|
Really looking forward to The Squid and the Whale looking better than the crappy DVD.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 01:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:22 |
|
God, I'm so ready for a 4k Criterion Hoffman blu-ray, I saw the new transfer at the Cinerama here and it was jawdropping.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 01:40 |
|
Lone Wolf and Cub is 39.99 on Amazon. Go go go!
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 01:46 |
|
FYI, Breathless is also getting a repackaging for November. The dual format edition is going OOP in favor of separate DVD and Blu editions.Magic Hate Ball posted:God, I'm so ready for a 4k Criterion Hoffman blu-ray, I saw the new transfer at the Cinerama here and it was jawdropping. I want to give it another chance and P&P restored Technicolor is easy to convince me to rewatch. It's just idiotic how Lionsgate is practically holding the StudioCanal library hostage in the US.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 01:59 |
|
Cloks posted:Lone Wolf and Cub is 39.99 on Amazon. Go go go! Let's see if it gets canceled. Really happy they are including Shogun Assassin too. I'm not a huge fan of it, but for the sake of being a completionist I'm happy.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 02:03 |
|
One Eyed Jacks looks really interesting. It has the guy from Paths Of Glory who Kubrick fired (he was the crying, slow witted one) and Marlon Brando. How could you go wrong? They're both sneezing actors.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 05:37 |
|
zandert33 posted:Let's see if it gets canceled. Really happy they are including Shogun Assassin too. I'm not a huge fan of it, but for the sake of being a completionist I'm happy. Why would it get cancelled? Edit: Oh. The order. I was thinking you meant Criterion would cancel the set. Detective No. 27 fucked around with this message at 06:11 on Aug 16, 2016 |
# ? Aug 16, 2016 05:41 |
|
It'll be that price during the next B&N sale anyway
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 06:00 |
|
blue squares posted:It'll be that price during the next B&N sale anyway No it will be 50
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 06:13 |
|
Well I also don't want to make one of my favorite companies lose money because someone hosed up. I don't think it's right. If indeed it's a mistake
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 06:16 |
|
Cloks posted:Really looking forward to The Squid and the Whale looking better than the crappy DVD. Yeah I have been re watching a lot of Noah Baumbach movies lately and he is kind of underrated as a director. He is a perfect blend of astute observations and really mean that makes him an interesting director.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 08:21 |
|
blue squares posted:Well I also don't want to make one of my favorite companies lose money because someone hosed up. I don't think it's right. If indeed it's a mistake Amazon would be taking the hit more than criterion would.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 13:06 |
|
blue squares posted:Well I also don't want to make one of my favorite companies lose money because someone hosed up. I don't think it's right. If indeed it's a mistake Criterion wouldn't take the hit at all. They have a price that they'll sell their movies to Amazon for, and Amazon pays that regardless of what they charge. Here's how pricing tends to work (relatively simplified): Criterion sells it to a store for a set price (which can vary based on contracts and poo poo). The store then sells it to the customer for hopefully a higher price so they can make money. Now, let's say your brick and mortar store accidentally sells a movie for 5 bucks. Criterion loses nothing. Sales get weird, since sometimes the company will pay the difference and all that jazz. I don't know enough about Criterion's business dealings to really give you a good explanation on how sales are handled (for example, is Amazon given a cheaper price BECAUSE it helps Criterion determine how many sets to press up initially?) Clearance is something else completely.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 14:27 |
|
That makes sense. Thanks
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 14:38 |
|
You've heard of msrp right? Manufacturers suggested retail price. This is just a price given that you will make a good profit on carrying their items. Criterion would be the manufacturer. Criterion would sell to Barnes and nobles and Amazon at a whole sale price and Barnes and Noble normally sells at msrp. Amazon could sell lower and make less of a profit per unit but sell more units. That's always been Amazon's MO. Criterion makes the same money either way even if people pay more at Barnes and Noble. Criterion probably makes more money if you buy directly from them and not during their flash sale.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 14:49 |
|
Real close to J'ing off to this Punch-Drunk Love and The Squid and The Whale news.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 19:30 |
|
Boywhiz88 posted:Real close to J'ing off to this Punch-Drunk Love and The Squid and The Whale news. And then you would wipe yourself all over the squid and the whale right?
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 19:43 |
|
Quite excited to hear about PTA finally getting his Criterion recognition. Does this mean There Will Be Blood and Magnolia could also be in the pipeline?
