|
X-O posted:I think he looks fine. Also that scene is amazing. Definitely should have been in the film. Those "hands" and "feet" look really shithouse. The scene itself was fine though.
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 16:40 |
|
|
They had to delete that scene because it makes the viewer think Jubilee is going to be relevant
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
Away all Goats posted:They had to delete that scene because it makes the viewer think Jubilee is going to be relevant Someone should go back in time and delete her first appearance.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
FilthyImp posted:It's literally said in the intro that Mystique saving Nixon ushered in an era of mutant acceptance. I'm guessing watching a Blue skinned, red haired, yellow eyes shapeshifter on Live TV made everyone less goony about the way they look? It's one of the more interesting concepts of the movie, but unfortunately doesn't quite get that final step to being a cohesive (or relevant) theme amidst the unfocused motley that was the rest of the film..
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
Turns out I was wrong, the Sinister post-credit tease actually is to setup Old Man Logan.quote:Cinema Blend reports X-Men: Apocalypse director Bryan Singer let the detail about Sinister slip on the commentary track for the most recent X-Men picture. Specifically, the director mentioned the post-credit scene featuring a representative of the Essex Corporation obtaining a vial of Wolverine’s blood from the ruined Alkali Lake facility is a direct connection the third Wolverine film.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 11:29
|
|
|
Crossing my fingers for live action Sugerman, otherwise hype kind plummeted.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 12:47
|
|
|
That mall scene must have been cut fairly early seeing as they didn't have finished effects for the Nightcrawler breakdancing scene.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 13:03
|
|
|
jubilee owns and should have been in the movie at the expense of mystique worship scenes
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 13:08
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Someone should go back in time and delete her first appearance. In the movie, or...? WickedHate fucked around with this message at 13:32 on Sep 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 13:27
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Someone should go back in time and delete her first appearance. #BROKEN Jubilee sounds pretty cool.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
Raserys posted:jubilee owns and should have been in the movie at the expense of mystique worship scenes Agreed, somebody make a Jubilee solo movie please.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 13:37
|
|
|
Travis343 posted:Agreed, somebody make a Jubilee solo movie please. Are vampire movies still popular though?
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 15:25
|
|
|
I would have been interested in a Wolverine/Jubilee driving across America flick
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
Raserys posted:jubilee owns and should have been in the movie at the expense of mystique worship scenes They felt they needed to squeeze everything out of Jlaw before her contract expired.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 16:22
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:They felt they needed to squeeze everything out of Jlaw before her contract expired. But then she said she might want to come back for the next film. Probably because she's had a few films underperform and she's not the Hollywood darling anymore.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 16:24
|
|
|
I don't think most of the movies she does are even meant to be successes. Joy still got an Oscar nomination.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 16:30
|
|
|
Dario the Wop posted:Turns out I was wrong, the Sinister post-credit tease actually is to setup Old Man Logan. fuuuuuuck, Richard E. Grant as Mr. Sinister is some of the best casting I've ever heard for a comic book movie.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
I feel like Snister is wasted in a Wolverine solo film so I hope he's the villian also in Gambit and Deadpool 2
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
He's just not Mr. Sinister unless he's after Scott and Jean's genetic material.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
Sinners Sandwich posted:I feel like Snister is wasted in a Wolverine solo film so I hope he's the villian also in Gambit and Deadpool 2 
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:He's just not Mr. Sinister unless he's after Scott and Jean's genetic material. And people say Marvel movies don't have great villains. Here's a guy who steals used condoms!
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:He's just not Mr. Sinister unless he's after Scott and Jean's genetic material.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
I haven't seen Apocalypse, but do they ever explain what changed the timeline so much that Scott, Jean, Storm, Angel and maybe others were born 20 years too early? Especially since we saw them at the end of DOFP.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
Lobok posted:And people say Marvel movies don't have great villains. Here's a guy who steals used condoms! He and Jared Leto should talk
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Sinners Sandwich posted:I feel like Snister is wasted in a Wolverine solo film so I hope he's the villian also in Gambit and Deadpool 2 Well there's pretty much no chance of Gambit getting made anymore
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Marvel should snatch up Tatum for a future movie. He's shown to be a decent actor with good comedic timing so he'd fit into the MCU. I dunno, Adam Warlock?
