|
TBeats posted:You originally asked me to provide evidence that he wasn't blocking traffic. https://www.periscope.tv/w/alEUWzF6WUtiVkJhcXlLZXh8MURYeHlaanZyV1ZLTUeqwuA0FroEbYR-fkuoPoVS7A5Sid0t1LcaxZgMW-6b
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 04:49 |
|
|
I gave you a time (roughly four minutes in) in which he got arrested. Give me a time in the video when he was blocking traffic.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:18
|
|
|
I've been covering myself with a thick layer of shoe polish all morning in solidarity with the man who got arrested for blocking traffic
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:19
|
|
|
Why are you in love with this guy so much? Wow what a hero he inconvenienced thousands of unrelated people trying to drive down a street.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:19
|
|
|
Molothecat posted:I've been covering myself with a thick layer of shoe polish all morning in solidarity with the man who got arrested for blocking traffic Send some of that good stuff my way, my shoes are looking real dull today
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
TBeats posted:Protesting is a protected right even if you wanna give it a different name to make it seem differently. Yes, and noone denied anyone's right to assemble and protest. This specific assembly was clearly blocking traffic, which is not a protected right. Blocking traffic is a tactic that BLM has adopted in their protests. When they do this, they know that they risk being arrested - this is a conscious choice. It is civil disobedience. It's not a "different name," it's the specific term that best describes what they are doing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
TBeats posted:I gave you a time (roughly four minutes in) in which he got arrested. Give me a time in the video when he was blocking traffic. Roughly the entire time prior to roughly 4 minutes in. Note the magical lack of cars in the lane, and the arrested gentleman being in said lane for the bulk of the time. Crazy, right? What is more likely: a) It was a pedestrian lane b) cars were not in the lane because asshats like this gentleman were in the lane
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:21
|
|
speng31b posted:Yes, and noone denied anyone's right to assemble and protest. This specific assembly was clearly blocking traffic, which is not a protected right. Blocking traffic is a tactic that BLM has adopted in their protests. When they do this, they know that they risk being arrested - this is a conscious choice. It is civil disobedience. It's not a "different name," it's the specific term that best describes what they are doing. So because someone blocked traffic, arrest the guy that wasn't blocking traffic? Gotcha.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
Guns are bad, but If I lived in america I would want one. Guns in america often kills americans and I think thats a plus.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:21
|
|
Cartouche posted:Roughly the entire time prior to roughly 4 minutes in. Not the magical lack of cars in the lane, and the arrested gentleman being in said lane for the bulk of the time. I didn't see him block traffic one time in the video. But you aren't arguing in good faith so I'm just going to assume that you don't care.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:22
|
|
|
TBeats posted:I didn't see him block traffic one time in the video. But you aren't arguing in good faith so I'm just going to assume that you don't care. Define "block traffic" you insufferable child.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
Man you guys are really heated. How about a relaxing dip in the Bigfoot gardens water park, then you can talk it out over some fresh yeti nuggets.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:23
|
|
Cartouche posted:Define "block traffic" you insufferable child. Standing in front of traffic so that it can't get through, which would require standing in a lane on the road. Something he did not do. Cars are not allowed to drive where he was standing.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
TBeats posted:I didn't see him block traffic one time in the video. But you aren't arguing in good faith so I'm just going to assume that you don't care. Goddamn you are loving retarded.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
various cheeses posted:Just a thought, but have you considered that the report-happy retard babies are the ones that should be removed instead? This applies to life in general in 2016+ unfortunately. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
TBeats posted:Standing in front of traffic so that it can't get through, which would require standing in a lane on the road. Video clearly shows him walking in the middle of said lane. Video clearly shows traffic not using said lane due to people being in said lane. Redgrendel2001 posted:Goddamn you are loving retarded.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:25
|
|
Cartouche posted:Video clearly shows him walking in the middle of said lane. Even though I don't see what you are seeing (I even see cars driving past him in the video), I'll humor you. Shortly before he got arrested, the police told him if he stepped in the street again he would be arrested. He did not step in the street from that point on, which means he complied with the officers' demands. So what was he arrested for? He did exactly what he was told. E: There was also a cop driving against traffic trailing him.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:28
|
|
|
ITT: Lanesplaining; how limiting a 3 lane road to 2 lanes by walking in the third lane is not "blocking traffic".
