|
Is feminism really about taking down men and putting women in charge? because if so I'm glad of it. I can't wait to be owned by women. my body is ready.
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 23:12 |
|
|
As a feminist, I believe it's sexist that men can go topless but women can't. Women should be encouraged to go topless. Unless they're old/ugly in which case it would be just as inappropriate as an old/ugly man going topless and that's not sexism that's just common sense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
RedMage129 posted:Is feminism really about taking down men and putting women in charge? because if so I'm glad of it. I can't wait to be owned by women. my body is ready. actually, head feminist Andrea Dworkin advocates for the use of cloning technology to allow women to reproduce asexually. this way men can go extinct and feminism can win its final victory Applewhite posted:As a feminist, I believe it's sexist that men can go topless but women can't. Women should be encouraged to go topless. feminists have already fought and won this battle in Ontario 
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 02:59
|
|
|
revdrkevind posted:I would consider identifying primarily as a Democrat once I went six months without some Republican listening to how I vote straight-ticket Democrat every single election and then condescendingly informing me I'm actually a Democrat. Lol you missed the point
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:05
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:actually, head feminist Andrea Dworkin advocates for the use of cloning technology to allow women to reproduce asexually. this way men can go extinct and feminism can win its final victory Actually clone based reproduction would ultimately fail. The problem is that over time you have genetic degradation from carbon decay and loss in the DNA sequence, so you have to have a constant supply of fresh blood from a plexed gene pool to refresh the rudimentary sequence and refesh the organism to the current gene swarm in the time cypher. So realistically in a state of medical perfection a clone based reproduction sequence could expect a longevity of around 800 years before total extinction.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:As a feminist, I believe it's sexist that men can go topless but women can't. Women should be encouraged to go topless. I think women could just remove their milk ducts and go topless short of just wearing pasties. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:Actually clone based reproduction would ultimately fail. The problem is that over time you have genetic degradation from carbon decay and loss in the DNA sequence, so you have to have a constant supply of fresh blood from a plexed gene pool to refresh the rudimentary sequence and refesh the organism to the current gene swarm in the time cypher. So realistically in a state of medical perfection a clone based reproduction sequence could expect a longevity of around 800 years before total extinction.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
I don't know about the dumb question, but that first page action cracked me up
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:18
|
|
|
MY PALE GOTH SKIN posted:Are you sure it's not retarded slapfighting about which word is "correct" Who are you talking to?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
WHAT are you talking???
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:34
|
|
|
We're just talking about a word and suddenly people get all emotional.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:35
|
|
|
SA....... ......is the new tumblr
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
sorry starwar I can't copy your style sorry
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
MY PALE GOTH SKIN posted:Lol you missed the point what was your point? besides jerking your mouth off
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Pitdragon posted:the guys who were talking about rich v poor were right. too bad the rich are smart enough to utilize the old "divide and conquer" strategy and get poor people to blame each other for all of society's problems while they continue loving everyone who isn't them behind closed doors For real tho, if I had to choose between a boot on my neck or a nice tasteful pump, I would go w// the latter.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 05:31
|
|
|
im better than all of you put together e: way less racist, way less sexist, way less judgemental than you
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
reallivedinosaur posted:im better than all of you put together lol judge us harder
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 09:39
|
|
|
Maybe quit saying that women make 78 cents for every dollar a man makes in almost every profession. That's been debunked a hundred times.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 11:17
|
|
|
The Dennis System posted:Maybe quit saying that women make 78 cents for every dollar a man makes in almost every profession. That's been debunked a hundred times. women should get an automatic +25% bonus on all pay cheques, so that the average works out to be even with men!
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 11:28
|
|
|
I looked into it and the women working at my company make the same amount as me, so basically that proves feminism wrong I guess. But they can still give all women automatic raises if they want cuz I have a joint checking account with my wife so the patriarchy strikes again!
