|
Lobok posted:I'm rewatching Civil War and the part where they over explain Spider-Man's goggles bugs me. Was that the result of them working backwards from "we want his eyes to be animated" to "his eyepieces need to be some kind of tech for them to move" to "gadget eyepieces are needed because he needs them to help him focus"? Parker clearly explains why he needs those funky goggles on his ghetto costume after Stark makes fun of them. Then Stark makes a comment about giving him an upgrade, which we later see at the airport scene. It's a a fairly simple explanation that doesn't require Sherlock-level deductive reasoning.
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 06:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 20:20 |
|
|
teagone posted:Parker clearly explains why he needs those funky goggles on his ghetto costume after Stark makes fun of them. Then Stark makes a comment about giving him an upgrade, which we later see at the airport scene. It's a a fairly simple explanation that doesn't require Sherlock-level deductive reasoning. But why he needs the goggles is my point. There's never before been a tie-in between the eyes on his mask and what he explains as a kind of sensory overload (Spider-Sense) so it stands out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 12:25
|
|
|
Well it makes sense that a guy who's known for VERY RECENTLY ACQUIRING SUPER HUMAN SENSORY ABILITIES (among other things) might have to make some adjustments to adapt to that? I mean come on guy. Also he doesn't want to get stuff in his eyes while swinging around.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
I don't have a problem with him having eyes on his mask. Just never mind.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
BSS Movie Thread: The goggles, they do something.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
Lobok posted:But why he needs the goggles is my point. There's never before been a tie-in between the eyes on his mask and what he explains as a kind of sensory overload (Spider-Sense) so it stands out. They added a thing so they can do the Deadpool eyes on Spider-Man because it's about time.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
Expressive Eyes Spider-Man is best Spider-Man.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Why do they waste valuable comic pages telling me this stuff.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
Because Stan needed to fill some pages.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Now we know why Spider man is always strapped.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Why do they waste valuable comic pages telling me this stuff. I like the one for Cyclops  His dorky bowtie makes me smile.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
I thought the source of Cyke's powers was the entire dimension inexplicably full of red kinetic energy
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
No that's some crazy idiot's idea to fix powers he didn't like.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Why do they waste valuable comic pages telling me this stuff. I'm glad you spent the time to find that panel so you could show me how much you missed the point.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:They added a thing so they can do the Deadpool eyes on Spider-Man because it's about time. But they didn't need a thing to do Deadpool eyes, Deadpool did them just fine without having Tony Stark drop off a mask at his place. Oh wait I forgot nerds are babies who cannot process things like fun or facial expressions without a ~tactical realism~ explanation tacked on.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 02:39
|
|
Lobok posted:I'm glad you spent the time to find that panel so you could show me how much you missed the point. Yeah, yeah, gently caress you too.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 02:45
|
|
|
Lobok posted:I'm glad you spent the time to find that panel so you could show me how much you missed the point. We all get what you're saying, we're just not bothered by such a quick and harmless line of dialogue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
I just noticed there's some guy with no lines in the Ant-Man movie who very obviously has a Ten Rings of the Mandarin tattoo on his neck. Man, that's a huge throwback to Iron Man 1 and 3. I kind of wonder if they put that there on purpose or if Marvel has plans to do a more traditional Mandarin story at some point.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 04:45
|
|
|
notthegoatseguy posted:I just noticed there's some guy with no lines in the Ant-Man movie who very obviously has a Ten Rings of the Mandarin tattoo on his neck. Man, that's a huge throwback to Iron Man 1 and 3. I kind of wonder if they put that there on purpose or if Marvel has plans to do a more traditional Mandarin story at some point. I think it's one of the things that they dropped due to the production clusterfuck.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 04:46
|
|
|
A traditional Mandarin story would both defeat the point of Iron Man 3 and also be incredibly racist.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
That DVD extra was suck a weak cop-out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
TwoPair posted:But they didn't need a thing to do Deadpool eyes, Deadpool did them just fine without having Tony Stark drop off a mask at his place. Oh wait I forgot nerds are babies who cannot process things like fun or facial expressions without a ~tactical realism~ explanation tacked on. Eh. Not really. It's a two second scene, I don't understand why you are at all even slightly irked by this. Even if they didn't explain the eyes, Tony Stark was still gonna make that suit because there's no way in hell a poor 15 year old can make something that good. Although, I've seen videos of kids make whole Master Chief costumes out of cardboard and poo poo and it's super neat. But they didn't want to have a cardboard Spidey running around, so hey, let the richest dude in the franchise help! Edit: Look how cool this kid is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TPANByjqh8 CelticPredator fucked around with this message at 07:32 on Sep 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 07:26
|
|
|
He listens to Electro House now. Not cool anymore.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 08:36
|
|
|
Correct, you aren't. Get with the times grandpa. It's nbd.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 13:13
|
|
|
