|
tessiebee posted:Re bankchat, here is the link: Good thing we used taxpayers money to bail out all these banks, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to save the economy by giving themselves massive bonuses and not lending to anyone for the next decade.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 18:28 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 01:40 |
|
Spangly A posted:I've never heard of it and I don't know anyone in (supermarket) retail who has heard of it. I also can't be arsed to go through Mike Ashley's repeated ignorance-is-a-defence claims but I would imagine it'd be much more likely in sportswear than supermarkets. Its absolutely not supposed to happen and like yourself I've never heard of it occurring in a supermarket but have in a few other environments, which raised questions about the legality of doing so. Answer: Its not. I'm not sure if this came up in the Sports Direct debacle to be honest. Shoplifting doesn't just occur in supermarkets and department stores. Of course they are the bigger targets but its not unheard of for independent shops to be hit by shoplifting as well. In fact it does have a direct negative impact on some of the larger businesses' employees as a whole in cases like the Co-Op and John Lewis/Waitrose because of the company structure. That's mostly why even your Saturday morning part time shelf stacker will be (quite understandably) annoyed by someone trying to nick a few razor blades or a few joints of beef.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 18:33 |
|
London Zoo has the ghost of harambe running amok apparently.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 18:38 |
|
https://twitter.com/guardian/status/786620234799153152 Harambrexit
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 18:41 |
|
Judoon Platoon posted:Harambrexit It's been a bad day and this made me smile, thank you thread. p.s beards are sexy - if it's not Grizzly Adams I don't want to know.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 18:46 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Because they're scared that their career would be over due to the right wing press. Which acts that way to try to preserve their angry aging audiences. That's not necessarily strictly true. I bet at least a few Friedmanites did the numbers and found that the profitability of legalized drugs is nothing to the money that can be wrung out of stuffing private prisons with dirt cheap labour.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:07 |
|
Bottom row second in from the right. Hmm... I see what's going on here.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:07 |
|
Oscar Romeo Romeo posted:
The answer to that is fairly easy: there is absolutely no moral equivalency between stealing from a local or a co-op (bad) and stealing from a parasitic corporation like Sainsbury's (good) fwiw the guys I know that work in waitrose held the same view that grazing and shoplifting was something they gave absolutely no shits about, but your experiences may vary.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:08 |
|
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/786626679812812800 oh, and https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/786592620826988544 LemonDrizzle fucked around with this message at 19:17 on Oct 13, 2016 |
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:10 |
|
https://twitter.com/jay_beecher/status/786285012496842753 The Farage affair tapes from the disgruntled kipper are coming out.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:22 |
|
Sounds like they should put it to a referendum.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:22 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/786626679812812800
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:27 |
|
Laradus posted:
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:29 |
|
Zephro posted:That was before the fun times of the last few days. It'll be interesting to see if that makes any difference... quote:More than half of voters in Scotland would support an independence referendum in the event of a Tory-led hard Brexit.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:32 |
|
Sinn Fein Dad!
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:32 |
|
England replica kits are going up, just in time for christmas.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:37 |
|
Parkingtigers posted:https://twitter.com/jay_beecher/status/786285012496842753 did that end the way I think it did specifically her thinking about ringing up nigel farage post-coitus and saying "nigel, you aren't all that"? Four on the go when you're a politician, that's plebian. Smh.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:37 |
|
baronvonsabre posted:New poll shows 55% support for independence referendum if Tories pursue hard Brexit Ah, but we all know undecided voters swing towards the status quo, right...?
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:38 |
|
serious gaylord posted:England replica kits are going up, just in time for christmas. who the gently caress wants one of them anyway?
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:40 |
|
Ah, but we all know undecided voters swing towards the status quo, right...? [/quote] Which would be more relevant if the status quo was an option.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 19:52 |
|
First Referendum: Do you want to be independent? Scotland: No. Second Referendum: Do you want to leave the EU? Scotland: No. Third Referendum: Would you rather be independent or leave the EU?
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:00 |
|
nopantsjack posted:Third Referendum: Would you rather be independent or leave the EU? Scotland: No.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:03 |
|
Fourth Referendum: Do you even want to be here? I mean like we're all for democracy and that but if you're not going to even think about leaving the union then why even bother voting at all
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:07 |
|
JFairfax posted:who the gently caress wants one of them anyway?
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:08 |
|
radmonger posted:Which would be more relevant if the status quo was an option. The joke is that "everyone knew" Remain would win the EU referendum because of last-minute swing voters. I am a big fan of swing voters, though I don't mind if they hang straight down either.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:11 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:Haha not only is Britain turning into a xenophobic hellhole they're about to lose their favorite dirt-paste marmite as well haha But Lexit!
