|
Was the Pancor Jackhammer in any of the Battlefields? Apparently three were ever made and only one survived testing. I'm mad about it being in Battlefield!
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 10:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 05:48 |
|
How about that m95 where you use the en bloc clip as a stripper clip.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 12:03 |
|
Fresh Shesh Besh posted:Hey, nerds, just a heads up: The game is 22% off on Green Man Gaming right now if you have an account. Up from 12% just recently. I suggest you grab it now because I wouldn't feel comfortable holding out for 25%. Tempted, and I do trust GMG. But if there are problems, from what I hear, Origin support is a lot better... I have pre-ordered games through GMG, and it is always so annoying waiting for the keys to finally be released... Always rumours that there are problems getting keys on release day, etc.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 14:06 |
|
VulgarandStupid posted:Was the Pancor Jackhammer in any of the Battlefields? Apparently three were ever made and only one survived testing. I'm mad about it being in Battlefield! 2 and 3.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 18:16 |
if you are an american ordering through gmg you may want to pay througj paypal as lots of major banks dont handle gmg transactions well ive had my card frozen a couple times before
|
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 18:20 |
|
DoctorStrangelove posted:I think he's more referring to how the FAMAS model in BF4 is a mashup of two or three different versions of the gun. Correctimundo, it's not a 'real' FAMAS. I was initially pretty put off by BF1 having lots of nigh-unreal firearms, but it became quickly obvious that the game isn't about historical accuracy. It's practically an alt-universe, or a 1919 continuation of WW1. It's still really, really fun so in the end whether it's real or wacky, I don't much mind. If you can't play the game because you're allowed to top off an M95, well,
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 19:25 |
I feel describing the setting as alt universe is a bit too strong, you might as well go full Codename Eagle/Necrovision with that term. I'd say it is more of a series of what if scenarios set in late WW1.
|
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 19:26 |
|
VulgarandStupid posted:Was the Pancor Jackhammer in any of the Battlefields? Apparently three were ever made and only one survived testing. I'm mad about it being in Battlefield! The Pancor Jackhammer will see a revival around the time the US annexes Canada and China invades Alaska. A mysterious lone wanderer in the aftermath of nuclear holocaust will use one with surgical precision to leave nary an eyeball nor a crotch in his ambling path intact.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2016 23:09 |
|
MadBimber posted:Correctimundo, it's not a 'real' FAMAS. I was initially pretty put off by BF1 having lots of nigh-unreal firearms, but it became quickly obvious that the game isn't about historical accuracy. It's practically an alt-universe, or a 1919 continuation of WW1. It is the famas-felin a modified version of the famas g1 commando and part of Frances version of the land warrior system, that is why it looks different than a standard a1 or g1 model.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 01:32 |
|
xyigx posted:It is the famas-felin a modified version of the famas g1 commando and part of Frances version of the land warrior system, that is why it looks different than a standard a1 or g1 model. bruv, bruv. I see that it's a FELIN. In my (admittedly limited) research and or gunporn jerking off of FAMAS models, I've not seen a G1 modified for FELIN, as opposed to G2 which seems quite common. In fact I'm not even sure the G1 went into production or was just a prototype for G2. So it's a gun using an updated land-warrior program stuffed on to a non-production model firearm. Check out the receiver grip and the 25 round mag, it's a 'plausible' firearm.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 01:55 |
|
You could target the groin in Fallout? I knew about being able to aim for the eyes, but not the groin.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 02:42 |
|
Monocled Falcon posted:You could target the groin in Fallout? I knew about being able to aim for the eyes, but not the groin. Groin targeting was only a thing in 1/2, and you really got no benefits for groin targeting over eye targeting.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 03:04 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:Groin targeting was only a thing in 1/2, and you really got no benefits for groin targeting over eye targeting. The little dialog box and its reaction was the benefit. And as we all know the chat box is the real metagame.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 03:54 |
|
MadBimber posted:bruv, bruv. I see that it's a FELIN. In my (admittedly limited) research and or gunporn jerking off of FAMAS models, I've not seen a G1 modified for FELIN, as opposed to G2 which seems quite common. In fact I'm not even sure the G1 went into production or was just a prototype for G2. So it's a gun using an updated land-warrior program stuffed on to a non-production model firearm. Check out the receiver grip and the 25 round mag, it's a 'plausible' firearm. They have felin versions of all of them at least in some capacity just due to them still having every model in service. Hell they still run the a1's made in the 70's lol. Not like it will matter soon with them switching to the 416 anyhow. Trust me "gun" people got all kinds of salty and pissed when they changed the ammo count in bf3 to reflect the appropriate gun. Dice even had the exact model in the patch notes since people were crying so hard. If it hadn't been for that I would never have known about all of Frances cobbled together versions of the famas.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 04:04 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:Groin targeting was only a thing in 1/2, and you really got no benefits for groin targeting over eye targeting. flavourful text disagrees, though eye targeting was much more useful wrt deathclaws
