|
i'm looking forward to iCloud breaking when Sierra releases and millions of people are uploading 10gb of backups simultaneously
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 15:58 |
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:Nope. The content remains for other people to use. that's not what it means. content is consumed on a per person basis and once consumed that person will need new and different content. this is why we create new content. it has been consumed by enough people that they want something new.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:that's not what it means. content is consumed on a per person basis and once consumed that person will need new and different content. this is why we create new content. it has been consumed by enough people that they want something new. You are insane.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:Nope. The content remains for other people to use. we are in a human centipede model, someone creates the content and feeds it to the first consumer. the content must be excreted from the first consumer before it can be consumed by the second consumer, and so on.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
calling it "consumed" is a shorthand for saying viewed/heard/read for a particular piece of content without having to specify the means by which the content is consumed "content" is itself short for tv show/movie/book/song/album/podcast/web video/etc.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
after a podcast is listened to it is marked as "consumed" and then disappears from my phone for someone else to listen to.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:Tomb Cook
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
C.H.O.M.E posted:we are in a human centipede model, someone creates the content and feeds it to the first consumer. the content must be excreted from the first consumer before it can be consumed by the second consumer, and so on.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
C.H.O.M.E posted:we are in a human centipede model, someone creates the content and feeds it to the first consumer. the content must be excreted from the first consumer before it can be consumed by the second consumer, and so on. i thought this was called the cremnob model
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:im gonna update the word filter to this lol, do
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 00:29
|
|
|
Satellit3 posted:lol, do
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
tim cook [t i m c o o k] timb cook [t i m b c o o k] tomb cook [t o m b c o o k]
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 04:52
|
|
|
just realized the dongle is actually a very good move because someone with fancy lightning headphones won't ever switch from an iphone because they'll need to be powered or some poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 07:03
|
|
|
Oh, Woz, you are just not as cool as Tim http://www.afr.com/technology/mobil...20160821-gqxwsg Steve Wozniak posted:If it's missing the 3.5mm earphone jack, that's going to tick off a lot of people. I would not use Bluetooth … I don't like wireless. I have cars where you can plug in the music, or go through Bluetooth, and Bluetooth just sounds so flat for the same music.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 07:21
|
|
|
Kurvi Tasch posted:Oh, Woz, you are just not as cool as Tim He is right
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 07:29
|
|
|
Millstone posted:He is right No one cares about sound quality except weird old dudes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 09:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 12:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 12:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 12:37
|
|
|
officially proven; timb reads this thread
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 12:41
|
|
|
its weird that the wireless airpods havent leaked yet and we're just weeks away from the iphone release
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 14:16
|
|
|
i hope they use some proprietary wireless that's better than bluetooth also if you could mix outside noise in that would be cool
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
airplay to ur ears
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 14:49
|
|
|
quote:“Our practices tend to reinforce a natural selection bias — those who are interested in working as a team to deliver a great product versus those whose primary motivation is publishing,” says Federighi. BTFO
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 15:44
|
|
|
he's right about bluetooth audio quality being awful poo poo for idiots butquote:"If there's a Bluetooth 2 that has higher bandwidth and better quality, that sounds like real music, I would use it. But we'll see. Apple is good at moving towards the future, and I like to follow that."
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
GameCube posted:he's right about bluetooth audio quality being awful poo poo for idiots but an uncompressed stereo audio stream is only about 1.5 mbps. bluetooth 4 supports "up to" 25 mbps i have no idea why bluetooth audio still sucks. you would think uncompressed audio would be the norm now
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 19:53
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:i have no idea why bluetooth audio still sucks. you would think uncompressed audio would be the norm now Apple doesn't support the chosen format of uncompressed audio, FLAC. Is there any difference between Apple Lossless and FLAC in terms of quality or is it just nerd audiophile poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:an uncompressed stereo audio stream is only about 1.5 mbps. bluetooth 4 supports "up to" 25 mbps cheap as poo poo hardware at every point in the signal chain because consumers have proven they don't care that their bluetooth audio accessories sound worse than fm radio
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
trilljester posted:Apple doesn't support the chosen format of uncompressed audio, FLAC. apple can make money off of one but not the other
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
trilljester posted:Is there any difference between Apple Lossless and FLAC in terms of quality or is it just nerd audiophile poo poo? they are both lossless so there is no difference by definition
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
my spirit animal is a sweet potato
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
trilljester posted:Apple doesn't support the chosen format of uncompressed audio, FLAC. the fault isn't just Apple being a special snowflake, Bluetooth devices are just generally poo poo at negotiating which audio format to use. my old car used to default to the lowest bitrate possible when it connected to my phone for A2DP and would stay there until you trigger the Bluetooth speakerphone mode after which it would resume playing at much better quality. who knows why. if Apple does go with high bitrate headphones it is gonna be funny when a bunch of Apple users are all crammed into a close space. Bluetooth gets really lovely when the 2.4GHz band gets congested.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:an uncompressed stereo audio stream is only about 1.5 mbps. bluetooth 4 supports "up to" 25 mbps yeah, that "up to" means in a faraday cage in a clean room with the antennae touching
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
deep in my heart of hearts i hope that the actual iphone 7 announcement will show off a phone that does include a headphone jack and tim will use the announcement to demonstrate that they have committed to combating leaks and will use the recent spate of them as a way to root out leakers the phone will still be too big with a very bad os but some dreams are just too big
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 21:20
|
|
|
bluetooth is bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
trilljester posted:Apple doesn't support the chosen format of uncompressed audio, FLAC. pretty sure the only difference is some header data in the file. conversion is pretty much instant.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 21:25
|
|
|
Stymie posted:deep in my heart of hearts i hope that the actual iphone 7 announcement will show off a phone that does include a headphone jack and tim will use the announcement to demonstrate that they have committed to combating leaks and will use the recent spate of them as a way to root out leakers it's nice to want things
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
Scott Forstall posted:it's nice to want things
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 22:19
|
|
|
embrace the power of now
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 15:58 |
|
|
Citizen Tayne posted:You are insane. he's right though, think about porn. while it's not "consumed" in the sense that it's gone, everything it offers, it's essence, the reason why you would watch it, is gone I mean not exclusively there are some tv shows worth rewatching and some porn clips are just so perfectly debaucherous
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 23:59
|
|
