Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

Crazycryodude posted:

Victoria II is probably my favorite Paradox game but then again it seems like there's only about 27 other people on the planet who actually understand and enjoy it so I guess I'm just weird.
Taking a break from battering Africa as a monarchist confederacy right now, because evil. Victoria 2 best game.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Griz
May 21, 2001


unwantedplatypus posted:

So humans have ridden horses, camels, and elephants into combat, as well as occasionally using dogs. What other animals have we used for war? What are the traits which make an animal suitable for use in warfare?
the US Navy has sea lions and dolphins trained to stick marker buoys on mines and divers.

HEY GAL posted:

hello thread!

I just spent like half an hour trying to remember where I heard that first one before

there's a folk metal arrangement of it in Black Sails season 1 episode 7.

OpenlyEvilJello
Dec 28, 2009

Waci posted:

But what if they discover more cassowary? How can we be sure this is really maximum cassowary?

We'll have no recourse but to change the English language itself.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

The navy found a use for dolphins, but they escaped in hurricane Katrina. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1EBqPZyo88

My favorites are the bits of ordinance strapped to animals. Russia put explosives on dogs and tried training them to run at tanks. Somebody tried using pigeons to steer bombs. America had a very effective bomb developed with little timed incendiary charges tied to a bunch of bats, so that when the bats found little shadowy spots in Japanese buildings, they'd burst into flame. It never saw action because the nuclear bomb came out first.

The Belgian
Oct 28, 2008

Sounds delicious.

Splode
Jun 18, 2013

put some clothes on you little freak

SlothfulCobra posted:

My favorites are the bits of ordinance strapped to animals. Russia put explosives on dogs and tried training them to run at tanks. Somebody tried using pigeons to steer bombs. America had a very effective bomb developed with little timed incendiary charges tied to a bunch of bats, so that when the bats found little shadowy spots in Japanese buildings, they'd burst into flame. It never saw action because the nuclear bomb came out first.

Chief of the Bureau of Ordnance, Rear Admiral Reuben G. L. Goldberg at your service.

Corsair Pool Boy
Dec 17, 2004
College Slice

unwantedplatypus posted:

So humans have ridden horses, camels, and elephants into combat, as well as occasionally using dogs. What other animals have we used for war? What are the traits which make an animal suitable for use in warfare?

The Allies brought a few hundred homing pigeons ashore with them on D-Day, I believe we also tried to kill Castro with one.

Australia fought {and lost) a couple wars against emus.

Hunt11
Jul 24, 2013

Grimey Drawer

Feral_Shofixti posted:

The Allies brought a few hundred homing pigeons ashore with them on D-Day, I believe we also tried to kill Castro with one.

Australia fought {and lost) a couple wars against emus.

I think the real statement is what wasn't used in an attempt to kill Castro.

aphid_licker
Jan 7, 2009


The British designed an area denial nuke with a live chicken as a component

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

e: hey check out the idiot who can't read half a page back

aphid_licker fucked around with this message at 01:13 on Sep 4, 2016

Slim Jim Pickens
Jan 16, 2012
Does anybody know anything about an insane backwoods wrestling fad in 17th-century America where the best way to win was to gouge your opponent's eyes out?

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

Slim Jim Pickens posted:

Does anybody know anything about an insane backwoods wrestling fad in 17th-century America where the best way to win was to gouge your opponent's eyes out?

18th and 19th
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gouging_(fighting_style)

Slim Jim Pickens
Jan 16, 2012

Thank you I will credit this thread when I start the league up again.

SeanBeansShako
Nov 20, 2009

Now the Drums beat up again,
For all true Soldier Gentlemen.
Grow that thumbnail thick!

TasogareNoKagi
Jul 11, 2013

Why did American and German torpedoes have the same laundry list of flaws going in to WW2? Was it a case of convergent evolution and no money to fully test everything during the interwar period, or did someone steal the other guy's notes?

