|
4.5 billion is still impressive. Remember that when Trump claimed 10 billion, he was including a bunch of wacky stuff like saying that the name "Trump" itself was an asset worth a billion dollars.
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 20:04 |
|
|
Сука блядь!
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
That report's name? Albert Trumpstein
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:08
|
|
|
Only 4.5 billion? Sad!
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:08
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:4.5 billion is still impressive. Remember that when Trump claimed 10 billion, he was including a bunch of wacky stuff like saying that the name "Trump" itself was an asset worth a billion dollars. 3 billion*
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:08
|
|
|
wow what a pauper *im* worth that along with my house on a country club and my JD and my 140 IQ test
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:10
|
|
|
I would've expected about $1 billion.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:10
|
|
|
iirc he literally said his worth is whatever he feels it is on that given day
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:iirc he literally said his worth is whatever he feels it is on that given day yes he claimed his brand is worth 3 billion, but it depends on how he feels about things just lmao
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:12
|
|
|
if he's got 4 and a half billion he really should have spent a couple dozen mil on a decent gotv operation
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:16
|
|
|
OhFunny posted:https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/762859554795249664 This almost makes me think he's seen internal/campaign polls of Texas that shows a tie/Clinton winning and wants to at least try to keep Texas red. It's too dumb/desperate to be a properly strategic move. I mean, he's a Bush, but still. On its face this move makes 0 sense. But he's now a guy named George Bush who once endorsed Donald Trump, so he's DQed from the Presidency going forward, which is nice.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:23
|
|
|
Cigar Aficionado posted:This almost makes me think he's seen internal/campaign polls of Texas that shows a tie/Clinton winning and wants to at least try to keep Texas red. It's too dumb/desperate to be a properly strategic move. I mean, he's a Bush, but still. On its face this move makes 0 sense. Try thinking like a complete idiot, it's a perfect strategic move in that context.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:25
|
|
|
Cigar Aficionado posted:This almost makes me think he's seen internal/campaign polls of Texas that shows a tie/Clinton winning and wants to at least try to keep Texas red. It's too dumb/desperate to be a properly strategic move. I mean, he's a Bush, but still. On its face this move makes 0 sense. Clinton winning Texas is real and people need to start accepting it
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:26
|
|
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gop-senator-why-i-cannot-support-trump/2016/08/08/821095be-5d7e-11e6-9d2f-b1a3564181a1_story.html This is pretty huge. I've never seen a sitting senator denounce support for their own party's candidate. Is this unprecedented? I mean I doubt it because few things in this world are unprecedented but it's still loving crazy. Edit: duh forgot about cruz and all the rest. Still though. Throw another on the pile. Trillhouse fucked around with this message at 06:30 on Aug 9, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:28
|
|
|
4.5 billion, eh? The really cool owner of my local football team--- who is a Muslim named Khan--- is richer than that. Step it up, Donald.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:Try thinking like a complete idiot, it's a perfect strategic move in that context. "Hey even though I'm just a state land commissioner and by far the best move for my future political career is to just say absolutely nothing, I'm going to decide to endorse the most reviled Presidential candidate in history who's down 10 points or more and imploding and isn't a Republican and isn't even running a real campaign and completely poo poo on my dad and said my uncle did 9/11". Yeah checks out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:31
|
|
|
Trillhouse posted:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gop-senator-why-i-cannot-support-trump/2016/08/08/821095be-5d7e-11e6-9d2f-b1a3564181a1_story.html
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:33
|
|
|
OhFunny posted:https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/762859554795249664 Transcription errors can be a bitch.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/brokencountry1/status/762811442848342016
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:38
|
|
|
i'm the benghazi toes
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
Trillhouse posted:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gop-senator-why-i-cannot-support-trump/2016/08/08/821095be-5d7e-11e6-9d2f-b1a3564181a1_story.html Zell Miller in 2004.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
I don't think it's too crazy for George P. Bush to endorse Trump. The vast majority of Republicans will be in a similar boat as him once Trump loses, saying they did their duty for the party and respected the will of their voters. It's too late for Jeb's career but they might not want the Bush family to get too caught up in the inevitable Dolschtosslegende that'll emerge concerning why Trump lost - Cruz might take that gamble for his "I was right" campaign of 2020, as is his style, but the Bushes are probably looking for a way to preserve their dynasty. It's kind of an odd time to be endorsing though after such a tough week, the convention might've made more sense. Trump as a problem for the Republicans may sort of resemble the Iraq war vote for the Democrats, where short-term it's very hard to go against the prevailing mood even if it's easy to see how it might end in disaster and you definitely don't want to be on the outside if it turns out they were right, so nominally savy politicians who know better are endorsing a bad idea and will spend the rest of their careers explaining it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
yeah but trump humiliated his dad repeatedly and took a lot of joy in doing so.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:46
|
|
|
Dolash posted:I don't think it's too crazy for George P. Bush to endorse Trump. The vast majority of Republicans will be in a similar boat as him once Trump loses, saying they did their duty for the party and respected the will of their voters. It's too late for Jeb's career but they might not want the Bush family to get too caught up in the inevitable Dolschtosslegende that'll emerge concerning why Trump lost - Cruz might take that gamble for his "I was right" campaign of 2020, as is his style, but the Bushes are probably looking for a way to preserve their dynasty. It's kind of an odd time to be endorsing though after such a tough week, the convention might've made more sense. I agree that Trump will go down as the Republicans' version of the Democrat's Iraq war vote, in that it will be very hard if not impossible to shake it off for anyone who endorsed Trump going forward in their careers, especially in the short term (2-4 years from now).
