|
Week 1 depth charts don't mean poo poo, y'all are playing yourselves. In actual news worth worrying about : https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/773952753378918400 Oh wow the Pats being mysterious about a weeks-long Gronk injury who would've seen that coming
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 19:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 15:36 |
|
|
You guys are crazy. Cam is going to light it up tonight.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 19:45
|
|
|
Benne posted:Week 1 depth charts don't mean poo poo, y'all are playing yourselves. Remember like 2 weeks ago when Coby Fleener was listed as the Saints' #4 TE on their website for a while? There's a decent chance this change wasn't even intentional.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
The Walrus; have you no shame!?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
gently caress, I've fallen for the trap and got involved in a discussion on Reddit about covariance.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
Talk me out of dropping Woodhead for C. Mike. .5 ppr I feel like I'm never going to feel comfortable starting Woodhead.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
Woodhead has been "a good fantasy running back" for multiple years. C.Mike has been a constant disappointment literally every year he's been in the league.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
Do not drop a dude with a defined role for a handcuff in my opinion.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
weekly font posted:Talk me out of dropping Woodhead for C. Mike. .5 ppr You keep the guy who actually catches passes in a .5 PPR league
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
I believe Woodhead was the #8 overall RB last year in half PPR so you should probably keep him.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
Those of you who use FAAB waivers: what days do you have waivers clear? And at what time? My league just voted to switch this season so it's completely new for all of us. On one hand, a later waiver time means that there's opportunity to place bids during the afternoon leading up to a Thursday or Monday game. On the other hand, that rules out the ability to get a last minute player on Sunday AM. If I set the time earlier to accommodate Sunday then now Thurs/Mon are screwed and any bids will have to be put in the night prior. In most cases I don't know if this matters but I can see how somebody would be upset if they don't have the foresight to bid early or if news on a player doesn't break until it's too late. I wish ESPN had a smart setting that was "lock waivers 1 hour before earliest kickoff"
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
Midnight M,W,F,S,S Or whatever 0pm Easten is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
Fantasy Football 2016: BeWare the Hype
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:06
|
|
|
opposable thumbs.db posted:I believe Woodhead was the #8 overall RB last year in half PPR so you should probably keep him. But his inconsistency is just maddening. He had a lot of games of bad production, and a handful of weeks of great production. Nearly half his TDs for the year came in 1 game. I'm not saying I would drop him for CMike because CMike is an enormous question mark right now, but I would be leery about treating Woodhead as anything more than an RB3/Flex in good match-ups.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
The problem with woodhead is his production relies solely on tds and his team being behind. He's just as likely to score 5 points as 25.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
Send A.J. Green and LeGarrette Blount Receive Demaryius Thomas and Jeremy Langford It's a half PPR league. Current receivers are Green, Keenan Allen, Sammy Watkins, Jeremy Maclin, Sterling Shepard, and Torrey Smith. Current RBs are Blount, Frank Gore, Ryan Mathews, Isaiah Crowell, and Dion Lewis. I'm definitely thinner at RB than WR, but I want to be starting four WRs each week and only two RBs. I feel like I would be downgrading a starting receiver spot substantially in exchange for a slight upgrade on Gore and a boost to my RB depth. Thoughts?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
The problem I noticed last year with having any player on SD is that their defense is so bad so their offense is never on the field long enough to guarantee any kind of consistency
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:20
|
|
|
Who, if any, of these players would you trade for Christine Michael? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
kiimo posted:Who, if any, of these players would you trade for Christine Michael? DGB. I would NOT trade Ginn or Clay if you were thinking about it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
commish posted:But his inconsistency is just maddening. He had a lot of games of bad production, and a handful of weeks of great production. Nearly half his TDs for the year came in 1 game. I'm not saying I would drop him for CMike because CMike is an enormous question mark right now, but I would be leery about treating Woodhead as anything more than an RB3/Flex in good match-ups. Papes posted:The problem with woodhead is his production relies solely on tds and his team being behind. He's just as likely to score 5 points as 25. His production relies on receptions, not TDs, not sure what you two are talking about honestly. In half PPR, I count 6 games with >9 points and no touchdown, out of 13 total games in which he didn't score a touchdown. Compare that to AP, who scored >9 points in 3/7 games without a touchdown, or Doug Martin, who scored >9 points in 6/11 games without a touchdown. So he has a similar fraction of games without touchdowns still being usable in fantasy, and he managed to be a top tier RB without scoring TDs in many games... Seems opposite of reliant on TDs. Edit: though agreed on general "inconsistency." As someone pointed out in the thread earlier, the first half of the year he balled out, then SD seemed to really want to get Gordon going so fed him the ball constantly, then Woodhead picked right back up with monster games once Gordon got injured. So inconsistent week to week, but with very clear reasons why. This year looks to be another with Gordon getting fed, unfortunately.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
