|
Making it even better, the constant use of "marks" makes me pretty sure he's not American. I have no idea what a "secondment" is.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 06:11 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 09:33 |
|
walrusman posted:Making it even better, the constant use of "marks" makes me pretty sure he's not American. Second amendment, duh!
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 06:15 |
|
walrusman posted:Making it even better, the constant use of "marks" makes me pretty sure he's not American. It's a temporary transfer to another department. Apparently only used in British English so you're on the money.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 07:11 |
|
Social skills important in the workplace? Whaaaaaa..?!
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 08:47 |
|
People actually believe this
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 13:01 |
|
System Metternich posted:
HOW?!? How the gently caress do they see a loving low res screen in a world with photoshop and think "yep, sounds good"? And since when is 500 likes a lot?
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 13:17 |
|
500 isn't a lot, I agree, Furia. They should've used a crazier number like Half a Million or something.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 13:20 |
|
N. Senada posted:500 isn't a lot, I agree, Furia. They should've used a crazier number like Half a Million or something. In general these idiots always have to photoshop in pretty low numbers so that the idiots they want to bait with the images actually figure "hey we can do this".
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 13:35 |
|
Murphy Brownback posted:Adult wrestling fans are some of the weirder people out there. They are like tropers but instead of seeing real life through the lens of anime they see it through roided and greased up men pretending to fight each other. I have a feeling that if he gets an exit interview, he's going to be told in no uncertain terms that bullshit like this is exactly why he doesn't get the promotions or sweet ambassador gigs (where the main draw is you get to receive lots of food????) he feels he deserves. Also, if the corporation only promotes "nonsensical, douchebag, sociopathic people", why hasn't he got the job? Also, Fathis Munk posted:Social skills important in the workplace? Whaaaaaa..?! e: also he is furiously Googling to find out whether being fired from his previous job will negatively impact his ability to find another job in the field? I am beginning to see why he thought this was a good idea as he's clearly a few light bulbs short of a picnic.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 13:45 |
|
In Europe, do employers say why you were terminated? All the places I've worked just give dates of employment.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 13:57 |
Baron Corbyn posted:Taken from the WWE thread, Performed a modified CM Punk pipe bomb on my boss .... might get fired now We used to have a guy like this. He wasn't trusted with anything more than low-level data entry (which was always double-checked by others) and physical labor because of poor performance in virtually every category. He always bitched about being given these jobs, thinking he was destined for greatness and deserved more responsibility and money. He was a professional gamer as well, so he whined about his keyboard and mouse not being ergonomically perfect to try and get different ones that suited him. I threatened to confiscate his keyboard and make him use an Xbox controller if he kept up his complaining. When he finally got let go, he went on a huge rant about how he's "the only person who does any work around here" and saying that he deserves more money than the people who have been there for longer and do more important work. Later we received an anonymous letter that was really obviously from him, claiming that the manager who fired him was secretly trying to take over the company. He was a bizarre kid.
|
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 14:43 |
|
System Metternich posted:
This is circulating in Serbia, but with one of their politicians. Also: http://imgur.com/gallery/oOT0X quote:Tuesday night, I was heading out to go on a date. I was hit head on by a drunk driver going the wrong way at 75 mph. I have several fractured ribs, whole face is fractured, recently had surgery on an open fracture in my arm (humerus bone) and a broken ankle. No, you did not get hit at 120 km/h and only got broken bones. Why would she (or whoever) need to make this up? Even if it's true that the person in the photo was a victim of an accident, why do they feel the need to share it? And why go all out on the speed, making the whole thing impossible?
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 17:04 |
|
Non Serviam posted:This is circulating in Serbia, but with one of their politicians. The same thing literally just happened about a mile from my house, minus the drunk part. I'm guessing the people involved wished that was the only thing that happened to them, since one died, and the other two are still in critical condition.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 17:11 |
|
Non Serviam posted:
Dude that totally can happen. Crumple zones have gotten really good. Not the only outcome possible, but it's not unprecedented.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 17:17 |
|
Tunicate posted:Dude that totally can happen. Crumple zones have gotten really good. The way I read it, she was a pedestrian.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 17:19 |
|
System Metternich posted:
Don't worry. If Zuckerburg doesn't pull through, Trump will go away all by himself. 329k likes, 59k comments
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 17:25 |
|
Don't you have to be friends with people on Facebook before messaging them? Is the implication here that Trump's bff wants him to drop from the race?
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 17:45 |
|
ghost emoji posted:Restaurant with weird food rules visited by utter dumpster fire of a family. I've been thinking about this one a lot and there is one thing (but only the one thing) that for sure actually happened here. The guy told a really little kid they could have a cookie but they could not have it right now, and the kid flipped out. And maybe they once met an old lady who didn't give a poo poo about manners anymore. Maybe.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 18:10 |
Furia posted:Don't you have to be friends with people on Facebook before messaging them? Is the implication here that Trump's bff wants him to drop from the race? You can message them, but the message gets put in a different folder you need to specifically open. No notification is given.
