|
I'm not crazy for sitting Cam in favor of Tyrod Taylor, right? This is my first Fantasy League
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:33 |
|
|
Recycle Bin posted:I'm not crazy for sitting Cam in favor of Tyrod Taylor, right? This is my first Fantasy League Yes, you are crazy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
Benne posted:Yes, you are crazy. Are you doubting the TyGOD?? But yes, it would be silly to sit Cam Newton for him.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
Recycle Bin posted:I'm not crazy for sitting Cam in favor of Tyrod Taylor, right? This is my first Fantasy League Yeah, that seems like a poor decision.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Starting TyGod is a bit too far. Derek Carr and Matty Stafford are probably the deepest I go over cam
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Starting TyGod is a bit too far. Derek Carr and Matty Stafford are probably the deepest I go over cam But....TyGod is better than both of those guys.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
TyGod isn't playing the Saints and the Colts (who are banged up), respectively
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
Stafford, Luck, Arodge, Carr, Bort will be the top QBs this weekend. E: not in that order
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
Recycle Bin posted:I'm not crazy for sitting Cam in favor of Tyrod Taylor, right? This is my first Fantasy League I was listening to the CBS FF podcast and both Jamie and Dave faced this exact question and went with Tyrod. So it's not crazy, it's reasonable. But it is question-worthy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
Isn't Dave a moron tho?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Someone please explain Clive Walford to me and whether I should replace Dwayne Allen with him
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
I guess I'll go with Cam, but it's probably moot anyways. My first matchup is with the one player who wanted to make a joke team and I'm projected to win 125 to 70 with either QB. At least with Cam I'll have a reason to care about tonight's game
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
Something is starting to happen
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
This is the most happy I'll ever be all season
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:Someone please explain Clive Walford to me and whether I should replace Dwayne Allen with him He has good measurables, a potentially good offense, not a ton of competition for snaps, and a potentially favorable schedule for TEs. He gon b gud
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Also the Raiders tossed it like a hundred times to the TE last year
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
Come on Broncos defense
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:Someone please explain Clive Walford to me and whether I should replace Dwayne Allen with him He's a really athletic 2nd year te on a good passing offense. Saints defense could be historically bad this year so he could get a td or 2. I'd start Allen over him though in most formats.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
I made a GDT https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3789485
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
Clive Walford is a solid second-year TE but I think people are getting a little too hyped about him. The match-up with the Saints is pretty juicy so he's got Week 1 value. But Bill Musgrave offenses are never as pass-happy as the Raiders were last year. Musgrave is a run run RUN kind've guy and Oakland's beefing up their offensive line in the offseason coincides with Musgrave's general tendencies. Walford is a capable blocker AND receiver so he's a great football prospect find for the Raiders cause he'll be on the field a ton doing everything you could ask for from a TE. But I personally doubt the passing volume will be there to make him a TE1.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
Our league commish grabbed Cam Newton 1.01 and played Dalton over him. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
counterpoint: clive walford is love clive walford is life do not fear the clive accept him into your hearts
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
Tiptoes posted:Clive Walford is a solid second-year TE but I think people are getting a little too hyped about him. The match-up with the Saints is pretty juicy so he's got Week 1 value. But Bill Musgrave offenses are never as pass-happy as the Raiders were last year. Musgrave is a run run RUN kind've guy and Oakland's beefing up their offensive line in the offseason coincides with Musgrave's general tendencies. Walford is a capable blocker AND receiver so he's a great football prospect find for the Raiders cause he'll be on the field a ton doing everything you could ask for from a TE. But I personally doubt the passing volume will be there to make him a TE1. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
Should I use my #1 waiver on Andy Janovich???
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
Well he has scored a touchdown on 100% of his carries in the NFL, you'd be foolish not to.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Well it appears everyone made a mistake with doubting Benjamin.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:What everyone else said. The mechanism blocking you is called lovely Rule. Sure is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Well it appears everyone made a mistake with doubting Benjamin. Man I just how big the guy is. He makes Darian Stewart and TJ Ward look like little kids.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
lol at all the Cam doubters in this thread
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
Benne posted:lol at all the Cam doubters in this thread there are Cam doubters?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:51
|
|
|
This'll show that fucker who drafted Denver Def in the 7th round in my league.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
Benching Cam was The Right Move sorry about your wrong process right results Benne 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:54
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Benching Cam was The Right Move sorry about your wrong process right results Benne My process is Don't Sit Your Studs and Don't Overthink Week 1 which is the right and correct process
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
is lynch worth picking up in a deep league?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
Do ESPN default settings really only give you points once you hit a yardage multiple of 10 because that's seriously the worst poo poo I've ever seen
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:02
|
|
|
JiUC posted:is lynch worth picking up in a deep league? gently caress no
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
Gobias Ind. posted:Should I use my #1 waiver on Andy Janovich??? You'd be a fool not to
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
Teemu Pokemon posted:Do ESPN default settings really only give you points once you hit a yardage multiple of 10 because that's seriously the worst poo poo I've ever seen Yeah it's super dumb, the default setting is 10 yards to one point, which only gives whole numbers. You have to set it to 0.1 points per yard.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
MrSargent posted:Are you doubting the TyGOD?? T-Mobile is already an excellent nickname, no need for this tygod bs
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:33 |
|
|
I just dropped Tim Hightower to get Jernovich but I'm 5th in the waiver order so who knows.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:32
|
|
