|
This tweet makes zero goddamn sense at all.
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 20:35 |
|
|
sharkbomb posted:That's what I'm trying to say-- there were many levels of preparation and communicating tax returns between Trump's people and to/from the IRS. That information is out in the world beyond just some tightly controlled IRS database. Also, Trump gets tons of tax breaks from state entities for being in real estate and I'd bet they have seen his returns and have copies sitting in email boxes of low-level state grunts. Trump's businesses are so sprawling I have a difficult time believing that poo poo is locked down. Maybe something like a Nevada return could pop up but that wont tell you much.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:27
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Maybe something like a Nevada return could pop up but that wont tell you much. Okay I'll cede the argument - I don't know anything about this poo poo and am just doing some coffee-fueled blind speculatin' but if those returns get leaked in a few months I am going to gloat like a motherfucker
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:29
|
|
|
Oiled and Ready is right about the endocrine disrupting compounds btw. Chemicals in the water turning the friggin' frogs gay is a v funny Alex Jones bit but it's also a serious concern amongst the environmental chemist types who investigate these things. Both from mass-produced plastics and from the contraceptive pill (women pee out most of the hormones in the pill and they last for a really, really long time). The jury's still out if it has any effect on people but fish and amphibians and even molluscs and poo poo can be pretty hosed up by it. There's a SERIOUS SCIENCE PEER REVIEWED REVIEW ARTICLE here if you wanna read more. I dunno how well-regarded it is cause I just googled around for one but it's been cited 19 times which is better than nothing?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:30
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Trump seems immune to Russian hacking He pays the hackers protection money. Sort of. Except instead of him paying them to let him do what he wants, they pay him so that he can do what they want. Though it might be entirely without the payment bit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/spectreforever/status/768938497881219072 https://twitter.com/drdavidduke/status/769044017963266048
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:32
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:I'll change someone's name to "redneck nazgul" if they dare claim it God dammit, too slow reading the earlier pages and thinking up "Witch King of NASCAR". loving Night Crew and reading through the conspiracy theories.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:32
|
|
|
Pancakes posted:"Witch King of NASCAR" 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:33
|
|
|
I get probated for poo poo that other people do and get away with, it's a rigged system folks and low-energy liddle Shenji needs to be locked up. Sad!
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:37
|
|
|
sharkbomb posted:I see what you're saying. The Juanita Broadrick case against Bill Clinton was press gossip by 1992, it didn't hit papers until 1999. In 2003, the media (liberal and conservative) ridiculed people who said Saudi was involved and turned "the 28 pages" into a joke. They accepted McCain's SNL appearance where he got offended at a Mexican stereotype and then took a dramatic pause before he delivered the punchline, "I JAS KEEDINGGGG!" 4 days before the declaration of war, Cheney went on Tim Russert. He asserted that the facts indicated that Iraq was "reconstituting nuclear weapons". Russert made him repeat himself. Unlike all other statements about WMDs, this one is clearly a lie that Cheney had no reason to believe. A year later, only two journalists had the balls to call Cheney out on this impeachable travesty: Russert and Chris Matthews. To this day it's one of a few issues Matthews is strikingly informed on.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:37
|
|
|
Oiled and Ready posted:The Juanita Broadrick case against Bill Clinton was press gossip by 1992, it didn't hit papers until 1999. I want no part of this
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:41
|
|
|
C2C - 2.0 posted:This tweet makes zero goddamn sense at all. you need to get truly twisted on some dank david duke memery to comprehend what is going on
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:42
|
|
|
the amount of prep work a normal citizen must do to wholly comprehend the discourse occurring in the 2016 presidential campaign is staggering & cannot be recommended by any reasonable person
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:44
|
|
|
Fargo Fukes posted:Oiled and Ready is right about the endocrine disrupting compounds btw. Chemicals in the water turning the friggin' frogs gay is a v funny Alex Jones bit but it's also a serious concern amongst the environmental chemist types who investigate these things. Both from mass-produced plastics and from the contraceptive pill (women pee out most of the hormones in the pill and they last for a really, really long time). The jury's still out if it has any effect on people but fish and amphibians and even molluscs and poo poo can be pretty hosed up by it. There's a SERIOUS SCIENCE PEER REVIEWED REVIEW ARTICLE here if you wanna read more. I dunno how well-regarded it is cause I just googled around for one but it's been cited 19 times which is better than nothing? Yeah for a good analogy imagine Hitler often ranted about how CFCs were actually Jewish mind control It's a similarly dumb argument but if people ignored Carson because she was "aping Hitler" they'd be dumb too the blind spot of western science is anything that is both beneficial for big pharma/oil/etc AND counterproductive for liberals to accept as fact