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:12 |
|
A second referendum won't be happening any time soon, this is a draft bill that will be debated in the hopes of agreeing concrete conditions to pursue the referendum contingent on the Brexit negotiations and probably final single market status. So once the negotiating geniuses of May, Johnson, Fox, and Davis sort out those filthy foreigners us rambunctious Scots will rightly doff our caps and accept our place once more.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:16 |
|
So in a somewhat surprising move, the defence secretary Corbyn appointed to replace Clive Lewis (Nia Griffiths, a unilateralist) has said Labour will continue to back Trident, as that was the decision taken by conference in 2015. A lot of people had speculated Lewis was moved specifically because he wanted to take this approach. Personally I'm glad. Hats off to Jeremy for having principles but Trident is a ridiculous hill to die on, especially now the submarines have already been ordered. The party backing renewal but in practice allowing MPs to vote with their conscience is an acceptable compromise, they just have to figure out a good line to take on Jeremy saying he would never use them. Also if Clive Lewis wasn't moved for this reason it lends credibility to the idea that he could be being groomed for future leadership.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:34 |
|
JFairfax posted:[i]Could we be returning to Royston Vasey very soon for a Brexit special? This is a local England for local people.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:36 |
|
jabby posted:
"Your call" aka cowards option is probably fairly common among PMs, surely? I can't remember if the PM is the one who sets the predetermined co-ordinates but I'd sure as gently caress not order a nuke on whoever the military had lined up before the apocalypse began. Would definitely order it if I could aim though. Staggered shots at either the easiest place to penetrate crust or Antarctica. gently caress y'all.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:38 |
|
jabby posted:Personally I'm glad. Hats off to Jeremy for having principles but Trident is a ridiculous hill to die on, especially now the submarines have already been ordered. The party backing renewal but in practice allowing MPs to vote with their conscience is an acceptable compromise, they just have to figure out a good line to take on Jeremy saying he would never use them. That it's irrelevant?
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 20:54 |
|
jabby posted:Personally I'm glad. Hats off to Jeremy for having principles but Trident is a ridiculous hill to die on, especially now the submarines have already been ordered. The party backing renewal but in practice allowing MPs to vote with their conscience is an acceptable compromise, they just have to figure out a good line to take on Jeremy saying he would never use them. "I'm not a mass murderer" Not sure how that polls with the people though, the Center-Left seemed rather fond of their last one.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:02 |
|
Those worrying about ISA savings account rates should consider putting their savings in a stocks & shares ISA instead of a cash ISA. I opened one last August, and have had a return of 10% (albeit in GBP...). I have a moderate risk portfolio and it's admittedly pretty volatile (dived £1k in the first 2 weeks before slowly climbing again), but there's no reason you couldn't go for a much lower risk portfolio aiming for a 2-5% return, which is still miles better than any cash ISA out there. I did mine through rplan.co.uk - ridiculously easy and intuitive, but there's loads of others, just Google...
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:02 |
|
the Russians are just waiting for Corbyn to be prime minister then they'll do that thing from the Simpson's with the Soviet Union name plate and launch a nuclear first strike against the UK confident that that coward Jeremy won't have told the captains to fire our tiny number of warheads Then as they cackle and bask in the warm radioactive glow they will be evaporated by the US retaliation because they have a hundred times as many nukes as we do
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:05 |
|
Spangly A posted:"Your call" aka cowards option is probably fairly common among PMs, surely? I can't remember if the PM is the one who sets the predetermined co-ordinates but I'd sure as gently caress not order a nuke on whoever the military had lined up before the apocalypse began. PM doesn't set the co-ordinates, they just order retaliate, don't, use your own judgement or put the sub under the command of an ally. Probably he should just say that he stands by what he said, but there are other options available besides ordering a retaliation personally, and he should leave it at that. Seems like it should leave enough wiggle room so people can't say he made the deterrent useless.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:07 |
|
jabby posted:The party backing renewal but in practice allowing MPs to vote with their conscience is an acceptable compromise, they just have to figure out a good line to take on Jeremy saying he would never use them. There isn't one.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:08 |
|
You can shoplift all you want but please grab a terminal and knock it off the stockfile on your way out please it makes my shop look untidy otherwise.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:10 |
|
Nuclear deterrants exist to not be used. The point at which they ever would be used is the point at which they are most useless.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:10 |
|
You'd have to be a completely loving insane country to go on faith that a country with nukes won't use them just because their leader's principled. At which point it's not like the deterrent works anyway.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:13 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 01:40 |
|
jabby posted:PM doesn't set the co-ordinates, they just order retaliate, don't, use your own judgement or put the sub under the command of an ally.
|
# ? Oct 13, 2016 21:16 |