|
Dante80 posted:Update: Cloud Imperium's head of communications David Swofford got in touch to clarify a few points. As various readers have pointed out, the reason for the higher prices is because of VAT laws within the EU: If anything this just shows CIGs talents at finding the absolute most rear end backwards solution to a solved problem. 
Hamburger Test fucked around with this message at 23:06 on Aug 3, 2016 |
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 12:25 |
|
|
Matlock Birthmark posted:The Extra's section in their store is just filled with delightful scummy stuff. That's where they are still selling the Manual of setting up and modding a Star Citizen private server Interesting that they specifically note it's a pre-order. Do they actually charge you for it right away or just take your billing info like they're supposed to on a pre-order?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Raskolnikov posted:Birthmarks can be removed and noticeable scarring is almost non existent. QFT. And extremely likely, given both her narcissistic nature and Hollywood perfectionism. Dude, it's her.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
It's all in Derek's July blog. Come on guys, you all know this by now 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
Matlock Birthmark posted:The Extra's section in their store is just filled with delightful scummy stuff. That's where they are still selling the Manual of setting up and modding a Star Citizen private server The gently caress is in it? Blank pages?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
D1E posted:QFT. And extremely likely, given both her narcissistic nature and Hollywood perfectionism. I can't believe people are still doubting this, it's like autism causes people not to be able to recognize faces or something
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
I didn't even know you could get those things removed. Do they just laser them or something?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
Pointy posted:I can't believe people are still doubting this, it's like autism causes people not to be able to recognize faces or something To be honest it's kind of creepy, but I'm still glad of it. thatguy posted:I didn't even know you could get those things removed. Do they just laser them or something? Aaaaand here I contribute to it: they're probably moles and you can get moles removed. Talk to your dermatologist if you have one that looks funky. Or if it's ticklish. e: or if you have recently received millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains and can spend all sorts of money on your appearance, you shallow oval office e2: I am cognizant of some degree of hypocrisy at this point Propagandist fucked around with this message at 23:16 on Aug 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
phosdex posted:Interesting that they specifically note it's a pre-order. Do they actually charge you for it right away or just take your billing info like they're supposed to on a pre-order? This would be less scummy, and I have no idea. I know with my brand new fake RSI account, if I add the item to my cart it will not let me complete without payment information. Now they might not bill it immediately, but for obvious reasons I do not want to test that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
I don't have any but I don't mind them on other people if they're not like big and gross and hairy and poo poo. Most of my mole related knowledge comes from Austin Powers.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
thatguy posted:I didn't even know you could get those things removed. Do they just laser them or something? Laser or scalpel. It's fairly common to have moles or birthmarks removed and tested for preventative reasons, especially if you have a history of melanoma. But you can have it removed just for cosmetic reasons too, it's not expensive.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Sandi? Successfully get rid of moles?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Sandi? Successfully get rid of moles? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
TBH, it's probably just makeup and concealer hiding the moley evidence. Also a ton of that cosmetic polyfiller poo poo old ladies trowel into their wrinkly faces so they can pretend they're sub 40.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Sandi? Successfully get rid of moles? Curse you. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Nicholas posted:But you can have it removed just for cosmetic reasons too, it's not expensive. It's also an in and out surgery. Cosmetic surgeons do that procedure on a conveyor belt system.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Sandi? Successfully get rid of moles?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
If it wasn't Sandi, why would every CIG-powered streamer, reddit and their offical forum insta-ban the word "tickle" (and manual-ban anything close to it, like "sickle", "pickle" etc.)? Yesterday, WTFOSaurus and that pirate guy were constantly checking every single thing in chat in case the insta-ban didn't work. They didn't even really try to play the game, but basically played "banhammer 40k" regarding the word tickle and all of it's variations. Seriously, if it truly would not be her, why would they even react, and in such an extreme manner? They are banning people left and right that say "tickle" to an extent that even the shitizens themselves in the chats don't understand what's going on. Some pages back, someone posted that they even banned Huxley because he/she wrote a post with "tickle" in it. With their actions, they basically say "yep, that's her, you doubters. PS: your banned".