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:44
|
|
|
Al! posted:yep, seems like a good way to quickly put dumb bullshit out there Is this from that forthcoming Trump News Network animated program, Cucktales?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:48
|
|
|
Oiled and Ready posted:Imagine a majority of American black people were in Nation of Islam or the new black panthers, but to make a fair analogy only a small portion of them committed atrocities in the name of these groups. It'd be more like that. i just meant Wilders calls his program 'The Netherlands Belong To Us Again', then opens with Here is our plan: instead of financing the entire world and people we don't want here, we start giving our money to the average Dutch person. and then lists all his ideas on how to stop islamization, literally the only part of his 'program' that has any specifics since the main racial antagonism here isnt black/hispanic <-> white, but muslim/arab <-> white it's much easier to read it as a huge dogwhistle for white identity ('the average Dutch person')
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:49
|
|
|
Cael posted:Is this from that forthcoming Trump News Network animated program, Cucktales? Awoo ooo
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:50
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/769045744108068869 So in addition to at least congressman Kingston claiming full ignorance of the alt-right yesterday and now Trump doing the same thing, what exactly are they hoping to gain? Seems to me that alt-righters are some of Trump's biggest remaining supporters, and for him to stand up in an interview and go "who?" would have a lot of potential to work against him.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:50
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:hahaha gently caress you boosted, you little delicate flower. gently caress your guns too. im comin for your poo poo, riding on an alligator through the mire like a redneck nazgul. hissssss baggins hissss yall paranoid randroid posted:pluckin my fuckin banjo and singing a hootenanny in the mordor tongue Pancakes posted:God dammit, too slow reading the earlier pages and thinking up "Witch King of NASCAR". This amazing. I can't stop laughing. Captain_Maclaine fucked around with this message at 13:56 on Aug 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:50
|
|
|
Oiled and Ready posted:
you say a lot of dumb poo poo but today has been a new level
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:52
|
|
|
Grey Fox posted:https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/769045744108068869 So in addition to at least congressman Kingston claiming full ignorance of the alt-right yesterday and now Trump doing the same thing, what exactly are they hoping to gain? Seems to me that alt-righters are some of Trump's biggest remaining supporters, and for him to stand up in an interview and go "who?" would have a lot of potential to work against him. Trump 2016: I don't know what Steve said.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:53
|
|
|
galt white galt white GALLLLT WHIIIIITE Holy poo poo bill is that the neighbor's retarded kid? The hell is he saying? Alt.... Right?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:53
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:WILLY: Dilbret, you get memo?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:55
|
|
|
Grey Fox posted:https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/769045744108068869 So in addition to at least congressman Kingston claiming full ignorance of the alt-right yesterday and now Trump doing the same thing, what exactly are they hoping to gain? Seems to me that alt-righters are some of Trump's biggest remaining supporters, and for him to stand up in an interview and go "who?" would have a lot of potential to work against him. The alt-righters can just say "he's pretending to not know us" -- this won't reduce their support at all.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:56
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:quebec french has unvoiced vowels Like French didn't have enough silent letters. Truly the most innovative version of French.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
Grey Fox posted:https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/769045744108068869 So in addition to at least congressman Kingston claiming full ignorance of the alt-right yesterday and now Trump doing the same thing, what exactly are they hoping to gain? Seems to me that alt-righters are some of Trump's biggest remaining supporters, and for him to stand up in an interview and go "who?" would have a lot of potential to work against him. They're not going to abandon their candidate just because he's pretending to distance himself from them. They know he's going to keep saying "what everyone is thinking" about minorities and as long as he keeps running his mouth they will maintain their support
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 13:59
|
|
|
Grey Fox posted:https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/769045744108068869 So in addition to at least congressman Kingston claiming full ignorance of the alt-right yesterday and now Trump doing the same thing, what exactly are they hoping to gain? Seems to me that alt-righters are some of Trump's biggest remaining supporters, and for him to stand up in an interview and go "who?" would have a lot of potential to work against him. His other options are "embrace the alt-right" which is poison for other voters or "denounce the alt-right" which is poison for his base, this is the same response as the David Duke poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:01
