|
badjohny posted:They keep saying that it was made by google inside and out...but the hardware all seems pretty off the shelf? Probably gonna be an exclusive for some time until they include it in some update? E: Also, let's see what it gives us in terms of VR.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 09:49 |
|
CLAM DOWN posted:$900 CAD before tax is not an "average" price. this will be priced at the same as the iPhone 7 32GB or S7 edge 32GB
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:40 |
|
Thermopyle posted:Seems like a good phone for an average price? It's poo poo!!
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:40 |
|
CLAM DOWN posted:$900 CAD before tax is not an "average" price. I meant for a top of the line price. I mean, I don't know anything about what phones go for in CAD, I was talking about US.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:40 |
|
THF13 posted:drat guess I'm sticking with my cracked screen 6p for another year. Same. Or just buying a new one if they drop to $300.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:40 |
Nitrousoxide posted:The only unique thing about this phone is the camera. Most of what they described is software or image processor.
|
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:40 |
|
Thermopyle posted:I meant for a top of the line price. I mean, I don't know anything about what phones go for in CAD, I was talking about US. It seems decidedly average and there's no reason to buy it over even Sarnsung's offerings.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:41 |
|
logikv9 posted:wait is it really verizon exclusive? like, no GSM versions even from the google store? No, Verizon is the only carrier that will be selling it, but you can buy it unlocked from Google and other sources.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:41 |
|
Thermopyle posted:Seems like a good phone for an average price?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:41 |
|
Protocol7 posted:It seems decidedly average and there's no reason to buy it even over Sarnsung's offerings. Well except it's not a Samsung.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:41 |
|
google cardboard covered by hipster fabric
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:42 |
Google VR as a fashion accessory.
|
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:42 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:Expected to be at least 700€ here. For that price I get a similarly sized iPhone 7 with same storage. And it would be faster and water resistant, too. But *ahem* headphone jack and camera bump
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:43 |
|
Thermopyle posted:I meant for a top of the line price. I mean, I don't know anything about what phones go for in CAD, I was talking about US. Sure it's average for a "top of the line price", and it's not even close to a "top of the line" phone. Country doesn't matter, I did a direct currency conversion there.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:43 |
|
what the gently caress is this ridiculous fashionista VR poo poo
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:43 |
|
Maybe in 5 years VR will be a thing people buy
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:43 |
|
clicky things
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:43 |
|
This guy is one of Rob Lowe's illegitimate child.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:43 |
|
ijii posted:No mention of removable storage. Sorry Pixel, you're not for me. I'm not a fan of cloud crap. If you were expecting Google, who have not had expandable storage in phones for the past 5 generation of phones they have put out, to make a phone with expandable storage now, you need to pull your head out of your rear end.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:43 |
|
Thermopyle posted:Well except it's not a Samsung. Can't emphasize this enough. Would buy this over an S7 or Note 7 simply because it seems much more like a good marriage of hardware and software to create an experience that I don't feel like I have to fight to get to work well.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:44 |
|
CLAM DOWN posted:and it's not even close to a "top of the line" phone what?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:44 |
|
logikv9 posted:wait is it really verizon exclusive? like, no GSM versions even from the google store? Nah, unlocked on the Store. I'll probably wait a week and get it on sale.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:44 |
|
I paid $649 for the original Nexus 6 and I'm not making that mistake again. I'll think about it when I can get a used one for $400 in 6 months
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:44 |
|
Actually good colour names, not that hard
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:46 |
|
RVProfootballer posted:But *ahem* headphone jack and camera bump I guess I'll stick some longer with the 5X. Ironically, the headphone jack is starting to have issues.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:46 |
|
Thermopyle posted:what? The base Pixel at that price is 32GB, no IP68, awkward physical design including that bezel, small size, camera is nothing new, mediocre battery. That's not a top-of-the-line phone, for a top-of-the-line price.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:46 |
|
You can find the Fantastic Beasts here. *motions at crotch*
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:47 |
|
CLAM DOWN posted:Sure it's average for a "top of the line price", and it's not even close to a "top of the line" phone. Country doesn't matter, I did a direct currency conversion there. ^^ They're saying it's a best-ever camera, how's that "nothing new"? Saying IP68 is required to be a "top of the line phone" seems kinda weird to me.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:47 |
|
CLAM DOWN posted:The base Pixel at that price is 32GB, no IP68, awkward physical design including that bezel, small size, camera is nothing new, mediocre battery. That's not a top-of-the-line phone, for a top-of-the-line price. This is wrong thinking, but this isn't the thread for the discussion. I'm sure we'll have it later in the Android thread.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:47 |
|
I don't care about VR.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:47 |
There are no aliens in Eve.
|
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:48 |
|
teagone posted:I don't care about VR. fascinating!
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:48 |
|
That Fantastic Beast thing had a really terrible framerate. Way to kill the buzz with lovely experiences.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:48 |
|
Argh the hiss in her voice
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:48 |
Google 2016: isolating you from human interaction.
|
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:49 |
|
What do you think the headset will cost? $150
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:49 |
|
The 6P and 5X are no longer on sale on Google's store, but nothing up for the Pixel. Does that usually happen right after the keynote, or later?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:49 |
|
Thermopyle posted:This is wrong thinking, but this isn't the thread for the discussion. I'm sure we'll have it later in the Android thread. How is it wrong thinking to not want to pay $900 plus tax (which brings it over $1000) for this We can talk about it later I guess?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:49 |
|
The real question is how many times it gets lapped in real world speed tests by top competitors
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 09:49 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:That Fantastic Beast thing had a really terrible framerate. Way to kill the buzz with lovely experiences. Huh I thought if VR wasn't at least 60 fps people puke everywhere
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 17:50 |