|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2016 18:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
SMERSH Mouth posted:I noticed that collection when clicking through on the post before. Good stuff. Thanks! This is supercool. I love the colors.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
Am I a terrible human for liking this photo the more I look at it? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
 DSC_4717 by Tom Olson, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2016 18:56
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Am I a terrible human for liking this photo the more I look at it?
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
tau posted:I dig this. ND filter? Educate me please, what makes it apparent here that an ND filter was used?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 10:42
|
|
|
k-zed posted:Educate me please, what makes it apparent here that an ND filter was used? Smooth, silky water. You can do it without an ND filter, but the filter makes it more controllable, and relying less on the weather/time of day and the abilities of your camera playing along.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 11:04
|
|
|
k-zed posted:Educate me please, what makes it apparent here that an ND filter was used? Specifically, I tried getting the same effect last weekend on a hike. I wanted the smooth, misty water effect but I didn't have an ND filter with me so I just overexposed by a couple of stops at f/22 and ISO 50 to get a 0.5s exposure in bright daylight. It sort of worked but the whites in the water were blown out and unrecoverable.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 12:27
|
|
|
I wonder if you just take a couple of tripoded 0.5s exposures if you just blend the water parts all together as a composite if it ends up looking similar.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 12:29
|
|
|
I think you'd need a lot of images in the composite to get the same level of motion blur that you'd get from a ~1s exposure.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 13:35
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 13:48
|
|
|
VelociBacon posted:I wonder if you just take a couple of tripoded 0.5s exposures if you just blend the water parts all together as a composite if it ends up looking similar. If you're interested, this does work ok (but a filter is so much less work): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcZkCnPs45s
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 14:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 14:29
|
|
|
InternetJunky posted:If you're interested, this does work ok (but a filter is so much less work): "Filters can take a few seconds to attach, let me show you how to save time by making a composite of 19 images in Photoshop."
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:"Filters can take a few seconds to attach, let me show you how to save time by making a composite of 19 images in Photoshop." Ain't nobody got time for any of that. Just go stand by a waterfall at midnight and do your single long exposure then.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
 Choicecut fucked around with this message at 11:00 on Sep 8, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
 
SMERSH Mouth fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Sep 8, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
I'd be careful with your contrast. I think it's being applied in a way that is too stark.  Kandy by Tom Olson, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 07:29
|
|
|
Karl Barks posted:according to flickr stats, majority of people viewed this picture from search results for "young men" One of my most-viewed pics is of a place called Hooker Valley. I'm sure you can guess what most of the viewers were searching for 
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 10:44
|
|
|
RangerScum posted:I'd be careful with your contrast. I think it's being applied in a way that is too stark. Cool, thanks for the heads up. I backed it off a smidge and updated the post.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 11:03
|
|
|
 Trincomalee by Tom Olson, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
I went for a walk, and went up in some woods. Frederikshavn - DSC04468 by Anders Folkmar Belling Kraneled, on Flickr Frederikshavn - DSC04474 by Anders Folkmar Belling Kraneled, on FlickrThis one I had high hopes for, but I didnt get enough of the background in focus I think.  Frederikshavn - DSC04477 by Anders Folkmar Belling Kraneled, on FlickrThis one I just liked the way the shadows kind of divided the hill in two, pretty cool. Edit ugh I need to clean my sensor -Anders fucked around with this message at 17:53 on Sep 8, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
Got up very early while on Vacation in Maine and shot the sunrise DSC_0456 by Joe Pitha, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
Looks like more than one of us need to clean our sensors. The red on the clouds is pretty badass but the water looks poop and the horizon feels crooked.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Looks like more than one of us need to clean our sensors. How is the water poop? Legit asking, not being all sniffy about it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Compare it to the sky, where you got lots of texture and color to look at. The water is a flat grey void taking up a fifth of the image doing nothing. Obviously there's nothing you can do about that, you can't tell the water to suddenly look badass, but maybe some of it could be cropped out or if you get a situation like that again, include a foreground subject. A boat or a person, or everyone's favorite shoreline cliche: a dock.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Compare it to the sky, where you got lots of texture and color to look at. The water is a flat grey void taking up a fifth of the image doing nothing. I though it was pretty cool, less the giant dirt speck and crooked horizon, but my taste is poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
Good points. I'll straighten the horizon and try to clone out the speck and re-crop. This time there wasn't much of anything interesting for the sea as I was on a jetty. Let me see if I have any with the jetty in them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:09
|
|
|
 Kandy by Tom Olson, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 07:50
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Compare it to the sky, where you got lots of texture and color to look at. The water is a flat grey void taking up a fifth of the image doing nothing. Okay, this is my only try polishing this turd, but is this a better edit?  DSC_0456 by Joe Pitha, on FlickrStraightened, cleaned and cropped much of the water out (I don't have any jetty photos until the sun was a good deal higher and the dramatic red sky faded). This is as good as this one gets. Lesson learned for next time! I'll always be a bad photographer, but at least I won't be as bad forever.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 13:28
|
|
|
It's about as good as it's gonna get. Mark it down as a life lesson, get up even earlier and find a subject beforehand. Hang on to the photo to remind you next time. This is what 99% of my Lightroom catalog is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
For some stupid reason I always feel annoyed when I have to crop a photo to correct composition. But it's really a very necessary and legitimate part of the process of not always making lovely photography. Especially when working with medium format film.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
I usually take two photos, one composed how I think I want it, then another zoomed out a little bit to give me some crop freedom later on. It also means you don't lose as much of the scene if you have to straighten it up.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
 Shampoo posted:Okay, this is my only try polishing this turd, but is this a better edit?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
Here's probably my best one with the jetty in the shot: DSC_0467 by Joe Pitha, on FlickrAnd one that I took on the way back from the beach where I liked the angles.  DSC_0347 by Joe Pitha, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 19:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
 Kandy by Tom Olson, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 19:22
|
|