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
Matlock Birthmark posted:This would be less scummy, and I have no idea. I know with my brand new fake RSI account, if I add the item to my cart it will not let me complete without payment information. Now they might not bill it immediately, but for obvious reasons I do not want to test that. Which thread do you think you're in?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Sandi? Successfully get rid of moles? I wonder how much backer money was spent getting rid of moles... 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
...and there's our word of the day for today folks - Moles (User was banned for this post)
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:33
|
|
|
thatguy posted:I was just about to make this joke. As was I. I was gonna go for.. "If Sandi could get rid of moles she wouldn't be in this mess" That's what I get for playing games on my phone instead of  ing
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Sandi? Successfully get rid of moles? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
DOMDOM posted:uhhh how do you think he met her to begin with?? Does a tickle fetish star count as a trophy wife? That's maybe a participation award or consolation prize, at best.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
You've got to wake up pretty early to beat me to posting a bad joke
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
alphabettitouretti posted:Does a tickle fetish star count as a trophy wife? That's maybe a participation award or consolation prize, at best.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Sandi? Successfully get rid of moles?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
tooterfish posted:It does to a failed used car salesman with a bad haircut. yeah good point. Thumb man scored big.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Is tickle-chat still a thing? http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0842258/?ref_=tt_cl_t2 Her co-star in that movie Derek Smart linked to was in a movie called "Tickle Party: Volume 2 (Video) (as Dita)" 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
alphabettitouretti posted:Does a tickle fetish star count as a trophy wife? That's maybe a participation award or consolation prize, at best. It's arguably more romantic than the couples who met on prison work-release, or in STD clinics, or shooting rats down at the local dump. And honestly, having been part of the business of selling a very specific and curiously anodyne fantasy to a small niche of obsessive weirdos is almost like having actual marketing experience when it comes to the way they're selling Star Citizen; the only difference is that the tickle fetishists actually get a tickle fetish video in exchange for their money. I dunno, maybe Star Citizens look down on tickle fetishists for being so gauche as to pay for an actual product instead of just giving their money away and getting to imagine how great the product they're not getting will be.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:05
|
|
|
Please don't rat hunt shame. Theres not a lot to do around here sometimes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
derek it's been almost 24 hours since your tweets release the goods
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:11
|
|
|
Justin Tyme posted:derek it's been almost 24 hours since your tweets release the goods Technically his tweet didn't promise anything. It just said today wouldn't be a good day to be on the Internet if you were upset by the tickling video. And it's true -- for one of such delicate sensibilities, no day is a good day to be on the Internet, including today in particular.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
boviscopophobic posted:Technically his tweet didn't promise anything. It just said today wouldn't be a good day to be on the Internet if you were upset by the tickling video. And it's true -- for one of such delicate sensibilities, no day is a good day to be on the Internet, including today in particular. Next you're going to say he didn't even start development on the tweet until 2017.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:29
|
|
|
tuo posted:Seriously, if it truly would not be her, why would they even react, and in such an extreme manner? They are banning people left and right that say "tickle" to an extent that even the shitizens themselves in the chats don't understand what's going on. Some pages back, someone posted that they even banned Huxley because he/she wrote a post with "tickle" in it. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
SurfaceDetail posted:Please don't rat hunt shame. Theres not a lot to do around here sometimes. Man that's what I'm saying we can't all be sophisticated globetrotting nutritionist CIA special education legal aides like moma or master ticklers or or visionary scam artists some of us are just normal folks you know 
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
Spatial posted:I was inconsolable with laughter when I read this earlier. Their shining defender of hope just swatted aside in a huge blundering wave of stupidity. It's just too drat good She gets a few days off now and then because her particular brand of bullshit is abrasive even to that hugbox
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
There's two kinds of people in this world: ticklers, and ticklees.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
Wafflz posted:Next you're going to say he didn't even start development on the tweet until 2017. Oh shut up you content locust. I don't mind waiting for his tweet because I knew what I was getting involved in—sure, it might be delayed somewhat, but that's nothing concerning or, frankly, surprising. What matters is we're getting a much better tweet in the end, so i for one am happy with waiting until it's done.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 12:25 |
|
|
Trilobite posted:It's a tale as old as Hollywood: girl comes to town to make it big, has to do some skeevy things to pay the bills, gets found and rescued by a wanna-be big shot Hollywood producer. (And still somehow ends up doing skeevy things to pay the bills, but at least now the bills are a lot bigger and the skeevy things are focused on exploiting other people, which is...not better, I guess, but probably more comfortable.) Star Citizen: Selling a very specific and curiously anodyne fantasy to a small niche of obsessive weirdos Not quite up there with "your mother is a stretch goal", but pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 00:36
|
|
