|
Cake Attack posted:don't tell that to namtab I was going to if you hadn't. e: I'd have gone for something like "holy crap, Sono is Namtab!" Yes_Cantaloupe fucked around with this message at 16:16 on Aug 21, 2016 |
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:08 |
|
|
She could at least poach the egg and chicken and season the chicken w/ herbs and stuff....
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
Brought To You By posted:
I very much respect this opinion, but Micchan is clearly the best
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Compendium posted:She could at least poach the egg and chicken and season the chicken w/ herbs and stuff.... Yeah, it makes everything much more palatable.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
uhg, mmos only 2.5 chapters left in volume 2 of this, though there are some more chapters (that will probably be in volume 3 in some form) that are available online already
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 14:16
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 14:37
|
|
|
Classy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 15:11
|
|
|
Yes_Cantaloupe posted:I was going to if you hadn't.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 15:17
|
|
|
I'm dead *NARU* killed me with cuteness
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
This finally has me caught up to that other group that was doing this, but isn't anymore.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 09:03
|
|
|
And the extras. Uhg what a nightmare.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 12:50
|
|
|
Hail King Zog
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 12:53
|
|
|
Yes_Cantaloupe posted:Hail King Zog (Seriously though thanks for the hard work)
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 14:17
|
|
|
'Twas I, the manga liker.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 18:34
|
|
|
Winking practice was really good, thank you zoglin
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 20:05
|
|
|
These nerds... These god drat nerds...
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
Thank you Zoglin for your notes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
This hasn't been QC'd enough but I'm sick of looking at it so here you go. (it's the fate cooking manga)
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2016 07:30
|
|
|
Extra points for including a Cooking with Dog link. Love that show.
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2016 09:36
|
|
|
Mikl posted:Extra points for including a Cooking with Dog link. Love that show. it has salmon roe! hina would love it
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
Bamboo is good. I recommend it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
The continuation of the match against Roman.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 11:00
|
|
|
If someone actually won that way in a real tournament everyone would be insanely hype. Re: Celestial Rebirth, whether or not something is a silver bullet will change based on a lot of stuff; the card just has to be included in her deck as a response to discard cards in general, it doesn't really matter if it's a sensible card to include in her deck as-is. e; pet peeve: the word "factoid" does not mean "small fact." 
Lemon-Lime fucked around with this message at 12:06 on Sep 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 11:10
|
|
|
seriously, that's the most amazing bullshit win, and the crowd would be going wild
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 11:27
|
|
|
Yes_Cantaloupe posted:seriously, that's the most amazing bullshit win, and the crowd would be going wild If no one else, Roman would go wild. That seems like exactly her kinda poo poo. She probably will after getting over the shock of defeat, too.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 11:29
|
|
|
Roman got DUNKED on.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 13:41
|
|
|
Yeah no kidding. I can understand her fanboys being a bit bummed but like, there should be some screaming going on after a play like that. Then again, maybe that's more of an American game thing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 14:05
|
|
|
Man, I would kill to win that way. I love deck stealing, been trying for it since Theros. Incidentally, for those that don't follow Magic, go look up art from the next set to be released, Kaladesh. It is loving beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 14:30
|
|
|
Glagha posted:Then again, maybe that's more of an American game thing. I guess it's possible. I haven't been to any TCG events in Japan, but I know several American fighting game players who've gone to Tokyo tournaments who complain about how the Japanese players were so anti-hype. One particularly boisterous New Yorker actually had a Japanese player blow up on him, like "you're too loving loud! we don't act like that here!" (in Japanese of course). I still like to think there'd be people doing the Japanese version "going nuts" over it though, instead of just ~gloom~ Lemon-Lime posted:e; pet peeve: the word "factoid" does not mean "small fact." http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/02/the-difference-between-a-fact-and-a-factoid/  (Yeah the original definition was different, but I'm in the "whatever people use it as is what it means" camp.)
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 14:53
|
|
|
the first 2 images are of the same page. Is it supposed to be that way?
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:07
|
|
|
Droyer posted:the first 2 images are of the same page. Is it supposed to be that way? n-nope... Thanks, should be fixed now. At least there weren't any pages missing or out of order 
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:12
|
|
|
Roman is cute and I hope she joins the Manaka commentary crew
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:16
|
|
|
the tranquil grove card says "activate activated abilites", which seems a bit clunky.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:21
|
|
|
I forget if current mtg terminology is activate or use, but I think it is activate.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:22
|
|
|
Activate activated abilities is correct, though what MtG usually goes with is "Activated abilities can't be activated." IIRC. I hope the girls can still be friends. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
GimmickMan posted:what MtG usually goes with is "Activated abilities can't be activated." IIRC. It is, but I'm too dumb to come up with an elegant way of wording the blanket ban this card causes that uses that formatting. You could make the argument that there's not really any reason to stick to MTG terminology as long as whatever I do use is applied consistently, but please nobody do because I don't have a counterargument!
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:53
|
|
|
During your turn, spells your opponents control cannot be cast and activated abilities your opponents control cannot be activated.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
Mors Rattus posted:During your turn, spells your opponents control cannot be cast and activated abilities your opponents control cannot be activated. But do you "control" an activated ability before it's activated? I feel like you'd need to say "activated abilities on permanents your opponents control" or something, but then that leaves open activated abilities on non-permanents (like the "can use from the hand" ability on the angel in the article at the end) or activated abilities on your permanents that opponents can activate, like on this guy:  You can imagine I was great fun to play against, back when I went to mtg tournaments.
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
Oh apparently this is a thing:  I guess you just say "can't activate abilities" 
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:08 |
|
|
z0glin Warchief posted:Oh apparently this is a thing: Well it lets them activate abilities on lands, which seems important. They could still like, Maze of Ith. I also wonder if that specific omission is there to allow players to pay mana costs triggered by their opponent (Of the "unless your opponent pays X" variety) because that otherwise might deactivate the ability to tap for mana. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 17:07
|
|