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice
My only issue with Hoi4 is that it mechanically seems to suggest going full on Deep Operations but then undercuts itself in that you can't assign commanders in a way that's efficient.

I liked having the "Theaters" act as "Fronts" for the USSR and then each Army inside it be a corps level organization for achieving specific goals. So I might have two corps of 6 tank divisions each with a corps of 6 infantry divisions with artillery to act as my breakthrough force and then have two corps of motorized infantry behind the line to go fill in the gap and I repeat this along the axis of advance.

But then I run out of Generals and then eventually it gets unwieldy once you have 500-600 divisions running around and I have to consolidate to armies of 24 which I find silly.

I miss Hoi3's system in this regard and hope they add more depth for customized approaches to command.

But I must say, Hoi4 is very impressive when it comes to logistics, often I find myself brought to a dead halt by poor infrastructure/supplies instead the enemy/AI managing to mount a resistance, to the point of having to keep 100+ divisions in the rear to prevent "traffic jams".

Comstar
Apr 20, 2007

Are you happy now?
Why hasn't the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXusKM5uX0s* raid on St. Nazaire ever been made in to a movie? Is it because there is SO MUCH over the top, unbelievable heroics by a group of British Soldiers and Sailors straight out of central casting you can't actually fit it into one movie and have any audience believe it?

The stand out is the stammering bomb maker who can't talk to his girlfriend ,who steps over 2 bodies that died a second earlier, takes the wheel of a 5000 ton Destroyer from a Royal Engineer who has no idea what he's doing, and says "Don't worry chap, I've got it". Then he realises at the last second he's headed to the wrong exhaust port dry-dock, spins the wheel JUST at the right time, scraps the paint off the side and hit the bullseye exactly where he'd planned for it.

Ending with a shot of a furious Hitler demanding that the NEXT time the British Commando's try something like that again, every one of them will be shot.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* - Apologies for using Jeremy Clackson, but I just spent an hour watching it, and it's even more over the top and unbelievable than I'd known. 5 guys escaped all the way to Spain!

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye

TasogareNoKagi posted:

Why did American and German torpedoes have the same laundry list of flaws going in to WW2? Was it a case of convergent evolution and no money to fully test everything during the interwar period, or did someone steal the other guy's notes?

It was a case of insufficient testing and incompetence on the part of the bureaucrats that were supposed to ensure the torpedo's effectiveness. Dontiz threw the rear Admiral in prison for 6 months once he learned about it, a rare example of the Nazis being efficient. The Americans took a bit longer....

Also this was posted in GBS and seems worth reposting:

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


Raenir Salazar posted:

But I must say, Hoi4 is very impressive when it comes to logistics, often I find myself brought to a dead halt by poor infrastructure/supplies instead the enemy/AI managing to mount a resistance, to the point of having to keep 100+ divisions in the rear to prevent "traffic jams".

The one thing about HoI4's logistics that gets me is that I can't manually set the path for supplies to flow through. I hate how the logistics pathing ignores that nice big port I took for the express purpose of supplying my advance and instead decides to send a trickle through an underdeveloped overland route even though I've got naval superiority and plenty of convoys all lined up for that port because its stupid and is weighted towards land routes or whatever. Apparently it's been improved some since I ragequit, though.

Nude Bog Lurker
Jan 2, 2007
Fun Shoe

Nebakenezzer posted:

Also this was posted in GBS and seems worth reposting:

Not sure whether I laughed harder at Russia getting the poo poo kicked out of him or little :saddowns: Italy about to steam into the fray.

P-Mack
Nov 10, 2007

Nude Bog Lurker posted:

Not sure whether I laughed harder at Russia getting the poo poo kicked out of him or little :saddowns: Italy about to steam into the fray.

i'm still weirded out by there being two germanies

unwantedplatypus
Sep 6, 2012

P-Mack posted:

i'm still weirded out by there being two germanies

That's 50 years too soon at least

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

unwantedplatypus posted:

That's 50 years too soon at least

Prussia versus "Germany" maybe?

quote:

Apologies for using Jeremy Clackson

Why? Face punching aside he's a good presenter in that and I like his genuine appreciation for military history.