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 00:04
|
|
|
tragedyjones posted:I haven't seen Apocalypse, but do they ever explain what changed the timeline so much that Scott, Jean, Storm, Angel and maybe others were born 20 years too early? Especially since we saw them at the end of DOFP. It's not really that much earlier, just a couple of years. James Marsden was 11 in 1984.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
It's completely inexplicable and makes no sense, we're just to assume the First Class timeline is incompatibly different for no particular reason.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
Scott, Jean, and Ororo being teenagers in the 80s isn't really a major change. The thing that's hard to swallow is Havok, who was probably in his early 20s in 1963, having vaguely middle-aged parents and a teenage brother 20 years later. That and everyone else who's apparently aged about 4 years in the last 20.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 01:24
|
|
|
Chaos Hippy posted:Scott, Jean, and Ororo being teenagers in the 80s isn't really a major change. The thing that's hard to swallow is Havok, who was probably in his early 20s in 1963, having vaguely middle-aged parents and a teenage brother 20 years later. That and everyone else who's apparently aged about 4 years in the last 20. Maybe they're taking bizarre advantage of the actual comic's floating timeline where the ages of the characters as published in the 60's isn't 20 years different from those published in the 80's. No, that doesn't make sense within the context of a self-contained time-spanning story. Better explanation is they decided to just not give a poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
Sliding timeline 
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
The Wizard did it. Gravity something something.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
Every time you interact with Magneto his gravity well causes time dilation. It's why the movies end so quickly after the big end fight, it'd be too hard to explain the dilation in a couple minutes so they just show the undated future, which could be 7 years or 20 years, depending on perspective. The exception is Ian McKlellan Magneto as he is very old so he has less iron in his blood, and thus his field is not as strong.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
I think the fact that the timeline is completely hosed if you think about it for longer than a second means the X-men movies might be the closest adaptation of any comic book series. The secret is to not think about it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 05:18
|
|
|
It could have been entirely avoided if they just didn't use Havok in First Class, though at the time I heard rumors Havok was supposed to be Cyke's father in the movieverse and that placated me well enough. Then Apocolypse comes round...
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
ub posted:Maybe they're taking bizarre advantage of the actual comic's floating timeline where the ages of the characters as published in the 60's isn't 20 years different from those published in the 80's. Same difference, really.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
WickedHate posted:It could have been entirely avoided if they just didn't use Havok in First Class, though at the time I heard rumors Havok was supposed to be Cyke's father in the movieverse and that placated me well enough. Then Apocolypse comes round... Maybe they're pulling a Smallville and Havok was Havok's older brother.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 06:29
|
|
|
I doubt that this will ruin anyone's day, but just a heads up - The Blu-ray version of Cap 3 does NOT include the Thor short. The 3D Combo and iTunes versions comes with a code for the short. Not a deal breaker, but for anyone wanting to show it off to your non-internet savvy friends/family, you may have to splurge for an extra couple bucks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 19:13
|
|
|
CzarChasm posted:I doubt that this will ruin anyone's day, but just a heads up - The Blu-ray version of Cap 3 does NOT include the Thor short. The 3D Combo and iTunes versions comes with a code for the short. If it isn't actually on the disc I won't be watching it that way either way, so...
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 16:40 |
|
|
CzarChasm posted:I doubt that this will ruin anyone's day, but just a heads up - The Blu-ray version of Cap 3 does NOT include the Thor short. The 3D Combo and iTunes versions comes with a code for the short. Or you could just open youtube...
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 22:44
|
|