|
i know that Obama and Biden will probably want to enter the post-administration PEACE OUT, IM HAVING A PRIVATE LIFE FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS zone, but i can still fantasize that they'd pop up from time to time to go full trollin' with her
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:14 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 14:07 |
|
This whole thread is a basket of deplorable posts
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:14 |
|
"closes in on projected electoral lead" is the most horseracey line ever
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:14 |
|
mandatory lesbian posted:wow, leave it to nazis to be that unoriginal it's named after der sturmer, which was a nazi newspaper that was viciously anti-semitic even by nazi standards
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:14 |
|
It's great how since voting have trends have so changed so much other decade with VA going Blue. Trump could outperform by winning states like OH, NC,NV and FL but still end up losing the election.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:14 |
|
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:15 |
|
gently caress You And Diebold posted:This whole thread is a basket of deplorable posts hosed up if true
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:15 |
|
BOOOOOOOO!
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:15 |
|
Last page alone contained 6 bad squizzle posts, you can let up on the relentless terrible posting friend
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:15 |
|
iospace posted:Single down then? Pretty much. It's the best way to handle it I'd say, admit some level of fault for the exact word choice but don't back down from the meat of the statement.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:15 |
|
Squizzle posted:i know that Obama and Biden will probably want to enter the post-administration PEACE OUT, IM HAVING A PRIVATE LIFE FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS zone, but i can still fantasize that they'd pop up from time to time to go full trollin' with her i doubt they could resist, michelle might threaten obama though
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:15 |
|
misdirectomy posted:This page alone contains 6 bad squizzle posts, you can let up on the relentless terrible posting friend Only one on this page? Tatum Girlparts posted:Pretty much. It's the best way to handle it I'd say, admit some level of fault for the exact word choice but don't back down from the meat of the statement. Pretty much, as I edited my second response to Joe, it feels like a condensed version of her Reno speech.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:16 |
|
misdirectomy posted:Last page alone contained 6 bad squizzle posts, you can let up on the relentless terrible posting friend who the gently caress are you??? get 'em out, take his coat
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:16 |
|
The more I read and think about this deplorables thing, the more I'm starting to sympathize with the people who are offended by this. I can see people looking at this comment from Clinton against the backdrop of a modern progressive discourse where conservative views and policy positions are soundly and almost universally declared to be wholly invalid on their own merits, and nothing more than an attempt to cover for the real reason an individual may take these positions, which is of course naked racism\misogny\*phobia etc. I mean even without Trump, a huge number of liberal in the media will imply or outright accuse moderates and conservatives who disagree with the current liberal consensus on any issue of only doing so out of hatred for one demographic group or another. A well known example is how there is no legitimate pro-life position to many the modern left. These people don't actually value human life, they're just misogynists making up weak excuses for their deep-seated hatred of women, which they obviously feel whether they realize it or not. During the Bush administration there was a similar dynamic on the right. Back then on Fox News and talk radio, and even in the mainstream media sometimes, it was either you support Bush and the Iraq war, or you hate America and wish to see it destroyed. No in-between, either you support what I support or there is something wrong with you. I can see people viewing Clinton's comments in a similar way that I viewed the all the America-hater poo poo from the right back then as a hash critic of Bush's foreign policy. I think Clinton's 'deplorables' are far closer to Romney's '47%' than posters itt are willing to admit. Both are coming from a stance where support for the opposing candidate is evidence of something inherently wrong or broken in the supporter. Even though Clinton admitted she was over-generalizing, "half" is way too high of an estimate for what she was talking about.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:16 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Pretty much. It's the best way to handle it I'd say, admit some level of fault for the exact word choice but don't back down from the meat of the statement. i just wish she'd go full godzillary, but i know that's a fantasy
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:17 |
|
Probably was a minor blunder calling out Trump's sad dad/alt right supporters instead of focusing on the weirdo in chief. Still fun watching the hornet nest getting kicked and Trump supporters demanding a safe space.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:17 |
|
breaklaw posted:The more I read and think about this deplorables thing, the more I'm starting to sympathize with the people who are offended by this. lol
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:18 |
|
breaklaw posted:I think Clinton's 'deplorables' are far closer to Romney's '47%' than posters itt are willing to admit. Both are coming from a stance where support for the opposing candidate is evidence of something inherently wrong or broken in the supporter. which is true if you support donald trump then you're an rear end in a top hat or an idiot or both, no exceptions
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:18 |
|
Homework Explainer posted:how are these strategies not at cross purposes exactly she gets to be above the freeway by saying nice things about mccain that undermine his campaign messaging, forcing him to disavow a compliment or go harder toward being terrible to compensate
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:18 |
|
breaklaw posted:The more I read and think about this deplorables thing, the more I'm starting to sympathize with the people who are offended by this. Really, this feels like you bit into the conditioning that being called racist is just as bad as being called a n*****.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:19 |
|
breaklaw posted:The more I read and think about this deplorables thing, the more I'm starting to sympathize with the people who are offended by this. On the other hand, Mexican rapists, Judge Curiel, Obama is Kenyan, and Muslim gold star mother is oppressed by her husband.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:19 |
|
iospace posted:Like what, exactly? Joe wants full bore callout of GOP racist roots
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:19 |
|
iospace posted:Like what, exactly? "I regret saying 'half', that was wrong.......... it's all of them."
