|
Yeah there were definitely other options on the board but nothing screamed "pick me" plus he potentially fills my right wing hole. RWs all suck.
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 11:01 |
|
|
wow i had nylander pencilled in for round 7 or 8
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
Colorado selects defenseman Tyler Myers
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
Ginette Reno is up
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
guys I know my prospect team from a few years back was the envy of all the league but come on now
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:48
|
|
|
Pittsburgh takes Matt Murray because he's a good young goalie who has won a cup already and has a strong AHL pedigree and so I'm pretty sure he's going to be at worst a solid starting goalie and he has the potential to be an elite one. Kuznetsov-Malkin Landeskog Murray
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:Pittsburgh takes Matt Murray because he's a good young goalie who has won a cup already and has a strong AHL pedigree and so I'm pretty sure he's going to be at worst a solid starting goalie and he has the potential to be an elite one. boo
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:50
|
|
|
Jesus Matt murray? Out of all the goalies available, even the young ones?
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:51
|
|
|
Don't see a problem with Murray there. His track record is incredible. People predicting his regression aren't predicating it on any kind of evidence, but just some kind of vague hope/feeling, eg Gaudreau is too small/slow.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:Jesus Matt murray? Out of all the goalies available, even the young ones? There's other comparable ones but Murray has a Cup which doesn't really mean anything but I could have flipped a coin between him and the other two young goalies I'm thinking of so I might as well take the one I like and know
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Murray is gonna be a very good goalie but I wouldn't pick him over someone else. And young goalies this early seems weird to me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
So FBS is skipped at 2:49 right? I've got a terrible pick coming up and need to get it in before I go back to work
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:15
|
|
|
at 3:49est I think
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:at 3:49est I think goddamit if he takes the top guy on my list I will be upset. Very upset.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
stab posted:So FBS is skipped at 2:49 right? I've got a terrible pick coming up and need to get it in before I go back to work I'm working on my pick now, I should have it in within 20 minutes or so
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:No, I am saying that I think it's wise to use the first few picks you have on developing a core of the best possible players. Saving money on Dumba instead of choosing several other D who are young and a lot better is a worse strategy than drafting a better D now for more money and going cheap on your role players because those skills are more abundant. I hear you, but I think a better defenseman will only be incrementally beneficial, and cost 4-5 million more.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
FBS posted:I'm working on my pick now, I should have it in within 20 minutes or so Youre going to pick the one at the top of my list and make me sad, arent you?
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
FBS posted:I'm working on my pick now, I should have it in within 20 minutes or so If you pick my guy I will hunt you down and say mean things to you
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
With the 101st pick the Chicago Blackhawks select Brandon Saad. I need goal scoring and Saad was 12th in G/60 last year, on the Blue Jackets, with an only slightly-inflated shooting percentage. He's 23 and his contract covers most of his productive years. I know it broke his little heart going to Columbus last year so now that he's a Blackhawk again he'll be happy. Happy players keep their track suits dry.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
Veskit posted:I hear you, but I think a better defenseman will only be incrementally beneficial, and cost 4-5 million more. Dumba isn't under contract though, so I'm confused. He's an RFA right now, his contract was up this season. He's almost certainly going to cost substantially more than 850k.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
The Montreal Canadiens need leadership. The Montreal Canadiens need character. The Montreal Canadiens need grit. The Montreal Canadiens need clutch players. The Montreal Canadiens need winners. Let's hope he remembers those things. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8v8C3scwvg The Montreal Canadiens select Jordan Eberle
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
Eberle is the poo poo and that's a good rear end pick
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:Murray is gonna be a very good goalie but I wouldn't pick him over someone else. And young goalies this early seems weird to me. All the truly elite goalies are gone except for one and Murray is likely to be comparable to the other older ones left. Anyways Saad. Good pick that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
Eberle is a great pick.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:52
|
|
|
I was close to picking Eberle, he's older and I'm worried Edmonton broke him, but now I wish I had taken him more than anything
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
FBS posted:I was close to picking Eberle, he's older and I'm worried Edmonton broke him, but now I wish I had taken him more than anything which is kinda funny, as Saad was probably going to be my pick if you took Eberle. edit: it's the video giving you regrets isn't it
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
stab posted:edit: it's the video giving you regrets isn't it actually I closed the video because Team Canada jerseys give me 2010 Olympics flashbacks
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
And this the next year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSDYg7HUTCM Man it sucks that he had to get drafted by Edmonton. Also lol Pierre. "can you believe it" "yes".
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 20:04
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:Dumba isn't under contract though, so I'm confused. He's an RFA right now, his contract was up this season. Stop making sense against my stupidity
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Give me the real deal James Neal baby Neal-Getzlaf-Kane Weber
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
Paulocaust posted:Give me the real deal James Neal baby I like this team. That would be an amusing line to watch. People would get so mad at those three pieces of poo poo running wild on them.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
Paulocaust posted:Give me the real deal James Neal baby Stop stealing my gimmick of drafting the most punchable players. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
Please, please, there are enough punchable players for everyone
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
Neal is also good and also a good pick. yall making some intelligent hockey choices today
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
Neal is a terrific pick this late and that first line is awesome.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
It also costs like $25 million
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:It also costs like $25 million Now you care about money
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
Veskit posted:Now you care about money Well when four players cost $30 million that's not smart either but at least his four players are really good
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
stab posted:The Montreal Canadiens select Jordan Eberle dang it
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 11:01 |
|
|
Thinktank is skipped. Recapitor is on the clock until 8:02, then Otis Reddit
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2016 23:11
|
|