Spiros posted:DGB. I would NOT trade Ginn or Clay if you were thinking about it. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
commish posted:You guys are crazy. Cam is going to light it up tonight. I'm sitting him for Stafford. YOLO.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
commish posted:You guys are crazy. Cam is going to light it up tonight. [citation needed]
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:[citation needed] 
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:[citation needed] - Cam Newton
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:[citation needed] - Someone who took him in the first 3 rounds.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
RVProfootballer posted:His production relies on receptions, not TDs, not sure what you two are talking about honestly. In half PPR, I count 6 games with >9 points and no touchdown, out of 13 total games in which he didn't score a touchdown. Compare that to AP, who scored >9 points in 3/7 games without a touchdown, or Doug Martin, who scored >9 points in 6/11 games without a touchdown. So he has a similar fraction of games without touchdowns still being usable in fantasy, and he managed to be a top tier RB without scoring TDs in many games... Seems opposite of reliant on TDs. I didn't say he was reliant on TDs, but regardless, we all agree that he is very inconsistent, and I would expect that to continue (or get worse, really) with a first round pick slotted in as the starting RB and Woodhead almost being 32. Melvin can't be that bad again, can he? CAN HE VietCampo posted:- Someone who took him in the first 3 rounds. I wish I had Cam. I have to decide between Rivers against KC (who kill him) and Matt Ryan (who hates throwing TDS).
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
commish posted:I wish I had Cam. I have to decide between Rivers against KC (who kill him) and Matt Ryan (who hates throwing TDS). I would like to take this opportunity to say, "gently caress Matt Ryan". Thank you and god bless.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
VietCampo posted:- Someone who took him in the first 3 rounds. Cam was the 1.01 pick in my draft. League commish turned on auto draft and that was his first choice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
How concerned should I be about this Gronk thing? Concerned enough to play a rookie TE tonight? Or should I wait and see if I need to grab a Richard Rodgers or a Charles Clay by Saturday?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Definitely wait until Sunday, he will probably play. If not, grab whoever Sunday morning.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
RVProfootballer posted:His production relies on receptions, not TDs, not sure what you two are talking about honestly. Woodhead getting receptions correlates with the Chargers playing from behind.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
Vargo posted:How concerned should I be about this Gronk thing? Concerned enough to play a rookie TE tonight? Or should I wait and see if I need to grab a Richard Rodgers or a Charles Clay by Saturday? As a Gronk owner, I'm not putting much weight into it for a few reasons. #1, this is par for the course. Belichicanery is a real thing and Pat's injury reports should be taken with a grain of salt because this is not the only time the situation will come up this season. On top of that, changes to the injury designation system this year means that there is no more "probable" and Gronk will probably be listed as questionable for the entire season. It's going to be hard to say. Then you have the fact that Gronk at 50% is still better than most TEs available. If he's playing, he's worth being in my lineup. Lastly, there are two MNF games this week so worst case scenario I can look to grab someone like Jesse James. I'll expect to keep Gronk in the lineup and the only thing that will change it is hearing explicitly that he's OUT come Sunday evening.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
Vargo posted:How concerned should I be about this Gronk thing? Concerned enough to play a rookie TE tonight? Or should I wait and see if I need to grab a Richard Rodgers or a Charles Clay by Saturday? If Gronk is out search your heart and find Clive Walford
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
Currently accepting all to The Clive Tribe
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
Go Been a rough offseason for potential breakout tight ends.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:04
|
|
|
THE BLACK UNICORN RIDES AGAIN
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
Clay and Miller
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
It's Jared Cook time! (Please?)
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 15:36 |
|
|
(Dynasty)Traded away Gronk, so I'm all in on the latest crop of big breakout TEs.  One of them has to break out... Right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:34
|
|