Lobok posted:I'm glad you spent the time to find that panel so you could show me how much you missed the point. Maybe you should stop being such a sperglord over a few lines of dialogue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 15:08
|
|
|
I posted what I thought was a pretty simple question. Didn't expect everyone's reactions. Oh well! Anyway... https://twitter.com/chaeronaea/status/779162286313181184
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 16:20
|
|
|
Stupid question, but has anyone bought the new TMNT movie that comes with the masks? I want to know if they're actually decently wearable, so I can have ninja fights with my girlfriends three year old, and get pissy that he has to be Leonardo. I was always Leonardo. I'm too old to change turtles now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 22:29
|
|
Die Laughing posted:Stupid question, but has anyone bought the new TMNT movie that comes with the masks? I want to know if they're actually decently wearable, so I can have ninja fights with my girlfriends three year old, and get pissy that he has to be Leonardo. I was always Leonardo. I'm too old to change turtles now. Don't buy the new TMNT movie, there are better ways to get stupid ninja turtle masks.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:Expressive Eyes Spider-Man is best Spider-Man.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Die Laughing posted:Stupid question, but has anyone bought the new TMNT movie that comes with the masks? I want to know if they're actually decently wearable, so I can have ninja fights with my girlfriends three year old, and get pissy that he has to be Leonardo. I was always Leonardo. I'm too old to change turtles now. I do, and yes, they are wearable. There are only two though, with different colors on both sides.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
That's a bummer. I think there was a release of one of the cartoons that came with all four.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Don't buy the new TMNT movie, there are better ways to get stupid ninja turtle masks. Buy that movie it's awesome even without masks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
So over/under of there being part of Infinity War, Wanda going nuts for some reason and Dr Strange has to take her down? I was going through the Avengers Dissembled books and came across that part. Maybe because her powers are from an Infinity Gem, Thanos will be able to control her in some way. I am also assuming Dr Strange is going to show up in that film.
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:So over/under of there being part of Infinity War, Wanda going nuts for some reason and Dr Strange has to take her down? I was going through the Avengers Dissembled books and came across that part. Cue someone being insufferable about the term over/under in 5...4...3...
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2016 01:02
|
|
|
I doubt it. I mean, it's possible by why distract from Thanos as the major threat? Plus there's no Vision/Wanda romance stuff yet (but they hinted at it heavily in CW, implying to me that they're gonna explore that angle instead of abruptly killing her off), nor her attempts to have kids, or any of the other extenuating stuff leading to her breakdown. Plus they've defined her powers pretty hard-and-fast as glorified telekinesis/mind control (and even that's been heavily scaled back since AoU), so I'm doubting they just go "It's reality bending powers, whatever that is!" abruptly.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
Won't it be an issue for Vision since he has a stone embedded in his forehead?
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
Toxxupation posted:I doubt it. I mean, it's possible by why distract from Thanos as the major threat? Plus there's no Vision/Wanda romance stuff yet (but they hinted at it heavily in CW, implying to me that they're gonna explore that angle instead of abruptly killing her off), nor her attempts to have kids, or any of the other extenuating stuff leading to her breakdown. Plus they've defined her powers pretty hard-and-fast as glorified telekinesis/mind control (and even that's been heavily scaled back since AoU), so I'm doubting they just go "It's reality bending powers, whatever that is!" abruptly. I don't mean whole hog Avengers Disassembled stuff, but have her aparently betray them, and they lose because of it. Thanos clearly would be interseted in this human who has insanely powerful abilities, was was able to take over the Visions body and cause his density powers to go haywire in CW. Maybe I'm seeing too much Darkseid in Thanos as he's always been down into getting powerful beings on his side. Actually, it would kind of cool if he does have the Black Order and Supergiant is all trying to gently caress over the Avengers and Wanda totally overpowers her mind control. I'm just speculating, but Wanda being nuts and being involved in major problems for the Avengers is something that comes up a enough in recent memory and they like to take elements like that from the books. Plus having it caused by Thanos pulling her strings shows both his power and also gives them an out so when she gets freed, she doesn't have to go through some redemption. But then I'm 100% convinced that Guardians 2 ends with them on Earth. That's where the Simon Williams film festival stuff is from, because they're talking around LA or something before being picked up by I dunno, War Machine.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2016 01:25
|
|
|
I could definitely see Guardians 2 ending with the Guardians stranded on Earth considering that Bendis just did that in their ongoing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
Toxxupation posted:I could definitely see Guardians 2 ending with the Guardians stranded on Earth considering that Bendis just did that in their ongoing. Yea, I mean we know Guardians are going to be in Avengers 3, and its more logical thinking that they're on Earth rather than the Avengers going into space. At least in the first one. I don't think its unreasonable to expect some form of Carol Danvers in the movie as well, as Brie Larsen was cast before the director was chose, which heavily suggests she's appearing sooner than the solo film. Maybe she's even in the Guardians 2 credits sequence.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2016 01:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 20:20 |
|
|
As long as we get Rocket making fun of how unintelligent Stark is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2016 02:24
|
|