Elyv
Jun 14, 2013



Raenir Salazar posted:

Prussia versus "Germany" maybe?

It looks to me like it's supposed to represent WW1 and the artist couldn't figure out a way to represent the Germany was fighting on both the Eastern and Western Fronts other than making two of them.

Phanatic
Mar 13, 2007

Please don't forget that I am an extremely racist idiot who also has terrible opinions about the Culture series.

Raenir Salazar posted:

Why? Face punching aside he's a good presenter in that and I like his genuine appreciation for military history.

And, sure, face-punching the producer was a dick move, but he also face-punched Piers Morgan, which is downright praiseworthy.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

Elyv posted:

It looks to me like it's supposed to represent WW1 and the artist couldn't figure out a way to represent the Germany was fighting on both the Eastern and Western Fronts other than making two of them.

Yeah, the left side is the Western front, the right side is the Eastern front.

TerminalSaint
Apr 21, 2007


Where must we go...

we who wander this Wasteland in search of our better selves?

Feral_Shofixti posted:

The Allies brought a few hundred homing pigeons ashore with them on D-Day...

They had a proven record, one of the best examples being named G.I. Joe:

quote:

During the Italian Campaign of World War II, G.I. Joe saved the lives of the inhabitants of the village of Calvi Vecchia, Italy, and of the British troops of 56th (London) Infantry Division occupying it. Air support had been requested against German positions at Calvi Vecchia on 18 October 1943, but the message that the 169th (London) Infantry Brigade had captured the village, delivered by G.I. Joe, arrived just in time to avoid the bombing. G.I. Joe flew this 20 mile distance in an impressive 20 minutes, just as the planes were preparing to take off for the target. Up to a thousand men were saved.[1]

On 4 November 1946, G.I. Joe was presented the Dickin Medal for gallantry by Major-General Charles Keightley at the Tower on London, the citation credits him with the most outstanding flight made by a United States Army homing pigeon in World War II.[2] G.I. Joe was the 29th and the first non-British recipient of the medal.[2]

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



unwantedplatypus posted:

So humans have ridden horses, camels, and elephants into combat, as well as occasionally using dogs. What other animals have we used for war? What are the traits which make an animal suitable for use in warfare?

People have responded with some species, but the traits is an interesting question. I would say the three biggest are trainability, enough mental strength to keep it together, and a combination of endurance and easy enough care that they won't overly burden logistics, weighing against whatever advantage they are providing.

So as amazing as they could be, we never saw many cats on the battlefield, because a tiger's astounding physical prowess is immaterial if he's just going to wash himself and then go to sleep.

I suppose you could replace trainability with predictability, but most higher-order life is going to have a big range of possible behavior.

Fake edit; It also occurs that these are broadly similar to what you want in human soldiers as well.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice
We use pigeons for utility.

What about hawks? Stab someone's eyes out?

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Raenir Salazar posted:

We use pigeons for utility.

What about hawks? Stab someone's eyes out?

During Franco-Prussian war the besieged Parisians used pigeons to stay in contact with outside world; in consequence, Prussians employed hawks to catch the pigeons. The next step was to use balloons to transport the pigeons safely past the lines.

MI5 also had its own peregrine falcon division during WW2 to counter German spies:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/special_report/1999/01/99/wartime_spies/263333.stm

quote:

According to documents now held at the Public Record Office in Kew, London, at least two of the captured pigeons became "prisoners of war".

Displaying humour in the midst of adversity, an intelligence officer marked in his report: "Both birds are now prisoners of war working hard at breeding English pigeons."

Oh apparently in UK there also was a medal for animals that had shown gallantry, the Dickin Medal, awarded to 32 pigeons, 18 dogs, three horses, and one cat until 1949 (and then a bunch of dogs after 2000).

