together myself.

Captain Foo posted:

holy lmao why would anyone ever do this

this is truly a comedy option because i cannot stop laughing

(listen for network traffic) -> (write to pcap) -> (copy to nfs destination) -> (read pcap) -> (inject into network stack)

You can't listen for network traffic in aws :mmmhmm:

# ? Jun 23, 2016 14:34

VAGENDA OF MANOCIDE: Aug 1, 2004; whoa, what just happened here?; College Slice

Captain Foo posted:

holy lmao why would anyone ever do this

this is truly a comedy option because i cannot stop laughing

(listen for network traffic) -> (write to pcap) -> (copy to nfs destination) -> (read pcap) -> (inject into network stack)

Cybernetic Vermin posted:

everything is a file, lol if you don't route your network requests with dd

it's the unix philosophy

# ? Jun 23, 2016 19:42

trilljester: Dec 7, 2004; The People's Tight End.

2 days into using Fedora 24 in a VM. Have to say out of all of the other distros I tried (I even tried Gentoo, lol), this one is the most polished. I would even recommend it to my Mom, except she needs Windows for TurboTax.

# ? Jun 23, 2016 20:02

Captain Foo: May 11, 2004; we vibin'
we slidin'
we breathin'
we dyin'

trilljester posted:

2 days into using Fedora 24 in a VM. Have to say out of all of the other distros I tried (I even tried Gentoo, lol), this one is the most polished. I would even recommend it to my Mom, except she needs Windows for TurboTax.

If you're using turbo tax you should do your taxes by hand

# ? Jun 23, 2016 20:07

Tankakern: Jul 25, 2007

trilljester posted:

2 days into using Fedora 24 in a VM. Have to say out of all of the other distros I tried (I even tried Gentoo, lol), this one is the most polished. I would even recommend it to my Mom, except she needs Windows for TurboTax.

turbotax might work with wine staging if you want to try :sureboat:

# ? Jun 23, 2016 20:31

cowboy beepboop: Feb 24, 2001

I upgraded to Fedora 24 and now gnome crashes after 5 minutes and dumps me in the boot tty. Ctrl alt f2 fixes it and this is in dmesg:
traps: gnome-shell[1584] trap int3

how fix what do

# ? Jun 23, 2016 23:11

celeron 300a: Jan 23, 2005; by exmarx; Yam Slacker

my stepdads beer posted:

I upgraded to Fedora 24 and now gnome crashes after 5 minutes and dumps me in the boot tty. Ctrl alt f2 fixes it and this is in dmesg:
traps: gnome-shell[1584] trap int3

how fix what do

Out of curiosity, what kind of video driver do you have?

And if you're using wayland, try disabling it or vice versa.

This opinion comes from someone who is still on fc23

# ? Jun 23, 2016 23:42

Symbolic Butt: Mar 22, 2009; (_!_); Buglord

my stepdads beer posted:

I upgraded to Fedora 24 and now gnome crashes after 5 minutes and dumps me in the boot tty. Ctrl alt f2 fixes it and this is in dmesg:
traps: gnome-shell[1584] trap int3

how fix what do

good old cc

# ? Jun 23, 2016 23:45

carry on then: Jul 10, 2010; by VideoGames
(and can't post for 10 years!)

so wait does wayland work on f24 on nvidia or not?

i don't get the option on the login screen for wayland specifically

# ? Jun 23, 2016 23:50

Soricidus: Oct 21, 2010; freedom-hating statist shill

should i care about wayland yet

e: i tried it and it crashed, so i guess not

Soricidus fucked around with this message at 00:02 on Jun 24, 2016

# ? Jun 23, 2016 23:55

cowboy beepboop: Feb 24, 2001

celeron 300a posted:

Out of curiosity, what kind of video driver do you have?

And if you're using wayland, try disabling it or vice versa.

This opinion comes from someone who is still on fc23

nvidia, with their binary drivers. I might reinstall the drivers and see if that fixes this. using X afaik

# ? Jun 24, 2016 02:54

celeron 300a: Jan 23, 2005; by exmarx; Yam Slacker

my stepdads beer posted:

nvidia, with their binary drivers. I might reinstall the drivers and see if that fixes this. using X afaik

Yeah, maybe see if using nouveau instead of the binary drivers will help it.

If it does, then you'll just have to wait until the binary only drivers catch up or just install centos 7.

