|
From the TV IV threadThom12255 posted:https://twitter.com/adambvary/status/756981563699503104 So it's going back to Non-AATrek but it has literally the worst space sh....like who even....who even passes off on that poo poo.... Like do they not do focus groups on concept art? Who the gently caress......
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 02:40 |
|
|
naem posted:It's like an original Xbox game level render yeah that CGI looks like straight up garbage poo poo even TNG in 89 or so looked better than that garbage. Just do practical effects friends
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
 edit: missed the edit
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
I usually think people are way too whiney about special effects and stuff but whoa that trailer is really almost novelty bad. Seriously, Enterprise had better fx.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
so lemme guess they're basically doing the 70s star trek show that never happened
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:38
|
|
|
Or even go another 100 or so past TNG- jeez 25th century 26th century- the future is pretty big.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
lets bridge the gap between TOS and TNG
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
Hillary Clintons Thong posted:yeah that CGI looks like straight up garbage 1987. TNG came out in 1987, when Ronald Reagan was President and the Soviet Union was still A Thing and the Berlin Wall was still up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
lets bridge the gap between my dick and kiraFarmer Crack-rear end posted:1987. TNG came out in 1987, when Ronald Reagan was President and the Soviet Union was still A Thing and the Berlin Wall was still up. lol I was giving TNG the benefit after a few years of production, because really the first season is poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
Grim dark poo poo is super popular now. Show a federation that's gotten a little morally questionable after a hundred years of fighting the borg.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
Netflix isn't going to carry this lump of poo poo across the line for CBS. Its going straight to Vimeo for season 2.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
87, when I was 9. I'm pretty sure TNG gave me my first boner.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
gently caress though like I would love to watch a new star trek, but this CBS.com poo poo really kills it for me. these dudes are just painting themselves into a corner with all their special subscription only horse poo poo. How much is the cbs poo poo, 5 or 10 a month?
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
Hillary Clintons Thong posted:gently caress though like I would love to watch a new star trek, but this CBS.com poo poo really kills it for me. 6. It's loving ridiculous unless you motherfucking love NCIS.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
criscodisco posted:I usually think people are way too whiney about special effects and stuff but whoa that trailer is really almost novelty bad. Seriously, Enterprise had better fx. For all it's faults I don't think there was really a single bad VFX shot in Enterprise. Maybe the CG Gorn? I was all excited for the new show because they got the Wrath of Khan guy working on it but that teaser was utter trash. That's poo poo you include as part of a behind the scenes extra on the blu ray if anywhere at all, not what you use to try to sell people on your new project e: screencaps of it look like a still from Star Trek Online, a lovely free to play mmo
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
Hillary Clintons Thong posted:gently caress though like I would love to watch a new star trek, but this CBS.com poo poo really kills it for me. Normally a new Trek series would make me very excited but sadly I probably will lose interest quickly due to the hassle involved in watching it. I'll have every intention of a binge watch after season 1 comes out, but I'll get busy and lose interest and maybe accidentally read a few spoilers online but not really care and finally watch it in about 11 years like I did with DS9 because it was on network my cable company didn't carry.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
criscodisco posted:87, when I was 9. I'm pretty sure TNG gave me my first boner.  Who can blame you
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:I don't know whether to be excited that that retarded looking ship means it's probably not AATrek universe, or disappointed that it's probably the worst space ship I think I've ever seen in relation to star trek. Wow, I sure hope it's not in the Aatrek universe. I do not need full-on kiddy diddling in Star Trek. Those effects have GOT to be placeholders - which makes me wonder if people making this show have seriously poor judgment for showing it in public.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
They should probably sell the subscription by the year considering that traditional networks have new content like three months out of the year.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
Mondian posted:
I know you're joking but goddamn TNG was good to me and Rikers hairy nips helped me drift off to sleep many nights. Remember this was before the internet. We used our imagination in those days.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
Usually the fantasy was that me and Riker and Data beamed down to a planet but the transporter forgot to beam our clothes like the Ferengi one and Riker would be like "hey it's just us guys who cares?"