Nenonen fucked around with this message at 07:26 on Sep 4, 2016

Grand Prize Winner
Feb 19, 2007


P-Mack posted:

What I like about the Taiping proto-communism is that British observers get really obviously mad at it, but don't yet have the language and ideological framework of capitalist/communist conflict to describe why beyond complaining about "injury to trade."

Wait, why don't they? Didn't Marx publish before the Taiping war started?

Yvonmukluk
Oct 10, 2012

Everything is Sinister


Raenir Salazar posted:

Prussia versus "Germany" maybe?


Why? Face punching aside he's a good presenter in that and I like his genuine appreciation for military history.

I remember there was an episode of Top Gear where I think they'd just got a new Reasonably Priced Car and Al Murray (a british comedian perhaps best known for his role as The Pub Landlord) was one of the celebrities that came out to drive it, and at one point it cut to the two of them discussing WWII tanks.

Actually Murray did a whole documentary series called Al Murray's Road to Berlin, which was pretty good as I recall.

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

Grand Prize Winner posted:

Wait, why don't they? Didn't Marx publish before the Taiping war started?

That doesn't mean every Victorian had read and digested Das Kapital, though!

FastestGunAlive
Apr 7, 2010

Dancing palm tree.

Nenonen posted:

During Franco-Prussian war the besieged Parisians used pigeons to stay in contact with outside world; in consequence, Prussians employed hawks to catch the pigeons. The next step was to use balloons to transport the pigeons safely past the lines.

MI5 also had its own peregrine falcon division during WW2 to counter German spies:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/special_report/1999/01/99/wartime_spies/263333.stm


Oh apparently in UK there also was a medal for animals that had shown gallantry, the Dickin Medal, awarded to 32 pigeons, 18 dogs, three horses, and one cat until 1949 (and then a bunch of dogs after 2000).

The most recent recipient was a horse who carried ammo in Korea. The horse also had a statue made at the Marine Corps museum recently.

Rodrigo Diaz
Apr 16, 2007

Knights who are at the wars eat their bread in sorrow;
their ease is weariness and sweat;
they have one good day after many bad

unwantedplatypus posted:

So humans have ridden horses, camels, and elephants into combat, as well as occasionally using dogs. What other animals have we used for war? What are the traits which make an animal suitable for use in warfare?

Biting and stinging insects like scorpions or assassin bugs were occasionally loaded into clay jars and chucked at besiegers. In the fascist war against Ethiopia, the Ethiopians sometimes dropped beehives on Italian tanks and caused them to crash.

And of course various poisons & venoms were sometimes extracted to coat weapons, like the Arrow Frog's.

Plan Z
May 6, 2012

Supposedly there was an incident about a thousand years ago in China where they coated monkeys in flammable material and sent them into enemy camps. It sounds like one of those things that got passed down to quack 18th century European "historians" through a game of telephone, though.

Spacewolf
May 19, 2014
Awesome animalchat. (Or maybe faunachat?) Anyway, some things that bug me as I ponder the notion of a United Earth Defense Forces (space force, but also ground force, air force, naval force) for a sci-fi thing I'm doing:

1. Why do we, in the modern age, teach servicemembers close order drill? (I have my suspected reasons, and would be interested in seeing people's guesses why, but I'm kind of looking for the "accepted explanation" here, too - I never learned the stated reason, really, since I could never enlist (thanks, 20/80 corrected vision in better eye, with 10 degrees central field in the better eye - take away all my dreams why don't ya? :saddowns:) Be they enlisted or officer.
2. Setting aside issues of legality and war crimes and so forth (they're absolutely relevant but there's reasons I'm not considering them with this question), what's the youngest age at which it is actually practical to begin modern-style military training without doing physical/mental long-term damage to the trainee? Mind you, they wouldn't see operational service until at least 18 in this setting, so most of the time would be occupied by specialty training and the like, but I'm wondering at what age it begins to get practical to actually engage in, say, infantry training. (There's in-universe reasons why they're considering training under-18s as military personnel.)
3. What's the absolute longest that it's useful to have someone in a boot camp/basic training environment? (Is there anybody who has initial entry training for enlisted (or the equivalent phase of officer training) last longer than 12-13 weeks, at least as scheduled? Note that I'm not including specialty/MOS training in that, just the initial entry training.) Would there actually be a benefit to basic training lasting longer than 3 months?