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 23:07 |
|
InterrupterJones posted:Quite excited to hear about PTA finally getting his Criterion recognition. Does this mean There Will Be Blood and Magnolia could also be in the pipeline? Hard Eight seems more likely. I saw it for the first time recently and I think its definitely Criterion worthy.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 23:14 |
|
Hard Eight is clearly where they're going next. It's the only one that hasn't been released by anyone else and Criterion has a major hard-on for releasing directorial debuts.
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 23:15 |
|
Would that be the first criterion with Samuel L. Jackson and John C. Reilly?
|
# ? Aug 16, 2016 23:39 |
|
uhhhh I think you mean Sydney
|
# ? Aug 17, 2016 00:36 |
|
Rusty Staub posted:uhhhh I think you mean Sydney I dunno why PTA fought for that title, Hard Eight is so much better
|
# ? Aug 17, 2016 00:44 |
|
Cemetry Gator posted:One Eyed Jacks looks really interesting. It has the guy from Paths Of Glory who Kubrick fired (he was the crying, slow witted one) and Marlon Brando. How could you go wrong? They're both sneezing actors. Ever watch a cheap science fiction film from like the '50s or '60s and you can see that there's this really solid idea in there but it's getting buried under the bad effects and just the general lack of a visual/narrative/whatever grammar in which to express what the film is try to say? It's kinda like that. Like it feels like it would've been a wildly different, and much stronger, film if it had the next decade's worth of changes in the Western genre to draw upon (in terms of film grammar). It's not a bad film by any stretch, and it's definitely worth watching. And it'll be great to have it available again. But it definitely feels like a swing and a miss, a film that's really good for a footnote of a film, but it's still just a footnote. If that makes sense.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2016 02:17 |
|
I wonder what it would've been like with Kubrick behind the wheel?
|
# ? Aug 17, 2016 03:55 |
|
From people who saw the restoration, the film will probably be worth a re-evaluation based on seeing it properly. It's been stuck in public domain hell for decades other than a Paramount laserdisc. One Eyed Jacks was one of the last features shot in VistaVision, so it should look fantastic.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2016 04:08 |
|
InterrupterJones posted:Quite excited to hear about PTA finally getting his Criterion recognition. Does this mean There Will Be Blood and Magnolia could also be in the pipeline? Hey, Boogie Nights got a Crtierion Laserdisc! So, PTA is already part of the club. He just never made it onto a digital media, yet.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2016 04:53 |
|
Arthur Hiller, director of The In Laws
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 00:25 |
|
Cloks posted:Would that be the first criterion with Samuel L. Jackson and John C. Reilly? Do the Right Thing's in there isn't it? And Reilly was one of the billion people in The Thin Red Line. It'd probably be the first with both of them though
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 02:36 |
|
I'm fifteen minutes into My Darling Clementine, my first John Ford movie. I can already see why Kurosawa idolized him.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 03:37 |
|
It's weird, My Darling Clementine is like the one John Ford movie I've seen that I wasn't that into. It seems like it's everyone's favorite (that or the Searchers. I think my favorite's Stagecoach).
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 03:41 |
|
Hector Beerlioz posted:Arthur Hiller, director of The In Laws
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 06:18 |
|
Raxivace posted:He did a pretty solid movie that I watched a few weeks ago called The Americanization of Emily. RIP. The Americanization of Emily is so good and really deserves a Criterion.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 15:18 |
|
I'm glad Paddy Chayefsky got to satirize The Greatest Generation before it became too sanctified.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 15:40 |
|
Raxivace posted:He did a pretty solid movie that I watched a few weeks ago called The Americanization of Emily. RIP. I'll check it out thanks!
|
# ? Aug 18, 2016 15:59 |
|
K. Waste posted:The Americanization of Emily is so good and really deserves a Criterion. Warner Archive released it in 2014. Only $16 on Amazon and it has a commentary with Hiller.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2016 15:31 |
|
For the FilmStruck beta people, they added a good amount of new stuff. For the people that have to wait for launch, this is going to blow your pants off. I'm so hyped for the full release.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2016 20:30 |
|
Call Me Charlie posted:For the FilmStruck beta people, they added a good amount of new stuff. For the people that have to wait for launch, this is going to blow your pants off. I'm so hyped for the full release. Any standouts?
|
# ? Aug 24, 2016 22:57 |
|
Unmature posted:Any standouts? I didn't really want to mention specific titles (you should really have platinum) but this one's already been spoiled on /r/criterion awhile ago. Stalker was added. There's also a new Chantal Akerman collection and House was added to the horror collection.
|
# ? Aug 25, 2016 03:09 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:22 |
|
Is there any reason you don't want to mention specific titles? I'm part of the beta but I don't remember any NDA or anything
|
# ? Aug 25, 2016 03:22 |