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Apollodorus posted:Wow, I sure hope it's not in the Aatrek universe. I do not need full-on kiddy diddling in Star Trek. The other day they tweeted a picture of the un-upholstered captain's chair from the show, my guess is they scrambled to put something together so they'd have anything to show at SDCC.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
criscodisco posted:Normally a new Trek series would make me very excited but sadly I probably will lose interest quickly due to the hassle involved in watching it. I'll have every intention of a binge watch after season 1 comes out, but I'll get busy and lose interest and maybe accidentally read a few spoilers online but not really care and finally watch it in about 11 years like I did with DS9 because it was on network my cable company didn't carry. these are my feelings. I never got into star trek in my youth. Enterprise is the only one that came out in my adult life but I think it was cable only which I didn't have. I seriously watched most of the poo poo via syndication on a UHF tv set in the 90s until the advent of netflix, and not very regularly. I only watched DS9 in the past two years, thanks to netflix. I only recently got some sort of "cable" recently after years without any sort of broadcast tv in my house, and thats the Sony Playstation Vue or whatever, if that ties into that and I don't have to pay for it, like I understand certain channels are like, then maybe, otherwise I can't be bothered. I especially can't give a gently caress about a weekly broadcast poo poo because gently caress if I'm going to set my tv watching to a calendar and not just binge watch when I'm feeling particularly shut inish. CBS basically acting like its 95 again with this poo poo. No one will watch it and it will be "GUESS NO ONE WANTS STAR TREK WE TRIED" like mother fuckers way to miss the point
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
criscodisco posted:the hassle involved in watching it. Its going to set new standards of piracy like The Matrix did for 700mb .avi rips. Nobody in north america is going to pay CBS to watch this thing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
shadow puppet of a posted:Its going to set new standards of piracy like The Matrix did for 700mb .avi rips. Nobody in north america is going to pay CBS to watch this thing. I don't plan on paying if I do wind up watching it, but it's still a hassle. I'm really excited to watch the second season of Kimmy Schmidt, but still haven't bothered yet. I just need a new TV because if I want to watch something I've downloaded I have to convert the file and burn it to DVD. I just keep putting it off because this TV works fine and is huge. Someone should start a company where you get a box of 3rd world children who will watch your downloads and memorize them and act them out for you in your living room in HD.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
Great, a pizza cutter and a big pan to put the pizza on.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
Tighclops posted:For all it's faults I don't think there was really a single bad VFX shot in Enterprise. Maybe the CG Gorn? The bit where the Enterprise battles the future tech Luftwaffe was straight out of a 90's FMV game. I can't post youtube links so this pic will have to do.  Without checking was this in the show or did I steal it from a Red Alert clone and slap a UPN logo on it?
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
Apollodorus posted:Wow, I sure hope it's not in the Aatrek universe. I do not need full-on kiddy diddling in Star Trek. Right, I don't know why I keep calling JJ trek AA trek. There is the "Prime Timeline" (TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/STD(lol)) There is the "JJTrek Timeline" (ST2009/Into Darkness/Beyond) There is the "AATrek Timeline" (The one we inhabit, unfortunately)
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
Baka-nin posted:The bit where the Enterprise battles the future tech Luftwaffe was straight out of a 90's FMV game. I can't post youtube links so this pic will have to do. Come on, this wasn't bad for TV circa 2005. It looked a lot better in motion anyway.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:Right, I don't know why I keep calling JJ trek AA trek. are we the mirror universe? eh, all hail the terran empire.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
Germstore posted:are we the mirror universe? eh, all hail the terran empire. I often think we are the "bad" universe. Like SLIDERS or something come out of a wormhole and go "George Bush Won in 2000?!! 9/11??! A Decade of war? War on Terror? ISIS?!?! AATREK?! MODS KNEW"
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Tighclops posted:Come on, this wasn't bad for TV circa 2005. It looked a lot better in motion anyway. Yes it was, and no it didn't, it looked worse. Babylon 5 never got that bad 
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:I often think we are the "bad" universe. Like SLIDERS or something come out of a wormhole and go "George Bush Won in 2000?!! 9/11??! A Decade of war? War on Terror? ISIS?!?! AATREK?! MODS KNEW" Yeah I think like that too sometimes but then I get in my underwear and smoke out and just chill out you should try it unless you look really gross in your underwear.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:I often think we are the "bad" universe. Like SLIDERS or something come out of a wormhole and go "George Bush Won in 2000?!! 9/11??! A Decade of war? War on Terror? ISIS?!?! AATREK?! MODS KNEW" SLIDERS lol I remember watching the first few episodes of that way back in the day did it get BETTER or just turn to poo poo? All I remember is they teleported to some Soviets won the world or Nazis maybe I'm not quite sure.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
Hillary Clintons Thong posted:SLIDERS lol It managed to pull off both actually. Got a lot better, than spiralled out of control with a plotline about these dimension hoping mutant things.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
Sliders got better but then it got really, really stupid with like lizard alien time travelers or some poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
criscodisco posted:I don't plan on paying if I do wind up watching it, but it's still a hassle. I'm really excited to watch the second season of Kimmy Schmidt, but still haven't bothered yet. Get something like this http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-1080P-Mini-Media-Player-MKV-H-264-RMVB-Full-HD-with-HOST-Card-Reader-Free/32274872140.html Or a model with component video output if your tv is that old.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Hillary Clintons Thong posted:SLIDERS lol Sliders debuted in 1995, it took me until this year to finally watch it all because after season two it turned into a pile of hot garbage. It's awful, terrible, worse than voyager.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Baka-nin posted:Yes it was, and no it didn't, it looked worse. Babylon 5 never got that bad Are you kidding?  
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 02:40 |
|
|
Tears In A Vial posted:Sliders debuted in 1995, it took me until this year to finally watch it all because after season two it turned into a pile of hot garbage. It's awful, terrible, worse than voyager. thats the kind of feedback I need. worse than voyager is a drat fine metric for bad
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2016 01:21
|
|