|
mind the walrus posted:No way that dude isn't supposed to be on meds of some kind Several different kinds of meds, too. Gutworm infection meds, something for his inevitable ulcers, something for his :sadbrains: condition, etc etc..
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 15:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:56 |
|
|
He was, but it was a suppository and he ate it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:So on a continent known for its gigantic size where rural residences can be literally hundreds of miles apart, the government decided to rely on them to accurately report in using an online census? Let's not forget: Just for the hell of it, this year they decided to announce that unlike every previous census ever, they would this year be retaining your name and address for 4 years, and using it in conjunction with other databases to improve government services. And refused to provide any information about why they needed this data, how it would be secured, or how it could possibly benefit the population. https://twitter.com/jpwarren holds a pretty good summary. Also, they say that if you refuse to do it, you will get a $180 fine. Per day. This is not legally enforceable. e: oh yeah, the data is being stored on their webservers in cleartext.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 15:28
|
|
|
Pitcher annoyed. https://vine.co/v/5bZ2YgIMPWw
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 16:22
|
|
|
iRend posted:Let's not forget: Just for the hell of it, this year they decided to announce that unlike every previous census ever, they would this year be retaining your name and address for 4 years, and using it in conjunction with other databases to improve government services. http://twitter.com/stilgherrian/status/762903073379332096 Jesus christ.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 16:27
|
|
|
Holy crap every time someone from Aus, Canada, or Britain wants to give  poo poo about the First Peoples I'm going to show them that image.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
First Peoples? Is that the new Native American? Sounds kinda silly. Like the name of a mythical civilization in a fantasy novel.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:First Peoples? Is that the new Native American? Sounds kinda silly. Like the name of a mythical civilization in a fantasy novel. Find a better collective term, then. "Native American" is silly and useless because everyone born in the Americas is 'native'. "Indian" is confusing and wrong, even if many First Nations people are fine with it. "Indigenous tribes" is racist and also kind of silly ('tribe' implies lack of civilization, and 'indigenous' has the same problem 'native' does).
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
How about we use their names for themselves and not lump them all together? They weren't one nation after all. That's racist.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
Pre-colonials?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
the washington redskins
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:13
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:How about we use their names for themselves and not lump them all together? They weren't one nation after all. That's racist. Yes, of course, because they totally have a single name to refer to everyone whose claims to the Americas predate colonialism. I don't think so, Tim. Cakefool posted:Pre-colonials? I was going to say something snarkier about this suggestion, but I'm sure the reason why that won't work will come to you eventually.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
Cakefool posted:Pre-colonials? Pre-whitey
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
Aerdan posted:Yes, of course, because they totally have a single name to refer to everyone whose claims to the Americas predate colonialism. I don't think so, Tim. Amusingly your two responses contradict each other a little. Also, there may just possibly be a touch of humor or sarcasm in my post here on something awful dot com
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
Aerdan posted:Yes, of course, because they totally have a single name to refer to everyone whose claims to the Americas predate colonialism. I don't think so, Tim. Why do you need to group them all together? Would you say Palestinians are the same as the Israelis? Stop trying so hard.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
Dude if you're not trolling you should realize it's way less work to just call them "First Peoples" in a macro context and then specify by tribe as circumstances dictate--exactly the same way we did with "Native Americans" and "Indians" before--than quibble over semantics.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Would you say Palestinians are the same as the Israelis? Would you perhaps call them Middle Eastern? Might've heard that somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:28
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:The TV production companies wasting their time and the audience dumb enough to watch. I bet it's more of that stupid walking bullshit he's doing instead of stunts. He's been going downhill ever since he moved from his apartment and I think the isolation and lack of attention is really bringing out some of the stuff that wasn't readily apparent before. Now he's alone, probably going broke, and making insane videos about Crystal Pepsi that only he cares about and everybody else did as a joke. At least Shoenice is somewhat pleasant in a drunken sort of way. Beast is just going to that angry/sad part of life where he's probably going to flip out and either end it all or vanish for years to finally get the help he needs.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
Aerdan posted:Find a better collective term, then. "Native American" is silly and useless because everyone born in the Americas is 'native'. "Indian" is confusing and wrong, even if many First Nations people are fine with it. "Indigenous tribes" is racist and also kind of silly ('tribe' implies lack of civilization, and 'indigenous' has the same problem 'native' does). When people say "Native American," everyone loving knows they're not talking about some newborn baby in Jersey City. If you're going to nitpick to that extent, "First Peoples" is just as problematic as the others because they weren't all first. There was immigration via the land bridge to Siberia ~12000 BC, there was immigration over the water from Southwest Asia ~13500 BCE.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:33