|
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 18:10 |
|
Furia posted:Don't you have to be friends with people on Facebook before messaging them? Is the implication here that Trump's bff wants him to drop from the race? Depends on your privacy settings. Most people can receive messages from strangers, but it might wind up in a separate inbox meant to filter spam.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 18:12 |
|
Furia posted:HOW?!? How the gently caress do they see a loving low res screen in a world with photoshop and think "yep, sounds good"? It says 500K.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 18:14 |
|
Non Serviam posted:http://imgur.com/gallery/oOT0X With that filter I hope she dies. ok not really but fuckin' filters man
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 18:18 |
|
Non Serviam posted:The way I read it, she was a pedestrian. She mentioned that the driver walked away without a scratch. So, yeah.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 18:36 |
|
hyperhazard posted:She mentioned that the driver walked away without a scratch. So, yeah. What? That in no way implies she was a pedestrian; the way that it says she was hit 'head on' by a driver going the wrong way implies she was driving as well.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 19:35 |
|
Garrand posted:What? That in no way implies she was a pedestrian; the way that it says she was hit 'head on' by a driver going the wrong way implies she was driving as well. None of that necessarily means she was driving. It doesn't matter though, who cares.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 20:11 |
|
Non Serviam posted:None of that necessarily means she was driving. It doesn't matter though, who cares. I think I've figured out your inability to see obvious racism. You just don't understand what words mean. Like fundamentally.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 20:13 |
|
Non Serviam posted:None of that necessarily means she was driving. It doesn't matter though, who cares. "Head on" would imply she was traveling in the direction the drunk driver was coming from. If she wasn't driving, she was walking down the street in the middle of the road.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 21:08 |
|
Hardcordion posted:"Head on" would imply she was traveling in the direction the drunk driver was coming from. If she wasn't driving, she was walking down the street in the middle of the road. She also mentions in the comments that she was on her phone, which would definitely lose her sympathy points if she says she was driving.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 01:27 |
|
Bad Roy posted:She also mentions in the comments that she was on her phone, which would definitely lose her sympathy points if she says she was driving. She mentions she had her date on speakerphone, not that she was texting or something.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 01:46 |
|
Garrand posted:She mentions she had her date on speakerphone, not that she was texting or something. Anyone other than my mother who puts a caller on speakerphone is basically worse than a drunk driver
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 02:03 |
|
Oh boy.... http://imgur.com/gallery/84Lrk " Vandalized due to my police support..... On Tuesday Night, 9-13-2016, between 9:30PM and 10:45PM, my van was tagged by a supposed Black Lives Matter "Activist" because I have 3 Thin Blue Line Decals (it represents the Police, the blue line, separating the good from the evil). The Van was parked in my Driveway in Florissant, MO. I am an Owner/Operator, and this is my only source of income. I don't want any sympathy, I just want to show that no one is safe from these "peaceful" activists." I give this til tomorrow afternoon before it comes out that this Missouri Good 'ol Boy did this himself.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 02:54 |
|
Hardcordion posted:"Head on" would imply she was traveling in the direction the drunk driver was coming from. If she wasn't driving, she was walking down the street in the middle of the road. Head on doesn't necessarily mean both parties were driving. She could be crossing the street, and the front of the other car, who's coming from the wrong side, hits her. I actually looked up the definition, since I was worried I could be getting it wrong. But no, head on means that it involves the front. If that's not the common usage there though, I guess that's possible
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 03:39 |
|
CannedMacabre posted:Oh boy.... A few years ago, I came home at 2AM, and a group of six Asian people were at the house across from me. I didn't think anything of it since that house had late night parties all the time, and I lived in Little Saigon, and I just wanted to sleep. The next morning, one of our neighbors was going door to door to ask if anyone had witnessed anything after midnight, and it turned out my neighbor's son's car had been spray painted with "White Power" and had its tires slashed. What I'm saying is the imgurian probably did it to himself because there's no other damage to his car. That's my story, thanks for reading.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 03:54 |
|
Non Serviam posted:Head on doesn't necessarily mean both parties were driving. She could be crossing the street, and the front of the other car, who's coming from the wrong side, hits her. Head on usually refers to the positioning of the victim (more specifically that the front of both vehicles collided, really). One generally doesn't say a pedestrian is hit head on because it doesn't really matter what way they were facing. Much like how you don't hear of them being t-boned or rear ended either.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 04:07 |
|
Megera posted:What I'm saying is the imgurian probably did it to himself because there's no other damage to his car.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 04:07 |
|
Garrand posted:Head on usually refers to the positioning of the victim (more specifically that the front of both vehicles collided, really). One generally doesn't say a pedestrian is hit head on because it doesn't really matter what way they were facing. Much like how you don't hear of them being t-boned or rear ended either. Thanks for clarifying. English isn't my first language, so I appreciate it
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 04:25 |
|
Haifisch posted:That and he magically knows it was done by a Black Lives Matter activist. Unsurprisingly, the comments are mostly eating it up without question. Well, it WAS tagged by the bureau of land management.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 05:16 |
|
Back today with a incredibly important update re: cardboard and rain quote:Yesterday, I posted a picture of my van that had been tagged up by supposed BLM activists. The image showed a piece of cardboard. That Cardboard was used to cover the deplorable graffiti.....Until this morning, when the rain took it out.....
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 20:58 |
|
Ron Roenicke posted:Back today with a incredibly important update re: cardboard and rain Ah, the good old "some of my friends are black" rears its head. And loving cardboard. That's the nail in the STDH coffin for me. Like it's really hard to get some enamel spray paint in a close enough hue to cover that poo poo? At least until he has the time/money to get the panels re-painted. If I saw a contractor van with patches of gray or off-white paint on it, I'd assume "ah, must have been some vandalism" at the worst. And that's if I'd even think anything of it at all.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 21:15 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 09:33 |
|
I find it highly suspect that no functional damage was done. No tire slashing. No windows broken. No lights smashed. Just cheap, easy spray paint and an arrow pointing to the offending sticker. Also, I live pretty close to St. Louis on the Illinois side and I've never heard "PIG LOVER" in my life. Usually there is only one word that fills the space in "______ lover" in Missouri.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2016 22:24 |