|
Boxcar posted:Vomit. This is a woman who gets paid millions of dollars to give speeches - it is her main source of income. She is in the stratosphere of speakers with few who you could point to who earn more - the Michael Jordan of her field. This schmaltzy appeal to emotion does a disservice to her capability - boo hoo hoo, the lady paid some of the most money ever to give speeches gets criticism on her speaking ability. If the highest paid athletes can take critiques on their abilities, so can she without making appeals to sexism on her behalf. Sure, there are sexist attacks against her, but these are outliers and noise compared to her level of success. Hard to argue things are holding you back when you are at the top of your field and anyone who buys into this bullshit should think more critically. I wish I was as bad at speaking as her. Can we post pictures of salt in this thread or is that just a cspam thing
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 14:17 |
|
|
ImpAtom posted:So are you seriously arguing that women and men aren't held to different standards for things? Really? Please do no feed the troll
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:55
|
|
|
Boxcar posted:Vomit. This is a woman who gets paid millions of dollars to give speeches - it is her main source of income. She is in the stratosphere of speakers with few who you could point to who earn more - the Michael Jordan of her field. This schmaltzy appeal to emotion does a disservice to her capability - boo hoo hoo, the lady paid some of the most money ever to give speeches gets criticism on her speaking ability. If the highest paid athletes can take critiques on their abilities, so can she without making appeals to sexism on her behalf. Sure, there are sexist attacks against her, but these are outliers and noise compared to her level of success. Hard to argue things are holding you back when you are at the top of your field and anyone who buys into this bullshit should think more critically. I wish I was as bad at speaking as her. Counterpoint, gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:55
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:Oh you'd better hope it wasn't Mailer. That one's a class 7 daemon and you'll need the Pope to bless the gently caress out of you for protection. Eh, you're fine if you can get a holy off.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
Boxcar posted:Vomit. This is a woman who gets paid millions of dollars to give speeches - it is her main source of income. She is in the stratosphere of speakers with few who you could point to who earn more - the Michael Jordan of her field. This schmaltzy appeal to emotion does a disservice to her capability - boo hoo hoo, the lady paid some of the most money ever to give speeches gets criticism on her speaking ability. If the highest paid athletes can take critiques on their abilities, so can she without making appeals to sexism on her behalf. Sure, there are sexist attacks against her, but these are outliers and noise compared to her level of success. Hard to argue things are holding you back when you are at the top of your field and anyone who buys into this bullshit should think more critically. I wish I was as bad at speaking as her. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
Boxcar posted:Vomit. This is a woman who gets paid millions of dollars to give speeches - it is her main source of income. She is in the stratosphere of speakers with few who you could point to who earn more - the Michael Jordan of her field. This schmaltzy appeal to emotion does a disservice to her capability - boo hoo hoo, the lady paid some of the most money ever to give speeches gets criticism on her speaking ability. If the highest paid athletes can take critiques on their abilities, so can she without making appeals to sexism on her behalf. Sure, there are sexist attacks against her, but these are outliers and noise compared to her level of success. Hard to argue things are holding you back when you are at the top of your field and anyone who buys into this bullshit should think more critically. I wish I was as bad at speaking as her. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:So are you seriously arguing that women and men aren't held to different standards for things? Really? She obviously has found a way to act that works just fine - she makes millions speaking. Who gives a poo poo if a few people think you act cold - a few people think every top performers' methods are off. Internet critics abound and are omnipresent for all celebrities. Fact is - she's at the top of her field and nothing has held her back or stopped her. Getting criticism from the public is part of making it and that criticism seems to have zero effect on her success - it is background noise. Edit: Show me speakers more successful financially or with greater influence who receive less criticism. She is the leading candidate for President of the US and gets paid millions. She's doing just fine speaking and to think otherwise is to avoid reality. Boxcar fucked around with this message at 02:02 on Sep 9, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