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:How about we use their names for themselves and not lump them all together? They weren't one nation after all. That's racist. We don't have a large enough building to put the resulting new name for Aboriginal and Northern Affairs on.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
pre-
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
Imagine being an midget indian.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:36
|
|
|
This thread has gone to awful places and I'm not sure I can get schadenfreude from it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Why do you need to group them all together? Would you say Palestinians are the same as the Israelis? Stop trying so hard. Palestinians are not the same as Israelis but if if I want to talk about poo poo that concerns all the people that live in the Levant I'm not saying "The Palestinians, the Israelis, the Jordanians, the Lebanese, etc.." I'm going to group them together. People from San Diego aren't the same as people from San Fransisco but you're loving crazy if you think I'm not saying "Californians" when I'm talking about poo poo that includes both of them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:This thread has gone to awful places and I'm not sure I can get schadenfreude from it. I rather enjoy the tirades from the perpetually offended, the willfully ignorant, and the poor bastards that use local soliloquies that the previous two groups can't jerk themselves off fast enough to. The scootyfrooty is coming from inside the tread. Again. Still.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
Edit: never mind. I've lost interest.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
Somebody give this man his mod priviliges back http://hw-mobile.worldstarhiphop.com/u/vid/2016/08/iGVZn2sMX3tK_mobile.mp4 
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:08
|
|
|
amityville anus posted:Somebody give this man his mod priviliges back What is going on here
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:23
|
|
Tater Love 
|
mind the walrus posted:Dude if you're not trolling you should realize it's way less work to just call them "First Peoples" in a macro context and then specify by tribe as circumstances dictate--exactly the same way we did with "Native Americans" and "Indians" before--than quibble over semantics. Yeah but I mean there's evidence there might have been some people here before them, so.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:25
|
|
|
zakharov posted:What is going on here The guy was trying to meet up with what he thought was a 15 year old boy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
amityville anus posted:Somebody give this man his mod priviliges back What the gently caress is this?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:29
|
|
|
Is that really Aatrek?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Is that really Aatrek? Aatrek is American, so no.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
Can that get rehosted or at least linked? I can't see it and I want to laugh at the pedo. E--- Thanks. Jesus it really is a British Aatrek. mind the walrus has a new favorite as of 18:52 on Aug 9, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:44
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Is that really Aatrek? quote:Joseph Young age 26 from Bexleyheath came to meet what he thought was a 15 year old boy in Bexleyheath Broadway Kent he has been arrested, he kicked of with interceptors and hurt a team member and tried to punch another team member silly silly boy Another "case": quote:UPDATE Terry Andrew chulk age 53 from Bexleyheath Was arrested in January 2016 for online grooming a 14-year-old child it has took the police six months to get back to us in regards to Terry , Terry had already arranged to meet our decoy but we went to the police and told them that we would be meeting Terry the Met police instructed us that if we was to meet Terry that all our technical devices would get seized so Internet interceptors decided not to meet Terry in this time Terry decided to do a few things on his laptop to get rid of the evidence the Lab at the Met police said what ever he done got rid of all of his evidence, The police where given every piece of information regarding where Terry lives when the the police did arrive at Terry’s house he was not present and was informed By telephone to bring in all his technical devices to the police station which of course he would because by then he knew that there would be no evidence on his devices so it has took the police a lot of time and effort to get back to us with a decision of NFA as there was no evidence on his laptop so here at Internet interceptors blame the Met police for letting another one slip the net, this is why we go and meet them or go to their properties so that we know that they have no time to get rid of any evidence as you can see in our picture he looks like any other man a loving partner and A loving father but Terry you’ve got a dark secret haven’t you why don’t you admit to your family about your secret , Terry met our decoy on the same social media account where he met his current partner we might add a young partner Terry was talking to our decoy when his current partner was heavily pregnant with his child shame on you , Terry is currently still on the same social media account as so is his current partner with three different profiles Maybe leave it to the pros? e: mind the walrus posted:Can that get rehosted or at least linked? I can't see it and I want to laugh at the pedo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
Mierenneuker posted:Imagine being an midget indian.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
Prokhor Zakharov posted:What the gently caress is this? WWWWOOOOOORRRRRLLLLDDDDDSSSSTTTAAAARRRRRRRRR!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
amityville anus posted:Somebody give this man his mod priviliges back Pedophiles getting caught is a great scoodyfroody source. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAJ3RxCIkLg
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Why, when confronted, did he not go with the tried-and-true defense of repeating "it was a joke?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:56 |
|
|
Only schadenfreude here are the complete morons who trying to publicly shame people who obveously need some loving help, and making the rest of them so paranoid that it hurts legitimate investigations. Bunch of wankers, the lot of them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2016 19:01
|
|