# ? Jun 24, 2016 03:43

Notorious b.s.d.: Jan 25, 2003; by Reene

trilljester posted:

2 days into using Fedora 24 in a VM. Have to say out of all of the other distros I tried (I even tried Gentoo, lol), this one is the most polished. I would even recommend it to my Mom, except she needs Windows for TurboTax.

turbotax has a web product at feature parity with the desktop now

# ? Jun 24, 2016 19:36

Notorious b.s.d.: Jan 25, 2003; by Reene

b0red posted:

anyone wanna lend me some iptables/networking knowledge. i wouldn't normally ask anything like this here but i've looked around a good bit and feel some of you guys would have a better idea than half poo poo on serverfault/stackoverflow/random mailing lists

basically i want to mirror all my network traffic from 10.0.0.110 and forward it to 192.168.1.100. if they resided in the same subnet this would be very easy because all i'd have to do is
code:
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -j TEE --gateway 192.168.1.100
the problem is TEE only works for next-hop stuff soooo what do i do
code:
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.100
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.100
tried some poo poo like this with no dice.
it sucks that i even have to jump through this hoop. maybe like another node on the 10.0.0.0 network that has ipv4 forwarding enabled and they all TEE mirror at it and it forwards that data to 192.168.1.100. i don't fuckin know, all the network duplication poo poo i've found on github deals with specific ports and poo poo. maybe i'll just look into writing something myself or the possibility of loving with the iptables TEE code

this is not a good idea in general. just nothing about this makes sense

if you want a perfect record of the network traffic: either do this inside your switch with port mirroring, or send digested statistics with netflow

if you are only interested in the payload: set up a transparent proxy, and dump it at that point

# ? Jun 24, 2016 19:38

b0red: Apr 3, 2013

Notorious b.s.d. posted:

this is not a good idea in general. just nothing about this makes sense

if you want a perfect record of the network traffic: either do this inside your switch with port mirroring, or send digested statistics with netflow

if you are only interested in the payload: set up a transparent proxy, and dump it at that point

well the whole reason behind this is to recreate our lab network/product in AWS, which requires having an IDS to show its worth. aws being aws means jumping through some hoops for this to work.

fml maybe can convince the higher ups to collocate some equipment somewhere for this poo poo

# ? Jun 24, 2016 21:59

Soricidus: Oct 21, 2010; freedom-hating statist shill

fedora 24 updat: tried to install chrome because some google stuff isn't working in firefox for some reason i can't be bothered to debug

clicking on the chrome install link brings up what actually looks like quite a friendly software installer with useful information and stuff. is this packagekit? i thought it was bad but it looks like it's ok. maybe linux is finally ready for the deskt

code:

cannot download Packages/p/perl-B-Lint-1.20-6.fc24.noarch.rpm to /var/cache/PackageKit/24/metadata/fedora/packages/: Curl error (35): SSL connect error for [url]https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-24&arch=x86_64[/url] [Encountered end of file]

# ? Jun 24, 2016 23:26

Sapozhnik: Jan 2, 2005; Nap Ghost

well yeah, the package server is experiencing issues. On Windows the installer would just would say "The operation could not be completed (gently caress you, I'm not going to tell you why, that would take effort)"

# ? Jun 25, 2016 00:47

Soricidus: Oct 21, 2010; freedom-hating statist shill

Mr Dog posted:

well yeah, the package server is experiencing issues. On Windows the installer would just would say "The operation could not be completed (gently caress you, I'm not going to tell you why, that would take effort)"

"well yeah" is all very well but it sounds like that's the kind of thing that they could trivially display an actual friendly error message for

like here's a 10-second idea: if the repo is one that the user has connected to successfully in the past, and the error is the sort you'd get when the server is experiencing issues, then before you dive into the technical details you also display an explanation like, i don't know, maybe "the package server is experiencing issues"

I'm now getting "Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'", which i assume also means "the package server is experiencing issues" and not "something is broken on your computer"? idk, i have literally no idea whether the error message is telling me i need to fix poo poo or just wait.

# ? Jun 25, 2016 01:40

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Jun 4, 2024 13:35

Apocadall: Mar 25, 2010; Aren't you the guitarist for the feed dogs?

i am having such a bitch of a time getting a yealink voip phone talking through a linux openvpn server to an asterisk pbx

kill me

# ? Jun 25, 2016 03:11

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > YOSPOS > Linux: is the machine running fedora or just the user

«‹›1111 »