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
TBeats posted:Even though I don't see what you are seeing (I even see cars driving past him in the video), I'll humor you. Here also is a person who does not always see what is plain to others. [  To add, here is a person that great injustice has been done toward:  You fit right in 
Cartouche fucked around with this message at 17:37 on Jul 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
anyone blocking traffic should get smashed by a tractor trailer like that one goons ex gf
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
TBeats posted:So because someone blocked traffic, arrest the guy that wasn't blocking traffic? Your argument is like a car accident of the very kind BLM blocking roads might cause. You've managed to create such a terrible and pedantic narrative that you have turned those generally sympathetic to your ideas against you. It's almost like you have multiple lanes of traffic open to you, rhetorically, and you blocked off all but the shittiest one.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
vols bitch posted:anyone blocking traffic should get smashed by a tractor trailer like that one goons ex gf How did that happen?
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
vols bitch posted:anyone blocking traffic should get smashed by a tractor trailer like that one goons ex gf time to refill your cup
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
Re Dallas Shooter Once again sexual harassment or domestic violence is one of the red flags in the background of a mass shooter. Anyone convicted of one of these offences should have their ability to own guns stricken off without meeting some difficult standard of good behaviour and honouring restraining order and be willing to apply and pay for a current license. These kinds of restrictions, for example, would be completely legal under the 2nd Amendment as interpreted by people like Justica Scalia even.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
Jacobin posted:Re Dallas Shooter Once again sexual harassment or domestic violence is one of the red flags in the background of a mass shooter. Anyone convicted of one of these offences should have their ability to own guns stricken off without meeting some difficult standard of good behaviour and honouring restraining order and be willing to apply and pay for a current license. Yeah, but you'd have to actually be convicted of something, not just accused. Wouldn't have helped in this case.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:56
|
|
|
speng31b posted:Yeah, but you'd have to actually be convicted of something, not just accused. Wouldn't have helped in this case. We should convict more people of that crime type then
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
Jacobin posted:We should convict more people of that crime type then We'll get right on lowering the burden of proof just as soon as we finish these witch trials in Salem.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
Jacobin posted:We should convict more people of that crime type then You might want to pick a more attainable prereq in your proposed solution for limiting weapon access for potential mass murderers.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:03
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:ITT: Lanesplaining; how limiting a 3 lane road to 2 lanes by walking in the third lane is not "blocking traffic".  he seems pretty clearly to be on the shoulder. there were some people walking in the lanes early in the video though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
Screenshot the actual points and point it out to each other unless you two just want to circlejerk onto each other about who did what like what Concerned Citizen did. Walking in the shoulder is clearly not in traffic, but is potentially still technically a traffic hazard.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
I think they should protest on streets with sidewalks. It'd be safer for them.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:27
|
|
|
The guy was pretty obviously wandering back and forth over the line at the beginning of the video. He starts on the shoulder but when he turns around at the 30 second mark the solid line marking the shoulder is to his left meaning he's at least partially in the right most lane
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
think the cops that got fired over Facebook posts the past few days would have been reprimanded at all prior to Dallas? now police chiefs have to worry about which one of their retard employees are going to spark poo poo off next and officers actually get disciplined. thats good imo
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:34
|
|
|
The bigger news will be when the BLM's replacement hired gun shows up and starts picking off officers in Louisiana.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
Boner Zone posted:The guy was pretty obviously wandering back and forth over the line at the beginning of the video. He starts on the shoulder but when he turns around at the 30 second mark the solid line marking the shoulder is to his left meaning he's at least partially in the right most lane yeah I mean half the protest was occupying a lane, that's why the cops showed up in the first place. then they got everyone to move onto the shoulder. i don't really know why they arrested the guy since and the others had been following their orders.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
bring back old gbs posted:think the cops that got fired over Facebook posts the past few days would have been reprimanded at all prior to Dallas? now police chiefs have to worry about which one of their retard employees are going to spark poo poo off next and officers actually get disciplined. thats good imo what did the DPD do to "spark off" their murders that other police chiefs are trying to avoid?
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
bring back old gbs posted:think the cops that got fired over Facebook posts the past few days would have been reprimanded at all prior to Dallas? now police chiefs have to worry about which one of their retard employees are going to spark poo poo off next and officers actually get disciplined. thats good imo Until the whole thing backfires massively and as a result no half decent person will even think of joining the force. World is gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidBegnaud/status/751937392324407296
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 04:49 |
|
|
They have a lot of sherrif in that town.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:02
|
|