Boxcar posted:She obviously has found a way to act that works just fine - she makes millions speaking. Who gives a poo poo if a few people think you act cold - a few people think every top performers' methods are off. Internet critics abound and are omnipresent for all celebrities. Fact is - she's at the top of her field and nothing has held her back or stopped her. Getting criticism from the public is part of making it and that criticism seems to have zero effect on her success - it is background noise. https://twitter.com/Reince/status/773694140404170752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw That isn't the public.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:https://twitter.com/Reince/status/773694140404170752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw That rear end in a top hat gets just as much criticism (for his level), just from the other side, and doesn't do as well financially or politically as her. Edit: She is winning in what appears to be a landslide election - the public perception is that her speaking is just fine and the private is that it's worth a ton of money. Boxcar fucked around with this message at 02:07 on Sep 9, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:Thank you friend, this helps. Sorry friend, but in the end we all still lose. We could be looking at Hillary winning win less than 300 EVs, and a miminal higher popular vote than Trump, which means that for as terrible as Trump was Hillary was only somewhat better. Not losing in a landslide gives the angry white vote cause to stay angry and push for a more solid Trump republican party, House and Senate republicans will then do the only thing they can and appeal to the angry white vote, and this of course means that they will continue what they did to Obama and block Hillary's nominations, democrat's legislation, etc etc. Meanwhile, you will be inundated by the sudden rise and popularity of Trump TV, bringing all the alt-right news and commentary to the mainstream. Take comfort in the unknown for now, because anything short of a Clinton landslide will still be depressing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
edit: wrong thread
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:Sorry friend, but in the end we all still lose. We could be looking at Hillary winning win less than 300 EVs, and a miminal higher popular vote than Trump, which means that for as terrible as Trump was Hillary was only somewhat better. Yes this is exactly what it means, there is clearly nothing else at play during this election except cold hard logic.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
quote:There's no excuse. I was thinking in terms of an acronym - Aleppo," he explained. Johnson also said he thought the question was a fair one since he's running for president. this is the weakest poo poo I've seen since Lincoln Chafee blamed his glass steagal vote on his first day in office and his dad dying
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
botany posted:like honestly, wikileaks is supposed to be full of nerds. how the gently caress do they not understand the very basics of how emails work They're not full of anything now besides poo poo. Even most of Assange's friends have left him alone with Wikileaks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
duz posted:They're not full of anything now besides poo poo. Even most of Assange's friends have left him alone with Wikileaks. Hannity wished him the best on his show, he's his friend 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
Uranium 235 posted:NYT changed it to "stronghold of the Islamic State" which is also totally wrong. ISIS does not hold any part of Aleppo--it is split between the Syrian regime and Syrian rebels. The Syrian regime holds territory between ISIS and Aleppo. Since when has the NYT been a mouthpiece for the Kremlin? Because that's absolutely their line for why they are bombing Aleppo - everyone not with Assad is "ISIS".
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Hey remember when Trump said "eh it happens" about military rape? Yeah I don't think he's winning the white woman vote.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
nachos posted:
Ah yes L-Ep-O. We're all familiar with the letter Ep.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
Boxcar posted:
Could...could the legends be true? The anti-Celestial Scribe?!
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
Regarding the discussion of ad-blocking on news sites about 8 pages back- I block ads because every time I've experimentally tried going without the adblocker (at least 3 times in the last 10 years) I've gotten some sort of malware from a malicious ad. If you think I'm a bad person stealing internet content, to that I say: if your business model depends on ads, your business model is broken and it's not my job to make it work.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
TheOneAndOnlyT posted:I am still utterly stunned that it isn't getting more attention. It's basically tailor-made for Hillary to pounce on. The meta-story about the moderation has kind of drowned it out, because ultimately journalists in America are incredibly self absorbed and even when trying to wake up to their own professional disfunction are miles from actually realizing that this is about the fate of their nation, not them. Seriously, the whole Hillary access thing was the same deal. That there is a public good at stake barely occurs to them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