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:19 |
|
Oxxidation posted:which is true Regardless of your political beliefs Trump is one of the most under qualified presidential candidates in US history.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:19 |
|
breaklaw posted:I think Clinton's 'deplorables' are far closer to Romney's '47%' than posters itt are willing to admit. Both are coming from a stance where support for the opposing candidate is evidence of something inherently wrong or broken in the supporter. Even though Clinton admitted she was over-generalizing, "half" is way too high of an estimate for what she was talking about. she did that because she's a politician, and no half is probably right, maybe lowballing it slightly, unless you're counting the begrudging trump supporters there's no way a "compassionate conservative" supports trump and his policies (if you can really even call them that)
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:20 |
|
Karl Sharks posted:i just wish she'd go full godzillary, but i know that's a fantasy yea it'd be fun to see her go 'I apologize for saying half, it's obviously so much more of you delusional KKK wannabes' or something but that's just never going to happen and that's probably for the best.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:21 |
|
etalian posted:Probably was a minor blunder calling out Trump's sad dad/alt right supporters instead of focusing on the weirdo in chief. political blunder, sure i wish it was his supporters getting as much attention as he has because trump is nothing without them
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:21 |
|
Oxxidation posted:which is true What if you're just a Republican, have been a Republican you're whole life and always vote Republican almost automatically? What if you're a Democrat voting for Hillary for the same reasons, are you still and rear end in a top hat idiot then?
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:21 |
|
lol https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/774673449885192192
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:21 |
|
breaklaw posted:A well known example is how there is no legitimate pro-life position to many the modern left. These people don't actually value human life, they're just misogynists making up weak excuses for their deep-seated hatred of women, which they obviously feel whether they realize it or not. To be fair, there is no legitimate pro-life position. These people don't actually value human life, they're just misogynists making up weak excuses for their deep-seated hatred of women, which they obviously feel whether they realize it or not.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:22 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:yea it'd be fun to see her go 'I apologize for saying half, it's obviously so much more of you delusional KKK wannabes' or something but that's just never going to happen and that's probably for the best. i mean more in the sense that you see some posters on here just go "what the gently caress" and shred some awful thing the GOP has done i wish so hard should could unleash the hate she has for those awful bigots across from her and tear them an infinite amount of new assholes
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:22 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GczbDZcrLqw
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:22 |
|
What a piece of garbage
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:23 |
|
Android tweet. Joementum posted:"I regret saying 'half', that was wrong.......... it's all of them." I would love that too, but oh well.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:23 |
|
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/774651993084289024
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:23 |
|
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/774674345075609600
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:24 |
|
Joementum posted:"I regret saying 'half', that was wrong.......... it's all of them."
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:24 |
|
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:24 |
|
breaklaw posted:What if you're just a Republican, have been a Republican you're whole life and always vote Republican almost automatically? What if you're a Democrat voting for Hillary for the same reasons, are you still and rear end in a top hat idiot then? if you're a republican voter you're an rear end in a top hat by default and if you vote for donald trump "just because" without paying attention to anything he's said and done this late in the game then you're an idiot, too see, nice and tidy
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:25 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 14:07 |
|
breaklaw posted:What if you're just a Republican, have been a Republican you're whole life and always vote Republican almost automatically? What if you're a Democrat voting for Hillary for the same reasons, are you still and rear end in a top hat idiot then? the former would be an idiot because they haven't paid a lick of attention to what the republicans have done or said, or they support them in those actions/words so they're an rear end in a top hat democrats don't really have the same phenomenon, they are not authoritarian and do not vote over fear and vote against their own interests to an incredibly smaller degree (you can get into the third wayism and how lower class people get screwed over at times, but less than what would happen if they voted R)
|
# ? Sep 10, 2016 19:25 |