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 06:06 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:Groin targeting was only a thing in 1/2, and you really got no benefits for groin targeting over eye targeting. Groin hits were more likely to knock your opponent down, make then drop weapons or lose AP on their next round, and it was an easier target to hit than the eyes. Once you had the combat skill with your chosen weapon high enough, though, the eyes offer a much greater chance of rolling the most ridiculous damage multipliers available and ignoring damage reduction from armor, etc. Groin was one of the better choices in the early game if you were doing called shots, both for the effects and the flavor text. "I hope she wasn't planning on having children." The head was also solid for stuns and knockouts. Deathclaws were tough as fuckin' nails everywhere but the eyes, where they were merely beefy as heck. Late game, you shoot for the eyes on anything (with a few odd exceptions) if you still have a decent chance to hit, because a guy at 1 hp with a minigun does as much damage as a guy with 200 hp and a minigun, so you just need him dead ASAP. E: in any boxing matches, target the head. Pvt.Scott fucked around with this message at 06:14 on Sep 25, 2016 |
# ? Sep 25, 2016 06:11 |
|
LMAO if you didn't take the -1ap but no aimed shots trait. Then gauss pistol all the things.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 08:15 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:LMAO if you didn't take the -1ap but no aimed shots trait. Then gauss pistol all the things. or 2 AP modified plasma rifle in the first Fallout.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 17:26 |
do we have a BF2/2142 thread yet
|
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 17:33 |
Segmentation Fault posted:do we have a BF2/2142 thread yet They want to get the old BF4 thread through a few more pages before somebody does a Battlefield Megathread.
|
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 18:20 |
|
I was maybe going to make one once the 2142 revive servers start processing unlocks and stats correctly so I don't have to co-opt the BF4 thread. But I won't do that if there's going to be a megathread anyway
|
# ? Sep 25, 2016 19:58 |
|
Thinking over BF1, I'm a little disappointed that there's not at least one hellish moonscape map.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 05:20 |
|
Half of the alpha map was like that.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 05:19 |
|
But the rest of it looked pretty normal.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 05:21 |
|
We'll likely see one in the DLCs.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 05:26 |
|
Paschendale would make a nice two-phase map
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 11:15 |
|
Pvt.Scott posted:or 2 AP modified plasma rifle in the first Fallout. you mean the alien blaster. Who cares about 10 range when you can do rocket launcher damage with the thing
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 12:23 |
|
Official system requirements:quote:MINIMUM SPECS Pretty beefy minimum specs on the CPU/RAM. Maybe some of the other maps are more punishing. People are laughing at the AMD equivalent, but apparently BF1 can use the extra cores. I can't even remember if I have hyperthreading enabled currently on my 17 2600k@4.4GHz. I wonder if it could actually take advantage now.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 15:49 |
|
LampkinsMateSteve posted:Official system requirements: I was running ultra on my 3570k/1070 just fine
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 15:54 |
|
Jehde posted:Anyway to get this game ~$30 USD? Umm if there were, don't you think everyone would be doing it?
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 16:17 |
|
Game was running amazingly on ultra on my i5 970 with 8gbs of ram, constant 60fps.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 16:26 |
idk what mexico origin sells it for, but if you absolutely must buy the game but you refuse to pay more than half price on it and don't care if it will maybe get you banned, then thats possibly a route you could go
|
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 19:04 |
i would just buy it for full price or whatever GMG discount is tho.
|
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 19:05 |
|
Eonwe posted:idk what mexico origin sells it for, but if you absolutely must buy the game but you refuse to pay more than half price on it and don't care if it will maybe get you banned, then thats possibly a route you could go Mexican origin exploit has been fixed since March/April iirc.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 19:07 |
|
Eonwe posted:idk what mexico origin sells it for, but if you absolutely must buy the game but you refuse to pay more than half price on it and don't care if it will maybe get you banned, then thats possibly a route you could go I did this and got my account banned but repeated pleas and tickets to Origin's support team got it unbanned after about a month.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 19:12 |
yea i personally think that even if it still somehow were to work, its not a great idea
|
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 19:32 |
|
LampkinsMateSteve posted:Official system requirements: I would not put it past to overstate minimum system requirements in order to deflect any accusations of poor optimization.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 20:53 |
|
Randler posted:I would not put it past to overstate minimum system requirements in order to deflect any accusations of poor optimization. A lot of friends of mine have been pretty impressed with how well it runs on all of our machines of various ages. The steep requirements might just be "optimal" requirements.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2016 22:38 |
|
I've got a garbage old CPU and it runs much better than BF4 or BFH.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2016 00:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 05:48 |
|
Greenman had it for as low as $45 at one point. That's about as low as you could reasonably expect to get a preorder from anywhere semi-reputable.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2016 00:43 |