N. Senada posted:Could...could the legends be true? The anti-Celestial Scribe?!
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Well, 5.3 magnitude earthquake in North Korea: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37314927 Very close their prior test sites.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Everyone has seen the .goy bit, but how does he explain the copyrwite symbol instead of an @?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
That Humans of New York piece actually made me like Hillary much more. There's a real humanness that's lacking when she's just talking policy or being shellacked for her emails for the thousandth time. Hopefully she does more of them, it's interesting to see what's under the political mask.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
Americans Leading Eastern People Peacefully Onward Syria: checks out
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
NewMars posted:Everyone has seen the .goy bit, but how does he explain the copyrwite symbol instead of an @? The exact same way. Some PDFs are images with invisible text that is generated from the image using optical character recognition. It's far from perfect and I would believe both the v => y and the @ => © came from this. Wikileaks is lovely no doubt, but I don't think this is provably intentional.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
So we've got about 6 weeks before early voting begins. Considering Florida and North Carolina both have early voting, I assume Hillary's ground game is going to be focused on getting everyone to have already cast their vote for her by Halloween. Which is going to be the biggest issue with Trump's lack of ground game, people with anything at all going on on election day are going to have to choose between that and dragging their rear end back to their precinct to vote for an orange hate golem. Meanwhile Hillary's operation are going to be focused on fewer and fewer of her voters who need encouragement to give in to Abuela. It's double troubling for the GOP since if Hillary already got her vote locked in providing one rickety voting machine to Democratic majority precincts isn't going to have nearly the vote suppressing effect that is desired. Plus Trump's vigilante vote enforcement goons are going to have a much tougher time intimidating people. Epic High Five posted:Okay y'all I did some investigative reporting and Huma is definitely into some Demonic poo poo. I emailed that .goy address of hers and a bunch of gibberish from a daemon came back Did you email her @state.goy or did you use the proper address of ©state.goy?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
Know how I know that last night as a huge success for Hillary? Who besides maybe Fox News is talking about her answers to the email questions? No one. Everyone is talking either about Matt Lauer being a total pussy or Trump's crazy Putin and rape answers. That says a lot to me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
The halal market by my house carries Aleppo brand hummus, which is probably the best store-bought stuff I've ever had. Recent news has made snack time a depressing experience.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
Gyges posted:So we've got about 6 weeks before early voting begins. Considering Florida and North Carolina both have early voting, I assume Hillary's ground game is going to be focused on getting everyone to have already cast their vote for her by Halloween. Which is going to be the biggest issue with Trump's lack of ground game, people with anything at all going on on election day are going to have to choose between that and dragging their rear end back to their precinct to vote for an orange hate golem. Meanwhile Hillary's operation are going to be focused on fewer and fewer of her voters who need encouragement to give in to Abuela. DAMNIT, globalists tricked me into giving my personal info to a daemon AGAIN Why do I keep FALLING for this poo poo!!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:38
|
|
|
botany posted:
Please do.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:38
|
|
|
Bill Clinton played a saxophone so everyone here is okay with the fact he may have raped a women and sexually harassed many others.
Hollismason fucked around with this message at 02:46 on Sep 9, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
N. Senada posted:Could...could the legends be true? The anti-Celestial Scribe?! Hillary has a higher average speaking fee than Bill Clinton who is known as one of the best and I believe she received the most votes ever in a primary. As I said, sure, she gets sexist attacks, but to create some "I'm a girl who has no role models and can't act like the men when speaking" fiction that this is holding her back in any way is creating some kind of persecution myth. She is the best in the game today by any measurable statistic - stop having to turn her into the constant victim when she is the constant top performer.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
What battleground states have universal early voting?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
VanSandman posted:I've never really bought the whole 'nobody thought mittens would lose on his team' bit, those cards were canceled fast. Somebody was ready to tear the whole apparatus down immediately. This is begging the question (used correctly): your conclusion is baked into the assumption that he would be paying these now-redundant positions when he won. He was ready to toss his campaign staff, the only change was also tossing his transition team.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:Bill Clinton played a saxophone so everyone here is okay with the fact he may have raped two women and sexually harassed many others. Bill Clinton is not running for President.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:Bill Clinton played a saxophone so everyone here is okay with the fact he may have raped two women and sexually harassed many others. Hillary didn't though.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:45
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:Bill Clinton played a saxophone so everyone here is okay with the fact he may have raped two women and sexually harassed many others. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SZFRvuJ2a0
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 14:17 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/JDiamond1/status/773962616599289856
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:47
|
|