|
|
|
Don't see what's wrong with those two pictures.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:03
|
|
|
Grey Fox posted:https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/769045744108068869 So in addition to at least congressman Kingston claiming full ignorance of the alt-right yesterday and now Trump doing the same thing, what exactly are they hoping to gain? Seems to me that alt-righters are some of Trump's biggest remaining supporters, and for him to stand up in an interview and go "who?" would have a lot of potential to work against him. It's doubly weird because to the general public, alt-right as a thing doesn't matter. All they care about are the horrible things people closely associated with Trump do/say. No one gives a poo poo if Bannon is alt-right, they care that he ran a site that ran stories with headlines like "birth control makes you ugly" and all that other insane poo poo Hillary pointed out in her speech. It's important to bring up the name to get people in the alt-right to start losing their poo poo, but the important part is the message.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:03
|
|
Cat Army
|
Grey Fox posted:https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/769045744108068869 So in addition to at least congressman Kingston claiming full ignorance of the alt-right yesterday and now Trump doing the same thing, what exactly are they hoping to gain? Seems to me that alt-righters are some of Trump's biggest remaining supporters, and for him to stand up in an interview and go "who?" would have a lot of potential to work against him. They don't care. "Masterful art of negotiation / He's just feigning ignorance."
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
Speaking of Angela Merkel: https://twitter.com/DailyMirror/status/709158812712890369  uh, nobody worse than that you say?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
sharkbomb posted:I want no part of this I made a rare argument that modern journalists are spineless pussies WITHOUT blaming the Jews -no investigation of FDR inciting Pearl Harbor -Zero coverage of a gun that literally causes a heart attack. A few years ago the CIA released video testimony of a 1975 government group discussing and appearing to approve a dart gun intended to induce heart attack. -warren commission finds Oswald as sole shooter, later congressional hearing "thrown out for false audio" that finds it had to be multiple shooters, no media coverage -Zero media focus on the mechanism of 9/11 collapse- assuming it's all true, the first 3 steel buildings to ever collapse from heat all falling same day is worth a closer look, surely? If only for edification? Let's do a different scenario, a little closer to moral home. How many journalists in late 2001 and all of 2002 did smart, complex stories on the justifications for the Iraq war? And how many wrote either hawkish thinkpieces or endlessly recycled their favorite "Identity politics" thought experiments instead?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:05
|
|
|
That photo with the twins is uncomfortable but not for the reason the person that made the image thinks.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:06
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:Speaking of Angela Merkel: Hitler wasn't a bad Chanc- E: NEVERMIND apparently he was Chancellor through 1945 so defense dropped, only worse Chancellor was Chancellor velorum
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:07
|
|
|
One of these days it'd be pleasant to see a journalist push back while interviewing Trump when he makes some assertive statement about the interviewer. In that Cooper interview, Trump says "You see what's going on in the polls.." as if Cooper just innately agrees with Trump that the polls are favorable. Would've been nice to hear Cooper say that, no, I don't see the polls tilting in your favor sir.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:08
|
|
|
C2C - 2.0 posted:One of these days it'd be pleasant to see a journalist push back while interviewing Trump when he makes some assertive statement about the interviewer. It's funny, I only caught 5 minutes of the interview which was that exact part, and I too was wondering how Cooper let that one get by. It was a big fat pitch down the center.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:10
|
|
|
drat look at the Hillary thread regulars on the bottom there.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
Who do you think had more blood in em Trump or Hillary?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
C2C - 2.0 posted:One of these days it'd be pleasant to see a journalist push back while interviewing Trump when he makes some assertive statement about the interviewer. This is folly and Cooper knows it. Trump has no logical defense if you question a specific, but if you bite when he says "we all know", "people are saying" or "you see what's going on" he will tear you apart. No smart journalist ever bites on his traps anymore, and that's what they are. Cooper's most righteous journalistic strategy now is to keep feeding Trump's ego and steer him in the most ridiculous direction he can muster. E: you all are criticizing a VANDERBILT who has interviewed Trump tens of times before on his strategy Remind me who hates the globalists again?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 20:35 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q2oLn8Bmfo
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 14:13
|
|