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
Lol I like Hillary more than most liberals and this is still real funny
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
a dog from hell posted:Because the wealthy evade taxes? It's really not hard to put this one together. he campaigned on knowing all the loopholes and how to close them, so it's not this. if he made a billion and paid zero in taxes he'd be going over them line by line in his stump speech
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:58
|
|
|
Trillhouse posted:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gop-senator-why-i-cannot-support-trump/2016/08/08/821095be-5d7e-11e6-9d2f-b1a3564181a1_story.html Ego-bot posted:Lindsey Graham was first on board the NeverTrump train. There's also Mark Kirk and Ben Sasse.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 06:58
|
|
|
Cigar Aficionado posted:I agree that Trump will go down as the Republicans' version of the Democrat's Iraq war vote, in that it will be very hard if not impossible to shake it off for anyone who endorsed Trump going forward in their careers, especially in the short term (2-4 years from now). another step in Ted Cruz's master plan EDIT: i'm surprised Graham went NeverTrump, this kind of aggressive stupidity seems right up his alley
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:04
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:another step in Ted Cruz's master plan He prefers civilized stupidity and only wants to invade the middle East not glass it
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:08
|
|
|
OhFunny posted:https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/762859554795249664 Oh lord there's another one? We're going to have to put up with this one in 10-20 years, won't we?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:09
|
|
|
The horse race is dead! Long live the trumpster fire!
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:10
|
|
|
There's an 80% chance that Trump's hiding the return because he paid shockingly low amount, either because he's not rich or tax evasion or both.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:11
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:There's an 80% chance that Trump's hiding the return because he paid shockingly low amount, either because he's not rich or tax evasion or both. I'm hoping we find out he's dumb enough to hide money in Russia
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:14
|
|
|
The only thing that would be shocking to me is that he paid a lot of taxes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:15
|
|
|
the paradigm shift posted:He prefers civilized stupidity and only wants to invade the middle East not glass it
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:15
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:There's an 80% chance that Trump's hiding the return because he paid shockingly low amount, either because he's not rich or tax evasion or both. Reliable sources, and I won't say who, but reliable sources, they're saying it's because he donates a million dollars to NAMBLA every Christmas.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:19
|
|
|
Booyah- posted:Lol I like Hillary more than most liberals and this is still real funny drat I looked it up and this guy isn't being ironic either lmao If only Scott Adams were this funny
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:19
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:There's an 80% chance that Trump's hiding the return because he paid shockingly low amount, either because he's not rich or tax evasion or both. or because of the deductions from his large donations to NAMBLA not going to drop this until we get some answers in the form of his full and uncensored tax returns. these questions are being asked by many people, bigly amounts of people, and Trump isn't responding very suspicious imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:20
|
|
|
Bakanogami posted:Oh lord there's another one? I'm fairly sure the Bush family is politically dead on the national stage. George P. has the legacy of his uncle's Presidency and his father's embarrassing defeat to deal with. He might be Texas Governor in 10 years though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 20:04 |
|
|
OhFunny posted:I'm fairly sure the Bush family is politically dead on the national stage.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 07:27
|
|