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 11:34
|
|
|
Yeah I'd probably support these people if they actually called themselves Equalists instead of using the loaded term feminists.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 12:48
|
|
|
dad gay. so what posted:*bleeeeeeeeeeeeep*
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 15:37
|
|
|
this thread and everyone in it is terrible
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
Piso Mojado posted:this thread and everyone in it is terrible How should this topic be discussed?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
Piso Mojado posted:this thread and everyone in it is terrible SnowblindFatal posted:How should this topic be discussed? someplace else, preferably not by you
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 17:54
|
|
|
ArbitraryC posted:While i agree with you i have to admit i don't see people sharing bell hooks stuff on facebook, it's all sound and fury garbage from the aforementioned "shock mags". facebook is garbage
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 18:11
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:actually, head feminist Andrea Dworkin "head feminist" according to who because idk who the gently caress that is and I googled the name and it's just some woman with a bachelor's in English who died over a decade ago. Most known for defending porn I guess? see what I mean lol it's just people creating a strawman and then getting mad about it like my dude "we can just clone women forever and men will die off" is obviously the position of a person nuttier than Dale Gribble why would you even give that the time of day Moridin920 fucked around with this message at 18:16 on Aug 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:"head feminist" according to who because idk who the gently caress that is and I googled the name and it's just some woman with a bachelor's in English who died over a decade ago. Most known for defending porn I guess? I mean wasn't lena Dunham at the democratic convention or whatever, i think you're really downplaying how much this stuff is pushed as the media face of progressives. I totally agree that plenty of irl people who care about these issues are chill and reasonable about them but at some point you have to admit that you pretty much need to willfully tune out the bad side because it's incredibly prevalent.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
FoxStrats posted:lol judge us harder 
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
Has this been posted yet?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 19:32
|
|
|
Elfface posted:Has this been posted yet? too many words for a comic imho got bored looking for the first panel
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 19:32
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:"head feminist" according to who because idk who the gently caress that is and I googled the name and it's just some woman with a bachelor's in English who died over a decade ago. Most known for defending porn I guess? As a feminist though, I don't think that's a very outlandish idea. I consider it a pretty good overall goal for humanity. It's not like we are going to extinguish all living men but rather phase them out over time. I think they are still very useful now. Definitely required equipment. but I don't feel the far future has any real need for them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
dad gay. so what posted:who gives a poo poo you loving human being
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
for all the poo poo women say they have to go through none of them will ever know the true agony is that is sitting down to eat a tasty chip and accidentally squashing your own balls
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Salem Saberhagen posted:As a feminist though, I don't think that's a very outlandish idea. I consider it a pretty good overall goal for humanity. It's not like we are going to extinguish all living men but rather phase them out over time. I think they are still very useful now. Definitely required equipment. but I don't feel the far future has any real need for them. ok valerie solanas thanks for that retarded hot take which mod needs his dick sucked to gas this poo poo thread and kill between 10-50% of the posters in here
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
alsodad gay. so what posted:who gives a poo poo you loving human being
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Oh the over dramatic hyperbole. Think of it like horses. At one point they were super useful so there were many, and now there are few. It's not like we are trying execute anyone. Besides Andy Warhol was a prick.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Salem Saberhagen posted:As a feminist though, I don't think that's a very outlandish idea. I consider it a pretty good overall goal for humanity. It's not like we are going to extinguish all living men but rather phase them out over time. I think they are still very useful now. Definitely required equipment. but I don't feel the far future has any real need for them. Ok here's the fatal flaw with your plan even aside from genetic drift and DNA degrading (let's say we figure a solution to that out): you're assuming women are somehow in 100% control of cloning and that only women will get cloned and that as a result men will die out when there's absolutely no indication that it won't just be both sexes cloning themselves also prove that people are going to suddenly not want to gently caress just bc cloning exists. also this 'phase them out' over time poo poo is exactly the adversarial mentality that feeds nutter men who can then point to you and go 'see she wants to wipe men out' and justify their nuttiness also also the far future has no needs at all it isn't a sentient thing that cares. Humans could wipe themselves out in a nuclear holocaust tomorrow and 'the future' will be fine without any of us.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
As a man in the United States, myself and millions of others like me are so privileged to receive a forceful mutilation of our genitals, leaving a permanent sexual dysfunction! I can't wait until American women receive this equal right!
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 23:12 |
|
|
it springs from the mistaken prioritizing of equity (paternalism's gentler face) over equality, op.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2016 20:38
|
|