(Presume for the purposes of 3 that money/resource management is not a necessary consideration yet, just that everything else is.)

Yes, I'm doing this for sci-fi, and yes I can (and likely will) use artistic license a lot, but my thought process is that it's going to be a near-future setting time and (mostly) tech-wise. So I may as well learn about the real factors behind the stuff I mentioned before I apply artistic license, so I can do it with a clue.

P-Mack
Nov 10, 2007

Grand Prize Winner posted:

Wait, why don't they? Didn't Marx publish before the Taiping war started?

The manifesto yes, but Das Kapital only came out after the war. Even the manifesto was pretty obscure at the time, though, and certainly nowhere near the terrifying spectre it would later become.

Marx wrote a bunch of contemporary editorials about China, but they're mostly about condemning the opium wars and British trade policy rather than in depth analysis of the rebellions as anything other than symptoms of economic crisis.

hogmartin
Mar 27, 2007

Spacewolf posted:

Awesome animalchat. (Or maybe faunachat?) Anyway, some things that bug me as I ponder the notion of a United Earth Defense Forces (space force, but also ground force, air force, naval force) for a sci-fi thing I'm doing:

1: Partly for the same reason they're taught to make their beds and fold their underwear precisely. It teaches attention to detail, properly following orders, uniformity, things like that. It also teaches responsibility for and relying on the team, because it looks and feels pretty dope when everyone's perfectly in step, but if one person messes up it can throw everyone else off.
2: I don't know. It also depends how you define "modern-style military training". Does it include high school JROTC? If someone in 5th grade wears a uniform and learns rifle safety and marksmanship in the Boy Scouts, is that military-style training?
3: If you're excluding any actual occupational training and this is strictly indoc, there's probably not much to be gained past 12 weeks. Maybe in the future there are some technologies that require more extensive training, but then it's not basic training anymore, it's an actual occupational school. I also wouldn't discount resource management if you consider that the recruits are a resource. Their purpose is to be doing stuff out in the field/fleet/asteroid belt or whatever. If there's an active existential conflict, countries throughout recent history have also dialed back training just to get bodies out there, "yeah, ask your corporal when you get to your unit, no point in teaching you right now".

FastestGunAlive
Apr 7, 2010

Dancing palm tree.

Spacewolf posted:

Awesome animalchat. (Or maybe faunachat?) Anyway, some things that bug me as I ponder the notion of a United Earth Defense Forces (space force, but also ground force, air force, naval force) for a sci-fi thing I'm doing:

1. Why do we, in the modern age, teach servicemembers close order drill? (I have my suspected reasons, and would be interested in seeing people's guesses why, but I'm kind of looking for the "accepted explanation" here, too - I never learned the stated reason, really, since I could never enlist (thanks, 20/80 corrected vision in better eye, with 10 degrees central field in the better eye - take away all my dreams why don't ya? :saddowns:) Be they enlisted or officer.

In the Marines it's taught at boot camp as part of instilling good order, discipline, and quick obeying of orders. There's also the tradition of it and it's continued use in ceremonies (daily accountability formation, form for unit pt, retirements, promotions, change of command, etc). Officer wise there is not as much focus on it after entry level training unless you get tagged for one of the ceremonies.

Then you've got things like the silent drill team and 8th&i barracks where it's used to put on a show for civilians

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rodrigo Diaz
Apr 16, 2007

Knights who are at the wars eat their bread in sorrow;
their ease is weariness and sweat;
they have one good day after many bad
So hey is this for real? http://forward.com/news/world/349179/poland-poised-to-put-bad-historians-in-prison/ because lmao

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5